scholarly journals Strong modification of stratospheric ozone forcing by cloud and sea ice adjustments

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Xia ◽  
Y. Hu ◽  
Y. Huang
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Climatic Impact ◽  
Surface Cooling ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Surface Warming ◽  
Climate Simulations

Abstract. We investigate the climatic impact of stratospheric ozone recovery (SOR) with a focus on the surface temperature change in atmosphere-slab-ocean coupled climate simulations. We find that although SOR would cause significant surface warming (global mean: 0.2 K) in a climate free of clouds and sea-ice, it may result in surface cooling (−0.06 K) in the real climate. The results here are especially interesting in that the stratosphere-adjusted radiative forcing is positive in both cases. Radiation diagnosis shows that the surface cooling is mainly due to a strong radiative effect resulting from significant reduction of global high clouds and, to a lesser extent, from an increase in high-latitude sea ice. Our simulation experiments suggest clouds and sea ice are sensitive to stratospheric ozone perturbation, which constitutes a significant radiative adjustment that influences the sign and magnitude of the global surface temperature change.

scholarly journals Strong modification of stratospheric ozone forcing by cloud and sea-ice adjustments

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 7559-7567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Xia ◽  
Yongyun Hu ◽  
Yi Huang
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Climatic Impact ◽  
Surface Cooling ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Surface Warming ◽  
Climate Simulations

Abstract. We investigate the climatic impact of stratospheric ozone recovery (SOR), with a focus on the surface temperature change in atmosphere–slab ocean coupled climate simulations. We find that although SOR would cause significant surface warming (global mean: 0.2 K) in a climate free of clouds and sea ice, it causes surface cooling (−0.06 K) in the real climate. The results here are especially interesting in that the stratosphere-adjusted radiative forcing is positive in both cases. Radiation diagnosis shows that the surface cooling is mainly due to a strong radiative effect resulting from significant reduction of global high clouds and, to a lesser extent, from an increase in high-latitude sea ice. Our simulation experiments suggest that clouds and sea ice are sensitive to stratospheric ozone perturbation, which constitutes a significant radiative adjustment that influences the sign and magnitude of the global surface temperature change.

scholarly journals The Dependence of Radiative Forcing and Feedback on Evolving Patterns of Surface Temperature Change in Climate Models

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1630-1648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Andrews ◽  
Jonathan M. Gregory ◽  
Mark J. Webb
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Climate Feedbacks ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Feedback Parameter ◽  
Surface Warming ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract Experiments with CO2 instantaneously quadrupled and then held constant are used to show that the relationship between the global-mean net heat input to the climate system and the global-mean surface air temperature change is nonlinear in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs). The nonlinearity is shown to arise from a change in strength of climate feedbacks driven by an evolving pattern of surface warming. In 23 out of the 27 AOGCMs examined, the climate feedback parameter becomes significantly (95% confidence) less negative (i.e., the effective climate sensitivity increases) as time passes. Cloud feedback parameters show the largest changes. In the AOGCM mean, approximately 60% of the change in feedback parameter comes from the tropics (30°N–30°S). An important region involved is the tropical Pacific, where the surface warming intensifies in the east after a few decades. The dependence of climate feedbacks on an evolving pattern of surface warming is confirmed using the HadGEM2 and HadCM3 atmosphere GCMs (AGCMs). With monthly evolving sea surface temperatures and sea ice prescribed from its AOGCM counterpart, each AGCM reproduces the time-varying feedbacks, but when a fixed pattern of warming is prescribed the radiative response is linear with global temperature change or nearly so. It is also demonstrated that the regression and fixed-SST methods for evaluating effective radiative forcing are in principle different, because rapid SST adjustment when CO2 is changed can produce a pattern of surface temperature change with zero global mean but nonzero change in net radiation at the top of the atmosphere (~−0.5 W m−2 in HadCM3).

scholarly journals The Relationship between Land–Ocean Surface Temperature Contrast and Radiative Forcing

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 3239-3256 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Hugo Lambert ◽  
Mark J. Webb ◽  
Manoj M. Joshi
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Heat Transport ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Ocean Surface ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Balance Model ◽  
Surface Temperature Change

Abstract Previous work has demonstrated that observed and modeled climates show a near-time-invariant ratio of mean land to mean ocean surface temperature change under transient and equilibrium global warming. This study confirms this in a range of atmospheric models coupled to perturbed sea surface temperatures (SSTs), slab (thermodynamics only) oceans, and a fully coupled ocean. Away from equilibrium, it is found that the atmospheric processes that maintain the ratio cause a land-to-ocean heat transport anomaly that can be approximated using a two-box energy balance model. When climate is forced by increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration, the heat transport anomaly moves heat from land to ocean, constraining the land to warm in step with the ocean surface, despite the small heat capacity of the land. The heat transport anomaly is strongly related to the top-of-atmosphere radiative flux imbalance, and hence it tends to a small value as equilibrium is approached. In contrast, when climate is forced by prescribing changes in SSTs, the heat transport anomaly replaces “missing” radiative forcing over land by moving heat from ocean to land, warming the land surface. The heat transport anomaly remains substantial in steady state. These results are consistent with earlier studies that found that both land and ocean surface temperature changes may be approximated as local responses to global mean radiative forcing. The modeled heat transport anomaly has large impacts on surface heat fluxes but small impacts on precipitation, circulation, and cloud radiative forcing compared with the impacts of surface temperature change. No substantial nonlinearities are found in these atmospheric variables when the effects of forcing and surface temperature change are added.

scholarly journals Comment on "Tropospheric temperature response to stratospheric ozone recovery in the 21st century" by Hu et al. (2011)

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 2853-2861 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Previdi ◽  
L. M. Polvani
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gases ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
First Century ◽  
Tropospheric Temperature ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Twenty First Century

Abstract. Stratospheric ozone recovery is expected to figure prominently in twenty-first century climate change. In a recent paper, Hu et al. (2011) argue that one impact of ozone recovery will be to enhance the warming of the surface-troposphere system produced by increases in well-mixed greenhouse gases; furthermore, this enhanced warming would be strongest in the Northern Hemisphere, which is surprising since previous studies have consistently shown the effects of stratospheric ozone changes to be most pronounced in the Southern Hemisphere. Hu et al. (2011) base their claims largely on differences in the simulated temperature change between two groups of IPCC climate models, one group which included stratospheric ozone recovery in its twenty-first century simulations and a second group which did not. Both groups of models were forced with the same increases in well-mixed greenhouse gases according to the A1B emissions scenario. In the current work, we compare the surface temperature responses of the same two groups of models in a different experiment in which atmospheric CO2 was increased by 1% per year until doubling. We find remarkably similar differences in the simulated surface temperature change between the two sets of models as Hu et al. (2011) found for the A1B experiment, suggesting that the enhanced warming which they attribute to stratospheric ozone recovery is actually a reflection of different responses of the two model groups to greenhouse gas forcing.

scholarly journals The effect of rapid adjustments to halocarbons and N2O on radiative forcing

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Øivind Hodnebrog ◽  
Gunnar Myhre ◽  
Ryan J. Kramer ◽  
Keith P. Shine ◽  
Timothy Andrews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Initial Perturbation ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Radiative Heating ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Precipitation Decrease

AbstractRapid adjustments occur after initial perturbation of an external climate driver (e.g., CO2) and involve changes in, e.g. atmospheric temperature, water vapour and clouds, independent of sea surface temperature changes. Knowledge of such adjustments is necessary to estimate effective radiative forcing (ERF), a useful indicator of surface temperature change, and to understand global precipitation changes due to different drivers. Yet, rapid adjustments have not previously been analysed in any detail for certain compounds, including halocarbons and N2O. Here we use several global climate models combined with radiative kernel calculations to show that individual rapid adjustment terms due to CFC-11, CFC-12 and N2O are substantial, but that the resulting flux changes approximately cancel at the top-of-atmosphere due to compensating effects. Our results further indicate that radiative forcing (which includes stratospheric temperature adjustment) is a reasonable approximation for ERF. These CFCs lead to a larger increase in precipitation per kelvin surface temperature change (2.2 ± 0.3% K−1) compared to other well-mixed greenhouse gases (1.4 ± 0.3% K−1 for CO2). This is largely due to rapid upper tropospheric warming and cloud adjustments, which lead to enhanced atmospheric radiative cooling (and hence a precipitation increase) and partly compensate increased atmospheric radiative heating (i.e. which is associated with a precipitation decrease) from the instantaneous perturbation.

scholarly journals Metrics for linking emissions of gases and aerosols to global precipitation changes

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 525-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. P. Shine ◽  
R. P. Allan ◽  
W. J. Collins ◽  
J. S. Fuglestvedt
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Precipitation Change ◽  
Pulse Emission ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Input Parameters ◽  
Global Temperature Change ◽  
Precipitation Changes ◽  
Global Precipitation

Abstract. Recent advances in understanding have made it possible to relate global precipitation changes directly to emissions of particular gases and aerosols that influence climate. Using these advances, new indices are developed here called the Global Precipitation-change Potential for pulse (GPPP) and sustained (GPPS) emissions, which measure the precipitation change per unit mass of emissions. The GPP can be used as a metric to compare the effects of different emissions. This is akin to the global warming potential (GWP) and the global temperature-change potential (GTP) which are used to place emissions on a common scale. Hence the GPP provides an additional perspective of the relative or absolute effects of emissions. It is however recognised that precipitation changes are predicted to be highly variable in size and sign between different regions and this limits the usefulness of a purely global metric. The GPPP and GPPS formulation consists of two terms, one dependent on the surface temperature change and the other dependent on the atmospheric component of the radiative forcing. For some forcing agents, and notably for CO2, these two terms oppose each other – as the forcing and temperature perturbations have different timescales, even the sign of the absolute GPPP and GPPS varies with time, and the opposing terms can make values sensitive to uncertainties in input parameters. This makes the choice of CO2 as a reference gas problematic, especially for the GPPS at time horizons less than about 60 years. In addition, few studies have presented results for the surface/atmosphere partitioning of different forcings, leading to more uncertainty in quantifying the GPP than the GWP or GTP. Values of the GPPP and GPPS for five long- and short-lived forcing agents (CO2, CH4, N2O, sulphate and black carbon – BC) are presented, using illustrative values of required parameters. The resulting precipitation changes are given as the change at a specific time horizon (and hence they are end-point metrics) but it is noted that the GPPS can also be interpreted as the time-integrated effect of a pulse emission. Using CO2 as a references gas, the GPPP and GPPS for the non-CO2 species are larger than the corresponding GTP values. For BC emissions, the atmospheric forcing is sufficiently strong that the GPPS is opposite in sign to the GPPS. The sensitivity of these values to a number of input parameters is explored. The GPP can also be used to evaluate the contribution of different emissions to precipitation change during or after a period of emissions. As an illustration, the precipitation changes resulting from emissions in 2008 (using the GPPP) and emissions sustained at 2008 levels (using the GPPS) are presented. These indicate that for periods of 20 years (after the 2008 emissions) and 50 years (for sustained emissions at 2008 levels) methane is the dominant driver of positive precipitation changes due to those emissions. For sustained emissions, the sum of the effect of the five species included here does not become positive until after 50 years, by which time the global surface temperature increase exceeds 1 K.

scholarly journals A Temporal Kernel Method to Compute Effective Radiative Forcing in CMIP5 Transient Simulations*

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1497-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik J. L. Larson ◽  
Robert W. Portmann
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Kernel Method ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Atmospheric Temperature ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Effective Radiative Forcing ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Effective radiative forcing (ERF) is calculated as the flux change at the top of the atmosphere after allowing rapid adjustments resulting from a forcing agent, such as greenhouse gases. Rapid adjustments include changes to atmospheric temperature, water vapor, and clouds. Accurate estimates of ERF are necessary in order to understand the drivers of climate change. This work presents a new method of calculating ERF using a kernel derived from the time series of a model variable (e.g., global mean surface temperature) in a model-step change experiment. The top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative imbalance has the best noise tolerance for retrieving the ERF of the model variables tested. This temporal kernel method is compared with an energy balance method, which equates ERF to the TOA radiative imbalance plus the scaled surface temperature change. Sensitivities and biases of these methods are quantified using output from phase 5 of the the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The temporal kernel method is likely more accurate for models in which a linear fit is a poor approximation for the relationship between temperature change and TOA imbalance. The difference between these methods is most apparent in forcing estimates for the representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) scenario. The CMIP5 multimodel mean ERF calculated for large volcanic eruptions is 80% of the adjusted forcing reported by the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). This suggests that about 5% more energy has come into the earth system since 1870 than suggested by the IPCC AR5.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document