scholarly journals Variable habitat depth of the planktonic foraminifera <i>Neogloboquadrina pachyderma</i> in the northern high latitudes explained by sea-ice and chlorophyll concentration

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattia Greco ◽  
Lukas Jonkers ◽  
Kerstin Kretschmer ◽  
Jelle Bijma ◽  
Michal Kucera
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Planktonic Foraminifera ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Habitat Depth ◽  
Neogloboquadrina Pachyderma

Abstract. Neogloboquadrina pachyderma is the dominant species in the polar regions. In the northern high latitude ocean, it makes up more than 90 % of the total planktonic foraminifera assemblages, making it the dominant pelagic calcifier and carrier of paleoceanographic proxies. To assess the reaction of this species to future climate change and to be able to interpret the paleoecological signal contained in its shells, its habitat depth must be known. Previous work showed that N. pachyderma in the northern polar regions has a highly variable depth habitat, ranging from the surface mixed layer to several hundreds of metres below the surface, and the origin of this variability remained unclear. In order to investigate the factors controlling the habitat depth of N. pachyderma, we compiled new and existing population density profiles from 104 stratified plankton tow hauls collected in the Arctic and the North Atlantic Oceans during 14 oceanographic expeditions. For each vertical profile, the Depth Habitat (DH) was calculated as the abundance-weighted mean depth of occurrence. We then tested to what degree environmental factors (mixed layer depth, sea surface temperature, sea surface salinity, Chlorophyll a concentration and sea ice concentration) and ecological factors (synchronised reproduction and daily vertical migration) can predict the observed DH variability and compared the observed DH behaviour with simulations by a numerical model predicting planktonic foraminifera distribution. Our data show that the DH of N. pachyderma varies between 25 m and 280 m (average ~ 100 m). In contrast with the model simulations, which indicate that DH is associated with the depth of chlorophyll maximum, our analysis indicates that the presence of sea-ice together with the concentration of chlorophyll at the surface have the strongest influence on the vertical habitat of this species. N. pachyderma occurs deeper when sea-ice and chlorophyll concentrations are low, suggesting a time transgressive response to the evolution of (near) surface conditions during the annual cycle. Since only surface parameters appear to affect the vertical habitat of N. pachyderma, light or light-dependant processes might influence the ecology of this species. Our results can be used to improve predictions of the response of the species to climate change and thus to refine paleoclimatic reconstructions.

scholarly journals Depth habitat of the planktonic foraminifera <i>Neogloboquadrina pachyderma</i> in the northern high latitudes explained by sea-ice and chlorophyll concentrations

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (17) ◽  
pp. 3425-3437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattia Greco ◽  
Lukas Jonkers ◽  
Kerstin Kretschmer ◽  
Jelle Bijma ◽  
Michal Kucera
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Chlorophyll A ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Planktonic Foraminifera ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Neogloboquadrina Pachyderma ◽  
Chlorophyll Concentrations

Abstract. Neogloboquadrina pachyderma is the dominant planktonic foraminifera species in the polar regions. In the northern high-latitude ocean, it makes up more than 90 % of the total assemblages, making it the dominant pelagic calcifier and carrier of paleoceanographic proxies. To assess the reaction of this species to a future shaped by climate change and to be able to interpret the paleoecological signal contained in its shells, its depth habitat must be known. Previous work showed that N. pachyderma in the northern polar regions has a highly variable depth habitat, ranging from the surface mixed layer to several hundreds of metres below the surface, and the origin of this variability remained unclear. In order to investigate the factors controlling the depth habitat of N. pachyderma, we compiled new and existing population density profiles from 104 stratified plankton tow hauls collected in the Arctic and the North Atlantic oceans during 14 oceanographic expeditions. For each vertical profile, the depth habitat (DH) was calculated as the abundance-weighted mean depth of occurrence. We then tested to what degree environmental factors (mixed-layer depth, sea surface temperature, sea surface salinity, chlorophyll a concentration, and sea ice concentration) and ecological factors (synchronized reproduction and daily vertical migration) can predict the observed DH variability and compared the observed DH behaviour with simulations by a numerical model predicting planktonic foraminifera distribution. Our data show that the DH of N. pachyderma varies between 25 and 280 m (average ∼100 m). In contrast with the model simulations, which indicate that DH is associated with the depth of chlorophyll maximum, our analysis indicates that the presence of sea ice together with the concentration of chlorophyll a at the surface have the strongest influence on the vertical habitat of this species. N. pachyderma occurs deeper when sea ice and chlorophyll concentrations are low, suggesting a time-transgressive response to the evolution of (near) surface conditions during the annual cycle. Since only surface parameters appear to affect the vertical habitat of N. pachyderma, light or light-dependant processes might influence the ecology of this species. Our results can be used to improve predictions of the response of the species to climate change and thus to refine paleoclimatic reconstructions.

Dynamics and drivers of extreme seasons in the Arctic region

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Hartmuth ◽  
Lukas Papritz ◽  
Maxi Boettcher ◽  
Heini Wernli
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Sea Surface Temperatures ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Surface Temperatures ◽  
Ice Concentration

&lt;p&gt;Single extreme weather events such as intense storms or blocks can have a major impact on polar surface temperatures, the formation and melting rates of sea-ice, and, thus, on minimum and maximum sea-ice extent within a particular year. Anomalous weather conditions on the time scale of an entire season, for example resulting from an unusual sequence of storms, can affect the polar energy budget and sea-ice coverage even more. Here, we introduce the concept of an extreme season in a distinct region using an EOF analysis in the phase space spanned by anomalies of a set of surface parameters (surface temperature, precipitation, surface solar and thermal radiation and surface heat fluxes). To focus on dynamical instead of climate change aspects, we define anomalies as departures of the seasonal mean from a transient climatology. The goal of this work is to study the dynamical processes leading to such anomalous seasons in the polar regions, which have not yet been analysed. Specifically, we focus here on a detailed analysis of Arctic extreme seasons and their underlying atmospheric dynamics in the ERA5 reanalysis data set.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We find that in regions covered predominantly by sea ice, extreme seasons are mostly determined by anomalies of atmospheric dynamical features such as cyclones and blocking. In contrast, in regions including large areas of open water the formation of extreme seasons can also be partially due to preconditioning during previous seasons, leading to strong anomalies in the sea ice concentration and/or sea surface temperatures at the beginning of the extreme season.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two particular extreme season case studies in the Kara-Barents Seas are discussed in more detail. In this region, the winter of 2011/12 shows the largest positive departure of surface temperature from the background warming trend together with a negative anomaly in the sea ice concentration. An analysis of the synoptic situation shows that the strongly reduced frequency of cold air outbreaks compared to climatology combined with several blocking events and the frequent occurrence of cyclones transporting warm air into the region favored the continuous anomalies of both parameters. In contrast, the winter of 2016/17, which shows a positive precipitation anomaly and negative anomaly in the surface energy balance, was favored by a strong surface preconditioning. An extremely warm summer and autumn in 2016 caused strongly reduced sea ice concentrations and increased sea surface temperatures in the Kara-Barents Seas at the beginning of the winter, favoring increased air-sea fluxes and precipitation during the following months.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our results reveal a high degree of variability of the processes involved in the formation of extreme seasons in the Arctic. Quantifying and understanding these processes will also be important when considering climate change effects in polar regions and the ability of climate models in reproducing extreme seasons in the Arctic and Antarctica.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Regional impacts of climate change in the Arctic and Antarctic

1998 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 543-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter Weller
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Climate Impacts ◽  
Indigenous Populations ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Greenhouse Warming ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
The Past

Regional assessments of impacts due to global climate change are a high priority in the international programs on global-change research. in the polar regions, climate models indicate an amplification of global greenhouse warming, but there are large differences between the results of various models, and uncertainties about the magnitude and timing of the expected changes. Also, the observed high-latitude climate trends over the past few decades are much more regional and patchy than predicted by the models. As a first step in assessing possible climate impacts, model results are compared with observations of changes in temperature, precipitation, sea-ice extent, the permafrost regime and other cryospheric parameters. While considerable uncertainties remain in the long-term prediction of change, there is some agreement between model results and observed trends by season on shorter time-scales, The warming observed over the land masses of the Arctic over the past few decades is matched by corresponding observed decreases in snow cover the glacier mass, balances, by thawing of the permafrost, and to a lesser degree by reductions in sea-ice extent. in Antarctica, warming in the Antarctic Peninsula and Ross Sea regions is associated with large decreases in ice-shelf areas and reduced ice thicknesses on the lakes in the McMurdo Dry Valleys. Major future impacts due to global greenhouse warming are likely to include permafrost thawing on and and its consequences for ecosystems and humans; changes in the productivity of marine ecosystems in the Arctic and Southern Ocean: economic impacts on fisheries, petroleum and other human activities; and social impacts on northern indigenous populations. Some of these impacts will have positive ramifications, but most are likely to be detrimental. While uncertainties exist about the future, climate change in the polar regions during the past few decades can be shown to have had major impacts already which will become much mole pronounced if present trends continue.

Early Holocene ocean conditions off the Zachariæ Isstrøm, Northeast Greenland

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Davies ◽  
Anders Møller Mathiasen ◽  
Kristiane Kristensen ◽  
Christof Pearce ◽  
Marit-Solveig Seidenkrantz
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Ice Shelf ◽  
Outlet Glacier ◽  
The Impact

&lt;p&gt;The polar regions exhibit some of the most visible signs of climate change globally; annual mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) has quadrupled in recent decades, from 51 &amp;#177; 65 Gt yr&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#8722;1&lt;/sup&gt; (1992-2001) to 211 &amp;#177; 37 Gt yr&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#8722;1&lt;/sup&gt; (2002-2011). This can partly be attributed to the widespread retreat and speed-up of marine-terminating glaciers. The Zachariae Isstr&amp;#248;m (ZI) is an outlet glacier of the Northeast Greenland Ice Steam (NEGIS), one of the largest ice streams of the GrIS (700km), draining approximately 12% of the ice sheet interior. Observations show that the ZI began accelerating in 2000, resulting in the collapse of the floating ice shelf between 2002 and 2003. By 2014, the ice shelf extended over an area of 52km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, a 95% decrease in area since 2002, where it extended over 1040km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. Paleo-reconstructions provide an opportunity to extend observational records in order to understand the oceanic and climatic processes governing the position of the grounding zone of marine terminating glaciers and the extent of floating ice shelves. Such datasets are thus necessary if we are to constrain the impact of future climate change projections on the Arctic cryosphere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A multi-proxy approach, involving grain size, geochemical, foraminiferal and sedimentary analysis was applied to marine sediment core DA17-NG-ST8-92G, collected offshore of the ZI, on &amp;#160;the Northeast Greenland Shelf. The aim was to reconstruct changes in the extent of the ZI and the palaeoceanographic conditions throughout the Early to Mid Holocene (c.a. 12,500-5,000 cal. yrs. BP). Evidence from the analysis of these datasets indicates that whilst there has been no grounded ice at the site over the last 12,500 years, the ice shelf of the ZI extended as a floating ice shelf over the site between 12,500 and 9,200 cal. yrs. BP, with the grounding line further inland from our study site. This was followed by a retreat in the ice shelf extent during the Holocene Thermal Maximum; this was likely to have been governed, in part, by basal melting driven by Atlantic Water (AW) recirculated from Svalbard or from the Arctic Ocean. Evidence from benthic foraminifera suggest that there was a shift from the dominance of AW to Polar Water at around 7,500 cal. yrs. BP, although the ice shelf did not expand again despite of this cooling of subsurface waters.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Arctic Sea Ice’s Amplification as a Complement to Anthropogenic Global Warming

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Morando
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Global Warming ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Number Count ◽  
Anthropogenic Global Warming ◽  
Arctic Sea ◽  
Scientific Subject

Abstract Climate Change is a widely debated scientific subject and Anthropogenic Global Warming is its main cause. Nevertheless, several authors have indicated solar activity and Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation variations may also influence Climate Change. This article considers the amplification of solar radiation’s and Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation’s variations, via sea ice cover albedo feedbacks in the Arctic regions, providing a conceptual advance in the application of Arctic Amplification for modelling historical climate change. A 1-dimensional physical model, using sunspot number count and Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation index as inputs, can simulate the average global temperature’s anomaly and the Arctic Sea Ice Extension for the past eight centuries. This model represents an innovative progress in understanding how existing studies on Arctic sea ice’s albedo feedbacks can help complementing the Anthropogenic Global Warming models, thus helping to define more precise models for future climate change.

scholarly journals Impact of ocean circulation on regional polar climate simulations using the Arctic Region Climate System Model

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Bailey ◽  
Amanda H. Lynch ◽  
Katherine S. Hedström
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Water Runoff ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Ice Dynamics ◽  
Climate System Model ◽  
Ice Model

Global climate models have pointed to the polar regions as very sensitive areas in response to climate change. However, these models often do not contain representations of processes peculiar to the polar regions such as dynamic sea ice, permafrost, and Arctic stratus clouds. Further, global models do not have the resolution necessary to model accurately many of the important processes and feedbacks. Thus, there is a need for regional climate models of higher resolution. Our such model (ARCSy M) has been developed by A. Lynch and W. Chapman. This model incorporates the NCAR Regional Climate Model (RegCM2) with the addition of Flato–Hibler cavitating fluid sea-ice dynamics and Parkinson–Washington ice thermodynamic formulation. Recently work has been conducted to couple a mixed-layer ocean to the atmosphere–ice model, and a three-dimensional (3-D) dynamical ocean model, in this case the S-Coordinate Primitive Equation Model (SPEM), to the ice model. Simulations including oceanic circulation will allow investigations of the feedbacks involved in fresh-water runoff from sea-ice melt and sea-ice transport. Further, it is shown that the definition of the mixed-layer depth has significant impact on ice thermodynamics.

scholarly journals Impact of ocean circulation on regional polar climate simulations using the Arctic Region Climate System Model

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Bailey ◽  
Amanda H. Lynch ◽  
Katherine S. Hedström
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Water Runoff ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Ice Dynamics ◽  
Climate System Model ◽  
Ice Model

Global climate models have pointed to the polar regions as very sensitive areas in response to climate change. However, these models often do not contain representations of processes peculiar to the polar regions such as dynamic sea ice, permafrost, and Arctic stratus clouds. Further, global models do not have the resolution necessary to model accurately many of the important processes and feedbacks. Thus, there is a need for regional climate models of higher resolution. Our such model (ARCSy M) has been developed by A. Lynch and W. Chapman. This model incorporates the NCAR Regional Climate Model (RegCM2) with the addition of Flato–Hibler cavitating fluid sea-ice dynamics and Parkinson–Washington ice thermodynamic formulation. Recently work has been conducted to couple a mixed-layer ocean to the atmosphere–ice model, and a three-dimensional (3-D) dynamical ocean model, in this case the S-Coordinate Primitive Equation Model (SPEM), to the ice model. Simulations including oceanic circulation will allow investigations of the feedbacks involved in fresh-water runoff from sea-ice melt and sea-ice transport. Further, it is shown that the definition of the mixed-layer depth has significant impact on ice thermodynamics.

scholarly journals Consistent Comparison of Remotely Sensed Sea Ice Concentration Products with ERA-Interim Reanalysis Data in Polar Regions

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 2880
Author(s):  
Shuang Liang ◽  
Jiangyuan Zeng ◽  
Zhen Li ◽  
Dejing Qiao ◽  
Ping Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Climate Change Research ◽  
Ice Concentration

Sea ice concentration (SIC) plays a significant role in climate change research and ship’s navigation in polar regions. Satellite-based SIC products have become increasingly abundant in recent years; however, the uncertainty of these products still exists and needs to be further investigated. To comprehensively evaluate the consistency of the SIC derived from different SIC algorithms in long time series and the whole polar regions, we compared four passive microwave (PM) satellite SIC products with the ERA-Interim sea ice fraction dataset during the period of 2015–2018. The PM SIC products include the SSMIS/ASI, AMSR2/BT, the Chinese FY3B/NT2, and FY3C/NT2. The results show that the remotely sensed SIC products derived from different SIC algorithms are generally in good consistency. The spatial and temporal distribution of discrepancy among satellite SIC products for both Arctic and Antarctic regions are also observed. The most noticeable difference for all the four SIC products mostly occurs in summer and at the marginal ice zone, indicating that large uncertainties exist in satellite SIC products in such period and areas. The SSMIS/ASI and AMSR2/BT show relatively better consistency with ERA-Interim in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively, but they exhibit opposite bias (dry/wet) relative to the ERA-Interim data. The sea ice extent (SIE) and sea ice area (SIA) derived from PM and ERA-Interim SIC were also compared. It is found that the difference of PM SIE and SIA varies seasonally, which is in line with that of PM SIC, and the discrepancy between PM and ERA-Interim data is larger in Arctic than in Antarctic. We also noticed that different algorithms have different performances in different regions and periods; therefore, the hybrid of multiple algorithms is a promising way to improve the accuracy of SIC retrievals. It is expected that our findings can contribute to improving the satellite SIC algorithms and thus promote the application of these useful products in global climate change studies.

scholarly journals Surface Freshwater Fluxes in the Arctic and Subarctic Seas during Contrasting Years of High and Low Summer Sea Ice Extent

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1570
Author(s):  
Sarah B. Hall ◽  
Bulusu Subrahmanyam ◽  
Ebenezer S. Nyadjro ◽  
Annette Samuelsen
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Variability ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Extent

Freshwater (FW) flux between the Arctic Ocean and adjacent waterways, predominantly driven by wind and oceanic currents, influences halocline stability and annual sea ice variability which further impacts global circulation and climate. The Arctic recently experienced anomalous years of high and low sea ice extent in the summers of 2013/2014 and 2012/2016, respectively. Here we investigate the interannual variability of oceanic surface FW flux in relation to spatial and temporal variability in sea ice concentration (SIC), sea surface salinity (SSS), and sea surface temperature (SST), focusing on years with summer sea–ice extremes. Our analysis between 2010–2018 illustrate high parameter variability, especially within the Laptev, Kara, and Barents seas, as well as an overall decreasing trend of FW flux through the Fram Strait. We find that in 2012, a maximum average FW flux of 0.32 × 103 ms−1 in October passed over a large portion of the Northeast Atlantic Ocean at 53°N. This study highlights recent changes in the Arctic and Subarctic Seas and the importance of continued monitoring of key variables through remote sensing to understand the dynamics behind these ongoing changes. Observations of FW fluxes through major Arctic routes will be increasingly important as the polar regions become more susceptible to warming, with major impacts on global climate.

scholarly journals Climate change impacts on sea-ice ecosystems and associated ecosystem services

Elem Sci Anth ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadja S. Steiner ◽  
Jeff Bowman ◽  
Karley Campbell ◽  
Melissa Chierici ◽  
Eeva Eronen-Rasimus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Marine Protected Area ◽  
Well Being ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Mammal Species ◽  
Cultural Services ◽  
Key Species

A rigorous synthesis of the sea-ice ecosystem and linked ecosystem services highlights that the sea-ice ecosystem supports all 4 ecosystem service categories, that sea-ice ecosystems meet the criteria for ecologically or biologically significant marine areas, that global emissions driving climate change are directly linked to the demise of sea-ice ecosystems and its ecosystem services, and that the sea-ice ecosystem deserves specific attention in the evaluation of marine protected area planning. The synthesis outlines (1) supporting services, provided in form of habitat, including feeding grounds and nurseries for microbes, meiofauna, fish, birds and mammals (particularly the key species Arctic cod, Boreogadus saida, and Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, which are tightly linked to the sea-ice ecosystem and transfer carbon from sea-ice primary producers to higher trophic level fish, mammal species and humans); (2) provisioning services through harvesting and medicinal and genetic resources; (3) cultural services through Indigenous and local knowledge systems, cultural identity and spirituality, and via cultural activities, tourism and research; (4) (climate) regulating services through light regulation, the production of biogenic aerosols, halogen oxidation and the release or uptake of greenhouse gases, for example, carbon dioxide. The ongoing changes in the polar regions have strong impacts on sea-ice ecosystems and associated ecosystem services. While the response of sea-ice–associated primary production to environmental change is regionally variable, the effect on ice-associated mammals and birds is predominantly negative, subsequently impacting human harvesting and cultural services in both polar regions. Conservation can help protect some species and functions. However, the key mitigation measure that can slow the transition to a strictly seasonal ice cover in the Arctic Ocean, reduce the overall loss of sea-ice habitats from the ocean, and thus preserve the unique ecosystem services provided by sea ice and their contributions to human well-being is a reduction in carbon emissions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document