scholarly journals On the importance of observational data properties when assessing regional climate model performance of extreme precipitation

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 4323-4337 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Sunyer ◽  
H. J. D. Sørup ◽  
O. B. Christensen ◽  
H. Madsen ◽  
D. Rosbjerg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Pattern ◽  
Observational Data ◽  
Extreme Precipitation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Data Set

Abstract. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of climate studies addressing changes in extreme precipitation. A common step in these studies involves the assessment of the climate model performance. This is often measured by comparing climate model output with observational data. In the majority of such studies the characteristics and uncertainties of the observational data are neglected. This study addresses the influence of using different observational data sets to assess the climate model performance. Four different data sets covering Denmark using different gauge systems and comprising both networks of point measurements and gridded data sets are considered. Additionally, the influence of using different performance indices and metrics is addressed. A set of indices ranging from mean to extreme precipitation properties is calculated for all the data sets. For each of the observational data sets, the regional climate models (RCMs) are ranked according to their performance using two different metrics. These are based on the error in representing the indices and the spatial pattern. In comparison to the mean, extreme precipitation indices are highly dependent on the spatial resolution of the observations. The spatial pattern also shows differences between the observational data sets. These differences have a clear impact on the ranking of the climate models, which is highly dependent on the observational data set, the index and the metric used. The results highlight the need to be aware of the properties of observational data chosen in order to avoid overconfident and misleading conclusions with respect to climate model performance.

scholarly journals Regional climate model simulations as input for hydrological applications: evaluation of uncertainties

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kotlarski ◽  
A. Block ◽  
U. Böhm ◽  
D. Jacob ◽  
K. Keuler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Reference Data ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Mean Annual Precipitation ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Climate Model Simulations ◽  
Hydrological Applications

Abstract. The ERA15 Reanalysis (1979-1993) has been dynamically downscaled over Central Europe using 4 different regional climate models. The regional simulations were analysed with respect to 2m temperature and total precipitation, the main input parameters for hydrological applications. Model results were validated against three reference data sets (ERA15, CRU, DWD) and uncertainty ranges were derived. For mean annual 2 m temperature over Germany, the simulation bias lies between -1.1°C and +0.9°C depending on the combination of model and reference data set. The bias of mean annual precipitation varies between -31 and +108 mm/year. Differences between RCM results are of the same magnitude as differences between the reference data sets.

scholarly journals On the importance of observational data properties when assessing regional climate model performance of extreme precipitation

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 7003-7043 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Sunyer ◽  
H. J. D. Sørup ◽  
O. B. Christensen ◽  
H. Madsen ◽  
D. Rosbjerg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Data ◽  
Spatial Correlation ◽  
Extreme Precipitation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Climate Model Output ◽  
Extreme Precipitation Indices ◽  
Climate Studies

Abstract. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of climate studies addressing changes in extreme precipitation. A common step in these studies involves the assessment of the climate model performance. This is often measured by comparing climate model output with observational data. In the majority of such studies the characteristics and uncertainties of the observational data are neglected. This study addresses the influence of using different observational datasets to assess the climate model performance. Four different datasets covering Denmark using different gauge systems and comprising both networks of point measurements and gridded datasets are considered. Additionally, the influence of using different performance indices and metrics is addressed. A set of indices ranging from mean to extreme precipitation properties is calculated for all the datasets. For each of the observational datasets, the RCMs are ranked according to their performance using two different metrics. These are based on the error in representing the indices and the spatial correlation. In comparison to the mean, extreme precipitation indices are highly dependent on the spatial resolution of the observations. The spatial correlation also shows differences between the observational datasets. These differences have a clear impact on the ranking of the climate models, which is highly dependent on the observational dataset, the index and the metric used. The results highlight the need to be aware of the properties of observational data chosen in order to avoid overconfident and misleading conclusions with respect to climate model performance.

scholarly journals On the potential use of glacier and permafrost observations for verification of climate models

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 400-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Beniston ◽  
Wilfried Haeberli ◽  
Martin Hoelzle ◽  
Alan Taylor
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Model Verification ◽  
Dominant Feature

While the capability of global and regional climate models in reproducing current climate has significantly improved over the past few years, the confidence in model results for remote regions, or those where complex orography is a dominant feature, is still relatively low. This is, in part, linked to the lack of observational data for model verification and intercomparison purposes.Glacier and permafrost observations are directly related to past and present energy flux patterns at the Earth-atmosphere interface and could be used as a proxy for air temperature and precipitation, particularly of value in remote mountain regions and boreal and Arctic zones where instrumental climate records are sparse or non-existent. It is particularly important to verify climate-model performance in these regions, as this is where most general circulation models (GCMs) predict the greatest changes in air temperatures in a warmer global climate.Existing datasets from glacier and permafrost monitoring sites in remote and high altitudes are described in this paper; the data could be used in model-verification studies, as a means to improving model performance in these regions.

scholarly journals Precipitation bias correction of very high resolution regional climate models

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 4379-4388 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Argüeso ◽  
J. P. Evans ◽  
L. Fita
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Observational Data ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Frequency Condition ◽  
Recent Climate

Abstract. Regional climate models are prone to biases in precipitation that are problematic for use in impact models such as hydrology models. A large number of methods have already been proposed aimed at correcting various moments of the rainfall distribution. They all require that the model produce the same or a higher number of rain days than the observational data sets, which are usually gridded data sets. Models have traditionally met this condition because their spatial resolution was coarser than the observational grids. But recent climate simulations use higher resolution and the models are likely to systematically produce fewer rain days than the gridded observations. In this study, model outputs from a simulation at 2 km resolution are compared with gridded and in situ observational data sets to determine whether the new scenario calls for revised methodologies. The gridded observations are found to be inadequate to correct the high-resolution model at daily timescales, because they are subjected to too frequent low intensity precipitation due to spatial averaging. A histogram equalisation bias correction method was adapted to the use of station, alleviating the problems associated with relative low-resolution observational grids. The wet-day frequency condition might not be satisfied for extremely dry biases, but the proposed approach substantially increases the applicability of bias correction to high-resolution models. The method is efficient at bias correcting both seasonal and daily characteristic of precipitation, providing more accurate information that is crucial for impact assessment studies.

Robustness of projections of European precipitation for seasonal means and seasonal extremes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Ritzhaupt ◽  
Douglas Maraun
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Extreme Precipitation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
High Emission ◽  
Model Ensembles ◽  
Global Data

<p>We analyze several sets of global and regional climate models (GCMs and RCMs) to investigate how robust climate change signals for seasonal mean and extreme precipitation are. The projections of the regional climate models ENSEMBLES and EURO-CORDEX are used along with projections of their driving global data sets of CMIP3 and CMIP5, respectively. In addition, projections of CMIP6 and the high-resolution HighResMIP global models are used. The projections are used with high emission scenarios (A1B or RCP8.5) depending on availability. To calculate the climate change signals a future period 2071-2100 and a baseline period 1971-2000 is chosen. For comparability and to reduce the uncertainty by the choice of the emission scenario, the climate change signals are normalized by the European mean surface temperature. We make statements of percentage change per degree warming. The analyses are carried out for eight European sub-regions: Alps, British Isles, Iberian Peninsula, France, Mid-Europe, Scandinavia, Mediterranean and Eastern Europe. We define extreme precipitation as the 20-year return values of each season. Regarding mean precipitation the climate change signals are robust across the different data sets. In accordance with previous studies, there is a transition zone between increasing and decreasing signals which is located in southern Europe in winter and more north in summer. This seasonal cycle can be found for all regions. For extreme precipitation, the climate change signals indicating increases in all seasons and regions. Especially in summer, in most regions the RCMs showing a higher increase compared to the GCMs up to a difference of about 5%/K for the ensemble medians. Hence, the signals for extremes are not that robust than for means.</p><p>To understand where these differences come from, we are using a precipitation scaling for extremes to investigate the thermodynamic and dynamic contributions. The thermodynamic contribution shows homogeneous increasing signals for Europe. This means the dynamic contribution is the key to understand differences between the model ensembles.</p><p>We aim to understand the discrepancy between different lines of evidence and focusing our study in the field of climate information distillation.</p>

scholarly journals On the potential use of glacier and permafrost observations for verification of climate models

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 400-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Beniston ◽  
Wilfried Haeberli ◽  
Martin Hoelzle ◽  
Alan Taylor
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Model Verification ◽  
Dominant Feature

While the capability of global and regional climate models in reproducing current climate has significantly improved over the past few years, the confidence in model results for remote regions, or those where complex orography is a dominant feature, is still relatively low. This is, in part, linked to the lack of observational data for model verification and intercomparison purposes.Glacier and permafrost observations are directly related to past and present energy flux patterns at the Earth-atmosphere interface and could be used as a proxy for air temperature and precipitation, particularly of value in remote mountain regions and boreal and Arctic zones where instrumental climate records are sparse or non-existent. It is particularly important to verify climate-model performance in these regions, as this is where most general circulation models (GCMs) predict the greatest changes in air temperatures in a warmer global climate.Existing datasets from glacier and permafrost monitoring sites in remote and high altitudes are described in this paper; the data could be used in model-verification studies, as a means to improving model performance in these regions.

REMOLAND: New high-resolution surface boundary data for the regional climate model REMO and their impacts

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Ziegler ◽  
Felix Pollinger ◽  
Daniel Abel ◽  
Heiko Paeth
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Regional Climate Model ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Local Climate

<p class="western" align="justify"><span lang="en-US">In cooperation with the Climate Service Center Germany (GERICS) we want to improve the land surface module in the regional climate model REMO. Due to the need of high-resolution regional climate models to get information about local climate change, new data and new processes have to be integrated in these models.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span lang="en-US">Based on the REMO2015 version and focusing on EUR-CORDEX region we included and compared five different high-resolution topographic data sets. To improve the thermal and hydrological processes in the model’s soil we also tested three new soil data sets with a much higher spatial resolution and with new parameters for a new soil parameterization.</span></p>

scholarly journals Evaluation of ALARO-0 and REMO Regional Climate Models over Iran Focusing on Building Material Degradation Criteria

Buildings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 376
Author(s):  
Hamed Hedayatnia ◽  
Sara Top ◽  
Steven Caluwaerts ◽  
Lola Kotova ◽  
Marijke Steeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Material Degradation ◽  
Temperature And Precipitation ◽  
Climate Simulations ◽  
Optimal Approach ◽  
Building Physics

Understanding how climate change affects material degradation is the first step in heritage conservation. To study such impact, high-resolution climate information is required. However, so far, no regional climate simulations have been evaluated considering building damage criteria over the region of Iran. This paper has a twofold objective: to conduct an overview of climate model performance over Iran by evaluating the output of two regional climate models, ALARO-0 and REMO2015, and to find an optimal approach for model evaluation fitted to studies on building physics. Data of the evaluation run for both models were compared with data of weather stations located in six different climate zones in Iran to assess their performance over the region and gain insight about model uncertainties. Given that the research scope covers the evaluation of climate models to use in studies on building physics, in addition to climate parameters, five degradation risks are analysed. The performance of the two models varies over the studied locations. In general, both models fall within the spread of observations except for wind parameters. Accordingly, indices related to temperature and precipitation are well predicted, in contrast to indices related to wind. The analysis shows that considering the observed biases, selecting an ensemble of representative models based on the evaluation results of climate variables important for hygrothermal simulations would be recommended.

scholarly journals Projecting Health Impacts of Future Temperature: A Comparison of Quantile-Mapping Bias-Correction Methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1992
Author(s):  
Weijia Qian ◽  
Howard H. Chang
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Warm Season ◽  
Climate Science ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Quantile Mapping ◽  
Ed Visits

Health impact assessments of future environmental exposures are routinely conducted to quantify population burdens associated with the changing climate. It is well-recognized that simulations from climate models need to be bias-corrected against observations to estimate future exposures. Quantile mapping (QM) is a technique that has gained popularity in climate science because of its focus on bias-correcting the entire exposure distribution. Even though improved bias-correction at the extreme tails of exposure may be particularly important for estimating health burdens, the application of QM in health impact projection has been limited. In this paper we describe and apply five QM methods to estimate excess emergency department (ED) visits due to projected changes in warm-season minimum temperature in Atlanta, USA. We utilized temperature projections from an ensemble of regional climate models in the North American-Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (NA-CORDEX). Across QM methods, we estimated consistent increase in ED visits across climate model ensemble under RCP 8.5 during the period 2050 to 2099. We found that QM methods can significantly reduce between-model variation in health impact projections (50–70% decreases in between-model standard deviation). Particularly, the quantile delta mapping approach had the largest reduction and is recommended also because of its ability to preserve model-projected absolute temporal changes in quantiles.

scholarly journals Evaluation of uncertainties in mean and extreme precipitation under climate change for northwestern Mediterranean watersheds from high-resolution Med and Euro-CORDEX ensembles

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 673-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Colmet-Daage ◽  
Emilia Sanchez-Gomez ◽  
Sophie Ricci ◽  
Cécile Llovel ◽  
Valérie Borrell Estupina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Extreme Precipitation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Mountainous Regions ◽  
Extreme Precipitation Events ◽  
Precipitation Events

Abstract. The climate change impact on mean and extreme precipitation events in the northern Mediterranean region is assessed using high-resolution EuroCORDEX and MedCORDEX simulations. The focus is made on three regions, Lez and Aude located in France, and Muga located in northeastern Spain, and eight pairs of global and regional climate models are analyzed with respect to the SAFRAN product. First the model skills are evaluated in terms of bias for the precipitation annual cycle over historical period. Then future changes in extreme precipitation, under two emission scenarios, are estimated through the computation of past/future change coefficients of quantile-ranked model precipitation outputs. Over the 1981–2010 period, the cumulative precipitation is overestimated for most models over the mountainous regions and underestimated over the coastal regions in autumn and higher-order quantile. The ensemble mean and the spread for future period remain unchanged under RCP4.5 scenario and decrease under RCP8.5 scenario. Extreme precipitation events are intensified over the three catchments with a smaller ensemble spread under RCP8.5 revealing more evident changes, especially in the later part of the 21st century.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document