A general framework for understanding the response of the water cycle to global warming over land and ocean
Abstract. Climate models project increases in globally averaged atmospheric specific humidity at the Clausius–Clapeyron (CC) value of around 7% K−1 whilst projections for precipitation (P) and evaporation (E) are somewhat muted at around 2% K−1. Such global projections are useful summaries but do not provide guidance at local (grid box) scales where impacts occur. To bridge that gap in spatial scale, previous research has shown that the following relation, Δ(P − E) ∝ P − E, holds for zonal averages in climate model projections. In this paper we first test whether that relation holds at grid box scales over ocean and over land. We find that the zonally averaged relation does not hold at grid box scales. We further find that the zonally averaged relation does not hold over land – it is specific to zonal averages over the ocean. As an alternative we tested whether the long-standing Budyko framework of catchment hydrology could be used to synthesise climate model projections over land. We find that climate model projections of Δ(P − E) out to the year 2100 conform closely to the Budyko framework. The analysis also revealed that climate models project little change in the net irradiance at the surface. To understand that result we examined projections of the key surface energy balance terms. In terms of global averages, we find the climate model projections are dominated by changes in only three terms of the surface energy balance; an increase in the incoming longwave irradiance while the responses are (mostly) restricted to the outgoing longwave irradiance with a small change in the evaporative flux. Because the change in outgoing longwave irradiance is a function of the change in surface temperature, we show that the precipitation sensitivity (i.e. 2% K−1) is an accurate summary of the partitioning of the greenhouse-induced surface forcing. With that we demonstrate that the precipitation sensitivity (2% K−1) is less than the CC value (7% K−1) because most of the greenhouse-induced surface forcing is partitioned into outgoing longwave irradiance (instead of evaporation). In essence, the models respond to elevated [CO2] by an increase in atmospheric water vapour content that increases the incoming long-wave irradiance at the surface. The surface response is dominated by a near equal increase in outgoing long-wave irradiance with only minor changes in other terms of the surface energy balance.