scholarly journals Uma análise do discurso sobre a temática acesso aberto nos anais do EDICIC Ibérico no período de 2013 a 2017

Author(s):  
Isadora Victorino Evangelista ◽  
Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros

Objetivo. Se pretendía analizar el concepto de acceso abierto y observar si existe alguna relación con el concepto de acceso a la información como supervalor ético; como objetivos específicos, a) se buscaba investigar la presencia de los términos "acceso abierto" y "datos abiertos" en los eventos de EDICIC y su relevancia temática para el evento y también, b) difundir los conceptos analizados y destacar su importancia para el avance de la ciencia.Método. Se utilizó como fuente de investigación las actas del EDICIC Ibérico disponibles en acceso abierto, es decir, las ocurridas en el periodo 2013-2017. Los términos de búsqueda aplicados fueron "open access" y "open data", así como sus respectivos en español e inglés, presentes en el título, resumen y palabras clave. El corpus generó un total de 26 artículos, que fueron analizados posteriormente, utilizando como método el Análisis del Discurso.Resultados. Como resultados, fue posible llegar a un grupo de 09 instancias éticas, identificadas a partir del discurso de los autores cuando versan sobre los conceptos de Ciencia Abierta y su importancia para el desarrollo científico.Conclusiones. El acceso abierto ha supuesto cambios significativos en la difusión de la investigación científica, los datos gubernamentales y la investigación académica. Sin embargo, se puede ver que el principal factor que rige todo el movimiento es el acceso abierto en un entorno libre e igualitario. libre, igualitaria y que garantice los derechos constitucionales, evocando así el aspecto ético que implica esta premisa.

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Abadal ◽  
Lluís Anglada

La ciencia abierta es un cambio de modelo en la manera de hacer ciencia que supone realizar con una visión “abierta” (open) todas las etapas o fases de la investigación científica (diseño, recolección de datos, revisión, publicación, etc.). El objetivo de nuestro texto es analizar la evolución del concepto y de la denominación de ciencia abierta desde sus inicios previos hasta el empuje que le ha dado la Unión Europea (e-ciencia, ciencia interconectada, ciencia 2.0, ciencia abierta). También se quiere determinar cuáles son los elementos fundamentales que componen la ciencia abierta. Para ello, se han seleccionado y analizado los principales textos teóricos que han tratado sobre la cuestión, que han sido localizados a partir de consultas bibliográficas en las bases de datos Scopus y GoogleScholar. Como resultados, se pone de manifiesto que las denominaciones han sufrido más variaciones que propiamente el concepto y, en lo que respecta a los componentes, la ciencia abierta partió de cuatro elementos básicos (acceso abierto, datos abiertos, software libre, reproducibilidad) que se han ido ampliando hasta los ocho que constituyen el modelo propuesto por las recomendaciones de OSPP, que se están adoptando de manera amplia. Open science represents a paradigm shift in the way science is conducted that involves performing all stages of scientific research (design, data collection, review, publication, etc.) with an “open” vision. Our aim is to analyze the evolution of the denomination and the concept of open science from its beginnings (e-science, interconnected science, science 2.0, open science). We also want to determine which are the fundamental elements that make up open science. This is a theoretical research based on the selection and analysis of the most important conceptual documents about open science, which have been found in the Scopus and GoogleScholar databases. As a result, it is shown that the denominations have undergone more variations than the concept itself. Regarding the components, open science started with four basic elements (open access, open data, open software, reproducibility) that have been extended to the eight that are considered in the model proposed by OSPP recommendations.


ECA Sinergia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
María Elena Torrens Pérez ◽  
Gabriela Real Goya

El estudio tuvo como objetivo, conocer el comportamiento del salario mínimo, las realidades que acontecen y la desigualdad en su aplicación, a nivel global y de país. Como metodología se realizó la revisión bibliográfica en bases de datos de acceso abierto: EmeraldInsight, SciELO, Redalyc; y la consulta de políticas e informes de organismos internacionales y, legislaciones del gobierno ecuatoriano e investigaciones realizadas en Ecuador, por la importancia de establecer salarios mínimos acorde a las necesidades básicas y reales de cada contexto de país. Entre sus resultados se desatacan, la desigualdad de los salarios mínimos a nivel global y de país, así como las desigualdades salariales en cuanto al género, reconociéndose el salario mínimo como vital, para la satisfacción del trabajador y la de su familia, cabe desatacar que cada contexto es propio para el análisis y adecuación de los salarios mínimos acorde al equilibrio de la oferta y demanda.   Palabras clave: salarios mínimos, empleador y regímenes; salarios dignos; mercado laboral.   ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to know the behavior of the minimum wage, the realities that occur and the inequality in its application, at a global and country level. As a methodology, the literature review was carried out in open access databases: EmeraldInsight, SciELO, Redalyc; and the consultation of policies and reports of international organizations and, laws of the Ecuadorian government and research carried out in Ecuador, for the importance of establishing minimum wages according to the basic and real needs of each country context. Among its results, the inequality of minimum wages at a global and country level is highlighted, as well as gender inequalities, recognizing the minimum wage as vital, for the satisfaction of the worker and his family, it should be noted that Each context is appropriate for the analysis and adaptation of minimum wages according to the balance of supply and demand.   Key words: minimum wages, employer and schemes; living wages; working market.


Author(s):  
Sandra Fernández ◽  
Guillermo Ferragutti ◽  
Micaela Yunis

Resumen El presente trabajo se propone presentar los alcances y desafíos que implicó la construcción, diseño y difusión del Archivo Visual de la Sociabilidad Santafesina (1920-1960), proyecto de divulgación elegido y subsidiado desde 2014 por la Secretaría de Estado de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Provincia de Santa Fe en vinculación con Investigaciones Socio-históricas Regionales (ISHIR-CONICET/UNR). La originalidad de la propuesta radicó en la puesta en valor de fotografías, cedidas temporalmente por ciudadanos de la provincia, en las que se representaran las distintas manifestaciones de la sociabilidad formal e informal, su reproducción digital y su almacenamiento en un soporte online de acceso abierto, libre y gratuito. Palabras clave: Archivo visual. Fotografía. Sociabilidad. Santa Fe. Acceso Abierto. Resumo O presente trabalho tem como objetivo apresentar o escopo e desafíos envolvidos na construção, projeto e divulgação do Arquivo Visual da Sociabilidade Santafesina (1920-1960), projeto de divulgação escolhido e subsidiado, desde 2014, pela Secretaria Estadual de Ciência e Tecnologia da Província de Santa Fe. Santa Fe, vinculada à Investigações Sócio-históricas Regionais (ISHIR-CONICET/UNR). A originalidade da proposta reside na valorização de fotografias, cedidas temporariamente por cidadãos da província, nas quais estão representadas as diferentes manifestações da sociabilidade formal e informal, sua reprodução digital e armazenamento em um suporte on line de Open Access, livre e gratuito. Palavras chave: Arquivo visual. Fotografia. Sociabilidade. Santa Fe. Open Access.


Author(s):  
Johnny Alexander Salazar Cardona ◽  
Marcelo Mejía Giraldo ◽  
Luis Joyanes Aguilar

Resumen Actualmente, los gobiernos están aprovechando las herramientas tecnológicas que hoy se tienen para mejorar todos los procesos gubernamentales, permitiendo tener un contacto más directo con el ciudadano, brindando mayor transparencia, eficiencia, participación y facilidades en el acceso de información. El proceso descrito corresponde a un desarrollo constante llamado Gobierno abierto u Open Government (o-Gov), que consiste en publicar su información a la ciudadanía en general, permitiendo que estos datos estén accesibles en cualquier momento (Open data). Es por ello, que si se trabaja con estos datos abiertos se debe tener como objetivo el descubrimiento de conocimiento, aspecto que no está aplicando los gobiernos actuales. Por ende, el presente artículo tiene como objetivo exponer las falencias que presentan estos gobiernos, al no progresar hacia un gobierno abierto que aplique procesos de descubrimiento de conocimiento. Palabras Clave: Descubrimiento de Conocimiento, Madurez, Gobierno abierto y Open Data.   Abstract Currently governments worldwide are taking advantage of technological tools now have to improve all government processes, allowing us to have more direct contact with citizens, providing greater transparency, efficiency, participation and access facilities in the information. The whole process described above corresponds to a constant evolution called Open Government or o-Gov, releasing all their information to individuals and allowing data to be open and available at any time (Open data). That consists of publishing its information to the general citizenry, allowing the data to be accessible at any time (Open data). Is why, if you work with these open data should be targeted at knowledge discovery aspect that is not applying the current governments. Therefore, this article aims to expose the shortcomings presented by these governments, not progressing toward an open government that applies knowledge discovery processes. Keywords: Knowledge Discovery, Maturity, oGov and Open Data.


Author(s):  
Angélica Conceição Dias Miranda ◽  
Milton Shintaku ◽  
Simone Machado Firme

Resumo: Os repositórios têm se tornado comum nas universidades e institutos de pesquisa, como forma de ofertar acesso à produção científica e, com isso, dar visibilidade à instituição. Entretanto, em muitos casos ainda estão restritos aos conceitos do movimento do arquivo aberto e acesso aberto, sendo que já se discute o Movimento da Ciência Aberta, revelando certo descompasso, requerendo estudos que apoiem a atualização dessa importante ferramenta. Nesse sentido, o presente estudo verifica os requisitos envolvidos nos movimentos abertos, de forma a apoiar a discussão técnica e tecnológica. Um estudo bibliográfico, que transforma as informações sobre os movimentos em critérios para avaliação de ferramentas para criação de repositórios, apresentando a implementação da interação como um novo desafio. Nas considerações procura-se contribuir com a discussão sobre a Ciência Aberta, de forma mais aplicada bem como o ajuste dos repositórios a esse movimento.Palavras-chave: Repositórios.  Critérios de avaliação. Arquivo aberto. Acesso aberto. Dados abertos. Ciência aberta.SURVEY OF CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF REPOSITORY TOOLS ACCORDING TO OPEN SCIENCE Abstract: Repositories have become common in universities and research institutes, as a way of offering access to scientific production, thereby giving visibility to the institution. Meanwhile, in many cases, repositories are restricted to the concepts of open movement and open access considering that the Open Science Movement is already being discussed. Regarding this matter, this study verifies the requirements involved in the open movements, in order to support a technical and technological discussion.  A bibliographic study that transforms information about movements into criteria to evaluate tools used to create repositories, presenting an implementation of interaction as a new challenge. In the considerations, we contribute with a discussion about an Open Science, in a more applied way, as well as the adjustment of the repositories to this movement.Keywords: Repositories. Evaluation Criteria. Open File. Open Access. Open Data. Open Science.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Norris ◽  
Yiwei He ◽  
Rachel Loh ◽  
Robert West ◽  
Susan Michie

Introduction: Activities promoting research reproducibility and transparency are crucial for generating trustworthy evidence. Evaluation of smoking interventions is one area where vested interests may motivate reduced reproducibility and transparency. Aims: Assess markers of transparency and reproducibility in smoking behaviour change intervention evaluation reports.Methods: One hundred evaluation reports of smoking behaviour change intervention randomised controlled trials published in 2018-2019 were identified. Reproducibility markers of pre-registration, protocol sharing, data-, materials- and analysis script-sharing, replication of a previous study and open access publication were coded in identified reports. Transparency markers of funding and conflict of interest declarations were also coded. Coding was performed by two researchers, with inter-rater reliability calculated using Krippendorff’s alpha.Results: Seventy-one percent of reports were open access and 73% pre-registered. However, only 13% provided accessible materials, 7% accessible data and 1% accessible analysis scripts. No reports were replication studies. Ninety-four percent of reports provided a funding source statement and eighty-eight percent of reports provided a conflict of interest statement.Conclusions: Open data, materials, analysis and replications are rare in smoking behaviour change interventions, whereas funding source and conflict of interest declarations are common. Future smoking research should be more reproducible to enable knowledge accumulation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Kalandadze ◽  
Sara Ann Hart

The increasing adoption of open science practices in the last decade has been changing the scientific landscape across fields. However, developmental science has been relatively slow in adopting open science practices. To address this issue, we followed the format of Crüwell et al., (2019) and created summaries and an annotated list of informative and actionable resources discussing ten topics in developmental science: Open science; Reproducibility and replication; Open data, materials and code; Open access; Preregistration; Registered reports; Replication; Incentives; Collaborative developmental science.This article offers researchers and students in developmental science a starting point for understanding how open science intersects with developmental science. After getting familiarized with this article, the developmental scientist should understand the core tenets of open and reproducible developmental science, and feel motivated to start applying open science practices in their workflow.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliakbar Akbaritabar ◽  
Stephan Stahlschmidt

Identifying and monitoring Open Access (OA) publications might seem a trivial task while practical efforts prove otherwise. Contradictory information arise often depending on metadata employed. We strive to assign OA status to publications in Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus while complementing it with different sourcesof OA information to resolve contradicting cases. We linked publications from WOS and Scopus via DOIs and ISSNs to Unpaywall, Crossref, DOAJ and ROAD. Only about 70% of articles and reviews from WOS and Scopus could be matched via a DOI to Unpaywall. Matching with Crossref brought 53 distinct licences, which define in many cases the legally binding access status of publications. But only 53% of publications hold only a single licence on Crossref, while more than 42% have no licence information submitted to Crossref. Contrasting OA information from Crossref licences with Unpaywall we found contradictory cases overall amounting to more than 13%, which might be partially explained by (ex-)including green OA. A further manual check found about 17% of OA publications that are not accessible and about 15% non-OA publications that are accessible through publishers’ websites. These preliminary results suggest that identification of OA state of publications denotes a difficult and currently unfulfilled task.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Andy South ◽  
Ahmadou Dicko ◽  
Mark Herringer ◽  
Peter M. Macharia ◽  
Joseph Maina ◽  
...  

Background: Open data on the locations and services provided by health facilities have, in some countries, allowed the development of software tools contributing to COVID-19 response. The UN and WHO encourage countries to make health facility location data open, to encourage use and improvement. We provide a summary of open access health facility location data in Africa using re-useable R code. We aim to support data analysts developing software tools to address COVID-19 response in individual countries. In Africa there are currently three main sources of such open data; 1) direct from national ministries of health, 2) a database for sub-Saharan Africa collated and published by a team from KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme and now hosted by WHO, and 3) The Global Healthsites Mapping Project in collaboration with OpenStreetMap.      Methods: We searched for and documented official national facility location data that were openly available. We developed re-useable open-source R code to summarise and visualise facility location data by country from the three sources. This re-useable code is used to provide a web user interface allowing data exploration through maps and plots of facility type. Results: Out of 52 African countries, seven currently provide an official open facility list that can be downloaded and analysed reproducibly. Considering all three sources, there are over 185,000 health facility locations available for Africa. However, there are differences and overlaps between sources and a lack of data on capacities and service provision. Conclusions: These summaries and software tools can be used to encourage greater use of existing health facility location data, incentivise further improvements in the provision of those data by national suppliers, and encourage collaboration within wider data communities. The tools are a part of the afrimapr project, actively developing R building blocks to facilitate the use of health data in Africa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document