scholarly journals The association between relative leukocyte telomere length of prostate cancer patients at diagnosis with cancer prognostic parameters

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
Thiraphat Saengmearnuparp ◽  
◽  
Bannakij Lojanapiwat ◽  

Objectives: In this study, relative leukocyte telomere length (LTL) was investigated as a prognostic marker to evaluate association of LTL at the time of diagnosis and prostate cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival, overall survival, with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, pertinent data from 81 patients were collected. Patients underwent prostate cancer (PCa) treatment procedures determined by staging and current recommendation. Blood samples from suspected PCa patients were obtained before the initiation of diagnosis and treatment. LTL was determined by the quantitative polymerase chain reaction method. Relative LTL was compared to the main clinical outcome measures. Prostate cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival, overall survival and CRPC were calculated retrospectively, for a mean follow-up period of 30 months. Results: This analysis showed relative LTL was not associated with tumor stage, Gleason score, grade group, metabolic disease, or smoking. However, older age was significantly associated with short LTL (p < 0.001). All main outcomes were not associated with LTL. In contrast, a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) showed a CRPC association with relatively long LTL (p = 0.039). To our knowledge, these results are novel and give further strength to our hypothesis that relative LTL might be used as a prognostic marker in PCa especially in patients who will receive primary ADT. Conclusion: Aging was significantly associated with relatively short LTL. There was no significant association between LTL in PCa patients at diagnosis and cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival, or overall survival. However, patients who underwent ADT treatment alone showed CRPC associated with relatively long LTL.

Tumor Biology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 101042831769223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrika Svenson ◽  
Göran Roos ◽  
Pernilla Wikström

Previous studies have suggested that leukocyte telomere length is associated with risk of developing prostate cancer. Investigations of leukocyte telomere length as a prognostic factor in prostate cancer are, however, lacking. In this study, leukocyte telomere length was investigated both as a risk marker, comparing control subjects and patient risk groups (based on serum levels of prostate-specific antigen, tumor differentiation, and tumor stage), and as a prognostic marker for metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival. Relative telomere length was measured by a well-established quantitative polymerase chain reaction method in 415 consecutively sampled individuals. Statistical evaluation included 162 control subjects without cancer development during follow-up and 110 untreated patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer at the time of blood draw. Leukocyte telomere length did not differ significantly between control subjects and patients, or between patient risk groups. Interestingly, however, and in line with our previous results in breast and kidney cancer patients, relative telomere length at diagnosis was an independent prognostic factor. Patients with long leukocyte telomeres (⩾median) had a significantly worse prostate cancer–specific and metastasis-free survival compared to patients with short telomere length. In contrast, for patients who died of other causes than prostate cancer, long relative telomere length was not coupled to shorter survival time. To our knowledge, these results are novel and give further strength to our hypothesis that leukocyte telomere length might be used as a prognostic marker in malignancy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 933-939
Author(s):  
Takashi Ikeda ◽  
Hiroki Ishihara ◽  
Junpei Iizuka ◽  
Yasunobu Hashimoto ◽  
Kazuhiko Yoshida ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cancer cachexia is associated with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the association between sarcopenia and survival in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 197 patients diagnosed with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in our department and its affiliated institution between January 2008 and December 2015. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the sex-specific consensus definition. Castration-resistance prostate cancer-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival from the metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer diagnoses were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Risk factors affecting the survival outcomes were analyzed using the Cox proportional regression analysis. Results In total, 163 patients (82.7%) had sarcopenia. Cancer-specific survival and overall survival were significantly shorter in sarcopenic patients than in non-sarcopenic patients (median cancer-specific survival: 77.0 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0099; overall survival: 72.0 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0465), whereas castration-resistance prostate cancer-free survival did not significantly differ between the groups (P = 0.6063). Multivariate analyses showed that sarcopenia was an independent factor for cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio: 2.18, P = 0.0451), together with the Gleason score (hazard ratio: 1.87, P = 0.0272) and LATITUDE risk classification (hazard ratio: 2.73, P = 0.0008). Moreover, the prognostic association of sarcopenia was remarkable in patients aged &lt;73.0 years (cancer-specific survival: 82.0 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0027; overall survival: 72.0 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0078 in sarcopenic vs. non-sarcopenic patients), whereas the association was not significant in patients aged ≥73.0 years (cancer-specific survival: 76.0 and 75.0 months, respectively, P = 0.7879; overall survival: 67.0 and 52.0 months, respectively, P = 0.7263). Conclusion Sarcopenia was an independent risk factor of cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, especially in younger patients.


ISRN Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma H. Ramahi ◽  
Gregory P. Swanson ◽  
Matthew W. Jackson ◽  
Fei Du ◽  
Joseph W. Basler

Purpose. We performed a retrospective study to determine the outcome of a modern cohort of patients with high-grade (Gleason score ≥ 8) prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or hormone therapy. Methods. We identified 404 patients in the South Texas Veteran’s Healthcare System Tumor Registry diagnosed with high grade prostate cancer between 1998 and 2008. Mean follow-up was years. End points were biochemical failure-free survival, overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. Results. 5-year overall survival for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy was 88.9%, 76.3%, and 58.9%, respectively. 5-year metastasis-free survival for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy was 96.8%, 96.6%, and 88.4%, respectively, and 5-year cancer-specific survival was 97.2%, 100%, and 89.9%, respectively. Patients with a Gleason score of 10 and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen > 20 ng/mL had decreased 5-year biochemical failure-free and cancer-specific survival. Patients with a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen > 20 ng/mL had decreased 5-year overall survival. Discussion. Even for patients with high-grade disease, the outcome is not as dire in the modern era regardless of primary treatment modality chosen. While there is room for improvement, we should not have a nihilistic impression of how these patients will respond to treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16549-e16549
Author(s):  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Mizuki Onozawa ◽  
Shiro Hinotsu ◽  
Masatoshi Eto ◽  
Seiji Naito ◽  
...  

e16549 Background: Although a positive family history is known to increase the risk of morbidity of prostate cancer, little is known about the prognoses with hormone therapy of individuals with familial prostate cancer. Thus, in this study we aimed to determine the associations between hormone therapy and outcomes of a cohort of men with familial prostate cancer from a large community-based multi-institutional Japan-wide registry. Methods: Data of patients with prostate cancer who had received hormone therapy were extracted from a nationwide community-based database established by the Japan Study Group for Prostate Cancer. Family history of prostate cancer was available for 15,873 of these patients, who thus comprised the study cohort. Prognostic variables, including progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival, were compared between men with familial and men with sporadic prostate cancer. Results: A positive family history was identified in 247 patients (1.6%). Patients with a positive family history were younger than those without; however, other clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses were comparable. In subgroup analysis, family history was identified as a significant favorable prognostic factor for progression-free survival among patients treated by castration, as was overall survival among patients with PSA level at diagnosis less than 100 ng/mL and those with low or intermediate J-CAPRA risk. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that familial prostate cancer has an early-onset feature or is diagnosed earlier than sporadic prostate cancer. However, with hormone therapy the prognoses of individuals with familial prostate cancer are comparable to those of individuals with sporadic prostate cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bisheng Cheng ◽  
Shuchao Ye ◽  
Peiming Bai

Abstract Backgrounds At present, the application of tumor reduction surgery in oligometastatic prostate cancer has aroused extensive discussion among urologists, but clinicians have not reached a consensus on this issue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of cytoreductive surgery for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer by meta-analysis. Methods All relevant studies were systematically searched through The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) up to December 2019. All the previous clinical studies on the comparison of long-term efficacy between the cytoreductive surgery group and the endocrine therapy group were included in the search. The included studies were analyzed using Stata ver.14.0. The research has been registered on PROSPERO website with the registration number of crd42021224316. The relevant registration information can be obtained from the website: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero. Results The case presentation is as follows: ten studies were identified that met the conclusion criteria. The total number of samples was 804; 449 patients underwent cytoreductive surgery, and 355 patients underwent endocrine therapy, and we conducted a meta-analysis of studies to compare the prognosis of endocrine therapy and cytoreductive surgery for treating prostate cancer. After all the studies were analyzed, we found that between cytoreductive surgery and endocrine therapy, a significant difference existed in overall survival (HR = 0.635, 95% CI 0.443–0.908, P = 0.013), cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.407, 95% CI 0.243–0.681, P = 0.001), and progression-free survival (HR = 0.489, 95% CI 0.315–0.758, P = 0.001), while there were no significant difference in progresses to castration-resistant prostate cancer (HR = 0.859, 95% CI 0.475–1.554, P = 0.616). Conclusion The cytoreductive surgery held advantages in overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival. Therefore, compared with endocrine therapy, cytoreductive surgery could be a more suitable approach in treating oligometastatic prostate cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592097813
Author(s):  
Pernelle Lavaud ◽  
Clément Dumont ◽  
Constance Thibault ◽  
Laurence Albiges ◽  
Giulia Baciarello ◽  
...  

Until recently, continuing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and closely monitoring patients until evolution towards metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were recommended in men with non-metastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). Because delaying the development of metastases and symptoms in these patients is a major issue, several trials have investigated next-generation androgen receptor (AR) axis inhibitors such as apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide in this setting. This review summarizes the recent advances in the management of nmCRPC, highlighting the favourable impact of next-generation AR inhibitors on metastases-free survival, overall survival and other clinically meaningful endpoints.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vi243 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Xie ◽  
C. Sweeney ◽  
M. Regan ◽  
M. Nakabayashi ◽  
M. Buyse ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mikifumi Koura ◽  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Shohei Ueda ◽  
Takashi Matsumoto ◽  
Satoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective This study aimed to reveal the prognostic values of prior local therapy in first-line therapy using androgen receptor-axis targeting agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) or docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods The study included 303 patients treated with first-line therapy for non-metastatic and metastatic CRPC. The association between prior local therapy and therapeutic outcome including progression-free survival and overall survival was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses as well as propensity score-matched analysis. Results In univariate analysis, local prior therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.79; P = 0.0009). Overall survival, but not progression-free survival, was better among patients with prior local therapy compared with patients without prior local therapy even after multivariate analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusions This study robustly indicated that prior local treatment was prognostic for overall survival among patients with CRPC. This finding is useful to predict patient prognosis in CRPC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 169-169
Author(s):  
Brian Warnecke ◽  
Raissa Lakene Djoufack Djoumessi ◽  
Juan Garza ◽  
Michael Mader ◽  
Shreya Chaudhary ◽  
...  

169 Background: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United States. Death in prostate cancer patients is often related to other medical conditions and not prostate cancer itself. Hence, it is important to optimize other co-morbidities, such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases in these patients. However, there are numerous studies portraying the ability of statins to increase progression free survival and overall survival of prostate cancer. This has led to significant interest of statins having anti-cancer properties and ultimately improving long term outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study with chart review of 1,011 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer from 1995 to 2010 in a VA Hospital in San Antonio, Texas. Variables included age at diagnosis, statin use, type of statin (1st, 2nd, or 3rd generation), dose of statin (4 dosage levels), length of statin use, time followed in months (from diagnosis to death or end of study period), death, cause of death, and time to first progressive disease. Progressive disease was defined using PSWG2 guidelines which is PSA increase > / = 25% and at least 2ng/dl above the nadir. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the hazard function, with age, co-morbities and other cancers used as a covariate. End points were death by prostate cancer (56), death by any cancer (140), and death by all causes (484). We also looked at the effects of statins on progression free survival of prostate cancer. Results: The hazard ratio (HR) for use of statins and death by prostate cancer was 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20-0.62 (p = 0.0003), indicating that statin use has a statistically significant positive effect at delaying death by prostate cancer. Death by any cancer was significantly affected by statins with a HR of 0.47, 95% CI: 0.32-0.65 (p < 0.0001). Death by all causes was also affected significantly by statins with a HR of 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.78 (p < 0.0001). Length of statin use, shorter versus longer than 4 years, showed an inverse association with our primary end point with a HR of 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.69 (p < 0.0001). Dose level of statin, fourth level vs 1, 2, and 3, also showed an inverse association with our primary end point with a HR of 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.94 (p = 0.014). Lastly, statin exposure significantly increased progression-free survival with a HR of 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.95 (p < 0.021). Conclusions: It is clear that concomitant statin use increases overall survival in patients with prostate cancer, potentially even having anti-cancer protective effects against mortality. Longer duration of statin use and higher dose levels of statins increase length of overall survival in patients with prostate cancer. As mortality is often not due to prostate cancer, more interestingly, statin exposure is also shown to increase progression-free survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document