scholarly journals The efficacy of cytoreductive surgery for oligometastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bisheng Cheng ◽  
Shuchao Ye ◽  
Peiming Bai
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Backgrounds At present, the application of tumor reduction surgery in oligometastatic prostate cancer has aroused extensive discussion among urologists, but clinicians have not reached a consensus on this issue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of cytoreductive surgery for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer by meta-analysis. Methods All relevant studies were systematically searched through The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) up to December 2019. All the previous clinical studies on the comparison of long-term efficacy between the cytoreductive surgery group and the endocrine therapy group were included in the search. The included studies were analyzed using Stata ver.14.0. The research has been registered on PROSPERO website with the registration number of crd42021224316. The relevant registration information can be obtained from the website: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero. Results The case presentation is as follows: ten studies were identified that met the conclusion criteria. The total number of samples was 804; 449 patients underwent cytoreductive surgery, and 355 patients underwent endocrine therapy, and we conducted a meta-analysis of studies to compare the prognosis of endocrine therapy and cytoreductive surgery for treating prostate cancer. After all the studies were analyzed, we found that between cytoreductive surgery and endocrine therapy, a significant difference existed in overall survival (HR = 0.635, 95% CI 0.443–0.908, P = 0.013), cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.407, 95% CI 0.243–0.681, P = 0.001), and progression-free survival (HR = 0.489, 95% CI 0.315–0.758, P = 0.001), while there were no significant difference in progresses to castration-resistant prostate cancer (HR = 0.859, 95% CI 0.475–1.554, P = 0.616). Conclusion The cytoreductive surgery held advantages in overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival. Therefore, compared with endocrine therapy, cytoreductive surgery could be a more suitable approach in treating oligometastatic prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of Tumor Length in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Yang Wang ◽  
Yuanzhu Jiang ◽  
Wen Xiao ◽  
Xianbiao Xue ◽  
Xiangwei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Length ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Disease Specific

Abstract Background: In clinical work, it has been increasingly found that the prognosis is still very different even for esophageal cancer (EC) patients with the same TNM stage. Tumor length has been analysed as a possible independent prognostic factor in many studies, but no unanimous conclusion has been reached. Therefore, this review used a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between tumor length and prognosis in EC patients.Methods: A systematic search for relevant articles was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effective measures to estimate the correlation between tumor length and prognosis, including overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, and cancer-specific survival. STATA 15.0 software was used to perform the meta-analysis and the data synthesis.Results: Finally, 41 articles with 28,973 patients were included in our study. The comprehensive statistical results showed that long tumors are an independent prognostic parameter associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR=1.30; 95% CI: 1.21-1.40, p<.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.18-1.61, p<.001) in EC patients. Subgroup analyses also suggested a significant correlation between long tumors and poor OS. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation confirmed the reliability and stability of the results. Similar results were obtained in the analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis showed that long tumors were related to poor OS, DFS, PFS, DSS and CSS in EC patients. Tumor length might be an important predictor of prognosis in EC patients, and it can be used as an independent staging index. Further well-designed and large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence (STOMP): Five-year results of a randomized phase II trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piet Ost ◽  
Dries Reynders ◽  
Karel Decaestecker ◽  
Valerie Fonteyne ◽  
Nicolaas Lumen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

10 Background: Multiple randomized phase II trials suggest that metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) improves progression-free survival, but the majority of trials lack longer follow-up. We present the updated 5-year results from the STOMP-trial. Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, phase II study, asymptomatic PCa patients were eligible in case of a biochemical recurrence following primary PCa treatment with curative intent and presenting with up to 3 extracranial on choline PET-CT and a serum testosterone levels > 50 ng/ml. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either surveillance or MDT of all detected lesions. Randomisation was balanced dynamically on two factors: PSA doubling time (≤3 vs. > 3 months) and nodal vs non-nodal metastases. The primary endpoint was androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival. Castrate resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC) was a secondary endpoint. Tests were performed two-sided; p values less than 0.20 were deemed significant. Results: The 5-year ADT-free survival was 8% for the surveillance group and 34% for the MDT group (Figure 1, hazard ratio 0.57 [80% CI: 0.38-0.84], log-rank p = 0.06). There was no significant difference in effect for the different stratification factors (interaction test). The 5-year CRPC-free survival was 53% for the surveillance group and 76% for the MDT group (hazard ratio 0.62 [80% CI: 0.35−1.09]; log−rank p = 0.27). At a median follow for survival of 5.3 years (IQR 4.3-6.3), the 5-year overall survival was 85%, with 6 out of 14 deaths attributed to prostate cancer. Conclusions: The updated STOMP trial outcomes confirm the earlier reported significant difference in ADT free survival in favor of the MDT group compared to surveillance. Prostate-cancer related mortality is low within the first 5 years of diagnosis of oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01558427.

scholarly journals Prostate cancer patients can benefit from 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor treatment: a meta-analysis

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e9282
Author(s):  
Tuo Deng ◽  
Xueming Lin ◽  
Xiaolu Duan ◽  
Zihao He ◽  
Zhijian Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Reductase Inhibitors ◽  
Online Databases ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Control

Background The efficacy and safety of 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) in treating prostate cancer (PCa) have not been fully determined. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 5ARIs for PCa patients. Methods A comprehensive literature search of online databases was conducted to obtain comparative studies exploring the effectiveness and safety of 5ARIs in treating PCa up to October 2019. Summarized odds ratio s (OR s) or hazard ratio s (HR s) were calculated to compare the outcomes between 5ARI and control groups. Our meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42018109809. Results A total of 2,277 patients from 10 studies were included. No significant difference was found in prostate-specific antigen progression between two groups (OR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.52–1.29], P = 0.40). However, 5ARI treatment significantly reduced the total progression of PCa (OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.48–0.77], P < 0.0001), especially for patients with local (OR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.44–0.73], P < 0.00001) and low-Gleason score (≤7) PCa (OR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.48–0.84], P = 0.002). Additionally, 5ARIs also significantly prolonged the progression-free survival time (HR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.34–0.96], P = 0.04) for PCa patients. No significant difference was found in the occurrence of PCa recurrence, metastasis, biopsy reclassification, and side-effects between two groups. Conclusions Our study suggests that 5ARI treatment can benefit patients with local and low Gleason score (≤7) PCa, especially in delaying the disease progression. More studies with larger sample size and comprehensive study design are still needed to verify our outcomes.

Anthracycline-Containing Regimens for Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma In Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2820-2820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilad Itchaki ◽  
Anat Gafter-Gvili ◽  
Meir Lahav ◽  
Pia Raanani ◽  
Liat Vidal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
Transformation Rate ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 2820 Introduction: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), yet there are no standard guidelines regarding the best chemotherapeutic regimens for its management. The most prevalent regimens, especially in advanced disease, incorporate anthracyclines. There is no proof, however, that they are superior to non-anthracycline containing regimens, or even to single agent therapy. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anthracycline-containing regimens (ACR) to non-anthracycline containing chemotherapy (non-ACR) for adult patients with FL. Trials assessing rituximab or other immunotherapy were included only if the anthracycline was the only difference between study arms. A comprehensive search was conducted with no restrictions, until July 2010. Two reviewers appraised the quality of trials and extracted data. The primary outcome was overall survival. Time to event data was extracted and pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Secondary outcomes included survival at 5 years, disease control defined as progression free survival (PFS) or response duration (RD), transformation rate to aggressive lymphoma, complete remission (CR), overall response (OR), and adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes were pooled using random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 measure of inconsistency. Results: We identified ten trials, conducted between the years 1974–2006 and randomizing 2422 adult patients. Nine trials included naïve patients; one included relapsed and refractory FL patients. Six trials compared between the same chemotherapeutic regimens, with the addition of anthracyclines in the intervention arm as the only difference. There was no statistically significant difference between ACR and non-ACR arms, regarding overall survival at the end of follow up or all cause mortality at five years (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.76 – 1.23 and RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76 – 1.17, respectively, I2=0% for both analyses). PFS and RD favored the ACR arm, with a HR of 0.69, 95% CI 0.51–0.91 for disease control, 3 studies, I2=11%. There was no significant difference with regard to CR and OR, but analyses were heterogeneous. In four out of the ten trials, different chemotherapeutic regimens were compared, and only one study-arm contained anthracyclines. Similar to the results obtained with the same regimens comparison, there was no benefit for ACR with regard to OS (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.77 – 1.15) and mortality at five years (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.84 – 1.16). Disease control was improved with ACR (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.60–0.93). In all studies, there were no data regarding transformation rate to aggressive lymphoma. Toxicity data reported was insufficient for appropriate meta-analysis. Overall, ACR were more often associated with cytopenias, especially neutropenia, although the frequency of serious infections or death related to chemotherapy was similar to non-ACR. Also, alopecia and gastrointestinal side-effects, including nausea and vomiting, were more common with ACR. Cardiotoxicity was reported in five trials, and albeit rare, was associated with anthracycline use (RR 8.62; 95% CI 1.58 to 47.05). Conclusion: The use of anthracyclines in patients with FL has no demonstrable benefit on overall survival. However, ACR improve disease control, as measured by progression free survival and response duration with an increased risk for side effects, notably cardiotoxicity. Disclosures: Shpilberg: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone compared with enzalutamide in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer before or after chemotherapy: A retrospective study of real-world data (ACES).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 303-303
Author(s):  
Prantik Das ◽  
James Price ◽  
Michael Jones ◽  
Cristina Martin-Fernandez ◽  
Akram Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Biochemical Progression

303 Background: Abiraterone acetate (a prodrug of abiraterone, which is a selective inhibitor of androgen biosynthesis) combined with prednisone/prednisolone (AA+P) and enzalutamide (ENZ) (an androgen-receptor–signalling inhibitor) have proven survival benefit in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in chemo naïve and prior chemo patients. There have been no studies directly comparing the effectiveness of ENZ to AA+P in mCRPC patients. Methods: A retrospective, survival analysis study of 143 real world mCRPC patients (90 in AA+P and 53 in ENZ group) was conducted. Patients who started their treatment between 1st February 2012 and 31st May 2016 were included. The primary endpoint was biochemical progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Data was analysed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for covariates: prior radical or palliative treatment; Gleason score; baseline PSA; age; and chemo naïve or not. Results: After median follow up of 15 months (IQR 7 to 23) 112 events of biochemical progression were observed (71 in AA+P and 41 in ENZ). 41%in AA+P group and 30% patients in ENZ group received prior chemo. The chance of biochemical progression was significantly lower among ENZ patients than AA+P patients, when adjusting for all covariates in the Cox PH model (Hazard Ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.82, p=0.004. There was a trend implying the chance of rPFS could be higher among ENZ patients than AA+P patients (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.02, p=0.4). OS is lower among ENZ patients than AA+P patients, when adjusting for all covariates in the Cox PH model (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.41, p=0.7). 38% of ENZ patients reported fatigue compared to 16% of AA+P patients while hypertension was reported slightly more in AA+P patients than in ENZ patients. Conclusions: This study showed a statistically significant difference in biochemical progression-free survival, favouring ENZ, but no significant difference in radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Pre- and Postdocetaxel Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Trial-Level Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Fang ◽  
Mary Nakazawa ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Chun Li
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Method Approach

We examined the comparative efficacies of first-line abiraterone and enzalutamide in pre- and postdocetaxel settings in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) through a trial level meta-analysis. A mixed method approach was applied to 19 unique studies containing 17 median overall survival (OS) estimates and 13 median radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) estimates. We employed a random-effects meta-analysis to compare efficacies of abiraterone and enzalutamide with respect to OS and PFS. In the predocetaxel setting, enzalutamide use was associated with an increase in median OS of 5.9 months (p<0.001), hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, and an increase in median PFS of 8.3 months (p<0.001), HR = 0.47 compared to abiraterone. The advantage of enzalutamide improved after adjusting for baseline Gleason score to 19.5 months (p<0.001) and 14.6 months (p<0.001) in median OS and PFS, respectively. In the postdocetaxel setting, the advantage of enzalutamide use was nominally significant for median PFS (1.2 months p=0.02 without adjustment and 2.2 months and p=0.0007 after adjustment); there was no significant difference in median OS between the two agents. The results from this comprehensive meta-analysis suggest a survival advantage with the use of first-line enzalutamide over abiraterone in CRPC and highlight the need for prospective clinical trials.

Family history in primary hormone therapy for prostate cancer from a community-based multi-institutional Japan-wide database.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16549-e16549
Author(s):  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Mizuki Onozawa ◽  
Shiro Hinotsu ◽  
Masatoshi Eto ◽  
Seiji Naito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Family History ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Positive Family History ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival

e16549 Background: Although a positive family history is known to increase the risk of morbidity of prostate cancer, little is known about the prognoses with hormone therapy of individuals with familial prostate cancer. Thus, in this study we aimed to determine the associations between hormone therapy and outcomes of a cohort of men with familial prostate cancer from a large community-based multi-institutional Japan-wide registry. Methods: Data of patients with prostate cancer who had received hormone therapy were extracted from a nationwide community-based database established by the Japan Study Group for Prostate Cancer. Family history of prostate cancer was available for 15,873 of these patients, who thus comprised the study cohort. Prognostic variables, including progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival, were compared between men with familial and men with sporadic prostate cancer. Results: A positive family history was identified in 247 patients (1.6%). Patients with a positive family history were younger than those without; however, other clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses were comparable. In subgroup analysis, family history was identified as a significant favorable prognostic factor for progression-free survival among patients treated by castration, as was overall survival among patients with PSA level at diagnosis less than 100 ng/mL and those with low or intermediate J-CAPRA risk. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that familial prostate cancer has an early-onset feature or is diagnosed earlier than sporadic prostate cancer. However, with hormone therapy the prognoses of individuals with familial prostate cancer are comparable to those of individuals with sporadic prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Nilutamide in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer who Underwent Orchiectomy: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammed Rashid ◽  
K. Shamshavali ◽  
Manik Chhabra
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival

Background: Prostate cancer is the sixth leading cause of death, among all cancer deaths By 2030, this burden is expected to increase with 1.7 million new cases and 499,000 new deaths. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nilutamide in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients who underwent orchiectomy. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in the Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Library. References from included studies and studies from clinicaltrials.gov were explored without language and date restrictions. We included only randomized controlled trials, comparing the safety and efficacy of Nilutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer (mPCa) patients who underwent orchiectomy with placebo. The outcomes of concerns were survival and the response of drug and safety.. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Two authors were independently involved in the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. Disagreements between the two reviewers were resolved by consulting a third reviewer. Results: A total of five out of 244 studies were included in meta-analysis involving1637 participants. Nilutamide group showed improved response rate (RR=1.77, 95%CI 1.46-2.14, p<0.00001), disease progression (RR=0.59, 95%CI 0.47-0.73, p<0.00001), complete response (RR=2.13, 95%CI 1.40-3.23, p=0.003) and clinical benefit (RR=1.23, 95%CI 1.13-1.34, p<0.00001) when compared to placebo; however, stable disease favored the control group (RR=0.80, 95%CI 0.68-0.94, p=0.007). In addition, patients on Nilutamide showed prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival. Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events reported in Nilutamide group. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that patients with mPCa who underwent orchiectomy receiving Nilutamide showed significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival response rate and clinical benefits in comparison with the placebo group.

scholarly journals Prognostic impact of tumor length in esophageal Cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Yang Wang ◽  
Yuan Zhu Jiang ◽  
Wen Xiao ◽  
Xian Biao Xue ◽  
Xiang Wei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Length ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Disease Specific

Abstract Background In clinical studies, it has been observed that esophageal cancer (EC) patient prognosis can be very different even for those patients with tumors of the same TNM stage. Tumor length has been analysed as a possible independent prognostic factor in many studies, but no unanimous conclusion has been reached. Therefore, this review used a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between tumor length and prognosis in EC patients. Methods A systematic search for relevant articles was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effective measures to estimate the correlation between tumor length and prognosis, including overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, and cancer-specific survival. STATA 15.0 software was used to perform the meta-analysis and the data synthesis. Results Finally, 41 articles with 28,973 patients were included in our study. The comprehensive statistical results showed that long tumors are an independent prognostic parameter associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.21–1.40, p < .001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.18–1.61, p < .001) in EC patients. Subgroup analyses also suggested a significant correlation between long tumors and poor OS. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation confirmed the reliability and stability of the results. Similar results were obtained in the analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis showed that long tumors were related to poor OS, DFS, PFS, DSS and CSS in EC patients. Tumor length might be an important predictor of prognosis in EC patients, and it can be used as an independent staging index. Further well-designed and large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival of CDK 4/6 Inhibitors Plus Endocrine Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 6400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Piezzo ◽  
Paolo Chiodini ◽  
Maria Riemma ◽  
Stefania Cocco ◽  
Roberta Caputo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Sites

The introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) represents the most relevant advance in the management of hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer over the last few years. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is aimed to better characterize the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in some relevant subgroups and to test heterogeneity between different compounds with a particular focus on their ability to improve overall survival (OS). Pooled estimates of hazard ratios (HRs) were computed for progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and objective response rate (ORR) analysis in predefined subgroups to better understand treatment effect concerning specific patients’ characteristics. To estimate the absolute benefit in terms of PFS, pooled survival curves were generated by pooling the data of all trials. A total of eight RCTs were included. Adding a CDK4/6 inhibitor to ET is beneficial in terms of PFS, irrespective of the presence or not of visceral metastases, the number of metastatic sites, and the length of the treatment-free interval (TFI). The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors produces a significant OS improvement, both in aromatase inhibitor (AI)-sensitive (HR 0.75, 95% CI) and AI-resistant patients (HR 0.77, 95% CI [0.67–0.89]). Pooled data from each single drug show that palbociclib remains the only class member not showing a statistically significant HR for OS (HR 0.83, 95% CI [0.68–1.02]).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document