scholarly journals Nutritional risk patients management in a stroke reference center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliz Garcia Ferreira ◽  
Jamille Karolyne da Conceição ◽  
Ana Paula de Mello

Introduction: Nutritional screening should be used as a tool nutritional risk early identification, aiming at intervention for the prevention of malnutrition and rehabilitation. Objectives: Report nutritional risk management protocol in patients admitted for suspected stroke. Methodology: Experience report on the working method of nutrition team at a stroke reference center. Results: Nutrition screening by a Dietist is applied within 72 hours of admission of all patients admitted to the acute/integral stroke unit. First, NRS-2002 tool is applied, in which the following items are considered: BMI < 20.5Kg/m²; weight loss in the past three months; reduction in food intake in the last week; metabolic stress and age (≥70 years old). Those with a speech-language diagnosis of dysphagia are also considered at nutritional risk. After, anthropometric measurements: weight and height are measured with walking patients, or knee height, brachial and calf circumference of those with cognitive and/or motor disabilities. Individualized nutritional therapy (oral/enteral) is prescribed. In addition, cases are discussed in a multiprofessional daily round to define actions during rehabilitation and in the discharge process (conter- referral to primary care, nutrition advice and continuity of nutritional therapy at home). Conclusions: Establishing a nutritional risk management protocol is important for early identification in post-stroke patients, since nutritional status is directly related to a good prognosis and long-term quality of life.

Author(s):  
Angelika Beirer

Summary Background The prevalence of malnutrition in cancer patients ranges from about 20% to more than 70%. However, 10–20% of cancer patients’ deaths are related to malnutrition, not the malignancy itself. To reverse the pattern of weight loss, improve the patients’ quality of life, reduce the treatment toxicity, the psychological stress and the risk of mortality, the diagnosis of malnutrition should be made as early as possible to facilitate the best possible treatment. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted following guidelines of ESPEN (European Society for Clinical Nutrition), DGEM (German Society for Nutritional Medicine) and ASPEN (American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition). Results and conclusion To assess the risk of malnutrition, all cancer patients should be screened regularly with a valid screening tool (e.g., MUST [Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool], NRS [Nutritional Risk Screening] or PG-SGA [Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment]). If risk of malnutrition is present, adequate nutritional therapy is recommended to stop involuntary weight loss. Patients should engage in exercise to maintain and improve muscle mass, strength and function. They should be offered regular dietetic counselling, and their muscle depletion should be monitored by determining fat-free mass. As cachectic patients in particular are at risk, the presence of cachexia should also be recognized at an early stage. Three consensus-based definitions are widely accepted: Fearon et al. and the EPCRC (European Palliative Care Research Collaborative) propose definitions specifically for cancer cachexia, while Evans et al. put forward a definition for cachexia associated with all types of underlying chronic diseases. However, if there is a cancer cachexia diagnosis, additional pharmacological and psychological treatment should be considered.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabela Bernasconi JOSÉ ◽  
Vânia Aparecida LEANDRO-MERHI ◽  
José Luis Braga de AQUINO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Enteral nutritional therapy (ENT) is the best route for the nutrition of critically ill patients with improved impact on the clinical treatment of such patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the energy and protein supply of ENT in critically ill in-patients of an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). METHODS: Prospective longitudinal study conducted with 82 critically ill in-patients of an ICU, receiving ENT. Anthropometric variables, laboratory tests (albumin, CRP, CRP/albumin ratio), NUTRIC-score and Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), energy and protein goals, and the inadequacies and complications of ENT were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square or Fischer tests and the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: A total of 48.78% patients were at high nutritional risk based on NUTRIC score. In the CRP/albumin ratio, 85.37% patients presented with a high risk of complications. There was a statistically significant difference (P<0.0001) for all comparisons made between the target, prescription and ENT infusion, and 72% of the quantities prescribed for both calories and proteins was infused. It was observed that the difference between the prescription and the infusion was 14.63% (±10.81) for calories and 14.21% (±10.5) for proteins, with statistically significant difference (P<0.0001). In the relationship between prescription and infusion of calories and proteins, the only significant association was that of patients at high risk of CRP/albumin ratio, of which almost 94% received less than 80% of the energy and protein volume prescribed (P=0.0111). CONCLUSION: The administration of ENT in severely ill patients does not meet their actual energy and protein needs. The high occurrence of infusion inadequacies, compared to prescription and to the goals set can generate a negative nutritional balance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. Bucy ◽  
Kaitlyn A. Hanisko ◽  
Lee A. Kamphuis ◽  
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu ◽  
Theodore J. Iwashyna ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline POHL ep OUDIN ◽  
Patricia Sermande ◽  
Evelyne Lenormand ◽  
Johan Bardil ◽  
Ingrid Marianne

ObjectiveTo investigate the bacteraemia increase in haemodialysis sector based on data from specific dialysis nosocomial infections national network surveillance (DIALIN) and through an Association of Litigation and Risk Management protocol (ALARM).IntroductionIn 2017, the dialysis centre of East Reunion Hospital Group (ERHG) based in Saint-Benoit highlighted an increase in bacteraemia’s rates. It was a significant rising compared to previous years. Indeed, ERHG is participating since 2013 to the France haemodialysis infections network surveillance (DIALIN)[1], created in 2005 and that is allowing assessing bacteraemia. DIALIN is a multicentre prospective permanent survey that has followed six voluntary centres in 2005 and forty-two in 2016. Objectives of this network are firstly to produce data about acquired infections in haemodialysis sector such as infection incidence rate and standardized ratios allowing centres to compare themselves and, secondly, to improve the quality of care .The current study describe how a root cause analysis has been conducted through the ALARM risk assessment methodology to set up action plans and to reduce the phenomenon[2][3]MethodsFive years (2013-2017) of ERHG haemodialysis data were obtained from the haemodialysis infections national network surveillance (DIALIN).To investigate and to analyse clinical incidents, the French National Authority for Health (HAS)[2] recommends the use of an Association of Litigation And Risk Management (ALARM) protocol. It is a powerful method for the investigation and analysis of serious incidents by risks managers [4]. Well established in industries sectors, the ALARM method of investigation is well introduced in French healthcare system since the last ten years. It was used to provide root cause analysis of this phenomenon.Individual’s risk factors of each patients (endogenous factors) have been analysed but these risks were identical every year. Thus, we focused on elements different in 2017 from previous years (exogenous factors). We practised audits about hand hygiene, standard precautions, catheter connection and disconnection practices.Our investigations covered several domains of risks or contributary factors such as patient, professional workers, teams, clinical practices protocols, technical and organisational context, care management and Hospital regional health policy.ResultsData from DIALIN pointed out that the ERHG bacteraemia’s rate was similar or lower to the national network until 2016 (n= 0 in 2016 or 1 in 2015 bacteraemia per year only in catheter's access vascular). No infections nor bacteraemia on fistula were noted as showned on figure 1 and figure 2.In 2016, there were 68 haemodialysis chronic patients, 8996 dialysis sessions and incidence of all infections was 0.11 over 1000 sessions.In 2017, there were 84 haemodialysis chronic patients,10377 dialysis sessions and incidence of all infections is 0.77 over 1000 sessions. Bacteraemia’s rate was higher than national network and ERHG previous years.The analysis of potential causes by ALARM method gave us different explanations. First of all, an increase of dialysis sessions and patients number could explain the increase. Then, this method allowed us to highlight a lower hand hygiene indicator for the service and an equipment issue. A batch of extra-corporal-circuit line was defective and a national withdrawal of any batch was initiated thanks to the ERHG. Secondary, the human factors like recruitment of new members with non-compliance of internal processes, management and human resources issues, under stress work conditions, bad working atmosphere, communication issues between haemodialysis professional workers, contributed to the bacteraemia increase. The investigations had also highlighted a misuse of antiseptic serving to catheter 's connection and disconnection process. Some nurses did not respect the activity time of antiseptic and others nurses splashed the antiseptic instead of cleaned with a sterile wipe.Responses have been taken to stop this issue including the cooperation of healthcare team with the support of hygiene expert team. Nevertheless, because of the multiplicity of risk factors and identified roots causes, the phenomenon has not been stop promptly. Despite a slowdown, the phenomenon persists in 2018. Actions have been decided to standardize practices, to work in pairs, and to improve hand hygiene. News equipments and an other antiseptic following national guidelines ( alcoholic chlorhexidin 2%) were chosen by a multidisciplinary team.ConclusionsBacteraemia for dialysis patients might evolve towards serious complications as endocarditis or death in worth cases. During this period, no deaths nor endocarditis linked to bacteraemia have been revealed. The use of a risk management protocol derived from the industry allowed finding roots causes and set up actions plans to solve the phenomenon. ERHG participation to the DIALIN surveillance is continuing.References1.CPIAS, Auvergne Rhône Alpes. Annual report DIALIN ; 2016.2.HAS, Gestion des risques, Grille ALARM. JAM, N°14 août/septembre/octobre ; 2010.3.Reason JT.Human error.New york:Cambridge University Press;1990.4.Vincent C., Taylor-Adams S., Chapman E.J., Hewett D., Prior S., Strange P.,Tizzar A.How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: clinical Risk Unit and Association of Litigation and Risk Management protocol.BMJ.2000 Mar 18:320(7237):777-781 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document