Readerly Fanaticism
Chapter 3 provides a case study for what the poets of fanaticism were resisting: polemics that foreclosed rather than dwelled within the questions opened up by fanaticism. The greatest Renaissance philosopher of state sovereignty, Hobbes took fanaticism to be the constant threat at the “outworks” of his theory of the state and human personhood—a threat that needed to be destroyed by state violence. Hobbes offered a new concept of fanaticism as a product of passionate reading and cognitive breakdown in order to drain both religious value and political significance from beliefs that do not encourage obedience to the state. In contrast to Donne, Hobbes reinterpreted Samson and Christ to exclude religious justifications of rebellion or self-sacrifice. Yet Hobbes’s battle against the fanatics led him into a supreme difficulty: his belief in self-preservation as the foundation of both human being and natural law made it impossible for him to see Jesus as anything but a self-annihilating fanatic.