„Мировая русистика” в журналe «Русский язык за рубежом» - специальные выпуски

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (24 A) ◽  
pp. 183-199
Author(s):  
Halina Uchto
Keyword(s):  
International Association ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
State University ◽  
Language And Literature ◽  
Moscow State University ◽  
The Russian Language

The present paper aims to detail the profile of the scientific-didactic illustrated journal “Russian Language Abroad”, established by International Association of the Russian Language and Literature Teachers and State Russian Language Institute and set in Lomonosov Moscow State University. A new project carried out by Pushkin State Russian Language Institute in Moscow involves a compilation of special issues of “Russian Language Abroad” under the title “Russian Studies Worldwide”.

scholarly journals Results of the international project on publishing the works of Gertsel’ Shklyar

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-268
Author(s):  
Galina D. Neganova ◽  
Veranika N. Kurcova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
International Project ◽  
State University ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Pedagogic Institute ◽  
Language And Literature ◽  
Card Index ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
The Russian Language ◽  
Russian Dictionary

At late December 2017, in pursuance of the previously concluded international agreement on cooperation between Kostroma State University and the Centre for Research of Belarusian Culture, Language and Literature of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, a three-year work plan was approved. It included a project aimed at systematisation, scientific interpretation and preparation for publication of the heritage of Gertsel Shklyar, a talented linguist who, in the mid-20th century, contributed a lot to Belarusian linguistics, Russian linguistics, hebraistics. In the course of the project, previously unknown facts of Gertsel’ Shklyar’s biography, summary of the results of his scientific activities during his work at the Belarusian Academy of Sciences (the 1930s) and Kostroma Pedagogic Institute (the 1940s–60s) were disclosed. The linguistic scientist worked actively in the field of Belarusian studies – he participated in the compilation of the Belarusian-Russian and Russian-Belarusian dictionaries, studied Polonisms in the Belarusian language, worked on amending the existing Belarusian-language spelling, on the creation of university textbooks on the modern Belarusian language. Together with Sof’ya Rokhkind, he created the USSR’s first “Yiddish-Russian Dictionary (Jewish-Russian Dictionary)ˮ. Research in the field of the Russian language was mainly dialectological. Gertsel’ Shklyar laid the foundations for the card index of Kostroma regional dictionary. The article examines the results of the international project, highlights the events dedicated to the presentation of the book of selected works by Gertsel’ Shklyar.

scholarly journals Лінгво-психологічна характеристика прикметників та проблема їх лексикографічного опису

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-133
Author(s):  
Маргарита Жуйкова
Keyword(s):  
Naukova Dumka ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
State University ◽  
Moscow State University ◽  
The Russian Language

У семантиці багатьох прикметників – слів, що характеризують різні властивості предметів, значне місце належить ознакам, які людина отримує через органи сприйняття. У психолінгвістичному дослідженні, проведеному з носіями російської мови, була виявлена значна група іменників (більше ніж 7,6 тисяч одиниць), які безпосередньо пов’язані з тим чи тим відчуттям (слухом, зором, нюхом, смаком чи дотиком). Серед них близько 100 прикметників, на думку опитаних, називають такі ознаки, які мовці сприймають на дотик (температурні параметри предметів, фактура їхньої поверхні, консистенція, наявність чи відсутність вологи тощо). Мета нашого дослідження полягає у виявленні кореляцій між даними, які було отримано в психолінгвістичному експерименті, та лексикографічному описі відповідних прикметників, здійсненому традиційними лінгвістичними прийомами. Ми залучали інформацію переважно із різних словників російської мови, доповнюючи її даними із лексикографічних джерел англійської, української, польської та італійської мов. Докладно обстежено тлумачення прикметників двох груп: з семантикою температури та семантикою фактури поверхні. Загальний висновок полягає в тому, що лексикографи здебільшого ігнорують згадку про канал перцептивної інформації, часто використовуючи в тлумаченнях синоніми чи внутрішні відсилки. Це робить лексикографічний опис прикметників малоінформативним, не відбиває психолінгвальної реальності, не дає уявлення про ту значну роль, яка належить перцептивному компоненту в семантичному навантаженні прикметників. Література References Величковский Б. М., Зинченко В. П., Лурия А. Р. Психология восприятия. Москва: Из-во МГУ, 1973. Кузнецов А.М. Некоторые теоретические проблемы семантики последних десятилетий // Лингвистические исследования в конце ХХ века: Сб. обзоров. Москва, 2000. С. 173–185.Колбенева М. Г., Александров Ю. И. Органы чувств, эмоции и прилагательные русского языка: Лингво-психологический словарь. Москва: Языки славянских культур, 2010. Лаенко Л. В. Перцептивный признак как объект номинации. Воронеж : Воронеж. гос. ун-т, 2005. Селиверстова О. Н. Роль информантов в процессе семантических исследований // Психолингвистические проблемы семантики / Отв. ред. А. А. Леонтьев и А. М. Шах­нарович. Москва: Наука, 1983. С. 256-267. References (translated and transliterated) Velichkovskiy, B. M., Zinchenko, V. P., Luriya, A. R. (1973). Psihologiya Vospriyatiya [Psychology of Perception]. Moscow: Moscow State University. Kolbeneva, M. G., Aleksandrov, Yu. I. (2010). Organy chuvstv, emocii i prilagatelnye russkogo yazyka: Lingvo-Psihologicheskij Slovar [Organs of Senses, Emotions and Adjectives of the Russian Language]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskih kultur. Kuznecov, A.M. (2000). Nekotorye teoreticheskie problemy semantiki poslednih desyatiletiy [Some theoretical problems of semantics of recent decades]. Lingvisticheskie Issledovaniya v Kontse ХХ Veka. Moscow, 173-185. Layenko, L. V. (2005). Perceptivny Priznak kak Obyekt Nominatsii [Perception Feature as an Object of Nomination]. Voronezh: Voronezh State University. Seliverstova, O. N. (1983). Rol’ informantov v processe semanticheskikh issledovanij [The informants’ role in the process of semantic study]. In: Psiholingvisticheskiye Problemy Semantiki, (pp. 256-267). A. A. Leontyev, A. M. Shahnarovich, (Eds.). Moscow: Nauka Джерела АСРЯ – Активный словарь русского языка. Отв. ред. акад. Ю. Д. Апресян. М.: Языки славянской культуры. Т. 1, 2014. Т. 2, 2014. БАС – Словарь современного русского литературного языка в 17 т. М. – Л.: Из-во АН СССР, 1950-1967. Дм. – Толковый словарь русского языка под ред. Д. Дмитриева. М.: Астрель. 2003. Ефр. – Ефремова Т.Ф. Новый словарь русского языка: Толково-словообразовательный. М.: Русский язык, 2000. Т. 1: А-О., Т. 2: П-Я. Режим доступа: http://efremova-online.ru/ МАС – Словарь русского языка. В 4-х томах / Под ред. А.П. Евгеньевой. М. : Русский язык, 1985-1988. САР – Словарь Академии Российской, по азбучному порядку расположенный. В 6-и частях. СПб., 1806-1822. СУМ – Словник української мови : в 11-ти т. К. : Наукова думка, 1970-1980. ОШ – Ожегов С. И., Шведова Н. Ю. Толковый словарь русского языка: 4-е изд., дополн. М.: ООО «А Темп», 2006. Collins – The Collins English Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.collinsdictionary.com Dorosz. – Słownik języka polskiego pod red. W. Doroszewskiego. Retrieved from: http://sjp.pwn.pl/doroszewski/lista Hornby – Hornby A. S. The Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. V. 1, 2. М.: Рус. язык, 1982. Longman – The Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Retrieved from https://www.ldoceonline.com/ Zing – Zingarelli, Nicola. Vocabolario della lingua italiana: decima edicione. Bologna, 1973. Sources Slovar sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka v 17 t. (1950—1967) M. L.: Iz-vo       AN SSSR,Aktivnyj slovar russkogo yazyka. (2014). Yu. D. Apresyan, Ed. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoj kultury. V. 1, V. 2. Tolkovyj slovar russkogo yazyka. (2003). D. Dmitriev, Ed. Moscow: Astrel. Efremova T.F. (2000). Novyj slovar russkogo yazyka: Tolkovo-slovoobrazovatelnyj. Moscow: Russkiy Yazyk, 2000. T. 1: A-O. T. 2: P-Ya Slovar russkogo yazyka. (1985-1988). V 4-h tomah. A.P. Evgeneva, Ed. Moscow: Russkij Yazyk. Slovar Akademii Rossijskoj, po azbuchnomu poryadku raspolozhennyj. (1806—1822). 6 Vo­lumes. S.-Petersburg. Slovnyk ukrayinskoyi movy (1970-1980). 11 Volumes. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. (2006). Tolkovyj slovar russkogo yazyka: 4-e izd., dopoln. Moscow: A Temp Ltd. Collins – The Collins English Dictionary. Retrieved from: http://www.collinsdictionary.com Dorosz. – Słownik języka polskiego pod red. W. Doroszewskiego. Retrieved from: http://sjp.pwn.pl/doroszewski/lista Hornby — Hornby A. S. (1982). The Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. V. 1, 2. Moscow: Rysskiy Yazyk. Longman – The Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Retrieved from: https://www.ldoceonline.com/ Zing – Zingarelli, N. (1973). Vocabolario della lingua italiana: decima edicione. Bologna.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF DOCUMENTARY FILM IN TEACHING RUSSIAN

2019 ◽  
pp. 52-61
Author(s):  
Mexriniso YARMATOVA ◽  
Shokhida TURAEVA
Keyword(s):  
Documentary Film ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Documentary Films ◽  
State University ◽  
Visual Aids ◽  
Language And Literature ◽  
Language Classes ◽  
Economic Institute

Visual aids play active role in teaching Russian language because they enable students learning the language in better way, giving them opportunity to realize the topic much more as today’s effective method. This paper highlights some ideas of scholars’ for the use of visual aids (e.g., animation videos, documentary films), and an experiment carried out with the staff at the Department of Uzbek and Russian languages, Karshi Engineering-Economic institute as well as with the professor-teachers at the Department of Russian language and literature, Karshi State university, Karshi, Uzbekistan, in order to find out their attitudes according to the use of documentary films in Russian language classes. The findings are shown in the below-mentioned diagram. Рус тилини ўқитишда кўргазмали қўлланмалар самарали замонавий методлардан бири бўлиб, ўқувчиларга тилни мукаммал ўрганишга, мавзуни чуқурроқ англашга ёрдам беради. Мақолада, олимларнинг кўргазмали қўлланмалардан фойдаланишига бўлган муносабатлари ҳақида айрим фикрлари келтирилган(масалан, анимацион виделроликлар, ҳужжатлифильмлар), ҳамда рус тили дарсларида ҳужжатли фильмлардан фойдаланишга бўлган муносабатларини ўрганишда Қарши мухандислик-иқтисодиёт институтининг “Ўзбек ва рус тиллари” кафедрасида, ҳамда Қарши Давлат университетининг “Рус тили ва адабиёти”кафедрасидаги профессор-ўқитувчилар билан сўровнома ўтказилди, Қарши Ўзбекистон Олинган натижалар қуйидагидиаграммада келтирилган. Наглядные пособия играют важную роль в обучении русскому языку, так как они помогают учащимся лучше изучать язык, даютим возможность лучше осознать тему. В статье приводятся мненияпреподавателей и ученых в отношении использования наглядных пособий (например, анимационных видеороликов, документальных фильмов), а также описывается эксперимент, проведенный преподавателями кафедры узбекского и русского языков Каршинского инженерно-экономического института и кафедры русского языка и литературы Каршинского государственного университета для выяснения их отношения к использованию документальных фильмов на занятиях по русскому языку. Полученные результаты показаны на диаграмме.

scholarly journals Принципы построения русско-польского словаря разговорной речи

2018 ◽  
Vol 165 ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Dorota Drużyłowska
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
International Project ◽  
State University ◽  
Colloquial Language ◽  
Initial Work ◽  
The University ◽  
Colloquial Speech ◽  
Crucial Part ◽  
The Russian Language

Principles of Formation of the Russian-Polish Dictionary of Colloquial LanguageThis paper is the result of the initial work on a project aimed to develop Russian-Polish dictionary of colloquial language.The work on the dictionary started in 2015 as part of an international project run by the Centre of the Russian Language at the Institute of Slavic Studies at The University of Wroclaw, as well as the State University of St. Petersburg. Both lecturers and the graduate and post-graduate students formed the lexicographical group.The main purpose of the article is to define the meaning of colloquial language in every­day communication, regarding the changes that have occurred in recent decades at the lexical and phraseological level of the language. The author also presents and analyses the variety of this level of the Russian language. Moreover, the objective factors to develop Russian-Polish dictionary of colloquial speech are named. The crucial part of the article is devoted to the presentation of the microstructure of the dictionary. The author presents exemplary dictionary entries and discusses their particular elements.Zasady budowy rosyjsko-polskiego słownika języka potocznegoNiniejszy artykuł jest wynikiem wstępnej realizacji międzynarodowego projektu leksykograficznego zmierzającego do opracowania rosyjsko-polskiego słownika mowy potocznej.Pracę nad słownikiem rozpoczęto w 2015 roku w ramach międzynarodowego projektu Cen­trum Języka Rosyjskiego Instytutu Filologii Słowiańskiej Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego oraz Pań­stwowego Uniwersytetu w Petersburgu. W skład zespołu leksykograficznego weszli zarówno wy­kładowcy, jak i doktoranci oraz studenci IFS.Celem artykułu jest przede wszystkim określenie miejsca języka potocznego w codziennej ko­munikacji, zwrócenie uwagi na zmiany, jakie zaszły w ostatnich dziesięcioleciach na płaszczyźnie leksykalnej i frazeologicznej tej odmiany języka, i omówienie obiektywnych czynników przema­wiających za podjęciem pracy nad wspomnianym słownikiem.Drugą część artykułu poświęcono prezentacji wybranych artykułów hasłowych.

scholarly journals Еміль Балецький - дослідник закарпатських українських говорів (другий етап наукової діяльності) До 100-річчя від дня народження

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26
Author(s):  
ЄЛИЗАВЕТА БАРАНЬ
Keyword(s):  
Assistant Professor ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
State University ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Slavonic Language ◽  
History Of ◽  
University Of Budapest ◽  
The University ◽  
The Russian Language

Emil Baleczky (his pseudonyms: E. Latorchanin, O. Vyshchak, and his cryptonym: E. A.) is one of the most prominent personalities in the history of Ukrainian studies in Hungary in the twentieth century. His main scientific interests include Transcarpathian dialectology and historical lexicology of the Ukrainian language. The second stage of the scientist's professional carrier is connected with the University of Budapest, where in 1951, Emil Baleczky was appointed head of the Department of the Russian Language at the Institute of Foreign Languages, and at the same time assistant professor of the Russian Institute at the University. Among the scientific interests of Emil Baleczky was the investigation of lexical units commonly used in Transcarpathia, first of all, in terms of their etymology. Among the achievements of the researcher, special attention must be paid to Emil Baleczky's attempt to determine the origin of some borrowed words, including those originally Slavic, which are common in the Carpathian Ukrainian dialects. Emil Baleczky performed a deep etymological and lingual-geographical analysis of the word урик, урюк, орек in the Ukrainian language, that of the word дюг widespread in Precarpathian Ukrainian, Polish, and Slovakian dialects, and also that of the noun kert in Transcarpathian Ukrainian dialects. The author devoted a separate paper to the study of the origin of dialecticisms like фотляк, csulka ~ csurka, бôшн’ак, булґар’, валах, ґириґ, тôўт, and циганин, investigated the etymology of the terms of national dishes widespread in Carpathian Ukrainian dialects, in particular of the token бáник. He considered the role of the Old Church Slavonic language in the history of the Carpathian Ukrainian dialects. According to his contemporaries, it is known that Emil Baleczky did not maintain official connections with the Soviet Transcarpathians but was surprisingly well-informed about the scientific processes in his native land. He analyzed the works contained in the two editions of the Dialectological Collection of Uzhgorod State University. In addition to examining the issues raised, Baleczky complemented, specified, and sometimes criticized the achievements of his colleagues, which indicates his deep knowledge of Transcarpathian Ukrainian dialectology. Thus, we can state that Emil Baleczky's works testify the high professionalism of the author, his profound knowledge in the field of synchronic and diachronic dialectology. The love of Transcarpathian dialects inspired the researcher to study them thoroughly as well as to present the research results to the general public of Slavists. The main area of Emil Baleczky's scientific interest until the end of his life was Ukrainian linguistics, particularly Transcarpathian Ukrainian dialectology. The aim of this paper is to present the Emil Baleczky's achievements in the field of Transcarpathian Ukrainian dialectology, focusing on the period from 1957 to 1979.

scholarly journals Nouns Formed with -ism Suffix as a Type of Nominalization in Modern Russian Language

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-124
Author(s):  
Zhang Shuchun ◽  
Olga V. Kukushkina
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
State University ◽  
European Languages ◽  
Syntactic Function ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Syntactic Derivation ◽  
Moscow State University ◽  
Modern Russian

In the article Russian nouns formed with -ism suffix, often containing borrowed roots from other Indo-European languages, are analyzed from the perspective of their syntactic function as nominalization. As nominalization regarded in linguistics as a type of pure syntactic transformation (or “syntactic derivation” according to the definition of Jerzy Kuryłowicz), the -ost’ suffix as a word-formational formant for syntactic derivation is well acknowledged and described. As a contrast, the studied group of nouns with -ism suffix is seldom associated with or regarded as deadjectival nominals in previous works and dictionaries. Our analysis based on explanatory and morpheme dictionaries has shown, the motivational correlation between nouns with -ism suffix and adjectives are described in multiple ways, often contrasted one another. For instance, -isms are described in the morpheme dictionary (Lopantin, Ulukhanov 2016) as deadjectival nouns, while in the Shvedova dictionary as non-derivatives, motivating adjectives of quality. In addition, the seme ‘quality’ is also described variously in the two dictionaries – directly or using synonyms with different formants. The analysis of word-usages of -isms was conducted with the corpus “Russian Newspapers of the End of the XX Century”, developed by the Laboratory for General and Computational Lexicology and Lexicography (Lomonosov Moscow State University). The analysis has shown that the diagnostic context automatically differentiate the usage of -isms as nominalizations are the dependent names of the “feature carrier”, which as a result of nominalization has been moved from the position of subject to a dependent attribute.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document