Crystal Diagnostics Xpress™ LM Kit for the Rapid Detection of Listeria monocytogenes from Environmental Surfaces

2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-175
Author(s):  
Curtis H Stumpf ◽  
Brian Bullard ◽  
Weidong Zhoa ◽  
Stephanie Kuzenko-Hentosh ◽  
Gary D Niehaus
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Ceramic Tile ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Rapid Screening ◽  
Bacterial Strains ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Low Concentrations ◽  
Low Levels

Abstract The Crystal Diagnostics (CDx) Xpress™ LM kit is used for rapid screening of low concentrations of Listeria monocytogenes on environmental surfaces such as stainless steel, plastic, and ceramic tile. In addition to the Xpress LM kit, the CDx Xpress System comprises an automatic Xpress Reader,a BioCassette™ that incorporates antibody-coupled microspheres, and liquid crystal for selective identification of the intended microbe. All 56 of the 56 tested L. monocytogenes strains evaluated were detected, and 50 of the 50 nontarget bacterial strains were excluded when the test was conducted under the described kit conditions. Shelf-life testing of the antibody-coated microspheres and other CDx consumables indicated that all materials were stable for a minimum of 6 months (ongoing), and lot-to-lot testing demonstrated no significant differences among lots. The internal and independent laboratory tests on stainless steel, plastic, and ceramic tile surfa es demonstrated that the method is equivalent to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reference method, and there were no significant differences between the CDx Xpress LM kit presumptive and confirmed results for any of the matrixes. Overall, the CDx Xpress LM kit is one of the fastest to provide the sensitivity and specificity equivalent to the USDA reference method in screening low levels of L. monocytogenes surface contamination and, when combined with chromogenic culturing of presumptive positives, provides a streamlined confirmation process to rapidly and accurately differentiate L. monocytogenes from other microbes.

Comparative Evaluation of Veriflow®Listeria Species to USDA Culture-Based Method for the Detection of Listeria spp. in Food and Environmental Samples

2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1434-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C Joelsson ◽  
Shawn P Terkhorn ◽  
Ashley S Brown ◽  
Amrita Puri ◽  
Benjamin J Pascal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Ceramic Tile ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Complex Data ◽  
Listeria Species ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Veriflow®Listeria species (Veriflow LS) is a molecular-based assay for the presumptive detection of Listeria spp. from environmental surfaces (stainless steel, sealed concrete, plastic, and ceramic tile) and ready-to-eat (RTE) food matrixes (hot dogs and deli meat). The assay utilizes a PCRdetection method coupled with a rapid, visual, flow-based assay that develops in 3 min post-PCR amplification and requires only a 24 h enrichment for maximum sensitivity. The Veriflow LS system eliminates the need for sample purification, gel electrophoresis, or fluorophore-based detection of target amplification and does not require complex data analysis. This Performance Tested MethodSM validation study demonstrated the ability of the Veriflow LS assayto detect low levels of artificially inoculated Listeria spp. in six distinct environmental and food matrixes. In each unpaired reference comparison study, probability of detection analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between the Veriflow LS method and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guide Chapter 8.08 reference method. Fifty-one strains of various Listeria spp. were detected in the inclusivity study, and 35 nonspecific organisms went undetected in the exclusivity study. The study results show that the Veriflow LS is a sensitive, selective, and robust assay for the presumptive detection of Listeria spp. sampled from environmental surfaces (stainless steel, sealed concrete, plastic, and ceramic tile) and RTE food matrixes (hot dogs and delimeat).

Romer Labs RapidChek®Listeria monocytogenes Test System for the Detection of L. monocytogenes on Selected Foods and Environmental Surfaces

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 1490-1507
Author(s):  
Gregory Juck ◽  
Verapaz Gonzalez ◽  
Ann-Christine Olsson Allen ◽  
Meredith Sutzko ◽  
Kody Seward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Test System ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Detection Analysis ◽  
Media System ◽  
Reference Methods ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Inspection Service

Abstract The Romer Labs RapidChek®Listeria monocytogenes test system (Performance Tested Method 011805) was validated against the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA-FSIS/MLG), U.S. Food and Drug Association Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM), and AOAC Official Methods of Analysis (AOAC/OMA) cultural reference methods for the detection of L. monocytogenes on selected foods including hot dogs, frozen cooked breaded chicken, frozen cooked shrimp, cured ham, and ice cream, and environmental surfaces including stainless steel and plastic in an unpaired study design. The RapidChek method uses a proprietary enrichment media system, a 44–48 h enrichment at 30 ± 1°C, and detects L. monocytogenes on an immunochromatographic lateral flow device within 10 min. Different L. monocytogenes strains were used to spike each of the matrixes. Samples were confirmed based on the reference method confirmations and an alternate confirmation method. A total of 140 low-level spiked samples were tested by the RapidChek method after enrichment for 44–48 h in parallel with the cultural reference method. There were 88 RapidChek presumptive positives. One of the presumptive positives was not confirmed culturally. Additionally, one of the culturally confirmed samples did not exhibit a presumptive positive. No difference between the alternate confirmation method and reference confirmation method was observed. The respective cultural reference methods (USDA-FSIS/MLG, FDA/BAM, and AOAC/OMA) produced a total of 63 confirmed positive results. Nonspiked samples from all foods were reported as negative for L. monocytogenes by all methods. Probability of detection analysis demonstrated no significant differences in the number of positive samples detected by the RapidChek method and the respective cultural reference method.

Method Modification for the Atlas Listeria Environmental LE Detection Assay Using FoodChek Actero Listeria Enrichment Media and Half-Fraser Media for the Detection of Listeria spp. from Environmental Surfaces

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 562-576
Author(s):  
Brett Maroni ◽  
Tucker Lopez ◽  
Cambria Neal ◽  
Sarah Verver ◽  
Celina Puente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Common Species ◽  
Sample Volume ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Detection Assay ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
High Level

Abstract Two candidate method modifications for the Atlas Listeria Environmental LE Detection Assay were compared with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook 8.09 (MLG 8.09) method for detection of Listeria spp. on stainless steel, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and sealed concrete surfaces. For LE candidate method 1, samples were enriched in FoodChek Actero Listeria Enrichment Media [ALEM; Performance Tested MethodSM (PTM) 111201] at 35 ± 2°C for 18 to 24 h and evaluated for a range of analytical sample volumes. For LE candidate method 2, the current Roka PTM using 90 mL of Half-Fraser broth for enrichment at 35 ± 2°C was evaluated at 24 h with a reduced sample volume. These comparisons were made in multiple studies across the three environmental surfaces. Within each method and study, a total of 5 samples were uninoculated, 20 samples were inoculated with Listeria spp. at a low level to target fractional positivity, and 5 samples were inoculated with Listeria spp. at a high level to approach a probability of detection of 1. Inclusivity and exclusivity studies were also conducted for the LE method in combination with Half-Fraser and ALEM. The Atlas Listeria Environmental LE Detection Assay detected all 50 inclusive organisms, including 25 strains of L. monocytogenes and 5 strains of each of the other five common species of Listeria (L. innocua, L. welshimeri, L. ivanovii, L. seeligeri, and L. grayi) and none of the 30 exclusive organisms across all media and with both 200 and 2000 µL sample volumes. For the LE candidate method 1 studies, no significant differences were observed within the Roka ALEM method at 18, 20, or 24 h and for both the 200 and 2000 µL sample volumes as compared with the paired culture outcome. However, the ALEM method performed significantly better as compared with the unpaired reference method for sealed concrete and stainless steel. For the LE candidate method 2 studies, no significant differences were observed within the Roka HF method at 24 h for the 200 and 2000 µL samples as compared with the paired culture outcomes and unpaired reference method outcomes across the surfaces. The independent laboratory studies observed no significant differences in performance between the USDA/MLG 8.09 reference method and candidate methods 1 or 2, respectively, across the evaluated parameters. Overall, the candidate method 1 modification parameters and candidate method 2 sample parameters for the Atlas Listeria Environmental LE Detection Assay were statistically equivalent to or better than the reference method for detection of Listeria spp. on stainless steel, PVC, and sealed concrete surfaces, providing greater flexibility in method application for end users.

Validation of Workflow Changes, Phage Concentration and Reformatted Detection Threshold for the Sample6 DETECT/L™ Test: Level 3 Modification

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 1895-1904
Author(s):  
Kakolie Banerjee ◽  
Brittney Pierson ◽  
Elijah Carrier ◽  
Lauren Malsick ◽  
Chuxuan Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Test Volume ◽  
Current Configuration ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Sample Test

Abstract The AOAC Research Institute Performance Tested MethodsSM Program certified Sample6 DETECT/L™ in April 2014 (Certification No. 041401) for the detection of Listeria species (L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. seeligeri, L. marthii, L. welshimeri) on stainless steel environmental surfaces. A modification was approved in January 2016, increasing the concentration of sanitizer-neutralizing reagents in detection reagents, increasing the number of phage in the detection solution, and increasing the sample test volume. Moreover, changes to reduce the number of negative controls and add compatibility with polyurethane sponges were also approved. In this modification, to ensure that DETECT/L continues to meet performance expectations, Sample6 evaluated workflow changes to enhance sensitivity and the ease-of-use of the assay. Changes to the phage concentration and detection threshold, plus the inclusion of a confirmation step (DETECT Check), were validated to obtain better accuracy and optimize assay performance. Inclusivity, exclusivity, and robustness testing were conducted by Sample6 to evaluate the changes. A third-party laboratory compared the DETECT/L assay and the U.S. Department of Agriculture reference method in a stainless steel environmental surface matrix study. The data presented in this report demonstrate that the changes proposed to the DETECT/L assay meet or exceed the performance in the current configuration.

scholarly journals Comparison of three neutralizing broths for environmental sampling of low levels of Listeria monocytogenes desiccated on stainless steel surfaces and exposed to quaternary ammonium compounds

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengmin Li ◽  
Zhihan Xian ◽  
Hee Jin Kwon ◽  
Jiyoon Yoo ◽  
Laurel Burall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Quaternary Ammonium ◽  
Storage Conditions ◽  
Ammonium Compound ◽  
Environmental Sampling ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Environmental Test ◽  
Steel Surfaces ◽  
Low Levels

Abstract Background An effective environmental sampling method involves the use of a transport/neutralizing broth with the ability to neutralize sanitizer residues that are collected during sampling and to maintain viability of stressed Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) cells. Results We applied Lm onto stainless steel surfaces and then subjected Lm to desiccation stress for 16–18 h at room temperature (RT, 21–24 °C). This was followed by the subsequent application of Whisper™ V, a quaternary ammonium compound (QAC)-based sanitizer, diluted to 400 ppm and 8000 ppm of active quat, for 6 h. We then sampled Lm with sponges pre-moistened in three transport broths, Dey/Engley (D/E) broth, Letheen broth and HiCap™ broth, to generate environmental samples that contained sanitizer residues and low levels of stressed Lm, which were subsequently analyzed by an enrichment-based method. This scheme conformed with validation guidelines of AOAC International by using 20 environmental test portions per broth that contained low levels of Lm such that not all test portions were positive (i.e., fractional positive). We showed that D/E broth, Letheen broth and HiCap™ broth performed similarly when no quat or 400 ppm of quat was applied to the Lm contaminating stainless steel surfaces. However, when 8000 ppm of quat was applied, Letheen broth did not effectively neutralize the QAC in the samples. These comparisons were performed on samples stored under three conditions after collection to replicate scenarios of sample transport, RT for 2 h, 4 °C for 24 h and 4 °C for 72 h. Comparisons under the three different scenarios generally reached the same conclusions. In addition, we further demonstrated that storing Letheen and HiCap™ broths at RT for two months before sampling did not reduce their capacity to neutralize sanitizers. Conclusions We developed a scheme to evaluate the ability of transport broths to neutralize QAC sanitizers. The three transport broths performed similarly with a commonly used concentration of quat, but Letheen broth could not effectively neutralize a very high concentration of QAC. The performance of transport broths was not significantly affected under the assessed pre-sampling and post-sampling storage conditions.

Validation of the Listeria Right NowTM Test for Detection of Listeria spp. from Selected Environmental Surfaces Without Enrichment

2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 926-935
Author(s):  
Quynh-Nhi Le ◽  
Susan Alles ◽  
Brooke Roman ◽  
Eric Tovar ◽  
Edan Hosking ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Stainless Steel Surface ◽  
Bacterial Strains ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Rna Molecules ◽  
Detection Analysis ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Amplification Assay

Abstract Background: Listeria Right NowTM is a novel, enrichment-free molecular method for detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples from environmental surfaces. The test provides results in real time, indicating the current or recent presence of Listeria spp. in the environment. After sampling, the entire contents of the swab are subject to sample processing, releasing large quantities of target ribosomal RNA molecules into the lysate. A portion of the lysate is then tested using the ANSR® for Listeria isothermal nucleic acid amplification assay. Objective: A Performance Tested MethodSM study was conducted to validate the method for detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples from stainless steel and sealed concrete surfaces. Methods and Results: In inclusivity testing, 60 of 60 Listeria spp. strains tested positive. In exclusivity testing, 31 of 31 nontarget bacterial strains tested negative. In LOD testing, the test was able to detect as few as 2 CFU of L. monocytogenes applied to a stainless steel surface. In matrix testing of inoculated stainless steel and sealed concrete surfaces, there were no statistically significant differences in method performance comparing the Listeria Right Now and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference culture procedures as determined by probability of detection analysis. In robustness testing, modest changes to three assay operating parameters simultaneously did not significantly affect performance of the test. Conclusions and Highlights: Results can be obtained in less than 1 h using the Listeria Right Now test, allowing food industry personnel to take immediate corrective action in the case of Listeria contamination incidents.

Evaluation of the GENE-UP ® Listeria monocytogenes Method for the Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in a Variety of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Collaborative Study, First Action 2019.11

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Johnson ◽  
John Mills ◽  
Jean-Louis Pittet ◽  
Olivier Mathia ◽  
Patrick Bird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Control Level ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Cottage Cheese ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Environmental Surfaces

Abstract Background The GENE-UP®Listeria monocytogenes 2 (LMO 2) assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 121804) uses real-time PCR technology and a proprietary detection platform, the GENE-UP® Thermocycler, to detect Listeria monocytogenes in a variety of foods and environmental surfaces. Objective The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method’s interlaboratory performance and submit the result to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official MethodSM for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in a variety of foods and select environmental surfaces. Method The GENE-UP® method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study as part of the AFNOR NF VALIDATION certification process using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, full-cream goat milk cottage cheese (8.4% fat). The candidate method was compared to the ISO 11290-1/Amd.1:2004 reference method. Sixteen participants from 15 laboratories throughout the European Union participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (∼2 CFU/test portion) and a high inoculum level (∼10 CFU/test portion). Data from the study were analyzed according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model as presented in the AOAC validation guidelines. Results The dLPODC values with 95% confidence interval for each comparison were; -0.02 (-0.07, 0.03), -0.08 (-0.31, 0.16) and 0.00 (-0.03, 0.03) for the non-inoculated, low and high contamination levels respectively. Conclusion The dLPODC results demonstrate no difference in performance between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated. Highlights The GENE-UP LMO method demonstrated accuracy and precision in detecting and discerning L. monocytogenes from other Listeria species.

3M™ Petrifilm™ Environmental Listeria Plate

2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
DeAnn L Benesh ◽  
Erin S Crowley ◽  
Patrick M Bird
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Sampling Area ◽  
Plate Method ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Environmental Surface ◽  
High Level ◽  
Health Canada

Abstract A validation study of the 3M™ Petrifilm™ Environmental Listeria (EL) Plate (3M Food Safety, St. Paul, MN) was conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. The method was compared to the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the analysis of stainless steel environmental surfaces. Twenty replicates of the environmental surface were analyzed at a low and a high inoculum level. The low-level sampling area was inoculated with 0.2–2 CFU/5 cm2, and the high-level sampling area was inoculated with 2–5 CFU/5 cm2. Five control replicates were also analyzed at 0 CFU/5 cm2. There was no significant difference in the number of positives detected by the 3M Petrifilm EL Plate method and the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the environmental surface analyzed in this study.

Comparative Evaluation of Veriflow® Salmonella Species to USDA and FDA Culture-Based Methods for the Detection of Salmonella spp. in Food and Environmental Samples

2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1445-1457
Author(s):  
Amrita Puri ◽  
Adam C Joelsson ◽  
Shawn P Terkhorn ◽  
Ashley S Brown ◽  
Zara E Gaudioso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Ceramic Tile ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Salmonella Spp ◽  
Raw Meat ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The U.S

Abstract Veriflow®Salmonella species (Veriflow SS) is a molecular-based assay for the presumptive detection of Salmonella spp. from environmental surfaces (stainless steel, sealed concrete, plastic, and ceramic tile), dairy (2% milk), raw meat (20%fat ground beef), chicken carcasses, and ready-to-eat (RTE) food (hot dogs). The assay utilizes a PCR detection method coupled with a rapid, visual, flow-based assay that develops in 3 min post-PCR amplification and requires only an 18 h enrichment for maximumsensitivity. The Veriflow SS systemeliminates the need for sample purification, gel electrophoresis, or fluorophore-based detection of target amplification and does not require complex data analysis. This Performance Tested MethodSM validation study demonstrated the ability of the Veriflow SS method to detect low levels of artificially inoculated or naturally occurring Salmonella spp. in eight distinct environmental and food matrixes. Ineach reference comparison study, probability of detection analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between the Veriflow SS method and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service MicrobiologyLaboratory Guidebook Chapter 4.06 and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual Chapter 5 reference methods. A total of 104 Salmonella strains were detected in the inclusivity study, and 35 nonspecific organisms went undetected in the exclusivity study. The study results show that the Veriflow SS method is a sensitive, selective, and robust assay for the presumptive detectionof Salmonella spp. sampled from environmental surfaces (stainless steel, sealed concrete, plastic, and ceramic tile), dairy (2% milk), raw meat (20% fat ground beef), chicken carcasses, and RTE food (hot dogs).

Comparison of Assurance GDS® MPX ID for Top STEC with Reference Culture Methods for the Detection of E. coli Top 6 STEC; Direct Confirmation of Top 6 STEC from Isolation Plates and Determination of Equivalence of PickPen® and FSIS OctoMACS™ Concentration Protocols

2016 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 428-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Feldsine ◽  
Andrew H Lienau ◽  
Khyati Shah ◽  
Amy Immermann ◽  
Khanh Soliven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Laboratory Study ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Immunomagnetic Separation ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Independent Laboratory ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Microbiological Methods

Abstract Assurance GDS® MPX ID for Top Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC; MPX ID) was validated according to the AOAC INTERNATIONAL Methods Committee Guidelines for Validation of Microbiological Methods for Foods and Environmental Surfaces as (1) a secondary screening method for specific detection of the Top 6 STEC serogroups (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145) in raw beef trim, raw ground beef, raw spinach, and on stainless steel; and (2) as a confirmatory method for the identification of pure culture isolates as Top 6 STEC. MPX ID is used in conjunction with the upfront BCS Assurance GDS MPX Top 7 STEC assay. This Performance Tested MethodSM validation has two main parts: Method Developer studies and the Independent Laboratory study. A total of 180 samples and controls were analyzed. Results showed that MPX ID had no statistically significant differences with the reference culture methods for the detection of Top 6 STEC in the food matrixes (raw beef trim, raw ground beef, and raw spinach) and environmental sponges (stainless steel) studied. Inclusivity/exclusivity studies were also conducted. One hundred percent inclusivity among the 50 Top 6 STEC serovars tested and 100% exclusivity for the 30 non-Top 6 STEC organisms tested were demonstrated. For validation of MPX ID as a confirmatory method for isolated colonies, all inclusivity and exclusivity organisms were streaked for isolation onto five STEC plating media: modified rainbow agar, Levine's eosin-methylene blue (L-EMB) agar, rainbow agar with novobiocin and cefixime, and enterohemolysin agar with selective agents as well as trypticase soy agar with yeast extract. These isolated colonies were suspended and analyzed by Assurance GDS MPX Top 7 STEC and MPX ID. MPX ID was able to correctly confirm all inclusivity organisms from all plate types, except two STEC isolates from L-EMB agar plates only in the Independent Laboratory study. All exclusivity organisms were correctly determined by MPX ID as non-Top 6 STEC from the STEC plating media. An additional but separate part of these studies was a comparison of immunomagnetic separation (IMS) efficiency using the Assurance GDS procedure with a PickPen® device and the U.S. Department of Agriculture procedure using the OctoMACS™ Separator device for plating onto chromogenic agar. Results demonstrated the equivalence of the two IMS procedures for plate confirmation of Top 7 STEC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document