Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible: including a translation of Foscarini's Letter on the motion of the earth

1991 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 29-1567-29-1567
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Bramadat

Is it possible for conservative Protestant groups to survive in secular institutional settings? Here, Bramadat offers an ethnographic study of the Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship (IVCF) at McMaster University, a group that espouses fundamentalist interpretations of the Bible, women's roles, the age of the earth, alcohol consumption, and sexual ethics. In examining this group, Bramadat demonstrates how this tiny minority thrives within the overwhelmingly secular context of the University.


Author(s):  
Kathleen C. Oberlin

The typical story about creationist social movements centers on battles in the classroom or in the courtroom—like the Scopes Trial in 1925. But there is a new setting: a museum. “Prepare to Believe” is the slogan that greets visitors throughout the Creation Museum located in Petersburg, Kentucky. It carries the message that the organization Answers in Genesis (AiG) uses to welcome fellow believers as well as skeptics since opening in 2007. The Creation Museum seeks to persuade visitors that if one views both the Bible (a close, literal reading) and nature (observational, real world data) as sources of authority, then the earth appears to be much younger than conventionally understood in mainstream society. This book argues that the impact of the Creation Museum does not depend on the accuracy or credibility of its scientific claims, as many scholars, media critics, and political pundits would suggest. Instead, what AiG goes after by creating a physical site like the Creation Museum is the ability to foster plausibility politics—broadening what the audience perceives as possible and amplifying the stakes as the ideas reach more people. Destabilizing the belief that only one type of secular institution may make claims about the age of the earth and human origins, the Creation Museum is a threat to this singular positioning. In doing so, AiG repositions itself to produce longstanding effects on the public’s perception of who may make scientific claims. Creating the Creation Museum is a story about how a group endures.


Author(s):  
Darius Ade Putra

Abstract Since the 1960s, started by Lynn White, Christianity has begun to get attacks because it is considered to have triggered ecological damage. Christianity through the teachings of the Bible is accused of legitimizing absolute anthropocentric ideas which then give rise to expansive actions to the environment and nature. In the midst of the massive damage to the environment and in order to fi nd a possible solution to this problem, it is felt necessary to resonance the new approach to the Scriptures that further explores the sound of the earth. One approach that can be developed is ecological hermeneutics. Based on several principles it is possible to see and understand the biblical text from the perspective of the earth. In addittion, this approach will be elaborated with local wisdom so that it can help the text contextualization process. In the end, a new paradigm is expected to encourage awareness of the importance to tend the universe.   Abstrak Sejak tahun 1960an, dimulai oleh Lynn White, Kekristenan mulai mendapat serangan karena dinilai telah menjadi pemicu kerusakan ekologi. Kekristenan melalui ajaran Alkitab dituduh melegitimasi gagasan-gagasan antroposentris absolut yang kemudian melahirkan tinndakan- tindakan ekspansif terhadap lingkungan dan alam. Di tengah masifnya kerusakan lingkungan dan dalam rangka mencari kemungkinan jalan keluar dari persoalan ini, dirasa perlu untuk menggemakan pendekatan baru pada Kitab Suci yang lebih mengeksplorasi suara bumi. Salah satu pendekatan yang bisa dikembangkan adalah hermeneutik ekologi. Berdasarkan beberapa prinsip-prinsipnya memungkinkan untuk melihat dan memahami teks Alkitab dari perspektif bumi. Selain itu, pendekatan ini akan dielaborasi dengan local widom agar membantu proses kontekstualisasi teks. Pada akhirnya diharapkan sebuah paradigma baru yang mendorong kesadaran akan pentingnya merawat alam semesta.


Author(s):  
Renata Colwell

In the wake of the English Civil Wars of the 1640s, increased religious tolerance gave rise to unprecedented religious radicalism. While most emerging religious sects adopted unorthodoxinterpretations of the Bible, some sects were more radical than others. The Diggers, led by Gerrard Winstanley, were unique in that their biblically inspired focus on private property’s inherent corruption drove them to establish an agricultural commune in Surrey in 1649. By setting an example for the rest of the world and encouraging others to adopt their methods, they hoped to ultimately restore the Earth to a state of ‘Common Treasury.’ Drawing on scriptural precedent and personal interpretation of the Bible, Winstanley offered an eloquent, politically charged justification for the Diggers’ program of communal living in The True Levellers Standard (1649), which became the Digger manifesto. It pointedly critiquedseventeenth-century English society, had both a positive and negative impact on the Diggers’ reception at the time, and survived the movement’s violent suppression and subsequent collapse. Today, it continues to offer great insight into the origins, development and fate of the Digger movement, while at the same time inspiring modern scholars to delve deeper into the movement’s significance, and raising questions about property and equality that remain highly relevant in this day and age. 


Religions ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 398
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cohen

The following essay is presented as part of a long-term project concerned with the theory and practice of modern Jewish thinkers as interpreters of the Bible. The recent Bible commentaries of Eliezer Schweid, who is one of the foremost Jewish scholars and theologians active in Israel today, are analyzed in comparison with parallel interpretations of Martin Buber, with special reference to the first chapters of Genesis. Their respective analyses of Biblical narrative reveal notable similarities in their treatment of the literary “body” of the text as the key to its theological significance. Nonetheless, Buber articulates religious experience largely “from the human side,” striving to mediate Biblical consciousness to the contemporary humanistic mindset, while Schweid positions himself more as the clarion of the “prophetic writers” for whom the fear of God, no less than the love of God, must inform an authentic religious sensibility. Schweid’s more theocentric perspective has great import for contemporary issues such as the universal covetousness engendered by the violation of our ecological covenant with the Earth.


1953 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. K. Barrett

In the terminology of classical Christian theology the word eschatology means ‘the doctrine of the last things’. A discussion of NT eschatology would, under such a definition, treat of the hope of life after physical death, personal immortality, the general resurrection, the last judgment, heaven and hell. This use of the word remains of course in current usage; but in modern biblical discussion ‘eschatology’ is commonly employed in a somewhat different way, which may be defined by the statement that in characteristically eschatological thinking the significance of a series of events in time is defined in terms of the last of their number. The last event is not merely one member of the series; it is the determinative member, which reveals the meaning of the whole. Such thinking inevitably assumes the reality of historical processes, and that they are meaningful; in this, of course, it is fully consistent with Biblical thought as a whole; indeed, it might be said that the Biblical view of history derives its characteristic pattern from the fact that the Bible is a predominantly eschatological book. This is not to say either that the whole of the Bible is written from an eschatological standpoint, or that eschatological writing is not to be found outside the Bible; but the Bible is undoubtedly the classical field of eschatology, dominated as it is by the belief that the Judge of all the earth will do right, but that the right which He does will not necessarily be seen to be right until it is brought to a full end.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henri Sirangki

God created man in His image and likeness. This means that humans have a resemblance to their creator. When God created man the Bible clearly says that in the beginning God only created man, male and female. Then God made man as his mandate on earth in order to develop and conquer the earth. However, recently there has been an issue about LGBT, especially lesbians, who are pro and contra in the community. For some people there are those who accept the lesbian behavior and there are also those who reject the behavior. Such behavior is not only carried out by non-Christian people but such behavior has also been carried out by those who have held the status of believers in God, even though the Bible clearly opposes such behavior because it is contrary to God's purpose and purpose in creating humans as male and female. female. On that basis it can be said that those who become lesbian perpetrators are not only against their human nature but also against God's decree. Humans can only fulfill God's purpose of creating them in being mandatory over the whole creation if humans have contact with the opposite sex instead of the same sex.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-101
Author(s):  
Asigor Parongna Sitanggang

Understanding the eschatology of each group or ecclesiastical school is quite diverse because this subject is indeed a difficult thing. This paper, Pengaruh Kosmologi Bumi Datar dalam Eskatologi Alkitab (The Influence of Flat Earth Cosmology in Bible Eschatology), aims to re-explore biblical texts relating to eschatology or the end of time. Of all the biblical texts available, it is found that the end times do not talk about the destruction of the earth and/or the universe and replace it with something completely or absolutely new, but only include natural disasters without destroying the absolute earth and/or the universe, so it is the renewal of the earth/universe that exists, now, inhabited by humans. This paper is the result of library research using the historical-critical hermeneutic method of the biblical texts used, including the two-source theory for the synoptic gospels. What is intended in this paper is that many eschatological texts or the texts discuss about the end times in the Bible, both Old Testament as also the New Testament, are strongly influenced by the understanding of flat-earth cosmology, so that reading of these biblical texts should not be carried out using the understanding of modern round-earth cosmology round. AbstrakPemahaman eskatologi masing-masing kelompok atau aliran gerejawi cukup beragam karena memang pokok ini adalah hal yang sulit. Makalah ini, Pengaruh Kosmo-logi Bumi Datar dalam Eskatologi Alkitab, bertujuan untuk menggali ulang teks-teks biblis yang berkaitan dengan eskatologi atau akhir zaman. Dari semua teks biblis yang ada, maka ditemukan bahwa akhir zaman tidak berbicara mengenai penghancuran bumi dan/atau alam semesta dan menggantikannya dengan sesuatu yang sepenuhnya atau mutlak baru, melainkan hanya menyertakan bencana-bencana alam tanpa menghancur-kan mutlak bumi dan/atau alam semesta, sehingga itu merupakan pembaruan bu-mi/alam semesta yang ada, yang sekarang, yang didiami manusia. Makalah ini merupa-kan hasil penelitian kepustakaan dengan menggunakan metode hermeneutik historis-kritis atas teks-teks biblis yang digunakan, termasuk teori dua sumber bagi Injil-injil sinoptik. Yang hendak dibuktikan dalam makalah ini adalah terdapat banyak teks eskato-logis atau tentang akhir zaman dalam Alkitab baik Perjanjian Lama maupun Perjanjian Baru yang sangat dipengaruhi oleh pemahaman kosmologi bumi datar (flat-earth cosmology), sehingga pembacaan teks-teks biblis tersebut tidak boleh dilakukan dengan menggunakan pemahaman kosmologi bumi bulat (round-earth cosmology).


1953 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-102
Author(s):  
K. E. Bugge

Addresses Read by Grundtvig at Diocesan Meatings.By K. E. Bugge.The years from 1813 to 1820 were deseribed by Grundtvig as "seven Iean years", and not without reason. At that time he was regarded by his scholarly colleagues as a fanatical visionary, and among his fellow-clergy he also stood alone. An essential cause of this was the bold and provocative attitude adopted by him at the supplementary dioecesan meetings. The institution of dioecesan meetings was introduced into Denmark in 1618, and from then onwards the meetings were held twice yearly, and in later times only once yearly. Here the Bishop gatbered together the deans of the diocese to discuss matters affecting the clergy. In 1809 Bishop Munter had a regulation put into force in accordance with wich all the clergy in the diocese were invited to take part in the so-called "supplementary diocesan meeting" which took place after the regular meeting was finished. The purpose of this gathering was to hear papers read on theological subjects. Grundtvig took part in these supplementary diocesan meetings during the period when he was curate for his father, Pastor Johan Grundtvig, at Udby (1811-13) , and again a couple of times in 1814. He read a paper on each occasion. The first time was in October, 1811, when he read a paper "On Scolarship among the Clergy". The original paper , the manuscript of which has been preserved , has not yet been published; it is directed against the excessive worship of reason by the "enlightened" school of theology. Grundtvig himself , however, published a revised version of his address in 1813. - The manuscript of Grundtvigs second paper contributed to a diocesan meeting - in July, 1812 - first came to light in the autumn of 1951. It is a long essay on "Enlightenment". Grundt vig here draws a distinction between three kinds of enlightenment : the inter­ pretation of the word given by the Bible Christianity of his forefathers, Kant's interpretation, and finally, the most widespread type of "enlightenment", which directly breaks down everything connected with Christianity of olden times. Of this last type of enlightenment he declares: "I venture to say that the present age takes pride in its shame ... for its enlightenment consists in the pursiut of earthly things ... To be absorbed in the confusion of the earth or to rove through the empty air, that is what people eaU enlightenment". True enlightenment , on the other hand, is "that which is given from above". Grundtvigs third contribution to a diocesan meeting (in the autumn of 1812) was the wellknown "Roskilde-Riim" which he published in 1814 with many additions and alterations. The main purpose of these verses is to set forth the crushing verdict of history upon the interpretation of Christianity offered by the "enlightened" school of theology. Grundtvig's fourth address read to a diocesan meeting - in July, 1813 - has not yet been published. Accor­ ding to a statement by Grundtvig him self, it dealt with biblical interpretation; and in the Grundtvig arehives there are at least two essays which , in accor­ dance with their subject and external criteria, could be this address. Here Grundtvig attacks the methods of biblical interpretation used by the "en­ lightened " school of theology, which allow human reason to judge whether the sayings of the Bible are worthy of belief or not. In his fifth addre.ss to a diocesan meeting - which, unlike the others, was read at the diocesan meeting at Maribo - Grundtvig describes how we are ju stified in expecting that the Church of Christ, in spite of the present times of tribulation, will renew itself again . This essay was published in "Dansk Kirketidende", 1876, with moder­ nised spelling. In his sixth and last address to a diocesan meeting Grundtvig attacks one of the shibboleths of the Age of Enlightenment: tolerance. The address, which gave so much offence that the Bishop forbade Grundtvig to show himself at the diocesan meetings any more, is printed in the edition of Grundtvigs works by Hal Koch and Georg Christensen.lt is characteristic of Grundtvigs addresses to diocesan meetings that they all had a very definlte obj ect: to contend against the excessive worship of reason by the "enlightened" school of theology, "which", as he says, "like a devouring worm daily eats its way into the heart of the people." This is of fundamental importance for an understandin g of Grundtvig's educational ideas as they were expressed in his writings of the 1830's and later. Here the key­ word is precisely "true enlightenment". In the addresses to the diocesan mee­ tings we have the first violent polemics against "false enlightenment". Both in these addresses and in his later educational writings Grundtvig stresses the point that true enlightenment is the light shed upon our human life by what the Bible - not reason - has to say about the human lot. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document