Brief Report: Results of Third-Grade Students in a Reform Curriculum on the Illinois State Mathematics Test
Over the past decade, there has been a call for major reforms in mathematics education, from classrooms where students memorize facts and practice algorithms to classrooms in which reasoning and understanding are given more emphasis (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM], 1989, 1991, 1995). In response, a number of curricula have been developed that attempt to meet this vision. One reform curriculum in widespread usage is the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project's (UCSMP) elementary curriculum, Everyday Mathematics. In the UCSMP curriculum, students work in small groups exploring mathematics in real-life contexts, using calculators, manipulatives, and other mathematical tools from kindergarten onward. In contrast to traditional curricula, students are encouraged to use these tools or to “invent” their own computational algorithms to solve problems, and the sharing of their alternative solution methods is a regular part of class discussions. Additionally, problems are nearly always application-based and never presented as sets of symbolic problems. For example, in a second-grade UCSMP lesson, students are given a picture depicting various animals and their heights or lengths. During this activity, students work in small groups to construct number stories that compare the animal heights and then to find a solution method. In the follow-up discussion, students share their stories and solution procedures and offer alternative methods.