Abstract
Interprofessional education (IPE) is increasingly being recognised as one way how to develop a collaborative health workforce better equipped to deal with the diversity and complexity of future healthcare contexts [1]. IPE could also contribute towards blurring some of the institutionally demarcated professional boundaries and silos, so widespread in most health professional education and health systems. However, despite the rhetoric of IPE, the development of this pedagogy remains variable worldwide. The challenges of developing, implementing and sustaining interprofessional education are often underestimated or overlooked. Achieving an interprofessional agenda is a wicked problem [2] and is at odds with the prevalent and privileged medical narrative, sharp professional domains, traditional curricula and scarce resources.
This presentation which stems from primary research and a systematic search and review of the literature, aims to de-construct IPE by moving beyond the rhetoric of this pedagogy; precisely by acknowledging its complexity, and the myriad of micro, meso and macro level determinants that influence its development. It will map out key recommendations of what is needed to move IPE forward. It is only when we reflect and engage in such dialogues that we can start to develop a range of context-specific IPE curricula aspiring towards a collaborative health workforce. Kuhlmann, E., Batenburg, R., Wismar, M., Dussault, G., Maier, C. B., Glinos, I. A., ... & Groenewegen, P. P. (2018). A call for action to establish a research agenda for building a future health workforce in Europe. Health research policy and systems, 16 (1), 52.Varpio, L., Aschenbrener, C., & Bates, J. (2017). Tackling wicked problems: how theories of agency can provide new insights. Medical education, 51(4), 353-365.
Key messages
Interprofessional education could contribute towards a collaborative health workforce. The road map for sustainable IPE curricula needs to be context-specific acknowledging both enablers and challenges.