scholarly journals Physical activity and health promoting lifestyle among diploma nursing students in Malaysia

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2331
Author(s):  
Kim Geok Soh ◽  
Kim Lam Soh ◽  
Salimah Japar ◽  
Swee Leong Ong ◽  
Azura Abdul Halain ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Sahu ◽  
Sailaxmi Gandhi ◽  
Manoj Kumar Sharma ◽  
P. Marimuthu

Objective. To evaluate the use of social media andthe health promoting lifestyle profile of indian nursingstudents. Methods. A cross-sectional study was carriedout with 125 students (89 undergraduate and 36graduate) from various Nursing universities in India, whoprovided information on their sociodemographic data,the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS) andthe Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP-II). Results.Regarding the BSMAS, the participants had an averageof 12.8 (maximum possible = 30); 42% reported theyfrequently delayed their sleep due to using social media;9% had excessive use of social media; by gender, men hadhigher total score than women. With respect to the healthpromoting lifestyle profile, the total average was 126.9(maximum possible = 208); no difference was observedby gender in the total score and men scored better in the domain of physical activity; students living with their families had higher scores inthe domain of health responsibility than those living alone; and graduate studentshad better scores than undergraduate students in the scale total and in the domainsof health responsibility, spiritual relations, and interpersonal relations. Conclusion.There is excessive use of social media, especially among male students. This studyalso revealed lower scores than those desired in the domains of Health PromotingLifestyle, especially for physical activity, health responsibility, stress management,and nutrition. Thereby, the findings may be used to improve health literacy on socialmedia, as well as promote a positive lifestyle among nursing students.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-32
Author(s):  
Rebecca Salud Tejada

Background: The importance of health promotion has been underscored in preventing the existing of certain diseases, safeguarding the health of the nation. However, certain factors must be considered in ensuring that all individuals are motivated in maintaining their highest health potential. This study aims to determine if there is a difference between the profile variables of the nursing students, their perceived social support measure and the Health-promoting lifestyles they practice. Methodology: A descriptive comparative research design was utilized in the study. Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II) and Personal Resource Questionnaire (PRQ) was used to gather data to one hundred eighteen (118) nursing students. To analyze the gathered data, frequency, percentages, t-test and one-way ANOVA were used in the study. Results: Results revealed that respondents’ nutrition and stress management were significantly different with age group. It was also found that the respondents’ physical activity is significantly different with gender. Conclusion: Nutrition, physical activity, stress management and health responsibility were the lowest Health-promoting lifestyle behaviors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 629-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yim Wah Mak ◽  
Angela H. F. Kao ◽  
Lucia W. Y. Tam ◽  
Virginia W. C. Tse ◽  
Don T. H. Tse ◽  
...  

AbstractAimThis study aimed to examine the relationships between socio-economic status, health-promoting lifestyles, and quality of life among Chinese nursing students.BackgroundNursing students will be future health promoters, but they may not always adopt the recommended healthy lifestyle. Currently, there are insufficient studies examining the health-promoting lifestyles of Chinese nursing students, and the impact of socio-economic status and health-promoting lifestyle on their health.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional survey. Data were collected from nursing students studying in pre-registration nursing programs of a university in Hong Kong. The survey was conducted through a self-administered questionnaire that solicited information regarding their socio-economic status, health-promoting lifestyle, quality of life, and perceptions of the barriers to adopting a health-promoting lifestyle.FindingsA total of 538 students returned completed questionnaires for analysis. Among the health-promoting lifestyle subscales, the participants performed best in interpersonal relations and worst in physical activity, and the vast majority of them did not actively engage in health-risk behaviors. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that only 5% of the variance in quality of life was explained by socio-economic variables, whereas a total of 24% of the variance was explained when health-promoting lifestyle variables were added. In particular, health responsibility, physical activity, spiritual growth, and stress management were statistically significant predictors of quality of life.ConclusionsEarly concerns about how prepared nurses are to take on the role of promoting health still apply today. School administrators should plan the nursing curriculum to include activities that encourage student nurses to participate in health-promoting lifestyles. Future studies are needed to explore the barriers that prevent students from practicing health-promoting behavior.


Author(s):  
Pradip S. Borle ◽  
M. A. Parande ◽  
V. S. Tapare ◽  
Vidya Sanjeev Kamble ◽  
Pradymunaa C. Bulakh

Background: In addition, Health promoting behaviours among the nursing students may affect the quality of patient education. Therefore, this study was undertaken to determine the health-promoting lifestyle behaviours of nursing students in a tertiary care institute, Maharashtra.Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 124 nursing students. Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile Proforma (HPLP)was prepared which consists of two parts, Part I deals with the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants  and Part II of the proforma deals with Health-promoting lifestyle information which was a modified version of Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II). It consists of 46 items divided into 7 subscales (Health responsibility, Physical activity, Food practices, Spiritual growth, Self-concept, Inter personal relations and Stress management). Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) of this tool was 0.8197. Permission of Institute Ethical Committee was taken. Descriptive statistics were used to describe HPLP. Data was analyzed by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Mann Whitney test. Results: Majority 89(71.77%) were have good HPLP score and 29(23.39%) were excellent category. The mean overall (Total) HPLP score was 62.27±9.66 (range 33-87). The highest mean score in the subscale were for self-concept and spiritual growth. The lowest scores were for food practices and physical activity. Highly significant difference (p<0.0001) was found between overall mean HPLP scores among the different age groups.Conclusions: These nursing students had reasonably good orientations towards health behaviours. Attention need to be paid for healthier food choices. Health promotion planning to motivate students for regular physical activity with the purpose of promoting health and preventing diseases is necessary. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document