Peggotty’s Work-Box: Victorian Souvenirs and Material Memory
AbstractThis article considers what we can and cannot learn from objects in texts. As its chief example, it takes Peggotty’s workbox in Charles Dickens’sDavid Copperfieldand, through this particular object in a particular text, thinks about how far it is legitimate to “read” cultural-social-historical meanings back into a text, and how far objects in texts operate differently than objects in the world. It then reads the workbox as a marker of memory in the novel, challenging Nicholas Dames’s “associationist” reading ofDavid Copperfieldin hisAmensiac Selves. The essay ends by considering some of the problems and potentials of “thing theory” in literary studies.
2018 ◽
Vol 2
(10)
◽
pp. 133-148
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2005 ◽
Vol 33
(2)
◽
pp. 415-433
◽
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Vol 72
(2)
◽
pp. 363-368
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Vol 26
(2)
◽
pp. 350-356
Keyword(s):
2016 ◽
Vol 1
(3)
◽
pp. 141
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Vol 11
(SPL1)
◽
pp. 1198-1201
Keyword(s):