Influenza vaccination of children and adolescents decreased influenza infection in nonvaccinated community members

2010 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. JC1
Author(s):  
Joel Schectman
2018 ◽  
Vol 190 (1) ◽  
pp. E3-E12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itziar Casado ◽  
Ángela Domínguez ◽  
Diana Toledo ◽  
Judith Chamorro ◽  
Jenaro Astray ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. e25797 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Anthony Moody ◽  
Ruijun Zhang ◽  
Emmanuel B. Walter ◽  
Christopher W. Woods ◽  
Geoffrey S. Ginsburg ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 162 (11) ◽  
pp. 1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia M. Rand ◽  
Peter G. Szilagyi ◽  
Byung-Kwang Yoo ◽  
Peggy Auinger ◽  
Christina Albertin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. CMO.S13774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud A. Shehata ◽  
Nagla Abdel Karim

Background Cancer patients often experience preventable infections, including influenza A and B. These infections can be a cause of significant morbidity and mortality. The increased risk of infection may be because of either cancer itself or treatment-induced immunosuppression. 1 Influenza immunization has been shown to decrease the risk of influenza infection in patients with intact immunity. 2 In cancer patients, active immunization has been shown to confer protective immunity against several infections at similar rates to healthy individuals, which has translated into decreased duration and severity of infection and potentially improved morbidity and mortality. 3 Objectives 1. To assess the efficacy of influenza vaccination in stimulating immunological response in patients with cancer during chemotherapy compared to control groups. 2. To assess the efficacy of influenza vaccination in preventing confirmed influenza and influenza-like illness and/or stimulating immunological response in children with cancer treated with chemotherapy, compared to placebo, no intervention, or different dosage schedules. 3. To determine the adverse effects associated with influenza vaccination in patients with cancer. Search Methods We searched MEDLINE/PubMed database for articles published from 1964 to 2013 using the search terms “cancer,” “adult,” “influenza vaccination,” and “chemotherapy.” Selection Criteria We included studies based on systematic sampling with defined clinical criteria irrespective of the vaccination status of cancer patients. Studies measure the serological response or clinical response to compare between the study group and the control group. Studies assessed the inactivated influenza vaccines and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) protective serological reaction and the clinical outcomes after vaccination. Data Collection and Analysis Two independent authors assessed the methodological quality of included studies and extracted data. Main Results We included 16 studies (total number of participants = 1,076). None of the included studies reported clinical outcomes. All included studies reported on influenza immunity and adverse reaction on vaccination. We included 6 solid tumor studies and 10 hematological studies. In 12 studies, the serological response to influenza vaccine was compared in patients receiving chemotherapy (n = 425) versus those not receiving chemotherapy (n = 376). In three studies, the serological responses to influenza vaccination in patients receiving chemotherapy are compared to that in healthy adult. Measures used to assess the serological responses included a four-fold rise increase in antibody titer development of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titer >40, and pre- and post-vaccination geometric mean titers (GMTs). Immune responses in patients receiving chemotherapy were consistently weaker (four-fold rise of 17–52%) than in those who had completed chemotherapy (50–83%) and healthy patients (67–100%). Concerning adverse effects, oncology patients received influenza vaccine, and the side effects described were mild local reactions and low-grade fever. No life-threatening or persistent adverse effects were reported. Authors’ Conclusion Patients with solid and some of hematological tumors are able to mount a serological response to influenza vaccine, but it remains unclear how much this response protects them from influenza infection or its complications. Meanwhile, influenza vaccine appears to be safe in these patients. While waiting results of randomized controlled trials to give us more details about the clinical benefits of the influenza vaccination, the clinicians should consider the currently proved benefits of influenza vaccination on management of the cancer patients undergoing systematic chemotherapy such as decrease in the duration and severity of the of the disease, and significant decrease in influenza-associated morbidity and mortality in these high-risk patients. 3


2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennise K. P. Tam ◽  
Shui-Shan Lee ◽  
Sing Lee

Objective.To determine the rate of influenza vaccination and the factors associated with the vaccination's acceptance among nurses in Hong Kong.Design.Cross-sectional survey.Participants.Nurses practicing between 2003 and 2007.Methods.A questionnaire was sent to all nurses registered with any of the 3 nursing associations that participated in this study.Results.A total of 941 completed questionnaires were available for analysis, though not all nurses responded to every question (response rate, 33.5%-36.3%). Vaccination rates in 2006 and 2007 were 57.2% and 46.2%, respectively. Nurses who were vaccinated in 2006 were more likely to get vaccinated in 2007 (P<.01); 56% of the nurses perceived influenza vaccine as being effective against influenza. The perceived effectiveness of influenza vaccine was a consistent predictor of rates of vaccination in 2006 (odds ratio [OR], 8.47 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 6.13-11.70];P<.01) and 2007 (OR, 6.05 [95% CI, 3.79-9.67];P<.01). Concern about contracting avian influenza was a predictor of the vaccination rate in 2006 but not in 2007 (OR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.03-2.09];P<.05), as was the perceived lack of control over avian influenza infection (OR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.06-2.18];P<.05).Conclusions.The overall influenza vaccination rate for nurses in Hong Kong was about 50%. It was affected by the perceived threat of an impending outbreak. The attitudes of nurses toward the effectiveness of and rationale for vaccination were a major barrier to increasing the rate of vaccination.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saji Saraswathy Gopalan ◽  
Devi Kalyan Mishra ◽  
Ashis Kumar Das

AbstractBackgroundInfluenza could be associated with illnesses, severe complications, hospitalizations, and deaths among adults with high-risk medical conditions. Influenza vaccination reduces the risks and complications associated with influenza infection in high-risk conditions. We assessed the prevalence and predictors of influenza vaccination in a national sample of adults with high-risk medical conditions.MethodsUsing the nationally representative National Health Interview Survey of 2019, we estimated the prevalence of influenza vaccination among adults with high-risk conditions. We tested the associations between receipt of vaccination and sociodemographic predictors with adjusted multivariable logistic regression.ResultsOut of 15,258 adults with high-risk conditions, 56% reported receiving an influenza vaccine over the previous 12 months. Multivariable regressions show that respondents from older age groups, females, other race/ethnic group, married, higher annual family income, having a health insurance and those with more than two high-risk conditions are more likely to receive the influenza vaccine. However, adults from non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity and living in the Southern census region are less likely to receive the vaccination. Education levels and living in a metro show no associations with vaccination status.ConclusionState authorities, primary physicians, specialists, and pharmacists have important roles in sensitizing and reminding individuals with high-risk conditions to receive timely vaccination. Similarly, affordability needs to be enhanced for influenza vaccination including better insurance coverage and reduced co-payment.


Author(s):  
Amelia Carro Hevia ◽  
Francisco Sanz Hernández ◽  
Javier Álvarez Aldeán ◽  
Manuel García Cenoz ◽  
Isabel Jimeno Sanz ◽  
...  

There is accumulating evidence showing that influenza infection and cardiorespiratory diseases are closely associated. Influenza has been described as a triggering factor capable of both exacerbate underlying chronic diseases as well as inducing the appearance of new respiratory and cardiovascular events. Consequently, influenza infection and its associated comorbidity have a significant impact on the health system. In this document, we extensively reviewed the current literature to describe the most relevant data on the relationship between influenza infection and cardiorespiratory diseases. Likewise, we analyzed the possible pathophysiological mechanisms explaining the connection between influenza infection and cardiac and respiratory events. Finally, reviewed data has been put into perspective to highlight the importance of influenza vaccination as an effective measure in the prevention of cardiorespiratory diseases, especially in the population with underlying chronic diseases.


Author(s):  
Claudio Zanettini ◽  
Mohamed Omar ◽  
Wikum Dinalankara ◽  
Eddie Luidy Imada ◽  
Elizabeth Colantuoni ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTCOVID-19 mortality rate is higher in the elderly and in those with preexisting chronic medical conditions. The elderly also suffer from increased morbidity and mortality from seasonal influenza infection, and thus annual influenza vaccination is recommended for them.In this study, we explore a possible area-level association between influenza vaccination coverage in people aged 65 years and older and the number of deaths from COVID-19. To this end, we used COVID-19 data until June 10, 2020 together with population health data for the United States at the county level. We fit quasi-Poisson regression models using influenza vaccination coverage in the elderly population as the independent variable and the number of deaths from COVID-19 as the outcome variable. We adjusted for a wide array of potential confounding variables using both county-level generalized propensity scores for influenza vaccination rates, as well as direct adjustment.Our results suggest that influenza vaccination coverage in the elderly population is negatively associated with mortality from COVID-19. This finding is robust to using different analysis periods, different thresholds for inclusion of counties, and a variety of methodologies for confounding adjustment.In conclusion, our results suggest a potential protective effect of the influenza vaccine on COVID-19 mortality in the elderly population. The significant public health implications of this possibility point to an urgent need for studying the relationship between influenza vaccination and COVID-19 mortality at the individual level, to investigate both the epidemiology and any underlying biological mechanism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document