scholarly journals SETD2 is required for DNA double-strand break repair and activation of the p53-mediated checkpoint

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sílvia Carvalho ◽  
Alexandra C Vítor ◽  
Sreerama C Sridhara ◽  
Filipa B Martins ◽  
Ana C Raposo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Alternative Mechanism ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Recombination Repair

Histone modifications establish the chromatin states that coordinate the DNA damage response. In this study, we show that SETD2, the enzyme that trimethylates histone H3 lysine 36 (H3K36me3), is required for ATM activation upon DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Moreover, we find that SETD2 is necessary for homologous recombination repair of DSBs by promoting the formation of RAD51 presynaptic filaments. In agreement, SETD2-mutant clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cells displayed impaired DNA damage signaling. However, despite the persistence of DNA lesions, SETD2-deficient cells failed to activate p53, a master guardian of the genome rarely mutated in ccRCC and showed decreased cell survival after DNA damage. We propose that this novel SETD2-dependent role provides a chromatin bookmarking instrument that facilitates signaling and repair of DSBs. In ccRCC, loss of SETD2 may afford an alternative mechanism for the inactivation of the p53-mediated checkpoint without the need for additional genetic mutations in TP53.

scholarly journals The ubiquitin landscape at DNA double-strand breaks

2009 ◽  
Vol 187 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy E. Messick ◽  
Roger A. Greenberg
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Parallel Processes ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Cellular Dna

The intimate relationship between DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair and cancer susceptibility has sparked profound interest in how transactions on DNA and chromatin surrounding DNA damage influence genome integrity. Recent evidence implicates a substantial commitment of the cellular DNA damage response machinery to the synthesis, recognition, and hydrolysis of ubiquitin chains at DNA damage sites. In this review, we propose that, in order to accommodate parallel processes involved in DSB repair and checkpoint signaling, DSB-associated ubiquitin structures must be nonuniform, using different linkages for distinct functional outputs. We highlight recent advances in the study of nondegradative ubiquitin signaling at DSBs, and discuss how recognition of different ubiquitin structures may influence DNA damage responses.

scholarly journals HP1β Chromo Shadow Domain facilitates H2A ubiquitination for BRCA1 recruitment at DNA double-strand breaks

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tej Pandita ◽  
Vijay Kumari Charaka ◽  
Sharmistha Chakraborty ◽  
Chi-Lin Tsai ◽  
Xiaoyan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Assembly Factor ◽  
Chromo Shadow Domain

Efficient DNA double strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination (HR), as orchestrated by histone and non-histone proteins, is critical to genome stability, replication, transcription, and cancer avoidance. Here we report that Heterochromatin Protein1 beta (HP1β) acts as a key component of the HR DNA resection step by regulating BRCA1 enrichment at DNA damage sites, a function largely dependent on the HP1β chromo shadow domain (CSD). HP1β itself is enriched at DSBs within gene-rich regions through a CSD interaction with Chromatin Assembly Factor 1 (CAF1) and HP1β depletion impairs subsequent BRCA1 enrichment. An added interaction of the HP1β CSD with the Polycomb Repressor Complex 1 ubiquitinase component RING1A facilitates BRCA1 recruitment by increasing H2A lysine 118-119 ubiquitination, a marker for BRCA1 recruitment. Our findings reveal that HP1β interactions, mediated through its CSD with RING1A, promote H2A ubiquitination and facilitate BRCA1 recruitment at DNA damage sites, a critical step in DSB repair by the HR pathway. These collective results unveil how HP1β is recruited to DSBs in gene-rich regions and how HP1β subsequently promotes BRCA1 recruitment to further HR DNA damage repair by stimulating CtIP-dependent resection.

scholarly journals Positive regulation of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation by activation of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Mec1(ATR)

Open Biology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 130019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Gray ◽  
Rachal M. Allison ◽  
Valerie Garcia ◽  
Alastair S. H. Goldman ◽  
Matthew J. Neale
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Genetic Exchange ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Complex Process ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna Damage Signalling

During meiosis, formation and repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) create genetic exchange between homologous chromosomes—a process that is critical for reductional meiotic chromosome segregation and the production of genetically diverse sexually reproducing populations. Meiotic DSB formation is a complex process, requiring numerous proteins, of which Spo11 is the evolutionarily conserved catalytic subunit. Precisely how Spo11 and its accessory proteins function or are regulated is unclear. Here, we use Saccharomyces cerevisiae to reveal that meiotic DSB formation is modulated by the Mec1(ATR) branch of the DNA damage signalling cascade, promoting DSB formation when Spo11-mediated catalysis is compromised. Activation of the positive feedback pathway correlates with the formation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) recombination intermediates and activation of the downstream kinase, Mek1. We show that the requirement for checkpoint activation can be rescued by prolonging meiotic prophase by deleting the NDT80 transcription factor, and that even transient prophase arrest caused by Ndt80 depletion is sufficient to restore meiotic spore viability in checkpoint mutants. Our observations are unexpected given recent reports that the complementary kinase pathway Tel1(ATM) acts to inhibit DSB formation. We propose that such antagonistic regulation of DSB formation by Mec1 and Tel1 creates a regulatory mechanism, where the absolute frequency of DSBs is maintained at a level optimal for genetic exchange and efficient chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals Kinesin Kif2C in regulation of DNA double strand break dynamics and repair

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songli Zhu ◽  
Mohammadjavad Paydar ◽  
Feifei Wang ◽  
Yanqiu Li ◽  
Ling Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Xenopus Egg ◽  
Xenopus Egg Extracts

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) have detrimental effects on cell survival and genomic stability, and are related to cancer and other human diseases. In this study, we identified microtubule-depolymerizing kinesin Kif2C as a protein associated with DSB-mimicking DNA templates and known DSB repair proteins in Xenopus egg extracts and mammalian cells. The recruitment of Kif2C to DNA damage sites was dependent on both PARP and ATM activities. Kif2C knockdown or knockout led to accumulation of endogenous DNA damage, DNA damage hypersensitivity, and reduced DSB repair via both NHEJ and HR. Interestingly, Kif2C depletion, or inhibition of its microtubule depolymerase activity, reduced the mobility of DSBs, impaired the formation of DNA damage foci, and decreased the occurrence of foci fusion and resolution. Taken together, our study established Kif2C as a new player of the DNA damage response, and presented a new mechanism that governs DSB dynamics and repair.

scholarly journals Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation temporally confines SUMO-dependent ataxin-3 recruitment to control DNA double-strand break repair

2021 ◽  
pp. jcs.247809
Author(s):  
Annika Pfeiffer ◽  
Laura K. Herzog ◽  
Martijn S. Luijsterburg ◽  
Rashmi G. Shah ◽  
Magdalena B. Rother ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna Repair Proteins ◽  
Short Time Window ◽  
Short Time

DNA damage-induced SUMOylation serves as a signal for two antagonizing proteins that both stimulate repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we demonstrate that the SUMO-dependent recruitment of the deubiquitylating enzyme ataxin-3 to DSBs, unlike recruitment of the ubiquitin ligase RNF4, additionally depends on PARP1-mediated poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation). The co-dependence of ataxin-3 recruitment on PARylation and SUMOylation temporally confines its presence at DSBs to a short time window directly following detection of the DNA damage. We propose that this mechanism ensures that ataxin-3 prevents the premature removal of DNA repair proteins only during the early phase of the DSB response and does not interfere with the subsequent timely displacement of DNA repair proteins by RNF4. Thus, our data show that PARylation differentially regulates SUMO-dependent recruitment of ataxin-3 and RNF4 to DSBs, explaining how both proteins can play a stimulatory role at DSBs despite their opposing activities.

scholarly journals Jack of all trades? The versatility of RNA in DNA double-strand break repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 721-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth F. Ketley ◽  
Monika Gullerova
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Non Coding Rna ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Rna:Dna Hybrid ◽  
Cellular Stressors ◽  
Long Non Coding Rna

Abstract The mechanisms by which RNA acts in the DNA damage response (DDR), specifically in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), are emerging as multifaceted and complex. Different RNA species, including but not limited to; microRNA (miRNA), long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), RNA:DNA hybrid structures, the recently identified damage-induced lncRNA (dilncRNA), damage-responsive transcripts (DARTs), and DNA damage-dependent small RNAs (DDRNAs), have been shown to play integral roles in the DSB response. The diverse properties of these RNAs, such as sequence, structure, and binding partners, enable them to fulfil a variety of functions in different cellular contexts. Additionally, RNA can be modified post-transcriptionally, a process which is regulated in response to cellular stressors such as DNA damage. Many of these mechanisms are not yet understood and the literature contradictory, reflecting the complexity and expansive nature of the roles of RNA in the DDR. However, it is clear that RNA is pivotal in ensuring the maintenance of genome integrity. In this review, we will discuss and summarise recent evidence which highlights the roles of these various RNAs in preserving genomic integrity, with a particular focus on the emerging role of RNA in the DSB repair response.

scholarly journals ATM- and ATR-Mediated Phosphorylation of XRCC3 Regulates DNA Double-Strand Break-Induced Checkpoint Activation and Repair

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1830-1844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumar Somyajit ◽  
Shivakumar Basavaraju ◽  
Ralph Scully ◽  
Ganesh Nagaraju
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna Damage Responses ◽  
Atr Kinase ◽  
Atm Signaling Pathway ◽  
Atm Signaling

The RAD51 paralogs XRCC3 and RAD51C have been implicated in homologous recombination (HR) and DNA damage responses. However, the molecular mechanism(s) by which these paralogs regulate HR and DNA damage signaling remains obscure. Here, we show that an SQ motif serine 225 in XRCC3 is phosphorylated by ATR kinase in an ATM signaling pathway. We find that RAD51C but not XRCC2 is essential for XRCC3 phosphorylation, and this modification follows end resection and is specific to S and G 2 phases. XRCC3 phosphorylation is required for chromatin loading of RAD51 and HR-mediated repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs). Notably, in response to DSBs, XRCC3 participates in the intra-S-phase checkpoint following its phosphorylation and in the G 2 /M checkpoint independently of its phosphorylation. Strikingly, we find that XRCC3 distinctly regulates recovery of stalled and collapsed replication forks such that phosphorylation is required for the HR-mediated recovery of collapsed replication forks but is dispensable for the restart of stalled replication forks. Together, these findings suggest that XRCC3 is a new player in the ATM/ATR-induced DNA damage responses to control checkpoint and HR-mediated repair.

scholarly journals Focused Ion Microbeam Irradiation Induces Clustering of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Heterochromatin Visualized by Nanoscale-Resolution Electron Microscopy

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 7638
Author(s):  
Yvonne Lorat ◽  
Judith Reindl ◽  
Anna Isermann ◽  
Christian Rübe ◽  
Anna A. Friedl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Spatial Clustering ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Stimulated Emission ◽  
Nuclear Chromatin ◽  
Carbon Ions ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks

Background: Charged-particle radiotherapy is an emerging treatment modality for radioresistant tumors. The enhanced effectiveness of high-energy particles (such as heavy ions) has been related to the spatial clustering of DNA lesions due to highly localized energy deposition. Here, DNA damage patterns induced by single and multiple carbon ions were analyzed in the nuclear chromatin environment by different high-resolution microscopy approaches. Material and Methods: Using the heavy-ion microbeam SNAKE, fibroblast monolayers were irradiated with defined numbers of carbon ions (1/10/100 ions per pulse, ipp) focused to micrometer-sized stripes or spots. Radiation-induced lesions were visualized as DNA damage foci (γH2AX, 53BP1) by conventional fluorescence and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy. At micro- and nanoscale level, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) were visualized within their chromatin context by labeling the Ku heterodimer. Single and clustered pKu70-labeled DSBs were quantified in euchromatic and heterochromatic regions at 0.1 h, 5 h and 24 h post-IR by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results: Increasing numbers of carbon ions per beam spot enhanced spatial clustering of DNA lesions and increased damage complexity with two or more DSBs in close proximity. This effect was detectable in euchromatin, but was much more pronounced in heterochromatin. Analyzing the dynamics of damage processing, our findings indicate that euchromatic DSBs were processed efficiently and repaired in a timely manner. In heterochromatin, by contrast, the number of clustered DSBs continuously increased further over the first hours following IR exposure, indicating the challenging task for the cell to process highly clustered DSBs appropriately. Conclusion: Increasing numbers of carbon ions applied to sub-nuclear chromatin regions enhanced the spatial clustering of DSBs and increased damage complexity, this being more pronounced in heterochromatic regions. Inefficient processing of clustered DSBs may explain the enhanced therapeutic efficacy of particle-based radiotherapy in cancer treatment.

scholarly journals i-BLESS is an ultra-sensitive method for detection of DNA double-strand breaks

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Biernacka ◽  
Yingjie Zhu ◽  
Magdalena Skrzypczak ◽  
Romain Forey ◽  
Benjamin Pardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Universal Method ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Agarose Beads ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break

AbstractMaintenance of genome stability is a key issue for cell fate that could be compromised by chromosome deletions and translocations caused by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Thus development of precise and sensitive tools for DSBs labeling is of great importance for understanding mechanisms of DSB formation, their sensing and repair. Until now there has been no high resolution and specific DSB detection technique that would be applicable to any cells regardless of their size. Here, we present i-BLESS, a universal method for direct genome-wide DNA double-strand break labeling in cells immobilized in agarose beads. i-BLESS has three key advantages: it is the only unbiased method applicable to yeast, achieves a sensitivity of one break at a given position in 100,000 cells, and eliminates background noise while still allowing for fixation of samples. The method allows detection of ultra-rare breaks such as those forming spontaneously at G-quadruplexes.

scholarly journals ATM-dependent pathways of chromatin remodelling and oxidative DNA damage responses

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160283 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Daniel Berger ◽  
Fintan K. T. Stanley ◽  
Shaun Moore ◽  
Aaron A. Goodarzi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Oxidative Dna Damage ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Chromatin Remodelling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Biochemical Network ◽  
Regulatory Function ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
The Impact

Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is a serine/threonine protein kinase with a master regulatory function in the DNA damage response. In this role, ATM commands a complex biochemical network that signals the presence of oxidative DNA damage, including the dangerous DNA double-strand break, and facilitates subsequent repair. Here, we review the current state of knowledge regarding ATM-dependent chromatin remodelling and epigenomic alterations that are required to maintain genomic integrity in the presence of DNA double-strand breaks and/or oxidative stress. We will focus particularly on the roles of ATM in adjusting nucleosome spacing at sites of unresolved DNA double-strand breaks within complex chromatin environments, and the impact of ATM on preserving the health of cells within the mammalian central nervous system. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document