scholarly journals HP1β Chromo Shadow Domain facilitates H2A ubiquitination for BRCA1 recruitment at DNA double-strand breaks

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tej Pandita ◽  
Vijay Kumari Charaka ◽  
Sharmistha Chakraborty ◽  
Chi-Lin Tsai ◽  
Xiaoyan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Assembly Factor ◽  
Chromo Shadow Domain

Efficient DNA double strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination (HR), as orchestrated by histone and non-histone proteins, is critical to genome stability, replication, transcription, and cancer avoidance. Here we report that Heterochromatin Protein1 beta (HP1β) acts as a key component of the HR DNA resection step by regulating BRCA1 enrichment at DNA damage sites, a function largely dependent on the HP1β chromo shadow domain (CSD). HP1β itself is enriched at DSBs within gene-rich regions through a CSD interaction with Chromatin Assembly Factor 1 (CAF1) and HP1β depletion impairs subsequent BRCA1 enrichment. An added interaction of the HP1β CSD with the Polycomb Repressor Complex 1 ubiquitinase component RING1A facilitates BRCA1 recruitment by increasing H2A lysine 118-119 ubiquitination, a marker for BRCA1 recruitment. Our findings reveal that HP1β interactions, mediated through its CSD with RING1A, promote H2A ubiquitination and facilitate BRCA1 recruitment at DNA damage sites, a critical step in DSB repair by the HR pathway. These collective results unveil how HP1β is recruited to DSBs in gene-rich regions and how HP1β subsequently promotes BRCA1 recruitment to further HR DNA damage repair by stimulating CtIP-dependent resection.

scholarly journals The ubiquitin landscape at DNA double-strand breaks

2009 ◽  
Vol 187 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy E. Messick ◽  
Roger A. Greenberg
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Parallel Processes ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Cellular Dna

The intimate relationship between DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair and cancer susceptibility has sparked profound interest in how transactions on DNA and chromatin surrounding DNA damage influence genome integrity. Recent evidence implicates a substantial commitment of the cellular DNA damage response machinery to the synthesis, recognition, and hydrolysis of ubiquitin chains at DNA damage sites. In this review, we propose that, in order to accommodate parallel processes involved in DSB repair and checkpoint signaling, DSB-associated ubiquitin structures must be nonuniform, using different linkages for distinct functional outputs. We highlight recent advances in the study of nondegradative ubiquitin signaling at DSBs, and discuss how recognition of different ubiquitin structures may influence DNA damage responses.

scholarly journals Kinesin Kif2C in regulation of DNA double strand break dynamics and repair

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songli Zhu ◽  
Mohammadjavad Paydar ◽  
Feifei Wang ◽  
Yanqiu Li ◽  
Ling Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Xenopus Egg ◽  
Xenopus Egg Extracts

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) have detrimental effects on cell survival and genomic stability, and are related to cancer and other human diseases. In this study, we identified microtubule-depolymerizing kinesin Kif2C as a protein associated with DSB-mimicking DNA templates and known DSB repair proteins in Xenopus egg extracts and mammalian cells. The recruitment of Kif2C to DNA damage sites was dependent on both PARP and ATM activities. Kif2C knockdown or knockout led to accumulation of endogenous DNA damage, DNA damage hypersensitivity, and reduced DSB repair via both NHEJ and HR. Interestingly, Kif2C depletion, or inhibition of its microtubule depolymerase activity, reduced the mobility of DSBs, impaired the formation of DNA damage foci, and decreased the occurrence of foci fusion and resolution. Taken together, our study established Kif2C as a new player of the DNA damage response, and presented a new mechanism that governs DSB dynamics and repair.

scholarly journals i-BLESS is an ultra-sensitive method for detection of DNA double-strand breaks

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Biernacka ◽  
Yingjie Zhu ◽  
Magdalena Skrzypczak ◽  
Romain Forey ◽  
Benjamin Pardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Universal Method ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Agarose Beads ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break

AbstractMaintenance of genome stability is a key issue for cell fate that could be compromised by chromosome deletions and translocations caused by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Thus development of precise and sensitive tools for DSBs labeling is of great importance for understanding mechanisms of DSB formation, their sensing and repair. Until now there has been no high resolution and specific DSB detection technique that would be applicable to any cells regardless of their size. Here, we present i-BLESS, a universal method for direct genome-wide DNA double-strand break labeling in cells immobilized in agarose beads. i-BLESS has three key advantages: it is the only unbiased method applicable to yeast, achieves a sensitivity of one break at a given position in 100,000 cells, and eliminates background noise while still allowing for fixation of samples. The method allows detection of ultra-rare breaks such as those forming spontaneously at G-quadruplexes.

scholarly journals RAP80 suppresses the vulnerability of R-loops during DNA double-strand break repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Yasuhara ◽  
Reona Kato ◽  
Motohiro Yamauchi ◽  
Yuki Uchihara ◽  
Lee Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Regions ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Critical Component ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Chromosome Translocations ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break

AbstractR-loops, consisting of ssDNA and DNA-RNA hybrids, are potentially vulnerable unless they are appropriately processed. Recent evidence suggests that R-loops can form in the proximity of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) within transcriptionally active regions. Yet, how the vulnerability of R-loops is overcome during DSB repair remains unclear. Here, we identify RAP80 as a factor suppressing the vulnerability of ssDNA in R-loops and chromosome translocations and deletions during DSB repair. Mechanistically, RAP80 prevents unscheduled nucleolytic processing of ssDNA in R-loops by CtIP. This mechanism promotes efficient DSB repair via transcription-associated end-joining dependent on BRCA1, Polθ, and LIG1/3. Thus, RAP80 suppresses the vulnerability of R-loops during DSB repair, thereby precluding genomic abnormalities in a critical component of the genome caused by deleterious R-loop processing.

scholarly journals DNA double-strand break repair: a theoretical framework and its application

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (114) ◽  
pp. 20150679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Murray ◽  
Bart Cornelissen ◽  
Katherine A. Vallis ◽  
S. Jon Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Auger Electron ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Histone H2ax ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
A Cell

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are formed as a result of genotoxic insults, such as exogenous ionizing radiation, and are among the most serious types of DNA damage. One of the earliest molecular responses following DSB formation is the phosphorylation of the histone H2AX, giving rise to γ H2AX. Many copies of γ H2AX are generated at DSBs and can be detected in vitro as foci using well-established immuno-histochemical methods. It has previously been shown that anti- γ H2AX antibodies, modified by the addition of the cell-penetrating peptide TAT and a fluorescent or radionuclide label, can be used to visualize and quantify DSBs in vivo . Moreover, when labelled with a high amount of the short-range, Auger electron-emitting radioisotope, 111 In, the amount of DNA damage within a cell can be increased, leading to cell death. In this report, we develop a mathematical model that describes how molecular processes at individual sites of DNA damage give rise to quantifiable foci. Equations that describe stochastic mean behaviours at individual DSB sites are derived and parametrized using population-scale, time-series measurements from two different cancer cell lines. The model is used to examine two case studies in which the introduction of an antibody (anti- γ H2AX-TAT) that targets a key component in the DSB repair pathway influences system behaviour. We investigate: (i) how the interaction between anti- γ H2AX-TAT and γ H2AX effects the kinetics of H2AX phosphorylation and DSB repair and (ii) model behaviour when the anti- γ H2AX antibody is labelled with Auger electron-emitting 111 In and can thus instigate additional DNA damage. This work supports the conclusion that DSB kinetics are largely unaffected by the introduction of the anti- γ H2AX antibody, a result that has been validated experimentally, and hence the hypothesis that the use of anti- γ H2AX antibody to quantify DSBs does not violate the image tracer principle. Moreover, it provides a novel model of DNA damage accumulation in the presence of Auger electron-emitting 111 In that is supported qualitatively by the available experimental data.

scholarly journals Beyond reversal: ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteases and the orchestration of the DNA double strand break repair response

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1881-1893
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Garvin
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Central Component ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break

The cellular response to genotoxic DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) uses a multitude of post-translational modifications to localise, modulate and ultimately clear DNA repair factors in a timely and accurate manner. Ubiquitination is well established as vital to the DSB response, with a carefully co-ordinated pathway of histone ubiquitination events being a central component of DSB signalling. Other ubiquitin-like modifiers (Ubl) including SUMO and NEDD8 have since been identified as playing important roles in DSB repair. In the last five years ∼20 additional Ub/Ubl proteases have been implicated in the DSB response. The number of proteases identified highlights the complexity of the Ub/Ubl signal present at DSBs. Ub/Ubl proteases regulate turnover, activity and protein–protein interactions of DSB repair factors both catalytically and non-catalytically. This not only ensures efficient repair of breaks but has a role in channelling repair into the correct DSB repair sub-pathways. Ultimately Ub/Ubl proteases have essential roles in maintaining genomic stability. Given that deficiencies in many Ub/Ubl proteases promotes sensitivity to DNA damaging chemotherapies, they could be attractive targets for cancer treatment.

scholarly journals SETD2 is required for DNA double-strand break repair and activation of the p53-mediated checkpoint

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sílvia Carvalho ◽  
Alexandra C Vítor ◽  
Sreerama C Sridhara ◽  
Filipa B Martins ◽  
Ana C Raposo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Alternative Mechanism ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Recombination Repair

Histone modifications establish the chromatin states that coordinate the DNA damage response. In this study, we show that SETD2, the enzyme that trimethylates histone H3 lysine 36 (H3K36me3), is required for ATM activation upon DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Moreover, we find that SETD2 is necessary for homologous recombination repair of DSBs by promoting the formation of RAD51 presynaptic filaments. In agreement, SETD2-mutant clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cells displayed impaired DNA damage signaling. However, despite the persistence of DNA lesions, SETD2-deficient cells failed to activate p53, a master guardian of the genome rarely mutated in ccRCC and showed decreased cell survival after DNA damage. We propose that this novel SETD2-dependent role provides a chromatin bookmarking instrument that facilitates signaling and repair of DSBs. In ccRCC, loss of SETD2 may afford an alternative mechanism for the inactivation of the p53-mediated checkpoint without the need for additional genetic mutations in TP53.

scholarly journals Positive regulation of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation by activation of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Mec1(ATR)

Open Biology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 130019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Gray ◽  
Rachal M. Allison ◽  
Valerie Garcia ◽  
Alastair S. H. Goldman ◽  
Matthew J. Neale
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Genetic Exchange ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Complex Process ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna Damage Signalling

During meiosis, formation and repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) create genetic exchange between homologous chromosomes—a process that is critical for reductional meiotic chromosome segregation and the production of genetically diverse sexually reproducing populations. Meiotic DSB formation is a complex process, requiring numerous proteins, of which Spo11 is the evolutionarily conserved catalytic subunit. Precisely how Spo11 and its accessory proteins function or are regulated is unclear. Here, we use Saccharomyces cerevisiae to reveal that meiotic DSB formation is modulated by the Mec1(ATR) branch of the DNA damage signalling cascade, promoting DSB formation when Spo11-mediated catalysis is compromised. Activation of the positive feedback pathway correlates with the formation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) recombination intermediates and activation of the downstream kinase, Mek1. We show that the requirement for checkpoint activation can be rescued by prolonging meiotic prophase by deleting the NDT80 transcription factor, and that even transient prophase arrest caused by Ndt80 depletion is sufficient to restore meiotic spore viability in checkpoint mutants. Our observations are unexpected given recent reports that the complementary kinase pathway Tel1(ATM) acts to inhibit DSB formation. We propose that such antagonistic regulation of DSB formation by Mec1 and Tel1 creates a regulatory mechanism, where the absolute frequency of DSBs is maintained at a level optimal for genetic exchange and efficient chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Ackerson ◽  
Carlan Romney ◽  
P. Logan Schuck ◽  
Jason A. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Genome Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Decision Points ◽  
Chromosome Fusions ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Ends

The regulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and telomeres are diametrically opposed in the cell. DSBs are considered one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage and must be quickly recognized and repaired. Telomeres, on the other hand, are specialized, stable DNA ends that must be protected from recognition as DSBs to inhibit unwanted chromosome fusions. Decisions to join DNA ends, or not, are therefore critical to genome stability. Yet, the processing of telomeres and DSBs share many commonalities. Accordingly, key decision points are used to shift DNA ends toward DSB repair vs. end protection. Additionally, DSBs can be repaired by two major pathways, namely homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The choice of which repair pathway is employed is also dictated by a series of decision points that shift the break toward HR or NHEJ. In this review, we will focus on these decision points and the mechanisms that dictate end protection vs. DSB repair and DSB repair choice.

scholarly journals The mRNA export adaptor Yra1 contributes to DNA double-strand break repair through its C-box domain

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Infantino ◽  
Evelina Tutucci ◽  
Noël Yeh Martin ◽  
Audrey Zihlmann ◽  
Varinia García-Molinero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mrna Export ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nuclear Pores ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Telomere Shortening ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

ABSTRACTYra1 is an mRNA export adaptor involved in mRNA biogenesis and export in S. cerevisiae. Yra1 overexpression was recently shown to promote accumulation of DNA:RNA hybrids favoring DNA double strand breaks (DSB), cell senescence and telomere shortening, via an unknown mechanism. Yra1 was also identified at an HO-induced DSB and Yra1 depletion causes defects in DSB repair. Previous work from our laboratory showed that Yra1 ubiquitination by Tom1 is important for mRNA export. Interestingly, we found that Yra1 is also ubiquitinated by the SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases Slx5-Slx8 implicated in the interaction of irreparable DSB with nuclear pores. Here we show that Yra1 binds an HO-induced irreparable DSB. Importantly, a Yra1 mutant lacking the evolutionarily conserved C-box is not recruited to an HO-induced irreparable DSB and becomes lethal under DSB induction in a HO-cut reparable system. Together, the data provide evidence that Yra1 plays a crucial role in DSB repair via homologous recombination. Unexpectedly, while the Yra1 C-box is essential, Yra1 sumoylation and/or ubiquitination are dispensable in this process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document