scholarly journals Comparison of human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in urine and cervical swab samples using the HPV GenoArray Diagnostic assay

PeerJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. e3910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pornjarim Nilyanimit ◽  
Jira Chansaenroj ◽  
Anant Karalak ◽  
Piyawat Laowahutanont ◽  
Pairoj Junyangdikul ◽  
...  

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the leading cause of cervical cancer. Urine-based HPV testing offers a simple and non-invasive method because of its increasing acceptance. A total of 164 pairs of cervical swab and urine samples from Thai women who underwent cervical cancer screening were used for HPV testing with HPV GenoArray Diagnostic Kits. The overall concordance percentage for HPV detection in the cervical swab and urine samples was 65.2%. The HPV genotypes most commonly detected were HPV16 and HPV18. An analysis of the urine samples and a second analysis of the cervical swab samples showed that the differences in the overall HPV detection rate between women with normal and abnormal cytology were not significant (p > 0.05). Urine samples processed with the GenoArray assay is an alternative for women who decline to undergo Pap smear even though it is not ideal as the first-line screening option.

Sexual Health ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Tota ◽  
Salaheddin M. Mahmud ◽  
Alex Ferenczy ◽  
François Coutlée ◽  
Eduardo L. Franco

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is expected to reduce the burden of cervical cancer in most settings; however, it is also expected to interfere with the effectiveness of screening. In the future, maintaining Pap cytology as the primary cervical screening test may become too costly. As the prevalence of cervical dysplasias decreases, the positive predictive value of the Pap test will also decrease, and, as a result, more women will be referred for unnecessary diagnostic procedures and follow-up. HPV DNA testing has recently emerged as the most likely candidate to replace cytology for primary screening. It is less prone to human error and much more sensitive than the Pap smear in detecting high-grade cervical lesions. Incorporating this test would improve the overall quality of screening programs and allow spacing out screening tests, while maintaining safety and lowering costs. Although HPV testing is less specific than Pap cytology, this issue could be resolved by reserving the latter for the more labour-efficient task of triaging HPV-positive cases. Because most HPV-positive smears would contain relevant abnormalities, Pap cytology would be expected to perform with sufficient accuracy under these circumstances. HPV Pap triage would also provide a low-cost strategy to monitor long-term vaccine efficacy. Although demonstration projects could start implementing HPV testing as a population screening tool, more research is needed to determine the optimal age to initiate screening, the role of HPV typing and other markers of disease progression, and appropriate follow-up algorithms for HPV-positive and Pap-negative women.


2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-44
Author(s):  
Indra Balachandran

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and viral persistence is a major risk factor in the development of squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma of the cervix. In the United States, deaths due to squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix have fallen by 75% since the 1960s because of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening. However, the traditional Pap had a sensitivity of about 70% for detecting clinically significant precancerous lesions and cancer because of sampling and interpretive errors. The introduction of 2 liquid-based Pap smear collection systems in the 1990s, the use of HPV testing as a triage and co-testing with Pap smear, and the introduction of 2 automated screening devices have had a significant impact on improving the detection of such precancerous lesions. This review provides an analysis of the changes in Pap smear collection, improvements in screening, the evolutionary changes of high-risk HPV testing, reporting terminology of Pap smears, and clinical management guidelines. The future impact of 2 prophylactic HPV vaccines on the incidence of cervical carcinoma is also discussed. This article also discusses alternatives such as primary screening for high-risk HPV testing with visual inspection for cervical cancer detection used in resource-poor settings with a high incidence of cervical cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S765-S765
Author(s):  
Anita Shallal ◽  
Joseph Trak ◽  
Saivaishnavi Kamatham ◽  
Omar Fehmi ◽  
Sarah Farooqi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Pap smear is a screening examination that detects abnormal cervical cells and may be paired with human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in order to detect high-risk, oncogenic HPV strains. The incidence of cervical cancer varies among groups due to racial and ethnic disparities, and 80% of cases occur in developing countries. Mortality rates for cervical cancer in the Middle East are disproportionately higher when compared to developed countries. Our study aims to assess the prevalence of HPV and cervical cancer among a subset of Arab-American women in southeast Michigan. Methods The study is a retrospective chart review of women who presented for routine cancer screening as part of the Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program (BCCCP), at the Arab-American Center for Economic and Social Services Clinic in southeast Michigan between 2003-2019. Paper charts were reviewed for information such as age, date of birth, monthly income, tobacco use, cervix-related gynecological examination performance, cervical cytology results, and HPV testing results. Women between the ages of 21 and 65 were included. In instances where cytology was performed, results and details of high-risk HPV testing were documented. In instances where high-risk HPV testing was performed, negative results were documented as such, and positive results were documented as either positive for HPV 16, 18, or other high-risk strains, or unknown if serotype testing was not available. Results A total of 464 charts from the BCCCP program were reviewed. All women included were uninsured and had immigrated from Middle Eastern countries, including Yemen and Lebanon. The average age of the women was 48.3 years. Of 464 women, 6% (n=28) of women declined to have a Pap smear. 85 women reported they had never had a Pap smear. Of the 436 women who did undergo Pap smear, 42 women (9.6%) had an abnormal pap smear. The remaining results are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Conclusion Our study results show a trend toward HPV serotype 16 and other serotypes compared to HPV serotype 18 in Arab-American women who recently immigrated to the United States. However, this needs to be studied on a larger cohort of patients to determine if these serotypes are more common among this ethnicity compared to the general population. Disclosures Marcus Zervos, MD, Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Liang ◽  
Thomas Einzmann ◽  
Sylke Ruth Zeissig ◽  
Arno Franzen ◽  
Katja Schwarzer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cervical cancer screening can be conducted with cytology and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing but few studies have compared the latter directly to concomitant testing (co-testing). We compared these strategies to determine appropriate screening. Methods Within a randomised population-based cohort study conducted around Mainz, Germany, eligible women (≥30 years) were screened via Pap smear, liquid-based cytology (LBC) and HPV testing (HC2) and HPV genotyped post hoc (PCR). These tests formed three strategies: cytology (Pap or LBC) and HPV (HC2 or PCR) stand-alone and co-testing. Screen positives and 5% negative women were invited to colposcopy. Absolute and relative sensitivity, specificity, false positive rates (FPR) and number needed to colposcopy to detect one lesion (NNC) were calculated. Estimates were crude and verification bias-adjusted using stratified sampling with bootstrapped confidence intervals. Results Of 2,627 screened women, cytology stand-alone demonstrated lowest sensitivities (47%) and highest specificities (97%-99%) while HPV stand-alone demonstrated higher sensitivities (79%-95%) but lower specificities (94%-95%). Co-testing increased sensitivity (84%-99%) but not specificity (92%-95%). Relative sensitivities were similar between crude and adjusted estimates, with greater detection via HPV-based strategies. Specificity of co-testing with LBC relative to HPV stand-alone was near unity (0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00) but significantly lower than unity with Pap co-testing. FPR and NNC were greatest under co-testing. Conclusions HPV stand-alone screening in women over 30 years appears appropriate over co-testing as a screening strategy. Key messages Co-testing for cervical cancer does not appear to add any benefit in detection and may introduce unnecessary harms compared to HPV stand-alone screening.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 562
Author(s):  
Alec J. Kacew ◽  
Glenn J. Hanna

The burden of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has risen, now representing the most common HPV-related malignancy. For years, researchers have explored the utility of measuring HPV-related markers from mouth, throat, and blood samples, often with the aim of gathering more information about an existing HPV-related tumor in a given patient. We review the widely varying methods for collecting and testing saliva and blood samples and offer guidance for standardizing these practices. We then review an array of clinical contexts in which non-invasive testing holds the most promise for potentially addressing unmet needs. In particular, such testing could help clinicians and researchers monitor the effects of vaccination and treatment. Meanwhile, due to the currently incomplete understanding of how carrying HPV relates to infection and subsequent oncogenesis, non-invasive testing methods may not be suitable for the screening setting at this time.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1276-1281
Author(s):  
R. Bahramabadi ◽  
M. K. Arababadi ◽  
M. Iranpour ◽  
E. Mohebbi ◽  
Z. Honarvar ◽  
...  

Background: High-Risk Human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) has been well established as the cervical cancer (CC) risk factor. In recent years, various diagnostic methods of human papillomaviruses (HPV) have been developed to promote sensitivity and specificity of CC screening which leads to a low mortality rate. This study aimed to compare diagnostic test metrics of two HPV diagnostic techniques, including Western blot and INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra II assay methods in asymptomatic or subclinical patients, among the South-Eastern Iranian women. Methods: 323 women were referred to the Pathology and Stem Cell Research Center, from February 2018 to January 2020. HPV-DNA with the INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra-II Assay kit and the western blot assays for HPV E7 and E6 assessment were employed. Results: Overall, 163 (50.4%) samples were dysplastic pap smear, the specificity of the HPV DNA test by INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra-II Assay test was significantly higher than the E7/E6 oncoproteins finding (67.3 vs. 49.9%), and the sensitivity was lower (96.6 vs. 74.8%), respectively. Conclusions: HR-HPV E7/E6 oncoproteins expression was evaluated as a possible novel biomarker for CC screening in pap smear as the preliminary test with satisfactory diagnostic values for HR-HPV types 16 and 18. The corresponding diagnostic values may be further improved by combining HPV DNA tests with the INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra-II test. Also, they may prove helpful for HR-HPV infection diagnosis in cases that the patients are asymptomatic or subclinical. Keywords: Cervical Cancer; Human Papillomavirus (HPV); Diagnostic Screening Programs; Oncogene Proteins


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 63-70
Author(s):  
Andrea D. Olivas ◽  
Julieta E. Barroeta ◽  
Ricardo R. Lastra

The association between high-risk genotypes of human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) and cervical cancer is well established. As hr-HPV testing is rapidly becoming a part of routine cervical cancer screening, either in conjunction with cytology or as primary testing, the management of hr-HPV-positive women has to be tailored in a way that increases the detection of cervical abnormalities while decreasing unnecessary colposcopic biopsies or other invasive procedures. In this review, we discuss the overall utility and strategies of hr-HPV testing, as well as the advantages and limitations of potential triage strategies for hr-HPV-positive women, including HPV genotyping, p16/Ki-67 dual staining, and methylation assays.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document