scholarly journals Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Three Endodontic Sealers: An Ex-Vivo Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 49-57
Author(s):  
Neeta Padmawar ◽  
Viddyasagar Moapagr ◽  
Vinay Vadvadgi ◽  
Jayshree Vishwas ◽  
Sourabh Joshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Scanning Microscope ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Microscopic Evaluation ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Electron Scanning Microscope ◽  
Endodontic Sealers

Introduction: To avoid the entry of micro-organism or their products, sealer should completely adapt to the root canal wall so that no gaps will be present. AH plus is the most routinely used sealer. EndoRez is methacrylate resin-based self as well as light cured sealer. Endosequence BC RCS is the recently introduced bioceramic based sealer. Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of Endosequence BS RCS, EndoRez and AH plus as a root canal sealer to root dentin under electron scanning microscope. Methods: Total 75 freshly extracted permanent maxillary central incisors with single canal were included in this study. All the teeth were decoronated till twelve millimeter and access cavity was prepared. All the teeth were prepared with rotary protaper till# F3 with intermediate copious irrigation with 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17%EDTA.Teeth were randomly divided into three groups according to sealers and were obturated- Endosequence BC RCS, Ah Plus and EndoRez. Access cavity was restored with glass ionomer type II in all the groups. After seven days, teeth were vertically sectioned and evaluated under electron scanning microscope for marginal adaptation. Results: Marginal gaps were present in all groups. Maximum number of gaps were present in Ah plus group. Endosequence BC RCS group showed least number of gaps. Discussion: Marginal adaptation of sealer depends upon the properties like flow, viscosity, presence or absence of smear layer etc. Better adaptation of Endosequence BC RCS to root dentin is due to formation of mineral infiltration zone which results in formation of calcific tags in dentine. Conclusion: Within the limitation of present study, newly introduced Endosequence BC RCS showed better marginal adaptability to root dentine. Further studies are required to evaluate and corelate these findings with other properties of these sealers.

scholarly journals Confocal laser scanning microscopic evaluation of depth of penetration and Sealer/Dentin interface between endodontic sealers - An in-vitro study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-67
Author(s):  
Lakshmi Balaji ◽  
Sukanya Kanaga Raj ◽  
Preethi V ◽  
Kandaswamy Deivanayagam
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Maximum Depth ◽  
Depth Of Penetration ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Microscopic Evaluation ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Endodontic Sealers ◽  
One Way Anova

An endodontic sealer contributes in obtaining an appropriate seal for the root canal system by establishing an association between the root canal walls and coronal restoration thereby promoting healing. This present research intended to compare the penetrating capacity and to determine sealer/dentin interface among various endodontic sealers. Horizontally sectioned tooth samples were obtained at 3 and 5mm and randomly divided into three groups: Group I - Chemically cured (AH Plus) sealer; Group II - Dual cured (EndoREZ) sealer; Group III – BioCeramic Nano sealer (iRoot SP). All three groups were coated with their respective sealers and obturated using cold lateral compaction technique. The samples were observed using Confocal Microscope for penetrating capacity evaluation and reviewing of sealer/dentin junction at 3 and 5mm depth. The results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's Post-Hoc method. On depth of penetration evaluation, one-way ANOVA analysis showed Group II exhibited maximum depth of penetration in contrast to Group III and Group I. Group I showed the least average depth of penetration among the other two groups at both 3 and 5mm. On sealer/dentin interface evaluation at 3mm, Group II showed increased interface in comparison with to Group III and Group I. No statistical significance evident among the groups at 5mm. EndoREZ showed maximum depth of penetration in comparison with iRoot SP and AH Plus sealer at both 3 and 5mm. EndoREZ also showed significant sealer/dentin interface at the level of 3mm when compared to other sealers used.

scholarly journals Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinicius Humberto Nunes ◽  
Ricardo Gariba Silva ◽  
Edson Alfredo ◽  
Manoel D. Sousa-Neto ◽  
Yara T. C. Silva-Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Water Control ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Endodontic Sealers ◽  
Push Out

This study evaluated comparatively the adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus endodontic sealers to human root dentin treated with 1% NaOCl and 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA, using the push-out test. Sixty root cylinders obtained from maxillary canines had the canals prepared and were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n=20), according to root dentin treatment: GI - distilled water (control), GII - 1% NaOCl and GIII - 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n=10) filled with either Epiphany or AH Plus. Bond strength push-out test data (kN) were obtained and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. There was statistically significant difference between sealers (AH Plus: 0.78 ± 0.13; Epiphany: 0.61 ± 0.19; p<0.01) and among root dentin treatments (distilled water: 0.58 ± 0.19; 1% NaOCl: 0.71 ± 0.12; 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA: 0.80 ± 0.17; p<0.05). In conclusion, AH Plus sealer presented greater adhesion to dentin than Epiphany, regardless of the treatment of root canal walls.

scholarly journals Debunking the Concept of Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Endodontic Sealers: Sealer Staining with Rhodamine B Fluorescent Dye Is an Inadequate Method

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3211
Author(s):  
David Donnermeyer ◽  
Sina Schmidt ◽  
Arno Rohrbach ◽  
Johannes Berlandi ◽  
Sebastian Bürklein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Penetration Depth ◽  
Rhodamine B ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Laser Scanning Microscopy ◽  
Confocal Laser ◽  
Dentinal Tubule ◽  
Dentinal Tubules ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Rhodamine B Dye

The aim of this study was to investigate the suitability of rhodamine B dye staining of an epoxy resin sealer (AH Plus) and calcium-silicate-based sealers (Total Fill BC Sealer, BioRoot RCS) to represent the penetration depth of the sealers into dentinal tubules after root canal obturation. In a three-step process, (1) leaching of rhodamine B from sealers into a buffer solution, (2) passive penetration of leached rhodamine B into dentinal tubules, and (3) conformity of rhodamine B penetration assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and sealer penetration assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), in root-canal-filled teeth, were evaluated. Rhodamine B dye massively leached out of Total Fill BC Sealer and BioRoot RCS into the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). A pinkish coloration of AH Plus was found after contact with PBS. Leached rhodamine B dye passively penetrated dentinal tubules from all three sealers when placed on root dentin. No correlation was observed between sealer penetration in SEM and rhodamine B penetration in CLSM. Staining of sealers using rhodamine B is an inadequate method with which to evaluate sealer penetration depth into dentinal tubules, as it overestimates the penetration of sealers into root dentin tubules.

scholarly journals Long-term evaluation of crown and root discoloration induced by different endodontic sealers

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. e18483
Author(s):  
Beatriz Serrato Coelho ◽  
Paula Pontes Garcia ◽  
Flávia Sens Fagundes Tomazinho ◽  
Leonardo Fernandes Cunha ◽  
Denise Piotto Leonardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
The Other ◽  
Tooth Crown ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Color Changes ◽  
Term Evaluation ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Endodontic Sealers

Aim: To evaluate crown and root discoloration promoted by different endodontic sealers after root canal filling. Methods: Eighty bovine incisors were prepared and filled with: Endofill, Sealer 26, AH Plus, and MTA Fillapex. Color was recorded using a spectrophotometer before endodontic treatment (T0) and at 24 hours (T1), seven days (T2), 30 days (T3), and 90 days (T4) after treatment. Analyses were performed on the middle and cervical regions of the crown, and on the cervical third of the root, immediately below the cementoenamel junction. The color alterations (ΔE) were calculated using Commission International de I’Eclairage (CIE) L*a*b parameters, and data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). Results: All sealers induced color alterations. Sealer 26 resulted in the smallest changes in color (E = 5.32). The other materials did not present statistical differences (AH Plus E = 6.98; MTA Fillapex E = 6.88; Endofill E = 6.41). Of the three regions analyzed, the largest discoloration was observed at the cervical third of the root (E=10.67). In terms of time, the largest ΔE values (E=7.72) were observed at T4. Color changes at T1 (E=5.88), T2 (E=6.10), and T3 (E=5.89) were statistically similar. Conclusions: All endodontic sealers promoted discoloration on the tooth crown and root.

scholarly journals A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different root canal irrigation regimens

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaves Medici Mônika ◽  
Izabel Cristina Fröner
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Ricinus Communis ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Canal Irrigation ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Root Canal Irrigation ◽  
Microscopic Evaluation ◽  
Scanning Electron

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of endodontic irrigants in removing the smear layer from instrumented root canal walls using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The endodontic irrigants used were: 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); 1% NaOCl mixed to 17% EDTAC; 2% chlorhexidine gel; and Ricinus communis gel. Photomicrographs of the middle and apical thirds were evaluated with the aid of the Fotoscore - v. 2.0 software. The results indicated that the mixture of sodium hypochlorite and EDTAC completely removed the smear layer from dentinal walls. The other endodontic irrigants were not as efficient in cleansing the root canals.

scholarly journals Adhesion capacity of bioceramic and resin-based root canal sealer to root dentin: an integrative review

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Carolyne De Pinho Quintão ◽  
Sabrina Teixeira Pinto Costa ◽  
Mariane Floriano Lopes Santos Lacerda ◽  
Caroline Felipe Magalhães Girelli ◽  
Carolina Oliveira De Lima
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Root Canal Sealer ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Dentin

Objetivo: comparar a capacidade de adesão do cimento biocerâmico EndoSequence BC e do cimento resinoso AH Plus através de uma revisão integrativa. Material e Métodos: os bancos de dados online Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science e BVS foram utilizados para a revisão da literatura. Os critérios de elegibilidade incluíram artigos disponíveis na íntegra nas bases de dados pesquisadas, em inglês, e o conteúdo referente à adesão do cimento Endosequence BC sealer em comparação ao AH Plus. Resultados: foram encontrados 45 artigos. Após a remoção duplicada, 22 artigos foram selecionados. Após a leitura dos resumos, textos completos e aplicação dos critérios de inclusão, foram incluídos no total oito artigos. Em relação à capacidade de adesão dos cimentos testados, o AH Plus apresentou melhor adesão do que o cimento BC sealer em três artigos e menor adesão em dois artigos. Força de adesão semelhante foi observada entre os grupos em três estudos. Conclusões: com base nos estudos incluídos, o AH Plus apresenta maior resistência de união quando comparado ao BC Sealer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document