The comparative study of male and female boarding school students’ family, school, academic, individual (mental), and cyberspace problems in Mahneshan (based on a content analysis of letters received by advisor)

2019 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 55-59
Author(s):  
Maryam Ahani
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Boarding School ◽  
School Students ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
The Comparative Study

scholarly journals PEMBELAJARAN KITAB KUNING DI PONDOK PESANTREN HIDAYATULLAH TERNATE

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-80
Author(s):  
Faizal Bachrong
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Education Institution ◽  
Boarding School ◽  
Qualitative Description ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
School Students ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Lecture Method ◽  
Senior High School Students

Pesantren is Islamic education institution that still be needed by the Ummah. The study of kitab kuning is an important element of it, and this generally tends to be stagnant, for various reasons. Therefore the study of the use of kitab kuning in pesantren is urgent. This research highlights the reality of kitab kuning study in boarding school, mainly Pondok Pesantren Hidayatullah Ternate. This is qualitative research in which the data collection techniques are interview, observation and study of documents and literature. The analysis of the data is qualitative description. The result of this research shows that Pondok Pesantren Hidayatullah Ternate, which was established in 1994, includes a combination between Islamic boarding school system and formal education units in the form of schools and madrasas. Basically the santri are lodged. The boarding school students are junior and senior high school students, both male and female. The male and female campuses are separated by a distance of about 1 km. They are all participated in tahfidz Alquran and ta’līm diniyyah. The books studied in this boarding school are limited to 5 books that outlined by the Central Executive, regarding Aqidah, Fikih, Tafsir, Sirah and Arabic. The study of these books uses lecture method and the santris only gather and heed without having the book.

scholarly journals THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DOWRY REGULATIONS IN INDONESIA AND MOROCCO LEGISLATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-232
Author(s):  
Ali Trigiyatno
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
The Other ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Different Characteristics

This article compares dowry regulations in Indonesia and Morocco. Bearing in mind that Indonesia and Morocco have different characteristics in dowry matter, the regulations are worth comparing for. As understood in Islamic marriages, dowry is an important obligation and must be fulfilled by the bridegroom for the bride. Normative Islamic teaching advocates for dowry that is simple and reasonable, but in practice, sometimes dowry becomes expensive and difficult to be given, and thus, causing unfavorable effects. In addition, dowry also has the potentials to be subjected to disputes between husband and wife if not regulated by legislation in details. The author uses a comparative study of law guided by a normative approach through library research. The main source is the statutes of two countries. Analysis technique used is content analysis. As a result, it is found that with different backgrounds of fiqh school in Indonesia and Morroco-one being strongly influenced by Shāfi‘ī school and the other is influenced by Mālikī school-have similar rules on dowry. The only significant difference is that the Mālikī School and its legislation in Morocco considers dowry as a marriage pillar. Meanwhile, the Shāfi‘ī school and its legislation in Indonesia, even though the dowry is regarded as compulsory, it does not become a condition or a marriage pillar. Other differences are the definition of dowry, regulation of wife’s luggage, lost dowry, defective dowry, introduction of mithil dowry, regulation of dowry disputes before entering the household, and regulation of furniture disputes other than the wife’s luggage.

scholarly journals Developing a Shared Decision-Making Model for Diabetic Patients: A Qualitative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. e1735
Author(s):  
Khorshid Vaskouei Eshkevarei ◽  
Kamran Hajinabi ◽  
Leila Riahi ◽  
Mohammadreza Maleki
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Decision Making Model

Background: Patient participation in healthcare leads to increased satisfaction and trust, reduction of anxiety, and a better understanding of patients’ needs. The components of shared decision-making (SDM) are well documented in the literature. The purpose of this study was to design an SDM model for diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: This qualitative content analysis study was performed in three steps. First, a descriptive comparative study was conducted using the widely-used George Brady method. Next, the perceptions of participants (both physicians and patients) were collected via interview and in focus group discussions (FGDs). Content analysis was used to categorize the comments made by participants. In the final step, the model of SDM for diabetic patients was designed based on expert panel discussions. Results: Twelve components were extracted from the comparative study. Two themes and six sub-themes were extracted from data resulting from physicians’ interviews, and two themes and ten sub-themes were extracted from data resulting from the FGDs involving patients. The model of SDM for diabetic patients was designed in light of three concepts; practitioners’ behavior, participatory decision-making process, and patients’ autonomy. Conclusion: This model was valuable because it recognizes the process of SDM in the context of Iran. The model’s main purpose was to help choose optimum strategies for the care of diabetic patients within the health sector. [GMJ.2021;10:e1735]

Patna rhizolineata sp. n. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense) in Pakistan

1980 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-276
Author(s):  
J. D. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Sorghum Halepense ◽  
Type Material ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Johnson Grass ◽  
Lepidoptera Pyralidae ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Pyralid Moth

AbstractA pyralid moth belonging to the tribe Anerastiini, reared from larvae feeding in the rhizomes of Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense) in Pakistan, is described from the male and female and named Patna rhizolineata sp. n. It is differentiated from the closely related Afrotropical species P. venatella Hmps. As a result of the comparative study of type material, P. brunneicostella Hmps., Critonia sarcoida Hmps. and P. aulacodes Meyr. were found to be conspecific with P. venatella and are placed as junior synonyms of it.

Editorial journalism and political interests: Comparing the coverage of Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment in Brazilian newspapers

Journalism ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 146488491989412
Author(s):  
Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques ◽  
Camila Mont’Alverne ◽  
Isabele Mitozo
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Vice President ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Situation ◽  
Political Interests ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Quantitative And Qualitative Methods

The article investigates how Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo – two of the leading Brazilian quality newspapers – expressed their editorial positions on the impeachment of the ex-president Dilma Rousseff. The comparative study encompasses quantitative and qualitative methods to examine 506 editorial texts published between 2015 and 2016. By using Content Analysis, the research found out that Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo take different positions along the process: each newspaper presents particular arguments to justify the impeachment’s legitimacy; regarding the solution for the political situation, O Estado de S. Paulo fully supports the impeachment, while Folha de S. Paulo asks for the then president and her vice-president to resign. In the end, both organizations agree in their editorials that Rousseff has to be removed from office. At the same time, Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo try to avoid being seen as actors conspiring against democracy, which makes them dispute whether Rousseff’s impeachment was or not a coup. This research provides the opportunity to investigate to what extent journalism loosens its place as a watchdog to behave as a demanding actor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document