infection control team
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

58
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1537
Author(s):  
Yoshiro Sakai ◽  
Kenji Gotoh ◽  
Ryuichi Nakano ◽  
Jun Iwahashi ◽  
Miho Miura ◽  
...  

Background: A carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) outbreak occurred in an advanced emergency medical service center [hereafter referred to as the intensive care unit (ICU)] between 2016 and 2017. Aim: Our objective was to evaluate the infection control measures for CRE outbreaks. Methods: CRE strains were detected in 16 inpatients located at multiple sites. Environmental cultures were performed and CRE strains were detected in 3 of 38 sites tested. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and detection of β-lactamase genes were performed against 25 CRE strains. Findings: Molecular typing showed the PFGE patterns of two of four Klebsiella pneumoniae strains were closely related and the same MLST (ST2388), and four of five Enterobacter cloacae strains were closely related and same MLST (ST252). Twenty-three of 25 CRE strains harbored the IMP-1 β-lactamase gene and 15 of 23 CRE strains possessed IncFIIA replicon regions. Despite interventions by the infection control team, new inpatients with the CRE strain continued to appear. Therefore, the ICU was partially closed and the inpatients with CRE were isolated, and the ICU staff was divided into two groups between inpatients with CRE and non-CRE strains to avoid cross-contamination. Although the occurrence of new cases dissipated quickly after the partial closure, a few months were required to eradicate the CRE outbreak. Conclusion: Our data suggest that the various and combined measures that were used for infection control were essential in stopping this CRE outbreak. In particular, partial closure to isolate the ICU and division of the ICU staff were effective.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s11-s11
Author(s):  
Sonja Rivera Saenz

Background: High-level disinfection (HLD) of semicritical instruments in a multispecialty ambulatory care network has the potential for increased risk due to the decentralized instrument reprocessing and lack of a sterile processing department. Attention to HLD practices is an important part of device-borne outbreak prevention. Method: An HLD database was developed to identify specific departments and locations where HLD occurred across a 30-medical practice ambulatory care network in eastern Massachusetts, which included otolaryngology, urology, endoscopy, and obstetrics/gynecology departments. Based on qualitative feedback from managers and reprocessing staff, this database centralized information that included the supply inventory including manufacturer and model information, HLD methodology, standard work, and listing of competency evaluations. The infection control team then led audits to directly observe compliance with instrument reprocessing and a monthly-driven HLD calendar was developed to enforce annual competencies. Result: The results of the audits demonstrated variability across departments with gaps in precleaning, transportation of used instruments, the dilution of enzymatic cleaner, and maintenance of quality control logs. Given the uniqueness of shape and size of various ambulatory locations, proper storage and separation between clean and dirty spaces were common pitfalls. Auditing also revealed different levels of staff understanding of standard work and variable inventory management. Centralized education sessions held jointly by the infection control team and various manufacturers for the reprocessing staff helped to create and reinforce best practices. Conclusion: Decentralized HLD that occurs across multiple ambulatory care sites led to gaps in instrument reprocessing and unique challenges due to variable geography of sites, physical space constraints, and an independent approach to procuring medical supplies. Through the auditing and feedback of all areas that perform HLD, an effective and sustainable strategy was created to ensure practice improvement. Streamlining standard work, seeking direct input from frontline staff, and collective educational events were critical to our success in the ambulatory setting.Funding: NoDisclosures: None


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-105
Author(s):  
Alshahrani et al. ◽  

The aim of this study was to assess the perception of healthcare workers regarding self-protection during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. The novel COVID-19 pandemic has completely changed the dynamic of governments, social lives, global economy, and health care systems priorities. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are one of the most group of people at risk of acquiring the infection, especially those who are taking care of COVID-19 patients. This cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted among HCWs during the period between May to July 2020 in Saudi Arabia. More than 70% of participating HCWs were able to access the personal safety policies and procedures in the workplace and COVID-19 treatment algorithm. In addition, the presence of an infection control team was also present in most of the institutes. The most common accessible personal protective equipment was hand gel sanitizer (89.9%), followed by disposable gloves (82.5%) and disposable masks (78.9%). More than 75% of participants reported that their institute has a special infection control team during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of the respondents (~75%) believe that their institute would take all necessary measurements to protect their personal integrity at work. Several precautionary measures were undertaken appropriately by the Saudi Government to overcome the COVID-19 immediate and futuristic consequences. Personal protective equipment and protective measures would be crucial for public health if implemented appropriately during highly spreading infections (e.g., COVID-19) to minimize the transmission and preserve health


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 2540-2545
Author(s):  
Steffen Höring ◽  
René Fussen ◽  
Johannes Neusser ◽  
Michael Kleines ◽  
Thea Laurentius ◽  
...  

AbstractTo the best of our knowledge, here, we describe the first hospital-wide outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 that occurred in Germany in April 2020. We aim to share our experience in order to facilitate the management of nosocomial COVID-19 outbreaks in healthcare facilities. All patients and hospital workers were screened for SARS-CoV-2 repeatedly. An infection control team on the side was installed. Strict spatial separation of patients and intensified hygiene training of healthcare workers (HCW) were initiated. By the time of reporting, 26 patients and 21 hospital workers were infected with a cluster of cases in the geriatric department. Fourteen patients developed COVID-19 consistent symptoms and five patients with severe pre-existing medical conditions died. The outbreak was successfully contained after intensified infection control measures were implemented and no further cases among patients were detected over a period of 14 days. Strict application of standard infection control measures proved to be successful in the management of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s299-s300
Author(s):  
Hala Amer ◽  
Ahmed Alenizi

Background: In 2018, the Ministry of Health (MOH) in Saudi Arabia launched the Infection Control Excellence Center (ICEC) program among healthcare governmental institutions to create an exceptionally high concentration of expertise and resources within the infection prevention and control discipline to afford the best patient outcomes possible. King Saud Medical City (KSMC), one of the main healthcare institutions in Riyadh, was selected to be among the 10 facilities participating in ICEC 2019 competition. It is expected to qualify the facility to lead the Kingdom infection prevention and control as well as sharing expertise at regional and international levels. Methods: The infection control team at KSMCA used a business model canvas to present the project vision, resources, partners, values, and revenue streams (Fig. 1). All project stakeholders were engaged, including core infection control team, various hospital departments as internal partners, along with the MOH team as external partners. The ICEC program was presented at the KSMC executive council to earn leadership support. The following assessment areas were included in the presentation: (1) quality assurance and patient care through sustain basic infection control standards and improve key performance indicators (KPIs); (2) enhance the development and structure of the infection control team; (3) pursue innovative ideas in infection control practices. Overall, 17 projects arranged into 4 programs have been proposed (Fig. 2). Results: The institution successfully passed the eligibility criteria assessment in the first quarter of 2019. Infection control KPIs have been corporatized with KSMC strategic KPIs that support infection control improvement initiatives. The infection control team continues to grow in function and capacity. Also, 4 additional were awarded CIC certification in 2019 to reach total of 11 CICs, which represent 30% of the team (including 1 recertification). A dashboard designed by the project management office facilitates follow-up with the proposed projects in progress. Completion levels ranging between 30% and 100% have been achieved among these projects. A final evaluation was conducted in December 2019, including a field visit by the MOH ICEC team as well as a written MCQs exams and interviews with the core infection control team. Communication among the stakeholders and leadership involvement were considered among the assessment criteria. Conclusions: The ICEC supports and motivates investment in human capital and encourages innovative, cost-effective solutions in infection control field in Saudi Arabia. It is also aligned with Saudi Arabia healthcare transformation and the 2030 vision through integrated programs in healthcare facilities.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


Author(s):  
Yeon Su Jeong ◽  
Jin Hwa Kim ◽  
Seungju Lee ◽  
So Young Lee ◽  
Sun Mi Oh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon Su Jeong ◽  
Jin Hwa Kim ◽  
Seungju Lee ◽  
So Young Lee ◽  
Sun Mi Oh ◽  
...  

Abstract Regular and well-organized inspection of infection control is an essential element of an infection control program. The aim of this study was to identify the functional scope of weekly infection control team rounding (ICTR) in an acute care hospital. We conducted weekly ICTR between January 18 and December 26, 2018 to improve the compliance to infection control and prevention measures at a 734-bed academic hospital in the Republic of Korea and analyzed the results retrospectively. We categorized the results into five groups: “well maintained,” “improvement needed,” “long-term support, such as space or manpower, needed,” “not applicable,” or “could not be observed”. A total of nine categories and 85 sub-elements of infection control and prevention practices were evaluated. The median number of infection control team (ICT) visits per department was 7 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6-7). The ICT assessed a median of 16 elements (IQR: 12-22), and a total of 7,452 results were obtained. Of those, 75% were monitored properly, 22% were “not applicable”, and 4% were difficult to observe. The most common practices that were difficult to observe were strategies to prevent catheter-related surgical site infections, pneumonia, and occupationally acquired infections as well as injection safety practices. Although the ICTR was able to maintain regular visits to each department, further strategies beyond regular ICTR are needed to reduce category of “could not observed”. This pilot study may provide an important reference for institutional infection prevention practices as it is the first study to investigate the functional coverage of ICTR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattea Clarke ◽  
John Devlin ◽  
Emmett Conroy ◽  
Enda Kelly ◽  
Sunita Sturup-Toft

Abstract Background Preventing transmission of COVID-19 within prisons is both important and challenging. The confined conditions in prisons can encourage person-to-person spread with the potential for outbreaks occurring. Contact tracing is an important contributor to the longer-term management strategy for COVID-19 in prisons as well as in the community but is highly resource-intensive. This paper describes the approach to contact tracing taken by the Irish Prison Service (IPS). Methods The IPS National Infection Control Team, in collaboration with the National Quality Improvement (QI) team and Health Service Executive (HSE) in Ireland, implemented a programme to develop and train in-prison contact tracing teams (CTTs). CTTs were run by prison staff with experience of working with detainees, prison IT systems and CCTV. Protocols for undertaking contact tracing for both detainee and staff cases of COVID-19 were established. Results All prisons, and two support agencies, within the IPS now have fully functional in-prison CTTs. Every CTT has responded to at least one case COVID-19, undertaken contact tracing and instigated quarantine of contacts. Conclusions A partnership approach with development of prison-led CTTs can provide an effective mechanism for contact tracing of COVID-19 cases within the prison setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document