finite elements analysis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

261
(FIVE YEARS 89)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 17-32
Author(s):  
Ilya Men

Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF) is a prominent failure mechanism in many design components; therefore, an evaluation of cycles to failure in this regime is of high importance. Most international standards recommend a closed loop strain-controlled mode specimen testing in this regime. However, the ꜪN data obtained from this test is not suitable for life evaluation of parts enduring force-controlled history during actual service without correction for control mode. Many existing procedures, which accounts for cyclic strain stabilization during force-controlled loading may significantly complicate the finite elements analysis (FEA) at solving or post processing stages and are often an inherent source of uncertainty. A heuristic, cost effective and sufficiently accurate approach for LCF life estimation is advocated. The method involves only two force loading FEA simulations, one of the actual parts and the other of the test specimen, using initial unstabilized stress strain curve, followed by a limited number of force-controlled specimens testing. Actual part and specimen life correlation performed using first loading unstabilized equivalent plastic strain value Ꜫp1 under locality and similitude assumptions. Unstabilized strain vs. number of cycles to failure curve Ꜫp1N is constructed and discussion regarding specimen geometry considerations for providing sufficient accuracy is included. Method validation and crack propagation study are provided.


Machines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Stefano Giorgetti ◽  
Alessandro Giorgetti ◽  
Reza Tavafoghi Jahromi ◽  
Gabriele Arcidiacono

A faulty dynamical interaction between a machine and a foundation can lead to unexpected and dangerous failures, impacting human lives and the environment. Some machines, as reciprocating compressors, have a low rotation speed; this can lead to dangerous frequency for the foundation blocks. For this reason, a careful analysis shall be done during the design phase to avoid the range of the frequency of resonances and low vibration speeds. Designers can approach this problem by relying both on Analytical Theory and Finite Element Analysis. This article compares these methods by studying the dynamical response of different foundation geometries in a case study of a reciprocating compressor foundation. The applicability limits of Analytical theory are explored and an evaluation of the difference in the estimation of natural frequencies of the system using Analytical Theory and Finite Elements Analysis are made for different foundation geometries. The comparison shows similar results until the foundation geometry is rigid; reference geometries limits are provided so that designers can choose which of the methods better suits their type of analysis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiram Martinez Muñoz

Abstract Nowadays, the use of technologies to increase productivity, reduce time, as well as reduce the possibilities of errors, has become indispensable. All processes have opportunities for improvement, and this can be done based on calculations that with the support of computational systems can be reduced considerably in time. In the heat treatment industry and more specifically in the electromagnetic induction heat treatment industry is no exception. Today we have numerous tools to optimize the design process of inductors used in heat treatment of metals. These tools can show us, in a virtual way, the results that we can obtain before having to manufacture the inductors, all this based on FEA (Finite Elements Analysis) simulations that performing calculations considering physical parameters approximate us to what we would have as a result. Computer based simulation programs for induction heating and resulting metallurgy are extremely useful in developing tooling and process for induction heating. Induction hardening simulation brings elements of inductor design, steel properties such as time-temperature-transformation curves, both thermal and magnetic properties at various temperatures and cooling rates based on the phase of the quench media on cooling. A common method in place hardening (static hardening) knows as single shot hardening. In this process, the inductor is designed with a top and bottom half loop connected by heating rails. The length of heating is determined by the length of the rails and percentage height of the width of the half loops. Accurately predicting the length of the heating pattern in this 3D modeling approach is computationally a heavy load on the modeling pre-requisites. Commonly the inductor is modeled and then tested with the actual results showing a different length than what was predicted. It is important to consider that like any system, these simulation tools are not infallible and have several factors that can affect the accuracy of the simulation results. This paper reaches into the analysis of why the predicted length may differ prom the test results discussing what factors constitute the largest variance from the predicted outcome. Inductor design and the reliance on set up will be discussed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105031
Author(s):  
Julian C.G. Silva Junior ◽  
Felipe C. Montefeltro ◽  
Thiago S. Marinho ◽  
Agustín G. Martinelli ◽  
Max C. Langer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 780
Author(s):  
Carlos González-Bravo ◽  
Miguel A. Ortega ◽  
Julia Buján ◽  
Basilio de la Torre ◽  
Loreto Barrios

The wear rate on Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) entails a heavy burden for patients. This becomes more relevant with increased wear risk and its consequences such as osteolysis. In addition, osteolysis has been described in cemented and uncemented acetabular implants, and nowadays, controversy remains as to whether or not to cement the acetabular component. A personalized theoretical study was carried out to investigate which parameters have an influence on wear risk and to determine the best fixation method. Liner wear risk was assessed for two different types of fixation (cemented vs uncemented) through Finite Elements Analysis (FEA). The intraoperative variables used to determine the wear risk (cervical-diaphyseal angle, Center of Rotation positioning -COR-, head material, head size, and liner thickness) are vital parameters in surgical planning. Two types of tridimensional liner models of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethene (UHMWPE) were simulated through finite element analysis (FEA—over 216 cases were the core of this research). A significant relationship was found between the cervical-diaphyseal angle and wear risk (p < 0.0001), especially in valgus morphology. The acetabular fixation technique (p < 0.0001) and liner thickness (p < 0.0001) showed a significant relationship with wear risk. According to our study, using a cemented fixation with a thick liner in the right center of rotation appears to be the proper stratagy for preventing polyethylene liner wear.


Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 1683
Author(s):  
Fermín A. Holguín ◽  
Roberto Prieto ◽  
Rafael Asensi ◽  
José A. Cobos

The analytical calculation of winding loss in gapped magnetic components is complex, and numerical analysis tools, such as finite elements analysis (FEA) tools, are commonly needed to characterize the windings. As FEA tools are used, the required design time of these types of components increases greatly when many simulations are needed to select the appropriate component for a given application, and simple analytical models become necessary to reduce the design time. In this paper, some analytical approaches for winding loss calculation in gapped magnetic components are reviewed and a general two-dimensional equivalent method, which aims to consider the frequency effects in conductors in a simplified manner, is proposed afterward. Due to its simplicity, it can be integrated into design and optimization tools in order to evaluate the influence of the air gap over the winding loss even at the early stages of the design process. The presented model shows good agreement with FEA simulations and measurements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document