RESEARCHING THE RATE OF PROFIT FOR REAL ESTATE IN THE CITY

The purpose of the article is to conduct research on the value of different segments of residential real estate in the city economy, rental rates. Based on this, determine the rate of return on the location of each investigated segment of real estate. The researches of the residential real estate market of the city of Kharkiv on the certain areas are carried out. The market value of one-room, two-room, and three-room apartments is calculated. The cost of rent for one-room, two-room, and three-room apartments is determined. Studies have been conducted and the rate of return calculated in relation to the location of each of the segments of residential real estate. Conclusions are made about the prospects for the development of the residential real estate market in the city economy, options for investing in real estate in the city and the best return on real estate. Today, the problem of profitability research when investing in different segments of real estate and real estate that differ in location is very relevant. Determining the rate of return or rate of return is possible using the approaches used in valuation and using valuation techniques and procedures. The problem of investing is important for business development. Current issues are - in what area to invest and how to get the maximum profit. It is very important for business owners and ordinary citizens to know the amount of profit that can be obtained. Real estate investing is an important and profitable project to save and increase your own resources. Today, there are several methods for assessing the effectiveness of investment. One of them is to determine the rate of return on each of the investment options. The problem posed in the work is the search for locations for investment within the city of Kharkiv with the maximum profit. As a result of research it was established: the average cost of 1 - bedroom apartments = $ 32,564; the average cost of 2 - bedroom apartments = 48385 $; the average cost of 3 - bedroom apartments = $ 65,849; average rent = $ 7; average selling price of 1 sq. km. m = $ 849; average rate of return = 10%. The minimum rental price per 1 sq. кm. m. in the areas of HTZ, Rogan, the village of East - $ 5, and the maximum cost in the areas of Center, Nagorny, Derzhprom - $ 10. Thus we see that those areas of the city in which the rate of return exceeds the average in Kharkov. Thus, the most favorable areas for investment are the areas of the beginning of Gagarin Avenue - 11.29%; Central Market, South Station - 12.36%; Zhukovsky, Shishkovka - 11.34%; Novozhanovo, Moskalivka - 11.76% and Saltivka - 11.17%.

Consumer culture, precarious incomes and mass indebtedness: Borrowing from uncertain futures, consuming in precarious times

In recent years, labour markets have been characterised by stagnant wages, reduced incomes and growing insecurity supplemented by the ongoing proliferation of outstanding payment obligations at almost all levels of economy and society. We draw upon current debates in social and economic theory to explore the disconnect between the deterioration of late capitalism’s distributive measures and the relative vitality of consumer cultures, suggesting that the latter relies substantially on immaterial, credit-based payment means to bridge the gap between the fundamental fantasy of ‘more and better’ and the decline of material productivity denoted by base rate of profit. We then use this disconnect as a breach-point for an in-depth interdisciplinary discussion of the substantive and ideological function of credit.

The Chilean economy, an analysis of the dynamics of profits, investments and production: A Marxist approach

This article aims to examine the dynamics of the Chilean economy as a consequence of actions taken by companies whose aim is to make profits. As such, the economic analysis used is Marxist and makes use of those classical indicators described in Capital (Rate of Surplus-Value, Organic Composition of Capital and Rate of Profit). It is maintained that with the Marxist method, we can discover that behind the accumulation of incomes lies the fact that out of each 8 hours worked, only 3 finance wages and 5 benefit the owners of capital. That fraction of the unpaid labour received by capital but invested back as new capital, plus that ‘excess’ surplus value that is consequence of high copper prices, raises the physical, but not necessarily the value, capital-per-worker ratio. As a consequence, that relation of exploitation to capital accumulation, which Marx called the Rate of Profit, is found to fall, rise and then fall again. We understand that various approaches have been made to calculate the classical indicators and include some of them as alternative methods in our results.

The transformation from value determination to value realization: the logical dilemma of the Okishio theorem

PurposeDifferent from Marx's analysis of the dialectical relationship between the production and realization of surplus value, the Okishio theorem only shows one aspect of the contradictory movement of the total social capital, that is, the reverse effect of the realization of surplus value on the production of surplus value.Design/methodology/approachThe production of surplus value and the realization of surplus value are simplified into one process. This simplification eliminates the contradiction between the production and realization of surplus value, and the antagonistic contradiction between accumulation and consumption and the antagonistic production-distribution relationship in capitalist society are naturally covered up.FindingsTherefore, it cannot explain the actual expansion way of the falling general rate of profit as the historical development law of capitalism. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the Okishio theorem places the analysis of the general rate of profit back into the social reproduction model with department equilibrium, which points out the significance of wage income to the realization of surplus value and outlines the macro mechanism of the realization of surplus value reacting to the production of surplus value. It also strongly promotes the research progress of the law that the profit rate tends to decline.Originality/valueThe mistake of the Okishio theorem is that the exchange process in the labor market forms the real wage rate. It determines the production price of wage goods, which thereby determines that the production price of capital goods and general rate of profit, the production of surplus value and realization of surplus value are simplified into the same process, and only the value that can be realized is the real value.

Profit Islamic Bank from Mudharabah and Musharakah Finance with Islamic Social Responsibility Disclosure

This research was conducted to determine the effect of mudharabah and musharakah financing on net profit of Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia. This study uses the annual financial statements of Islamic commercial banks obtained from the Financial Services Authority and annual reports on the website of Islamic commercial banks for the period 2010-2019. The test results found that mudharabah financing had a significant effect on the net profit of Islamic banks, this also strengthened Islamic social responsibility of Islamic commercial banks. But unlike mudharabah financing, musharakah financing actually has a negative effect on the net profit of Islamic commercial banks, which means that the higher the Islamic bank distributes musharakah financing, the rate of profit will decrease which results in the weakening of Islamic social responsibility disclosure. It is recommended that Islamic banks exercise greater caution when selecting consumers for mudharabah financing, as this type of financing carries a higher risk but also a higher profit share if the financing is successful. This research has a limitation in that it focuses exclusively on Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia, although additional research might be conducted by sampling Sharia Business Unit and Sharia Rural Bank.

IS IT WORTH READING K. MARX AND HOW TO READ IT?

On the Internet respectable economists are debating on the topic "False theses of Marxism: the tendency of the rate of profit to fall". Dozens of economists are involved in these debates. Some believe that K. Marx is right, others believe that he is wrong. At the same time, the disputants reveal negligence in relation to each other, a complete misunderstanding of the text of "CAPITAL", but they also admit accusations against K. Marx, such as: "his understanding of the meaning of the concept of" constant capital "was amateurish", or "the mechanism of "surplus time" was invented and the appropriation of workers' labor in this mythical "surplus time", and so on, etc. We cannot agree with such an attitude towards K. Marx, who left us (humanity!) An invaluable ideological legacy, manuscripts not fully published during his lifetime under the general title "CAPITAL".

Profit rates and assets-price inflation in the Spanish economy

The paper provides an in-depth analysis of profitability in Spain between 1995 and 2014, showing that behind the asset-price inflation of the growth period and its corresponding macroeconomic imbalances, an underlying problem of capital valorization can be found. For this purpose, a study of various measures of profitability is carried out based on the concept of productive labor and highlighting the role of finance (interest rates and indebtedness). The evolution of the profit rate in previous years is also shown , together with a comparison with countries in the Eurozone, both in the most advanced areas and in the periphery. The paper reveals the large extent of the underlying profitability crisis, with a huge fall of profit rates from the late sixties, during the period of the housing boom, and throughout the subsequent recession. In addition, this drop in profitability stands out in relation to other economies of the European periphery. Hence, the study puts the rate of profit at the center of the debate on the Great Recession in Spain, despite its absence in much of the economic literature.

The Transformation Problem of Values into Prices of Production: Marx Errors or an Inattentive Reading of 'Capital'?

The author presents the results of the discovery in Marx's works of the disparate elements of the theory of the original transformation of value into prices and the establishment of the general rate of profit. These results show:(a) Marx's tables in Chapter 9 of Volume III of Capital do not represent the usual interrelated branches of the economy, but particular spheres of production, exempt from the double-counting of profits and wages, and producing only final commodities. The total value of these commodities is equal to the net social product.(b) Marx carried out the original transformation of values into prices under the condition that wages remain unchanged. As a result, the first (chief) macroeconomic equality is fulfilled—the sum of the production prices for all net social products must be equal to the sum of its values. Also is fulfilled the second macroeconomic equality—the sum of profits of all sectors forming separate spheres of production must be equal to the sum of surplus values.(c) Marx assumed that the original transformation takes place in two stages: in the first stage, average rates of profit are formed in separate spheres of production, comprising two sectors of production: A and B. Sector A produced of constant capital for the sphere's own need. Sector B releases the final product for an exchange with other particular spheres. In the second stage, is established the general rate of profit in sectors B. A property of the original conversion is some change in the level of real wages, especially noticeable when using numerical models with a few spheres of commodity production. Therefore, Marx introduces the hypothesis of mutual compensation of positive and negative deviations of prices from the values of commodities. The hypothesis is fully confirmed under the conditions of the law of large numbers.(d) Marx also explains that non-equilibrium original prices of production, in which demand and supply of final goods do not coincide, can be transformed into equilibrium prices of production. For this to happen, corresponding changes in monetary wages, prices of constant capital, and the general rate of profit are necessary. However, the attainment of equilibrium prices was regarded by Marx as a secondary issue. At equilibrium prices, only the first (chief) macroeconomic equality is fulfilled.The author in developing alternative methods of transforming value into original and equilibrium prices of production uses all of the above elements of the theory of transformation of values into production prices. First, he restores the double counting of profits and wages in Marx's table. Second, he applies an iterative procedure of sequentially establishing the average and general rate of profit in the sectors and spheres of commodity production.The paper proposes new iterative calculation algorithms in the Excel program for the original and equilibrium transformation of values into production prices. The author tested the algorithms using the Wolfram Mathematica software. He also developed a method for converting the equilibrium production prices of goods back to their initial absolute values. This method refutes the well-known “eraser algorithm” by P. Samuelson. Ultimately, the author argues that Marx does not have the errors of transformation that his critics have attributed to him for so long.

The Transformation Problem of Values into Prices of Production: Marx Errors or an Inattentive Reading of 'Capital'?

The author presents the results of the discovery in Marx's works of the disparate elements of the theory of the original transformation of value into prices and the establishment of the general rate of profit. These results show:(a) Marx's tables in Chapter 9 of Volume III of Capital do not represent the usual interrelated branches of the economy, but particular spheres of production, exempt from the double-counting of profits and wages, and producing only final commodities. The total value of these commodities is equal to the net social product.(b) Marx carried out the original transformation of values into prices under the condition that wages remain unchanged. As a result, the first (chief) macroeconomic equality is fulfilled—the sum of the production prices for all net social products must be equal to the sum of its values. Also is fulfilled the second macroeconomic equality—the sum of profits of all sectors forming separate spheres of production must be equal to the sum of surplus values.(c) Marx assumed that the original transformation takes place in two stages: in the first stage, average rates of profit are formed in separate spheres of production, comprising two sectors of production: A and B. Sector A produced of constant capital for the sphere's own need. Sector B releases the final product for an exchange with other particular spheres. In the second stage, is established the general rate of profit in sectors B. A property of the original conversion is some change in the level of real wages, especially noticeable when using numerical models with a few spheres of commodity production. Therefore, Marx introduces the hypothesis of mutual compensation of positive and negative deviations of prices from the values of commodities. The hypothesis is fully confirmed under the conditions of the law of large numbers.(d) Marx also explains that non-equilibrium original prices of production, in which demand and supply of final goods do not coincide, can be transformed into equilibrium prices of production. For this to happen, corresponding changes in monetary wages, prices of constant capital, and the general rate of profit are necessary. However, the attainment of equilibrium prices was regarded by Marx as a secondary issue. At equilibrium prices, only the first (chief) macroeconomic equality is fulfilled.The author in developing alternative methods of transforming value into original and equilibrium prices of production uses all of the above elements of the theory of transformation of values into production prices. First, he restores the double counting of profits and wages in Marx's table. Second, he applies an iterative procedure of sequentially establishing the average and general rate of profit in the sectors and spheres of commodity production.The paper proposes new iterative calculation algorithms in the Excel program for the original and equilibrium transformation of values into production prices. The author tested the algorithms using the Wolfram Mathematica software. He also developed a method for converting the equilibrium production prices of goods back to their initial absolute values. This method refutes the well-known “eraser algorithm” by P. Samuelson. Ultimately, the author argues that Marx does not have the errors of transformation that his critics have attributed to him for so long.