ORIENTASI ENTREPRENEURIAL SOSIAL ANALISIS STATE OF THE ART BERDASARKAN SYNTHETIC SCOPING REVIEW

The purpose of the research using the synthetic scoping review method is to reveal state-of-the-art of entrepreneurial orientation study in social entrepreneurship context. This research was carried out in a mixed method approach with three stages, namely systematic review and scoping review as a qualitative approach and bibliometric mapping with co-occurrence analysis as a quantitative approach. The results of a systematic review show that a social entrepreneurial orientation has been initiated since 2002.. The European Union and quantitative research dominate. The results of the scoping review reveal seven dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation that are typical with social entrepreneurship context. Furthermore, the results of the co-occurrence analysis raise five major themes, namely 1) the effect of social entrepreneurial orientation on entrepreneurial financial performance, 2) economic performance and social performance, 3) Social entrepreneurial orientation in sociopreneurship practice, 4) the antecedent and consequent of the strategic domain of social entrepreneurial orientation and 5) Social entrepreneurial orientation in knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Based on results, this article contributes to new research opportunities on social entrepreneurial orientation study. Tujuan penelitian dengan metode synthetic scoping review disini adalah mengungkap kondisi terkini (state-of-the-art) kajian orientasi entrepreneurial dalam konteks entrepreneurship sosial. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan mixed method dalam tiga tahap, yaitu systematic review dan scoping review sebagai pendekatan kualitatif dan bibliometric mapping dengan analisis co-occurrence sebagai pendekatan kuantitatif. Hasil systematic review menunjukkan bahwa orientasi entrepreneurial sosial telah digagas sejak 2002. Uni Eropa dan penelitian kuantitatif mendominasi. Hasil scoping review memunculkan tujuh dimensi orientasi entrepreneurial yang khas dalam konteks entrepreneurship sosial. Selanjutnya, hasil analisis co-occurrence memunculkan lima tema besar, yaitu 1) pengaruh orientasi entrepreneurial sosial terhadap kinerja keuangan entrepreneurial, 2) kinerja ekonomi dan kinerja sosial, 3) orientasi entrepreneurial sosial dalam praktik sociopreneurship, 4) anteseden dan konsekuen domain strategis orientasi entrepreneurial sosial, dan 5) orientasi entrepreneurial social dalam knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, artikel ini berkontribusi membuka peluang penelitian baru dalam kajian orientasi entrepreneurial sosial.

Increasing saving intentions through leaderboards: A gamification approach

Saving money is important but challenging. To spur financial saving intentions, we propose a new strategy—gamification. Specifically, we investigate the effectiveness of competitive leaderboards in increasing individuals’ saving intentions. The results of two studies (total N = 618) show consistently that people’s saving intentions are higher when presented with a leaderboard than when not. Further, as leaderboards elicit social comparison, we explore whether the height of the comparison standard and individuals’ social comparison orientation moderate the effect. We find that the effect of leaderboards on saving intentions is more pronounced when people compare with a higher (as compared to a lower) standard (Study 1), but that the effect is not influenced by individuals’ social comparison orientation (Study 2). Taken together, this research provides a new and simple-to-implement strategy to facilitate saving intentions in order to help improve people’s financial well-being.

Finding Myself Fast and Furiously: The Role of Agency-Communion Orientation and Self-Concept Clarity in Support for Radicalism

The past research on radicalism is equivocal regarding the ways in which self-concept clarity shapes intentions to engage in radical behavior. Seeking to address the previous mixed findings in the literature, the present research examines how an individual’s agency-communion orientation moderates the effect of self-concept clarity on behavioral intentions for radical groups. Specifically, we propose that agency-oriented individuals show greater intentions to participate in radical groups when they experience low (vs. high) self-concept clarity, whereas communion-oriented individuals show no significant differences in their intentions to participate in radical groups across levels of self-concept clarity. A 2 (agency-communion orientation: low vs. high) × 2 (self-concept clarity: low vs. high) experimental design was used to test the hypotheses. Using gender as a proxy variable for agency-communion orientation, Study 1 shows that agency-communion orientation moderates the effect of self-concept clarity on intentions to participate in radical groups. Using chronic individual differences in agency-communion orientation, Study 2 shows that psychological entitlement mediates the interactive effect of self-concept clarity and agency-communion orientation on behavioral intentions for radical groups. Taken together, these findings support the role of agency-communion orientation and self-concept clarity in radicalism.

Components of Student Support in Blended and Online Learning

For every student cohort that registers for an online program, some will persist through to graduation while a good number will drop out. Studies continue to investigate the phenomena of persistence and dropout without consensus to the solution. However, student support has been shown to impact positively on a student's decision to stay for the duration of the program. Students of online/blended learning formats lack the advantage of socio-physical motivation. Therefore, they require support that constantly reassures them of peers, teachers, and university presence throughout the duration of the program. At every stage in the life of the program, the student will require specific support which are herein referred to as components of student support. They include student support during recruitment, registration procedures, registration requirements, orientation, study skills training, technology, learning materials, counselling and mentorship, communication and interactions, feedback, regional centers, library, students' association, and representation.

Liking low-status? Contextual and individual differences in attributional biases of low-status outgroup members

Previous studies on biased intergroup perceptions of outgroups’ irrationality mostly treated the target groups as opponents and rivals. In three studies, we extended this line of research and tested the hypothesis that individuals who challenge the existing social hierarchy exhibit more positive biases toward low-status outgroup members. We also hypothesized that when irrational thinking is framed as an important human trait, this bias is reduced among low social dominance orientation (SDO) individuals. In three studies (N = 169, N = 450, and N = 161), conducted in countries that vary in power distance levels (Poland, Spain, Sweden and Turkey), we examined under which conditions low-status outgroups are perceived as more rational than ingroup members. The results show that in a condition without irrationality framed as a human trait, psychology students (Study 1 and Study 2) and nonstudents low in group-based dominance orientation (Study 3) perceive outgroup members as less irrational than ingroup members. However, when participants were reminded that irrationality is a human trait, the perceived differences between in- and outgroup members were reduced. This effect was observed in all four countries (Study 1 and Study 2) and held when variables related to the tendency to behave in a socially desirable way were controlled for (Study 3).