Fire blight-susceptible, certified organic pome fruit is produced currently on 9,000 ha in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States with acreage continuing to expand in spite of a 2014 prohibition on antibiotics as allowable materials for infection suppression. Non-antibiotic practices for fire blight suppression mirror conventional management, but the full bloom to petal fall period when antibiotics are typically sprayed for fire blight control continues to receive research scrutiny owing to drawbacks and weaknesses of alternative materials. As solitary treatments, effective non-antibiotic materials (e.g., a yeast biocontrol, soluble coppers, and alum) raise the risk of a crop-value reducing, phytotoxic response termed fruit russeting. Conversely, materials with less russeting risk (e.g., Bacillus-based biorationals) are less effective for fire blight control. Spray programs using a combination of materials applied from mid-bloom to petal fall have the potential to provide high levels of protection with reduced russeting risk. In orchard trials, the effects of non-antibiotic spray programs on epiphytic population size of Erwinia. amylovora in flowers, yeast biocontrol population size, floral pH, infection suppression, and fruit russeting revealed strategies for sequencing sprays of non-antibiotic materials. The yeast biocontrol, Blossom Protect (Aureobasidium pullulans), sprayed at 70% bloom was an important contributor to fire blight suppression as was the soluble copper material, Previsto, when applied at full bloom. Choice of material for the petal fall spray timing was important to fruit russeting risk but apparently less important to overall infection incidence. Consequently, treatment programs of Blossom Protect at 70% bloom, a soluble copper at full bloom, and a Bacillus-based biorational at petal fall best balances the quality of infection suppression with risk of fruit russeting.