Physical Activity and Bone Vascularization: A Way to Explore in Bone Repair Context?

Physical activity is widely recognized as a biotherapy by WHO in the fight and prevention of bone diseases such as osteoporosis. It reduces the risk of disabling fractures associated with many comorbidities, and whose repair is a major public health and economic issue. Bone tissue is a dynamic supportive tissue that reshapes itself according to the mechanical stresses to which it is exposed. Physical exercise is recognized as a key factor for bone health. However, the effects of exercise on bone quality depend on exercise protocols, duration, intensity, and frequency. Today, the effects of different exercise modalities on capillary bone vascularization, bone blood flow, and bone angiogenesis remain poorly understood and unclear. As vascularization is an integral part of bone repair process, the analysis of the preventive and/or curative effects of physical exercise is currently very undeveloped. Angiogenesis–osteogenesis coupling may constitute a new way for understanding the role of physical activity, especially in fracturing or in the integration of bone biomaterials. Thus, this review aimed to clarify the link between physical activities, vascularization, and bone repair.

Bone innervation and vascularization regulated by osteoclasts contribute to refractive pain-related behavior in the collagen antibody-induced arthritis model

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis is often characterized by eroded joints and chronic pain that outlasts disease activity. Whilst several reports show strong associations between bone resorption and nociception, the underlying mechanisms remain to be unraveled. Here, we used the collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA) model to examine the contribution of osteoclasts in pain regulation. The antinociceptive effects of osteoclasts inhibitors and their mechanisms of actions involving bone vascularization and innervation were also explored. Methods: BALB/c female mice were subjected to CAIA by intravenous injection of a collagen type-II antibody cocktail, followed by intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide. Degree of arthritis, bone resorption, mechanical hypersensitivity, vascularization and innervation in the ankle joint were assessed. Animals were treated with osteoclast inhibitors, zoledronate and cathepsin K inhibitor (T06), and netrin-1 neutralizing antibody. Potential pronociceptive factors were examined in primary osteoclast cultures. Results: CAIA induced local bone loss in the calcaneus with ongoing increased osteoclast activity during the inflammatory phase of the model, but not after inflammation has resolved. Mechanical hypersensitivity was reversed by zoledronate in late but not inflammatory phase CAIA. This effect was coupled to the ability of osteoclasts to modulate bone vascularization and innervation, which was inhibited by osteoclast inhibitors. CAIA-induced hypersensitivity in the late phase was also reversed by anti-netrin-1 antibody. Conclusion: Osteoclasts induce pain-like behavior in the CAIA model independent of inflammation via effects on bone vascularization and innervation. Keywords: pain, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoclast, vascularization, innervation

Physical Activity and Bone Vascularization: A Way to Explore in Bone Repair Context?

Physical activity is widely recognized as a biotherapy by WHO in the fight and prevention of bone diseases such as osteoporosis. It reduces the risk of disabling fractures associated with many comorbidities, and whose repair is a major public health and economic issue. Bone tissue is a dynamic supportive tissue that reshapes itself according to the mechanical stresses to which it is exposed. Physical exercise is recognized as a key factor for bone health. However, the effects of exercise on bone quality depend on exercise protocols, duration, intensity and frequency. Today, the effects of different exercise modalities on capillary bone vascularization, bone blood flow and bone angiogenesis remain poorly understood and unclear. As vascularization is an integral part of bone repair process, the analysis of the preventive and/or curative effects of physical exercise is currently very undeveloped. Angiogenesis-osteogenesis coupling may constitute a new way for understanding the role of physical activity, especially in fracturing or in the integration of bone biomaterials. Thus, this review aims to clarify the link between physical activities, vascularization and bone repair.

Complex Tibial Pylon Fractures:Case report of combined treatment in a high-risk patient

Biotechnology is advancing by leaps and bounds to achieve a better recovery with the least possible morbidity in patients with complex joint fractures. Locking screw fixation systems with hydroxyapatite and low contact molded plates have been improved to obtain the best fixation without compromising bone vascularization. Implant placement has also been promoted with minimal approaches, such as MIPO or MISS techniques, thus avoiding damage to soft tissue. However, the complexity of the fracture, our main enemy and is the terrain where we must work, the only factor that cannot be modified.

The Effect of Exercise on the Prevention of Osteoporosis and Bone Angiogenesis

Physical activity or appropriate exercise prevents the development of osteoporosis. However, the exact mechanism remains unclear although it is well accepted that exercise or mechanical loading regulates the hormones, cytokines, signaling pathways, and noncoding RNAs in bone. Accumulating evidence has shown that bone is a highly vascularized tissue, and dysregulation of vasculature is associated with many bone diseases such as osteoporosis or osteoarthritis. In addition, exercise or mechanical loading regulates bone vascularization in bone microenvironment via the modulation of angiogenic mediators, which play a crucial role in maintaining skeletal health. This review discusses the effects of exercise and its underlying mechanisms for osteoporosis prevention, as well as an angiogenic and osteogenic coupling in response to exercise.

Analytical and morphometric study of nutrient foramina of femur and its clinical implications

Background: The femur is supplied princially by the diaphyseal nutrient artery which enters the bone throught the nutrient foramen. This supply is essential during the growing period, the early phases of ossification, and in different surgical procedures. The aim of present study was to examine the morphology and topography of the femur nutrient foramen to provide detalied data on such features.Methods: This was a cross-sectional-descriptive study in which we observed 50 femurs. We analysed the number and location of nutrient foramina, the length of the bone, the position of the nutrient foramen regarding to values of FI, correlation between number of nutrient foramen and length of femur, correlation between position of nutrient foramen and side of extremity to which femur belongs.Results: The double foramina were common in right (57.1%) and left (42.1%) femur, mostly located in medial lip of aspera line in right (64.3%) and on the lateral lip in left femur (68.4%), with statistically significant correlation, χ = 4.85; p = 0.03, p <0.05. The foramina in left (89.5%) and right (96.4%) femur were commonly observed at their middle third, with no statistically significant correlation between position of foramen accordingly to Foraminal Index value and side of extremity on which femur belongs (p=0.56; p>0.05). There is positive correlation between length of right and left femur and number of foramina.Conclusions: The study provides data of the nutrient foramina on femur, which is helpful for clinicians to help preserve bone vascularization during surgery.