bacterial translation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

81
(FIVE YEARS 19)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 2)

mBio ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Lanois-Nouri ◽  
Lucile Pantel ◽  
Jun Fu ◽  
Jessica Houard ◽  
Jean-Claude Ogier ◽  
...  

Odilorhabdins (ODLs) constitute a novel antibiotic family with promising properties for treating problematic multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. ODLs are 10-mer linear cationic peptides inhibiting bacterial translation by binding to the small subunit of the ribosome.


mSystems ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Taguer ◽  
E. Darbinian ◽  
K. Wark ◽  
A. Ter-Cheam ◽  
D. A. Stephens ◽  
...  

Most studies on the gut microbiome focus on the composition of this community and how it changes during disease. However, how the community transitions from a healthy state to one associated with disease is currently unknown.


Acta Naturae ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-44
Author(s):  
Anastasiia S. Zarechenskaia ◽  
Petr V. Sergiev ◽  
Ilya A. Osterman

Ribosome stalling during translation significantly reduces cell viability, because cells have to spend resources on the synthesis of new ribosomes. Therefore, all bacteria have developed various mechanisms of ribosome rescue. Usually, the release of ribosomes is preceded by hydrolysis of the tRNApeptide bond, but, in some cases, the ribosome can continue translation thanks to the activity of certain factors. This review describes the mechanisms of ribosome rescue thanks to trans-translation and the activity of the ArfA, ArfB, BrfA, ArfT, HflX, and RqcP/H factors, as well as continuation of translation via the action of EF-P, EF-4, and EttA. Despite the ability of some systems to duplicate each other, most of them have their unique functional role, related to the quality control of bacterial translation in certain abnormalities caused by mutations, stress cultivation conditions, or antibiotics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed-Husain M Bharmal ◽  
Alisa Gega ◽  
Jared M Schrader

Abstract Bacterial translation is thought to initiate by base pairing of the 16S rRNA and the Shine–Dalgarno sequence in the mRNA’s 5′ untranslated region (UTR). However, transcriptomics has revealed that leaderless mRNAs, which completely lack any 5′ UTR, are broadly distributed across bacteria and can initiate translation in the absence of the Shine–Dalgarno sequence. To investigate the mechanism of leaderless mRNA translation initiation, synthetic in vivo translation reporters were designed that systematically tested the effects of start codon accessibility, leader length, and start codon identity on leaderless mRNA translation initiation. Using these data, a simple computational model was built based on the combinatorial relationship of these mRNA features that can accurately classify leaderless mRNAs and predict the translation initiation efficiency of leaderless mRNAs. Thus, start codon accessibility, leader length, and start codon identity combine to define leaderless mRNA translation initiation in bacteria.


BMC Genomics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soma Jana ◽  
Partha P. Datta

Abstract Background Protein synthesis is a cellular process that takes place through the successive translation events within the ribosome by the event-specific protein factors, namely, initiation, elongation, release, and recycling factors. In this regard, we asked the question about how similar are those translation factors to each other from a wide variety of bacteria? Hence, we did a thorough in silico study of the translation factors from 495 bacterial sp., and 4262 amino acid sequences by theoretically measuring their pI and MW values that are two determining factors for distinguishing individual proteins in 2D gel electrophoresis in experimental procedures. Then we analyzed the output from various angles. Results Our study revealed the fact that it’s not all same, or all random, but there are distinct orders and the pI values of translation factors are translation event specific. We found that the translation initiation factors are mainly basic, whereas, elongation and release factors that interact with the inter-subunit space of the intact 70S ribosome during translation are strictly acidic across bacterial sp. These acidic elongation factors and release factors contain higher frequencies of glutamic acids. However, among all the translation factors, the translation initiation factor 2 (IF2) and ribosome recycling factor (RRF) showed variable pI values that are linked to the order of phylogeny. Conclusions From the results of our study, we conclude that among all the bacterial translation factors, elongation and release factors are more conserved in terms of their pI values in comparison to initiation and recycling factors. Acidic properties of these factors are independent of habitat, nature, and phylogeny of the bacterial species. Furthermore, irrespective of the different shapes, sizes, and functions of the elongation and release factors, possession of the strictly acidic pI values of these translation factors all over the domain Bacteria indicates that the acidic nature of these factors is a necessary criterion, perhaps to interact into the partially enclosed rRNA rich inter-subunit space of the translating 70S ribosome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (19) ◽  
pp. 173-174
Author(s):  
R.N. Kruglikov ◽  
T.V. Ovchinnikova ◽  
P.V. Panteleev

A new proline-rich antimicrobial peptide from alpaca (Vicugnia pacos) was obtained, as well as its modified analogs. The biological activity of the peptides was studied, and also the role of the N- and C-terminal fragments, when acting on bacterial cells, was analyzed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonatan Chemla ◽  
Michael Peeri ◽  
Mathias Luidor Heltberg ◽  
Jerry Eichler ◽  
Mogens Høgh Jensen ◽  
...  

Abstract In bacteria, translation re-initiation is crucial for synthesizing proteins encoded by genes that are organized into operons. The mechanisms regulating translation re-initiation remain, however, poorly understood. We now describe the ribosome termination structure (RTS), a conserved and stable mRNA secondary structure localized immediately downstream of stop codons, and provide experimental evidence for its role in governing re-initiation efficiency in a synthetic Escherichia coli operon. We further report that RTSs are abundant, being associated with 18%–65% of genes in 128 analyzed bacterial genomes representing all phyla, and are selectively depleted when translation re-initiation is advantageous yet selectively enriched so as to insulate translation when re-initiation is deleterious. Our results support a potentially universal role for the RTS in controlling translation termination-insulation and re-initiation across bacteria.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
SOMA JANA ◽  
Partha Pratim Datta

Abstract Background Protein synthesis is a cellular process that takes place through the successive translation events within the ribosome with the help of the event-specific protein factors, namely, initiation, elongation, release, and recycling factors. The translation process is fundamental to all organisms living in the wide variety of environments. In this regard, we asked the questions about how similar are those translation factors to each other from a wide variety of bacteria? Hence, we did a thorough in silico study of the translation factors from 495 bacterial sp., and 4262 amino acid sequences, wherein we theoretically measured their pI and MW values that are the two determining factors for distinguishing individual proteins in 2D gel electrophoresis. Then we analyzed the output from various angles. Results Our study revealed that, not all the pI values are same or random, but there is a distinct order, such that the pI values of translation factors are translation event specific. We found that the translation initiation factors are mainly basic, whereas, elongation and release factors that interact with the inter-subunit space of the intact 70S ribosome during translation are strictly acidic. Further analysis revealed that the acidic property of those factors is due to the higher frequencies of glutamic acids. However, two translation factors, the translation initiation factor 2 (IF2) and the ribosome recycling factor (RRF) showed variable pI values. Remarkably, the variability of the pI values of these two factors showed distinct lineage with the order of phylogeny. Conclusion From our results we conclude that, among all the bacterial translation factors, elongation and release factors are more conserved in terms of their pI values in comparison to initiation and recycling factors. Acidic properties of these factors are independent of habitat, nature, or the phylogeny of the bacterial species. Furthermore; irrespective of the different shapes, sizes, and functions of the elongation and release factors, possession of their strictly acidic pI values indicate that the acidic nature of these factors is a necessary criterion, perhaps to interact into the partially enclosed rRNA rich inter-subunit space of the translating 70S ribosome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document