Control Cell Migration by Engineering Integrin Ligand Assembly

Advances in mechanistic understanding of integrin-mediated adhesion highlight the importance of precise control of ligand presentation in directing cell migration. Top-down nanopatterning limited the spatial presentation to sub-micron. To enhance it to molecular level, we propose a bottom-up nanofabrication strategy. Via self-assembly and co-assembly, precise control of ligand presentation is succeeded by varying the proportions of assembling ligand and nonfunctional peptide. Assembled nanofilaments fulfill multi-functions exerting enhancement to suppression effect on cell migration with tunable amplitudes. Self-assembled nanofilaments possessing super high ligand density selectively suppress cancer cell migration by preventing integrin/actin disassembly at cell rear, which provides new insights to ligand-density-dependent-modulation, revealing valuable inputs to therapeutic innovations in tumor metastasis.One-Sentence SummaryEngineering integrin ligand assembly from bottom-up offers a generalized tool to selectively control cell migration with tunable amplitudes.

Impact of the mouse model and molar amount of injected ligand on the tissue distribution profile of PSMA radioligands

Purpose Various preclinical study designs are described in the literature for the evaluation of PSMA radioligands. In this study, [177Lu]Lu-Ibu-DAB-PSMA, an albumin-binding radioligand, and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 were investigated and compared under variable experimental conditions. Methods In vitro cell uptake studies were performed with PC-3 PIP and LNCaP tumor cells using a range of molar concentrations (0.75–500 nM) of both radioligands. Biodistribution and SPECT/CT imaging studies were carried out with the respective tumor mouse models using 0.05 nmol and 1.0 nmol injected ligand per mouse. Results In both tumor cell lines, the uptake of the radioligands was increased when using low molar concentrations of the respective ligand. The observed saturation effect at high ligand concentrations was more pronounced for LNCaP cells that express PSMA at lower levels than for PC-3 PIP cells. At all investigated timepoints, the in vivo uptake of both radioligands was higher in PC-3 PIP tumors than in LNCaP tumors. A low molar amount of injected ligand increased the PC-3 PIP tumor uptake mainly for [177Lu]Lu-Ibu-DAB-PSMA; however, the molar amount of ligand was relevant for both radioligands when using LNCaP tumors. Renal retention of both radioligands was, however, up to fourfold higher during the first hours after application of a low ligand amount compared to the high ligand amount. Conclusion The results of this preclinical study underline the relevance of the tumor model and applied ligand amount for the characterization of PSMA radioligands. The application of equal preclinical study designs is crucial to allow the comparison of novel radioligands with existing ones and, thus, predict potential advantages of new radioligands in view of a clinical application.

Mechanism of p38 MAPK–induced EGFR endocytosis and its crosstalk with ligand-induced pathways

Ligand binding triggers clathrin-mediated and, at high ligand concentrations, clathrin-independent endocytosis of EGFR. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) of EGFR is also induced by stimuli activating p38 MAPK. Mechanisms of both ligand- and p38-induced endocytosis are not fully understood, and how these pathways intermingle when concurrently activated remains unknown. Here we dissect the mechanisms of p38-induced endocytosis using a pH-sensitive model of endogenous EGFR, which is extracellularly tagged with a fluorogen-activating protein, and propose a unifying model of the crosstalk between multiple EGFR endocytosis pathways. We found that a new locus of p38-dependent phosphorylation in EGFR is essential for the receptor dileucine motif interaction with the σ2 subunit of clathrin adaptor AP2 and concomitant receptor internalization. p38-dependent endocytosis of EGFR induced by cytokines was additive to CME induced by picomolar EGF concentrations but constrained to internalizing ligand-free EGFRs due to Grb2 recruitment by ligand-activated EGFRs. Nanomolar EGF concentrations rerouted EGFR from CME to clathrin-independent endocytosis, primarily by diminishing p38-dependent endocytosis.

Artificial intelligence-assisted immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of tumor amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) expression as a combined predictive biomarker for panitumumab (Pan) therapy benefit in RAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Analysis within the phase III PICCOLO trial.

111 Background: High tumor mRNA levels of the EGFR ligands, AREG and EREG are associated with anti-EGFR agent response in patients (pts) with RAS-wt mCRC, regardless of tumor location. However, ligand RNA assays have not been adopted into routine clinical practice due to issues with analytical precision and practicality. Here we test whether AREG and EREG expression assessed by IHC can predict benefit from Pan. Methods: A retrospective biomarker study within the PICCOLO trial (NCT00389870; irinotecan [Ir] ± Pan in fluoropyrimidine-resistant RAS-wt mCRC). AREG and EREG positive tumor cells were assessed by IHC in all RAS-wt patients with available tumor tissue. Pathologists annotated tumor areas on digital images of glass slides. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms calculated the percentage of tumor cells staining positive for AREG and EREG within the tumor areas. More than 50% AREG and/or EREG tumor cell positivity was regarded as high ligand expression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints were RECIST response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Results: 274 RAS-wt pts had available tumor tissue. High ligand expression (n = 132) was associated with significant PFS benefit from IrPan compared with Ir (8.0 vs 3.2 months; HR 0.54 [0.37-0.79]; p = 0.001); whereas low ligand expression (n = 142) was not (3.4 vs 4.4 months; HR 1.05 [95% CI, 0.74-1.49]; p = 0.78). The ligand-treatment interaction was significant (p = 0.02) and independent of BRAF-mutation status and primary tumor location. Likewise RR was significantly improved in pts with high ligand expression (IrPan vs Ir: 48% vs 6%; risk ratio, 7.8 [2.90-20.69]; p < 0.0001) but not those with low ligand expression (IrPan vs Ir: 25% vs 14%; risk ratio, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.89-3.65]; p = 0.10) (interaction p = 0.01). Lesser effect was seen on OS. Conclusions: IHC assessment of AREG and EREG identified pts who did or did not benefit from Pan, as has been previously demonstrated through mRNA quantification. IHC represents a more practicable technique as it can be provided at the point of care and is associated with shorter turn-around times. AREG and EREG IHC may be of use in routine practice to identify patients who would benefit from anti-EGFR therapy and those for whom alternative treatment strategies should be explored.

Molecular basis for high ligand sensitivity and selectivity of strigolactone receptors in Striga

Seeds of the root parasitic plant Striga hermonthica can sense very low concentrations of strigolactones (SLs) exuded from host roots. The S. hermonthica HYPOSENSITIVE TO LIGHT (ShHTL) proteins are putative SL receptors, among which ShHTL7 reportedly confers sensitivity to picomolar levels of SL when expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana. However, the molecular mechanism underlying ShHTL7 sensitivity is unknown. Here we determined the ShHTL7 crystal structure and quantified its interactions with various SLs and key interacting proteins. We established that ShHTL7 has an active-site pocket with broad-spectrum response to different SLs and moderate affinity. However, in contrast to other ShHTLs, we observed particularly high affinity of ShHTL7 for F-box protein AtMAX2. Furthermore, ShHTL7 interacted with AtMAX2 and with transcriptional regulator AtSMAX1 in response to nanomolar SL concentration. ShHTL7 mutagenesis analyses identified surface residues that contribute to its high-affinity binding to AtMAX2 and residues in the ligand binding pocket that confer broad-spectrum response to SLs with various structures. Crucially, yeast-three hybrid experiments showed that AtMAX2 confers responsiveness of the ShHTL7–AtSMAX1 interaction to picomolar levels of SL, in line with the previously reported physiological sensitivity. These findings highlight the key role of SL-induced MAX2-ShHTL7-SMAX1 complex formation in determining the sensitivity to SL. Moreover, these data suggest a strategy to screen for compounds that could promote suicidal seed germination at physiologically relevant levels.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine derivatives as potent fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors

Discovery of a new class of 1H- pyrrorole [2,3-b]pyridine FGFR inhibitors with high ligand efficiency.

Antibiofilm Activity of Heather and Manuka Honeys and Antivirulence Potential of Some of Their Constituents on the DsbA1 Enzyme of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Heather honey was tested for its effect on the formation of biofilms by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Salmonella Enteriditis and Acinetobacter baumanii in comparison with Manuka honey. At 0.25 mg/mL, Heather honey inhibited biofilm formation in S. aureus, A. baumanii, E. coli, S. Enteriditis and P. aeruginosa, but promoted the growth of E. faecalis and K. pneumoniae biofilms. Manuka honey inhibited biofilm formation in K. pneumoniae, E. faecalis, and S. Enteriditis, A. baumanii, E. coli and P. aeruginosa, but promoted S. aureus biofilm formation. Molecular docking with Autodock Vina was performed to calculate the predictive binding affinities and ligand efficiencies of Manuka and Heather honey constituents for PaDsbA1, the main enzyme controlling the correct folding of virulence proteins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A number of constituents, including benzoic acid and methylglyoxal, present in Heather and/or Manuka honey, revealed high ligand efficiencies for the target enzyme. This helps support, to some extent, the decrease in P. aeruginosa biofilm formation observed for such honeys.