Short- and long-range interactions in the HIV-1 5’UTR regulate genome dimerization and packaging

Genome dimerization is a conserved feature of retroviral replication and a critical step in the HIV-1 life cycle, but how it is regulated is incompletely understood. Here, we developed FARS-seq (Functional Analysis of RNA Structure) to comprehensively identify sequences and structures within the HIV-1 5’UTR influencing dimerization. We found nucleotides important for dimerization throughout the HIV-1 5’UTR and identified distinct structural conformations in monomeric and dimeric RNA. The dimer displayed TAR, PolyA, PBS, and SL1-SL3 as stem-loops. In the monomer, SL1 was dramatically reconfigured into long- and short-range base-pairings with polyA and PBS, respectively. The polyA-SL1 interaction disrupts the major packaging motifs, and the PBS-SL1 interaction functionally couples the primer binding site with dimerization and Pr55Gag binding. Altogether, our data provide insights into late stages of HIV-1 life cycle and a mechanistic explanation for the link between RNA dimerization and packaging.

Selective packaging of HIV-1 RNA genome is guided by the stability of 5′ untranslated region polyA stem

To generate infectious virus, HIV-1 must package two copies of its full-length RNA into particles. HIV-1 transcription initiates from multiple, neighboring sites, generating RNA species that only differ by a few nucleotides at the 5′ end, including those with one (1G) or three (3G) 5′ guanosines. Strikingly, 1G RNA is preferentially packaged into virions over 3G RNA. We investigated how HIV-1 distinguishes between these nearly identical RNAs using in-gel chemical probing combined with recently developed computational tools for determining RNA conformational ensembles, as well as cell-based assays to quantify the efficiency of RNA packaging into viral particles. We found that 1G and 3G RNAs fold into distinct structural ensembles. The 1G RNA, but not the 3G RNA, primarily adopts conformations with an intact polyA stem, exposed dimerization initiation site, and multiple, unpaired guanosines known to mediate Gag binding. Furthermore, we identified mutants that exhibited altered genome selectivity and packaged 3G RNA efficiently. In these mutants, both 1G and 3G RNAs fold into similar conformational ensembles, such that they can no longer be distinguished. Our findings demonstrate that polyA stem stability guides RNA-packaging selectivity. These studies also uncover the mechanism by which HIV-1 selects its genome for packaging: 1G RNA is preferentially packaged because it exposes structural elements that promote RNA dimerization and Gag binding.

5′-Cap sequestration is an essential determinant of HIV-1 genome packaging

HIV-1 selectively packages two copies of its 5′-capped RNA genome (gRNA) during virus assembly, a process mediated by the nucleocapsid (NC) domain of the viral Gag polyprotein and encapsidation signals located within the dimeric 5′ leader of the viral RNA. Although residues within the leader that promote packaging have been identified, the determinants of authentic packaging fidelity and efficiency remain unknown. Here, we show that a previously characterized 159-nt region of the leader that possesses all elements required for RNA dimerization, high-affinity NC binding, and packaging in a noncompetitive RNA packaging assay (ΨCES) is unexpectedly poorly packaged when assayed in competition with the intact 5′ leader. ΨCES lacks a 5′-tandem hairpin element that sequesters the 5′ cap, suggesting that cap sequestration may be important for packaging. Consistent with this hypothesis, mutations within the intact leader that expose the cap without disrupting RNA structure or NC binding abrogated RNA packaging, and genetic addition of a 5′ ribozyme to ΨCES to enable cotranscriptional shedding of the 5′ cap promoted ΨCES-mediated RNA packaging to wild-type levels. Additional mutations that either block dimerization or eliminate subsets of NC binding sites substantially attenuated competitive packaging. Our studies indicate that packaging is achieved by a bipartite mechanism that requires both sequestration of the 5′ cap and exposure of NC binding sites that reside fully within the ΨCES region of the dimeric leader. We speculate that cap sequestration prevents irreversible capture by the cellular RNA processing and translation machinery, a mechanism likely employed by other viruses that package 5′-capped RNA genomes.

RNA Binding Properties of the Ty1 LTR-Retrotransposon Gag Protein

A universal feature of retroelement propagation is the formation of distinct nucleoprotein complexes mediated by the Gag capsid protein. The Ty1 retrotransposon Gag protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacks sequence homology with retroviral Gag, but is functionally related. In addition to capsid assembly functions, Ty1 Gag promotes Ty1 RNA dimerization and cyclization and initiation of reverse transcription. Direct interactions between Gag and retrotransposon genomic RNA (gRNA) are needed for Ty1 replication, and mutations in the RNA-binding domain disrupt nucleation of retrosomes and assembly of functional virus-like particles (VLPs). Unlike retroviral Gag, the specificity of Ty1 Gag-RNA interactions remain poorly understood. Here we use microscale thermophoresis (MST) and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) to analyze interactions of immature and mature Ty1 Gag with RNAs. The salt-dependent experiments showed that Ty1 Gag binds with high and similar affinity to different RNAs. However, we observed a preferential interaction between Ty1 Gag and Ty1 RNA containing a packaging signal (Psi) in RNA competition analyses. We also uncover a relationship between Ty1 RNA structure and Gag binding involving the pseudoknot present on Ty1 gRNA. In all likelihood, the differences in Gag binding affinity detected in vitro only partially explain selective Ty1 RNA packaging into VLPs in vivo.

Visualizing Rous Sarcoma Virus Genomic RNA Dimerization in the Nucleus, Cytoplasm, and at the Plasma Membrane

Retroviruses are unique in that they package their RNA genomes as non-covalently linked dimers. Failure to dimerize their genomes results in decreased infectivity and reduced packaging of genomic RNA into virus particles. Two models of retrovirus genome dimerization have been characterized: in murine leukemia virus (MLV), genomic RNA dimerization occurs co-transcriptionally in the nucleus, resulting in the preferential formation of genome homodimers; whereas in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1), genomic RNA dimerization occurs in the cytoplasm and at the plasma membrane, with a random distribution of heterodimers and homodimers. Although in vitro studies have identified the genomic RNA sequences that facilitate dimerization in Rous sarcoma virus (RSV), in vivo characterization of the location and preferences of genome dimerization has not been performed. In this study, we utilized three single molecule RNA imaging approaches to visualize genome dimers of RSV in cultured quail fibroblasts. The formation of genomic RNA heterodimers within cells was dependent on the presence of the dimerization initiation site (DIS) sequence in the L3 stem. Subcellular localization analysis revealed that heterodimers were present the nucleus, cytoplasm, and at the plasma membrane, indicating that genome dimers can form in the nucleus. Furthermore, single virion analysis revealed that RSV preferentially packages genome homodimers into virus particles. Therefore, the mechanism of RSV genomic RNA dimer formation appears more similar to MLV than HIV-1.

Structural Insights into RNA Dimerization: Motifs, Interfaces and Functions

In comparison with the pervasive use of protein dimers and multimers in all domains of life, functional RNA oligomers have so far rarely been observed in nature. Their diminished occurrence contrasts starkly with the robust intrinsic potential of RNA to multimerize through long-range base-pairing (“kissing”) interactions, self-annealing of palindromic or complementary sequences, and stable tertiary contact motifs, such as the GNRA tetraloop-receptors. To explore the general mechanics of RNA dimerization, we performed a meta-analysis of a collection of exemplary RNA homodimer structures consisting of viral genomic elements, ribozymes, riboswitches, etc., encompassing both functional and fortuitous dimers. Globally, we found that domain-swapped dimers and antiparallel, head-to-tail arrangements are predominant architectural themes. Locally, we observed that the same structural motifs, interfaces and forces that enable tertiary RNA folding also drive their higher-order assemblies. These feature prominently long-range kissing loops, pseudoknots, reciprocal base intercalations and A-minor interactions. We postulate that the scarcity of functional RNA multimers and limited diversity in multimerization motifs may reflect evolutionary constraints imposed by host antiviral immune surveillance and stress sensing. A deepening mechanistic understanding of RNA multimerization is expected to facilitate investigations into RNA and RNP assemblies, condensates, and granules and enable their potential therapeutical targeting.