The Subject in the Historical Process

1993 ◽  
pp. 124-137
Author(s):  
A. V. Margulis
Keyword(s):  
Historical Process ◽  
The Subject

scholarly journals The Future of the Middle Classes as in the «Logic» of the Historical Process in the 20th Century

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-122
Author(s):  
Alexandr I. Subetto
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Historical Process ◽  
Middle Classes ◽  
System A ◽  
The Future ◽  
Production Relations ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Predictive Research ◽  
Theoretical Reflection ◽  
Study Development

The Object of the Study. Middle classes in the logic of the historical process in the 20th century. The Subject of the Study. Production relations that determine the fate of the middle classes in capitalist and noosphere - socialist societies. The Purpose of the Study. Development of methodological grounds for predictive research on the problem of the historical fate of the middle classes. The Main Provisions of the Study. The author reveals a theoretical system-a concept that determines the future of the middle classes in Russia and in the world, taking into account the era of the Great Evolutionary Change. The scientific and philosophical essay is a kind of theoretical reflection on the problems and assessments that are set and disclosed in the monograph "Middle Classes in Capitalist Russia".

“A Page from the History of Marxism”: Gefter’s Edevours to Read Marx Anew

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3-1) ◽  
pp. 11-34
Author(s):  
Svetlana Neretina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Ussr Academy ◽  
Strategy Development ◽  
Early 20Th Century ◽  
Historical Science ◽  
Historical Process ◽  
The Sixties ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

The purpose of this paper is to show how the thought and speech of people holding and defending directly opposite positions affect the change in the thought and speech of people of their own and subsequent generations, with different life orientations, and to find ways of this influence. The author describes the situation that arose at the end of the sixties of the twentieth century, known as the ideological dispersal of philosophical, historical and sociological trends that ran counter to the policy of the CPSU, which became especially fierce in the fight against opponents after the USSR’s invasion of Czechoslovakia in August, 1968. One of the results of such an ideological battle was the defeat of the sector of the methodology of history of the Institute of General History of the USSR Academy of Sciences, headed by M. Ya. Gefter, who published a series of books in which the so-called laws of historical development (formational approach) were questioned and the fundamental provisions of the classics of Marxism-Leninism were criticized. The subject of analysis is Gefter’s article “A Page from the History of Marxism in the Early 20th Century”, published in the book “Historical Science and Some Problems of the Modernity”, dedicated to the analysis of Lenin’s tactics and strategy development which changed the views of many, especially young, historians on the historical process, and most importantly - on the methods of seeking and expressing the truth. The differences were expressed primarily in the fact that the proponents and defenders of the Soviet regime, which was based on their own established norms of Marxism-Leninism, fearlessly used all means of pressure on unwanted opponents. Professionals, however, who tried to understand the true sense of the historical process, the sense of judgments about it, especially the sense of the revolutionary struggle against the autocracy, unfolding at the beginning of the twentieth century, were forced to use the Aesopian language, which also provoked a distortion of this sense in many ways: due to the nebulous and veiled expressions, which give the impression of theoretical blackmail, causing such consequences as speech irresponsibility.

MELCHISEDECH'S NOVELLETTA of the Three Rings as Irenic Play (DECAMERON I.3)

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-39
Author(s):  
Franco Masciandaro
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Society ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Historical Process ◽  
Frame Narrative ◽  
Objective World ◽  
Rule Breaking ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Narrative Spaces ◽  
Main Frame

Building on Bakhtin's “plurality of voices” and on an anti-Hegelian exclusion of the subject from historical process, the essay explores how the unconventional plot of the novel symbolically resists and parodies the capitalist principles of contemporary 1960's Italian consumer society. The novel achieves this resistance by a calculated embedding of narrative spaces of transgression and rule-breaking actions within the main frame narrative, thereby positing an unproductive and non-conformist clash between the narrator-protagonist's hallucinatory and doxastic worlds (embedded texts) and the objective world of consumer society – represented by the frame narrative.

Need for aesthetics in visual and audio environments

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hatice Keten ◽  
H. Seval Köse
Keyword(s):  
Visual Environment ◽  
Historical Process ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Indoor Spaces ◽  
Country Office

Since the early ages, mankind has always been in search of a comfortable, convenient, safe and pleasant environment to live. Mankind’s quite different endeavors and intellectual progresses throughout the historical process have been related to the reason and continuity of his existence. Man’s endeavor to leave various traces in the environments he has been and his creativity have been effective in the formation of cultures and civilizations. This also denotes art.All environments that harbor men stand for their environment. The house, neighborhood, district, village, city, country, office, outdoor or indoor spaces where he dwells are considered the basic constituents of the environment that encircle mankind. All of these constituents have always been interwoven and in contact with cultural textures, aesthetics and art.The fact that the origin of cultures are cities also makes one think about the fact that mankind lives in this environment formed together by such cultural accumulation and the nature. This is because cultures spring from cities, live in cities and spread their influence from one city to another.In this study, the environment where mankind lives is analyzed in terms of meeting aesthetical expectations. With this study conducted on the basis of literature, it is intended to call attention to the subject of designing environments suited to the aesthetical needs and expectations of mankind.Keywords: Visual environment, audio environment, aesthetics.

scholarly journals On Plurality Category and Teaching in Turkish

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semra Alyılmaz
Keyword(s):  
Major Part ◽  
Historical Process ◽  
World Languages ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Made In ◽  
Double Group

When discussing about "plurality" of nouns in Turkish, it reminds /+lar/ affix after nouns (morpheme) and the subject is undervalued. Whereas, plurality and formation of plurality is not simple as it is thought as well as it is not made up of /+lar/ affix. It is because /+lar/ affix is only one of the linguistic elements in the morphological plurality used for making plural in Turkish.Out of /+lar/ affix, /+An+/, /+Ar+/, /+(ş)Ar+/, /+GIl+/, /+GUn+/, /+ºK+/, /+lA+/, /+ºs+/, /+ºş+/, /+ºT+/, /+ºz+/ affixes have given plurality, plus, double, group, generalization, exaggeration, respect etc. to the words they are added in the historical process of Turkish. However, a major part of affixes used in plurality by morphological ways in Turkish has lost their function of plurality etc. in the historical process and combined with the base, origin, and body of their words.The plurality in Turkish is a name of category (as it is in all world languages) and made in three ways: Morphological plurality, semantic plurality, and syntactic pluralityIn this article, information is given primarily in "generality" and "singularity" and secondarily in plurality in Turkish, ways of forming this category, and some problems in learning it.

The Ancient Hypothesis of Fiction: An Essay on the Origins of Literary Theory

Traditio ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 1-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley Trimpi
Keyword(s):  
Literary Theory ◽  
Scientific Method ◽  
Francis Bacon ◽  
Literary Discourse ◽  
Historical Process ◽  
Middle Way ◽  
Mental Construct ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Intellectual Disciplines

This is the first of several essays investigating the continuity of literary theory and of the principles which may account for its development. While critical terminologies change as they respond to problems emerging from the immediate historical process, a continuity, nevertheless, may be observed in the necessity for literary theory to take account of certain persistent relationships which underlie all intellectual disciplines. Among others, for instance, is the epistemological relation of the concept itself to the materials out of which it is formed and to the functions which it is subsequently to fulfil. Although the type of materials and functions will vary with the subject under consideration, the relation of the mental construct to its sources of sensation and to its role in the formation of knowledge remains relatively constant. The relation of the poet's mind, for instance, to its ethical materials, as described by Sidney, is strikingly near to the relation of the natural philosopher's mind to his data as described by Francis Bacon. Bacon seeks a ‘middle course [ratio media]’ between the rationalistic spider and the empirical ant, and finds that the bee ‘gathers its material from the flowers of the garden and of the field, but transforms and digests it by a power of its own.’ The bee goes about the true business of the scientist and represents ‘a closer and purer league between these two faculties, the experimental and the rational, (such as has never yet been made) …. ’ The ratio media in Bacon's material holds a position analogous to that of poetry in Sidney's: the balance between philosophical precept and historical example. This middle way is new, Bacon says, in the scientific method; it defines the intention of literary discourse, however, from its very origins, as I shall try to show, as well as a relationship which literary theory continually attempts to reestablish.

scholarly journals Seigfljótandi siðaskipti

Ritið ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-197
Author(s):  
Hjalti Hugason
Keyword(s):  
Religion And Politics ◽  
The Political ◽  
Social Field ◽  
Political Field ◽  
Historical Process ◽  
Lutheran Church ◽  
The Reformation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Church

This article is written on the occasion of the 500 years anniversary of the Lutheran reformation (siðbót) which started in 1517. The aim is to point out new perspectives worth considering in research on the main implications of the reformation in the political field (siðaskipti) and cultural and / or social field (siðbreyting). In this regard, it is pointed out that in researches of such a complex historical process is inevitable to assume pre-defined pardigms that can serve as prerequisites for the interpretation of the subject. It is also pointed out that, up to present time, a single one-sided paradigm which describes the reformation as a revolution has been assumed in Icelandic studies of the reformation which assumes that the transition from a catholic to a lutheran church in Iceland has been sudden and for more or less political reasons, ie. for the efforts of Christian the III:rd of Denmark to increase his assets, properties and power in the country. The article argues that the relationships between religion and politics was much more complexed at this time than has generally been expected, as well as that Christina the III:rd and his representatives in Iceland considered it as their duties as christians to promote the reformation in the country and in that way respond to the demand of Luther to the christian nobility to rescue the Church on the basis of the gospel. In the article it is assumed that the reformation in Iceland happened in the period 1539-1600 and the development took place on various religious, ecclesial, political and cultural fields. In that way it is meaningful to describe it as a viscous reformation.

scholarly journals “Cultural-historical meanings of the Third Rome”

2021 ◽  
pp. 111-127
Author(s):  
Tamara Totazovna Tedeeva
Keyword(s):  
Historical Context ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cultural Artifacts ◽  
Cultural Meanings ◽  
Historical Process ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Imperial Ideology ◽  
The One ◽  
Semantic Aspect

In theoretical and sociopolitical discourses, the semantic construct “The Third Rome" is often used in denotative meaning of imperial ideology. At the same time, it has multivariate connotation, the disclosure of which in the cultural-historical context on the one hand allows deeper understanding of the semantic aspect of the construct, while on the other – more precisely characterizing the culture of different epochs. The object of this research is the historical process of saturation of the semantic construct “The Third Rome" with meaningful content. The subject of this research is the basic cultural- historical connotations the concept “The Third Rome”. The goal of this work is to establish correlation between the basic connotations of the concept under review and the historical cultures by means of culturological attribution. Alongside the general theoretical philosophical-analytical toolset, the author tests the method of culturological attribution in relation to cultural-historical meanings of the concept “The Third Rome" as intangible cultural artifacts. The novelty of this article consists in elucidation of the historical subjectivity of cultural meanings of the concept “The Third Rome”. Attribution of this concept to several historical cultures allows determining its multiple connotation, which at times are antipodal. The most common interpretation (“The Third Rome” as an empire) is applicable only to certain historical cultures.

scholarly journals Study on the Realization Process of the Updating of Marxism

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Kong
Keyword(s):  
Historical Process ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Times ◽  
Realization Process

The updating of Marxism is to combine Marxism with the present characteristics of the times to touch the pulse of the times, reflect the spirit of the times and address the subject of the times, enabling it to adapt to the requirements of the times and lead the trend of the times. It is a historical process of constantly promoting Marxism to move with the times, a development process of mutual unification of theoretical innovation and practice innovation and a historical process of periodical development and constant advancement. The updating of Marxism is a process that is continuously pushed ahead in the two-way interactions of Marxist theory and conditions of the times. Further researches on the main sections contained in this process have a great significance in the process, in which we profoundly master the laws of the updating of Marxism and constantly advance the updating of Marxism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document