A Methodology Proposal for Supplier Performance Evaluation: Fuzzy DEMATEL Method with Sustainability Integrated SCOR Model

2019 ◽  
pp. 488-496
Author(s):  
Sinem Büyüksaatçi Kiriş ◽  
Dilek Yilmaz Börekçi ◽  
Tuğçe Koç
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Fuzzy Dematel ◽  
Supplier Performance ◽  
Scor Model

scholarly journals Supplier evaluation: The first step in effective sourcing

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kateřina Pikousová ◽  
Petr Průša
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Supplier Evaluation ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Supplier Performance ◽  
Evaluation Matrix ◽  
Evaluation Techniques ◽  
Selection Of

The evaluation and selection of suppliers are important tasks in any organisation. Each organisation needs to have a supplier evaluation matrix or model in place. The goal of this article is not only to give an overview of supplier performance evaluation techniques but also to present an example of such a supplier evaluation matrix used in practice. The article shows that suppliers’ qualities, strategies and abilities affect a buying company’s business. Reliable suppliers can help to develop stabile, long-term relationships that will be beneficial to both parties. Effective sourcing and purchasing require high-quality suppliers.

scholarly journals INTEGRASI METODE ANP DAN TOPSIS DALAM EVALUASI KINERJA SUPPLIER DAN PENENTUAN PRIORITAS SUPPLIER BAHAN BAKU UTAMA CETAK KORAN PADA PT MASSCOM GRAPHY SEMARANG

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Darminto Pujotomo ◽  
Nia Budi Puspitasari ◽  
Dwi Rizkiyani
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Analytical Network Process ◽  
Supplier Performance ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Priority Order

Salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan adalah keberadaan supplier yang berperan sebagai pemasok kebutuhan atau penyedia bahan baku. PT Masscom Graphy Semarang merupakan perusahaan percetakan yang telah menjalin kerjasama dengan beberapa supplier untuk menjamin kelangsungan produksinya. Oleh karena itu evaluasi kinerja supplier sangat penting dilakukan oleh perusahaan untuk mendapatkan supplier yang handal dalam memasok bahan baku. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi kriteria evaluasi kinerja supplier dan penentuan prioritas supplier yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan perusahaan, dan menentukan urutan prioritas supplier untuk bahan baku utama cetak koran. Terdapat 17 subkriteria yang digunakan dalam evaluasi kinerja supplier dan penentuan prioritas supplier. Metode Analytical Network Process (ANP) dapat dijadikan alternatif untuk suatu permasalahan yang memiliki banyak subkriteria yang saling berkaitan dalam pengambilan keputusan. Selanjutnya metode Technique For Orders Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) digunakan untuk perankingan supplier. Berdasarkan pembobotan subkriteria dengan menggunakan ANP, subkriteria yang paling besar pengaruhnya dalam evaluasi supplier adalah harga penawaran sebesar 0,17227. Selanjutnya, penentuan prioritas supplier dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode TOPSIS dan didapatkan urutan supplier untuk bahan baku kertas CD roll adalah supplier A, B, C, dan D, sedangkan untuk bahan baku tinta web adalah supplier L, N, O, dan M.   ABSTRACT One of the factors that influence the company performance is the presence of suppliers which supplies raw materials. PT Masscom Graphy Semarang is a printing company which has cooperated with several suppliers to ensure continuity of production. Therefore,  supplier performance evaluation conducted by the company is very important to obtain a reliable supplier in the supply of raw materials. The purpose of this research was to identify the supplier performance evaluation criteria and priorities of suppliers in accordance with the company's needs, and determined the priority order of the main raw material supplier for newspaper print. There was 17 sub-criteria used in evaluating the performance of suppliers and prioritization of suppliers. Analytical Network Process (ANP) can be used as an alternative to solve a problem that had many interrelated sub-criteria or influence in decision making. Furthermore, the method Technique For Orders Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used for ranking suppliers. Based on the weighted sub-criteria by using ANP, the most influence subcriteria in determining the priority of suppliers offering price of 0.17227. Furthermore, to the supplier prioritization was done by using the TOPSIS method and obtained the order suppliers for raw materials paper roll was a supplier A, B, C, and D, while the raw material for the ink web was a supplier of L, N, O and M.

A new supplier performance evaluation model

Kybernetes ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
He‐Yau Kang ◽  
Amy H.I. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Integrated Circuit ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Supplier Evaluation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Supplier Performance ◽  
Performance Evaluation Model ◽  
Proposed Model

PurposeMost industries have become increasingly competitive nowadays, and a good supply chain relationship is essential for a company to survive and to acquire reasonable profit. Therefore, supplier selection is very important. The purpose of this paper is to propose a novel model for evaluating the performance of suppliers.Design/methodology/approachA supplier performance evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) is constructed. DEA is applied first to evaluate quantitative factors, and the results are transformed into pairwise comparison values for AHP analysis. Qualitative factors are also evaluated through AHP analysis, and a final ranking of suppliers can be obtained by combining the quantitative and qualitative results.FindingsThe proposed model can be applied to evaluate and select the most appropriate integrated circuit packaging company for outsourcing. With the incorporation of experts' opinions and the consideration of qualitative and quantitative factors, the model can provide a both subjective and objective supplier performance ranking.Practical implicationsThe proposed model can be tailored and applied to supplier evaluation and selection in other industries.Originality/valueAlthough many models are available for supplier evaluation, this paper considers both the subjective and objective performance characteristics simultaneously in the evaluation process.

A hybrid type-2 fuzzy based supplier performance evaluation methodology: The Turkish Airlines technic case

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 436-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Görener ◽  
Berk Ayvaz ◽  
A. Osman Kuşakcı ◽  
Emir Altınok
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Methodology ◽  
Hybrid Type ◽  
Supplier Performance

scholarly journals A Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS model to supplier performance evaluation

DYNA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 88 (216) ◽  
pp. 126-135
Author(s):  
Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior ◽  
Michael Hsiao
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Topsis Method ◽  
Linguistic Terms ◽  
Management Actions ◽  
Automotive Company ◽  
Supplier Performance ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Decision Making Problem

Supplier performance evaluation is a decision-making problem that involves quantitative and qualitative metrics. Although several models that allow the use of linguistic terms such as "low" and "high" to evaluate suppliers, none of them enables the application of linguistic expressions, which is especially useful when decision makers hesitates to express their evaluations. This study proposes a model based on the Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS method to support the supplier performance evaluation. A pilot application was carried out in an automotive company considering 8 suppliers and 10 criteria. When compared to previous similar approaches, the proposed model presented the following advantages: it enables the use of linguistic expressions to assess the supplier performance in each criterion; it groups suppliers with similar levels of performance to develop appropriate management actions; and does not limit the number of criteria and suppliers evaluated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document