Ecosystem Approach for Assessing the Socio-economic Development of Industrial and Regional Systems in the Context of Digitalization

2021 ◽  
pp. 1609-1618
Author(s):  
Tatyana O. Tolstykh ◽  
Nadezhda V. Shmeleva ◽  
Elena A. Alpeeva ◽  
Diana Yu. Boboshko ◽  
Tatyana B. Malkova
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 98-107
Author(s):  
T. V. TERENTYEVA ◽  
◽  
A. A. VERTINOVA ◽  

The ecosystem approach to the development of the university and the region allows us to consider not only the joint activities of the region and the university, but also their joint development (co-development) on the basis of common goals provided for in the strategies of socio-economic development of the regions, development strategies and missions of universities. Based on the analysis of the literature carried out by the authors of this article, an institutional mechanism for the co-development of the university and the region was formed, which is a set of their connections, expressed in the performance of roles, regarding the inclusion of the region in the activities of the university and vice versa.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-473
Author(s):  
Надежда Гуськова ◽  
Nadezhda Guskova ◽  
Сергей Вдовин ◽  
Sergey Vdovin ◽  
Ирина Иванова ◽  
...  

Strategic management is aimed at socio-economic development of region at the effective use of his potential. Questions of development of strategy of increase of stability of regional development and forming of mechanism of its realization are actual. Transformation of the territorial systems, development and acceptance of the administrative decisions aimed at providing of their competitive edges and stability of development must be reasonable mathematical and instrumental methods. In this research the methodical approach to prognostication of basic indicators of steady development of the regional systems and ground of administrative decisions on the increase of stability of development of region are worked out, the integral indexes of stability of socio-economic development of subjects of Russian are built, complex estimation is conducted with the use of econometrics design (systems of simultaneous equalizations). Attained results of research allow using the worked out model for an estimation, comparative analysis and prognostication of the regional systems on the level of stability of their development.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4(73)) ◽  
pp. 46-56
Author(s):  
E.G. GORDIUCHYK ◽  
К.O. KOSTETSKA

Topicality. In today's socio-economic development, companies are finding the way to find new ways to increase their competitiveness. Also, in view of the global development trends and the latest documents, the socio-economic elements are becoming more and more relevant, which give a new experience to the person and provide an increase in quality of life parameters. Formation of modern trends and the transition to a new type of management, characterized by the increasing importance for a person to gain a special impression (experience) in the acquisition of a particular product or service, through the use of material or intangible production. Price competition changes weight, because a person is ready to spend big money to gain special experience, incl. from natural diversity. Therefore, the economy of impressions / experience, which is focused on consumer sensations and reflects the latest processes and phenomena of the post-industrial stage of development of society, is becoming increasingly relevant. Aim and tasks. The purpose of the article is to determine the theoretical basis for shaping the situation of the experience economy in light of the world trends and goals of the Millennium Development, defined in international documents. Research results. Taking into account the current trends of world development, the experience economy should become a component of inclusive growth on the basis of harmonization of interaction between society and the natural environment, social inclusion. Such guidelines can also be noted as key in the document Basic Principles of State Environmental Policy of Ukraine until 2030. At present, there is a mismatch between state legislative documents and regional development strategies. There is no clear detail of actions at the level of regional development plans. Thus it is necessary to distinguish priority directions of development of the economy of impressions in the structure of development of territories taking into account its functional features (recreational tourism, industrial, agricultural) and introduction of ecosystem approach for all directions of socio-economic development. To this end, it is necessary to highlight the basic principles of the economy of experience, taking into account the basic principles of sustainable development adopted at the UN Conference on Environment and Development.Conclusion. The study identified the origins and prerequisites of forming an impression economy. The author defined the essence of the notion of impression as a component of the impression economy, investigated existing approaches to determining the category of impression economy, analyzed the global trends in the development of the economy in terms of impressions, substantiated the use of natural resources to obtain positive impressions and improve quality of life. According to the authors, modeling the preconditions for the development of the economy of impressions can be understood as ensuring the health and socio-aesthetic development of man, the inclusion of society, the introduction of ecosystem approach that will promote inclusive growth and conservation of its natural resource potential. All kinds of natural resources (mineral, climatic, aquatic, land, forest, recreational, etc.) have a direct influence on forming an impression in the process of consuming the service and in the perception of the quality of life of a person. Therefore, it can be stated that natural resources are an essential component of the impression economy.


Author(s):  
Olga Shevchenko

The disparity of indicators of the development is a factor hindering the stable socio-economic development of the regions and forms a number of threats to create a consolidated economic space within the country, so they need to be evaluated in order to develop the tools influencing them. The problem of determination of factors influencing the disparity of regional development is considered in the paper. Published scientific works do not fully meet the needs for research on disparities due to the failure to take into account the levels of influence of individual indicators on dynamic development of regions. The aim of the study is to identify the main indicators that are socio-economic catalysts of the uneven development of regions based on a comprehensive assessment of the achieved level of socio-economic development of regional systems in Ukraine. There are some methods used in the study: taxonomic, grouping, cluster analysis, quartimax, correlation analysis. The paper proposes the mechanism that allows us to identify the key factors that determine the degree of disparity in the socio-economic development of regions. To describe such factors, the definition of a socio-economic catalyst and a retarder of development have been introduced. The calculated weighting factors are used to determine the force of influence of social and economic catalysts on the degree of uneven development of regions. It is revealed that the difference in the development of regions is more determined by economic factors and indicators that represent the welfare. The results of the research can be used to formulate a strategy for regulation of disparities in regional socio-economic development. The implemented methodology for assessing and analyzing interregional socio-economic unevenness and regional disproportions allows us to identify the key factors that determine the imbalance in socio-economic development of regions. Investigation of the factors that form the disparities in regional development allows us to form the systematic tool for influencing them.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 62-70
Author(s):  
S. L. Sazanova

The balanced socio–economic development of the territory of Russia is one of the main goals of managing the country’s economy. An important role in achieving this goal is played by the development of Russian border territories, especially those remote from the central regions of the country, but having sufficiently developed economic ties with neighboring countries. Russia and China have a fairly long border and vast border areas, in the development of which the governments of both countries are interested. A balanced long– term development of border areas is impossible without scientifically grounded state programs, the development of which presupposes a preliminary comparative analysis of the methodological and theoretical foundations of scientific theories, as well as their relevance to the set goals and objectives.The subject of research in the article is the heuristic possibilities of the cluster approach of the theory of spatial economics, on the one hand, and the ecosystem approach of the theory of socio–economic ecosystems, on the other. The research results are to identify the relative advantages and disadvantages of the cluster and system approaches as theoretical, methodological and practical tools for the development and implementation of programs for the socio–economic development of the territories of the Russian Federation bordering China. The author substantiated the advantages of the theory of socio–economic ecosystems as a theoretical and methodological tool for programs for the development of border areas.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-606
Author(s):  
Yuri V. Daneykin ◽  
◽  
Olga P. Ivanova ◽  
Vladimir A. Trifonov ◽  
◽  
...  

Problem and purpose. Assessment of the contribution of universities to the socio-economic development of regions, technological and innovative progress of industry are topical issues of the modern agenda for the modernization of higher education in the Russian Federation. The authors propose a methodology for assessing the contribution of universities to regional development from the standpoint of the ecosystem approach, which makes it possible to reconfigure the development programs of the actors of the regional ecosystem "Education – Science – Industry" in order to achieve the tasks of technological progress and socio-economic development of the region. Research methods. When determining indicators using the ecosystem concept, it was taken into account that the initial components for the work of each actor of the regional ecosystem "Education – Science – Industry" are the results of the activity of one of these components. When using the system theory in determining the groups of indicators, the process, environmental and design components of the regional ecosystem "Education – Science – Industry" were identified. Results. Eight blocks of subsystems of indicators of the university's contribution to regional development have been formed: in integration, investment processes and technological development of the region, innovative development of the region, demographic development of the region, labor market of the region, social development of the region, intellectual potential of the region, infrastructure of the region, economy of the region. The indicators of the efficiency (effectiveness) of the university ("internal" efficiency of the university) and the indicators of the university's contribution to the development of the region are distinguished. The indicators are divided into short-term (allowing to evaluate the university's contribution as the effect of the university's activities, which manifests itself within 1-2 years) and long-term (allowing to evaluate the university's contribution as the effect from the university's activities, which manifests itself in 5-7 years). The indicators are differentiated by groups (priority 1, priority 2, priority 3) taking into account the close relationship between the indicator and the indicator of the university's contribution to regional development. In the conclusion, the possibilities of practical use of the methodology for analyzing the performance of the university in the region and adjusting the programs for the development of universities in the regional ecosystem, including when assessing the effectiveness of the implementation of the Priority 2030 program, are shown.


Author(s):  
O. M. Usikova

Introduction. The economy is undergoing dramatic changes today. New tools, frameworks and practices are needed to ensure prosperity within regional systems of sectoral economic potential. The article is the result of a study of regional investment decisions that provide a framework for building a common regional strategy and strategic decision making that allows practitioners to align regional leaders in the overall direction of development and use key elements for regional suc-cess. The purpose of the article is to analyze the economic development and the potential to ensure strategic management decisions. Research methodology. The analysis of the irregularity of regional systems development of the sectoral complex in terms of their socio-economic development and potential has been used. The model is proposed, which makes it possible to quantify the economic potential, using the method of production functions. Results. The proposed models of potential subsystems at each level are considered in terms of dialectical unity of re-sources and the results of their use, which allows to combine the contradictions of resource and result approaches to deter-mine the essence of economic potential. The analysis of the point evaluation of the subsystems constituting the economic potential is carried out. Strategic monitoring is considered as objective information of sectoral management systems and the difference between strategic monitoring and traditional. An organizational and methodological approach to the strategic monitoring of the economic potential of the sector's industrial complex has been developed. Conclusions. A system of indicators for assessing the irregularity of socio-economic development of regional units and their potential is generalized and proposed, which is intended to generate a complex characteristic of the studied object by step-by-step study of its components. Keywords: economic development, economic potential, management, sectoral complex, potential subsystems, infor-mation system, strategic monitoring.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document