Contact Isolation

2019 ◽  
pp. 167-178
Author(s):  
Bjørg Marit Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Contact Isolation

scholarly journals 832. Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Wide-resistance Gram-negative Bacteria Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S457-S457
Author(s):  
Henry Pablo Lopes Campos e Reis ◽  
Ana Beatriz Ferreira Rodrigues ◽  
Julio César Castro Silva ◽  
Lia Pinheiro de Lima ◽  
Talita Lima Quinaher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Multiresistant Pathogens ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Contact Isolation ◽  
Bladder Catheter

Abstract Background Enterobacteria and multidrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli present a challenge in the management of invasive infections, leading to mortality rates due to their limited therapeutic arsenal. The objective of this work was to analyze risk factors that may be associated with these infections, for a better situational mapping and assertive decision-making in a university hospital in Brazil. Methods The study was conducted between January and September 2019, with 167 patients in contact isolation at a university hospital in Brazil. Potential outcome-related variables for wide-resistance Gram-negative bacteria (BGN) infections were evaluated. Risk factors were identified from univariate statistical analysis using Fisher’s test. Results 51 (30.5%) out of 167 patients in contact isolation evolved with wide-resistance BGN infection. Risk factors in univariate analysis were age, hospital unit and previous use of invasive devices. Patients aged up to 59 years were more likely to progress to infection than those aged over 60 years (p 0.0274, OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.5). Those admitted to the oncohematology (p < 0.001, OR 32.5, Cl 9.1-116.3) and intensive care unit (p < 0.001, OR 28.0, Cl 3.5-225.9) units were more likely to develop this type of infection. The least likely were those admitted to a kidney transplant unit (p 0.0034, OR 15.33, Cl 1.8-131.0). Prior use of mechanical ventilation (p 0.0058, OR 12.2, Cl 2.0-76.1) and delayed bladder catheter (p 0.0266, OR 5.0, Cl 1.2-20.1) in patients with respiratory and urinary tract infection, respectively, were also reported as risk factors related to these infections. The gender of the patients was not significant for the study. Conclusion This study determined that variables such as age, hospitalization unit, use of mechanical ventilation and delayed bladder catheter could be considered important risk factors in triggering the infectious process by wide-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Thus, the analysis of these factors becomes a great foundation to prevent the development of multiresistant pathogens through prevention strategies, prophylaxis management and more targeted empirical therapies. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Impact of Contact Isolation Precautions on Multi-Drug ResistantAcinetobacter baumanniiin the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1108-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Tawney ◽  
Lynn Semproch ◽  
Paul Lephart ◽  
Kevin Valentine ◽  
Ronald Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Contact Isolation

Control of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci at a Community Hospital: Efficacy of Patient and Staff Cohorting

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise M. Jochimsen ◽  
Laurie Fish ◽  
Kelly Manning ◽  
Sally Young ◽  
Daniel A. Singer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Hospital ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Infection Control Measures ◽  
Contact Isolation ◽  
Point Prevalence Survey ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
The Impact

AbstractObjective:To evaluate the efficacy of patient and staff cohorting to control vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) at an Indianapolis community hospital.Design:To interrupt transmission of VRE, a VRE point-prevalence survey of hospital inpatients was conducted, and VRE-infected or -colonized patients were cohorted on a single ward with dedicated nursing staff and patient-care equipment. To assess the impact of the intervention, staff compliance with contact isolation procedures was observed, and the VRE point-prevalence survey was repeated 2 months after the cohort ward was established.Results:Following the establishment of the cohort ward, VRE prevalence among all hospitalized inpatients decreased from 8.1% to 4.7% (25 positive cultures among 310 patients compared to 13 positive cultures among 276 patients,P=.14); VRE prevalence among patients whose VRE status was unknown before cultures were obtained decreased from 5.9% to 0.8% (18 positive cultures among 303 patients compared to 2 positive cultures among 262 patients,P=.002); and observed staff-patient interactions compliant with published isolation recommendations increased (5 [22%] of 23 interactions compared to 36 [88%] of 41 interactions,P<.0001).Conclusions:Our data suggest that, in hospitals with endemic VRE or continued VRE transmission despite implementation of contact isolation measures, establishing a VRE cohort ward may be a practical and effective method to improve compliance with infection control measures and thereby to control epidemic or endemic VRE transmission.

Healthcare workers' knowledge and beliefs on contact isolation precautions

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. e81-e82 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Carroll ◽  
S. Apoorva ◽  
B. Camins ◽  
J. Woodward ◽  
M. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Knowledge And Beliefs ◽  
Contact Isolation

scholarly journals Impact of Two-Step Testing Algorithm on Reducing Hospital-Onset Clostridioides difficile Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s42-s43
Author(s):  
Bhagyashri Navalkele ◽  
Wendy Winn ◽  
Sheila Fletcher ◽  
Regina Galloway ◽  
Jason Parham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Toxin A ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Contact Isolation ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Mississippi Medical ◽  
True Infection ◽  
Testing Algorithm ◽  
The University

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the leading causes of hospital–onset infections. Clinically distinguishing true CDI versus colonization with C. difficile is challenging and often requires reliable and rapid molecular testing methods. At our academic center, we implemented a 2-step testing algorithm to help identify true CDI cases. The University of Mississippi Medical Center is a 700+ bed academic facility located in Jackson, Mississippi. Hospital-onset (HO) CDI was defined based on NHSN Laboratory Identified (LabID) event as the last positive C. difficile test result performed on a specimen using a multistep testing algorithm collected >3 calendar days after admission to the facility. HO-CDI data were collected from all inpatient units except the NICU and newborn nursery. HO-CDI outcomes were assessed based on standardized infection ratio (SIR) data. In May 2020, we implemented a 2-step testing algorithm (Figure 1). All patients with diarrhea underwent C. difficile PCR testing. Those with positive C. difficile PCR test were reflexed to undergo enzyme immunoassay (EIA) glutamate dehydrogenase antigen (Ag) testing and toxin A and B testing. The final results were reported as colonization (C. difficile PCR+/EIA Ag+/Toxin A/B−) or true CDI case (C. difficile PCR+/EIA +/Toxin A/B +) or negative (C. difficile PCR−). All patients with colonization or true infection were placed under contact isolation precautions until diarrhea resolution for 48 hours. During the preintervention period (October 2019–April 2020), 25 HO-CDI cases were reported compared to 8 cases in the postintervention period (June 2020–December 2020). A reduction in CDI SIR occurred in the postintervention period (Q3 2020–Q4 2020, SIR 0.265) compared to preintervention period (Q4 2019–Q1 2020, SIR 0.338) (Figure 2). We successfully reduced our NHSN HO-CDI SIR below the national average after implementing a 2-step testing algorithm for CDI. The 2-step testing algorithm was useful for antimicrobial stewardship to guide appropriate CDI treatment for true cases and for infection prevention to continue isolation of infected and colonized cases to reduce the spread of C. difficile spores.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Clostridium Difficile and Contact Isolation: Safely Saving the Patient from the Isolation Experience During Testing

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. S110
Author(s):  
Dorine Berriel-Cass ◽  
Chau Nguyen ◽  
Kerrie VerLee ◽  
Theresa Klein ◽  
Jennifer Grile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Contact Isolation

scholarly journals Hand Sanitizers: A Review on Formulation Aspects, Adverse Effects, and Regulations

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 3326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Lee Jia Jing ◽  
Thong Pei Yi ◽  
Rajendran J. C. Bose ◽  
Jason R. McCarthy ◽  
Nagendran Tharmalingam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Direct Contact ◽  
Hand Sanitizer ◽  
Contact Isolation ◽  
Transmission Chain ◽  
Water Based ◽  
Airborne Microorganism ◽  
Control Tool

Hand hygiene is of utmost importance as it may be contaminated easily from direct contact with airborne microorganism droplets from coughs and sneezes. Particularly in situations like pandemic outbreak, it is crucial to interrupt the transmission chain of the virus by the practice of proper hand sanitization. It can be achieved with contact isolation and strict infection control tool like maintaining good hand hygiene in hospital settings and in public. The success of the hand sanitization solely depends on the use of effective hand disinfecting agents formulated in various types and forms such as antimicrobial soaps, water-based or alcohol-based hand sanitizer, with the latter being widely used in hospital settings. To date, most of the effective hand sanitizer products are alcohol-based formulations containing 62%–95% of alcohol as it can denature the proteins of microbes and the ability to inactivate viruses. This systematic review correlated with the data available in Pubmed, and it will investigate the range of available hand sanitizers and their effectiveness as well as the formulation aspects, adverse effects, and recommendations to enhance the formulation efficiency and safety. Further, this article highlights the efficacy of alcohol-based hand sanitizer against the coronavirus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document