Cancer Cell Fusion with Myeloid Cells: Implications for Energy Metabolism in Malignant Hybrids

Cell Fusions ◽  
2010 ◽  
pp. 351-394
Author(s):  
Rossitza Lazova ◽  
Ashok K. Chakraborty ◽  
John M. Pawelek
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 4685-4690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yazhuo Liu ◽  
Ruoyu Wang ◽  
Lichuan Zhang ◽  
Jianhua Li ◽  
Keli Lou ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg Shuvalov ◽  
Alyona Kizenko ◽  
Alexey Petukhov ◽  
Olga Fedorova ◽  
Alexandra Daks ◽  
...  

AbstractSEMG1 and SEMG2 genes belong to the family of cancer-testis antigens (CTAs), whose expression normally is restricted to male germ cells but is often restored in various malignancies. High levels of SEMG1 and SEMG2 expression are detected in prostate, renal, and lung cancer as well as hemoblastosis. However, the functional importance of both SEMGs proteins in human neoplasms is still largely unknown. In this study, by using a combination of the bioinformatics and various cellular and molecular assays, we have demonstrated that SEMG1 and SEMG2 are frequently expressed in lung cancer clinical samples and cancer cell lines of different origins and are negatively associated with the survival rate of cancer patients. Using the pull-down assay followed by LC-MS/MS mass-spectrometry, we have identified 119 proteins associated with SEMG1 and SEMG2. Among the SEMGs interacting proteins we noticed two critical glycolytic enzymes-pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA). Importantly, we showed that SEMGs increased the protein level and activity of both PKM2 and LDHA. Further, both SEMGs increased the membrane mitochondrial potential (MMP), glycolysis, respiration, and ROS production in several cancer cell lines. Taken together, these data provide first evidence that SEMGs can up-regulate the energy metabolism of cancer cells, exemplifying their oncogenic features.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3690-3690
Author(s):  
Takuya Tsubaki ◽  
Tetsuya Kadonosono ◽  
Tadashi Shiozawa ◽  
Takahiro Kuchimaru ◽  
Takashi Ushiki ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Solid tumors are infiltrated by a variety of myeloid-derived cells (MDCs), such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Extensive studies have revealed that they play pivotal roles in tumor progression, such as immunosuppression, angiogenesis, and enhancing tumor cell invasion, and metastasis. It has been suggested, however, that undefined MDCs exist in tumors and play key roles in tumor progression. In order to develop a novel anti-tumor strategy, we have been searching undefined tumor-infiltrating MDCs that associate with tumor progression. Recently we have isolated adherent MDCs (AMCs), which strongly adhere to culture dishes, from subcutaneous tumors of Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC). AMCs contained CD45(+) CD11b(+) F4/80(-) undefined cell population (named F4/80(-)AMC) that exhibit protumoral functions. In this research, we characterized F4/80(-)AMC and explored its protumoral functions. Methods F4/80(-)AMC were subcutaneously transplanted into syngenic C57BL/6J mice with firefly luciferase-expressing LLC (LLC/luc) cells and bioluminescence (BL) signals corresponding to tumor burden were monitored every four days. The direct effect of F4/80(-)AMC on cancer cell growth was examined in vitro by culturing LLC/luc cells with (co-culture) or without (mono-culture) F4/80(-)AMC. In addition, conditioned medium (CM) collected from co-culture and mono-culture were analyzed by using mouse cytokine protein array. Receptors for markedly increased cytokines in co-culture CM were knocked down in LLC/luc cells to examine their involvement in LLC growth, and the candidate cytokines were further investigated for their direct effect on LLC growth by adding their recombinant proteins to the culture medium and monitoring the growth of LLC/luc cells. Furthermore, the possibility that F4/80(-)AMC could have a role to recruit other MDCs to tumor site was examined by in vitro chemotaxis assays using transwell chambers, and the impact of the neutralizing antibody against candidate cytokines on MDCs chemotaxis was evaluated. Results Investigation of surface makers on F4/80(-)AMC revealed that F4/80(-)AMC is distinct from any other already-known myeloid cells [Figure 1]. BL signal from tumors co-transplanted with F4/80(-)AMC was significantly increased compared to the signal from LLC/luc tumors, indicating that F4/80(-)AMC promotes tumor growth in subcutaneous tumor models [Figure 2]. Since F4/80(-) AMC was able to enhance proliferation of LLC cells in an in vitro co-culture without cell-cell contact [Figure 3], we hypothesized that F4/80(-)AMC may directly enhance tumor cell growth through cytokine release. Cytokine array showed that 6 cytokines (lipocalin-2, CXCL1, CXCL2, adiponectin, CCL2, and CCL5) were markedly increased in co-cultured CM compared to mono-cultured CM [Figure 4]. Knocking down (KD) of receptors for these cytokines indicate that only KD of CXCR2, a receptor for CXCL1/CXCL2, significantly abrogated F4/80(-)AMC-induced LLC growth [Figure 5]. CXCL1 and CXCL2 dose-dependently promoted LLC proliferation [Figure 6], demonstrating that F4/80(-)AMC directly enhance cancer cell proliferation via CXCL1 and CXCL2. Furthermore, in tumors co-transplanted with F4/80(-) AMC, monocytic MDSC (Mo-MDSC) and TAM were elevated, while activated CTLs were reduced [Figure 7]. It has been known that Mo-MDSC can suppress CTLs activities and that TAM is differentiated from Mo-MDSC in tumors. Therefore, above results may reflect F4/80(-)AMC-mediated recruitment of Mo-MDSC, which subsequently suppress CTLs and differentiate into TAM. Moreover, antibodies against CCL2 and CCL5 significantly suppressed the migration of Mo-MDSC toward CM of F4/80(-) AMC, suggesting that F4/80(-)AMC recruits Mo-MDSC via CCL2 and CCL5 secretion [Figure 8]. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that F4/80(-)AMC contributes to tumor progression by creating an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Conclusions Our study sheds light on the protumoral functions of novel MDCs: F4/80(−)AMC. Further characterization of F4/80(−)AMC and elucidation of its relationship with known MDCs are required to understand overall roles of MDCs in malignant progression. Our goal in this work is to identify the cell surface markers of F4/80(−)AMC and develop a novel treatment strategy for advanced cancers based on the knowledge of F4/80(−)AMC. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-814
Author(s):  
Charles E. Gast ◽  
Alain Silk ◽  
Mark Schmidt ◽  
Lara Riegler ◽  
Chris Harrington ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucile Yart ◽  
Daniel Bastida-Ruiz ◽  
Mathilde Allard ◽  
Pierre-Yves Dietrich ◽  
Patrick Petignat ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Polyploid giant cancer cells (PGCCs) have been observed in epithelial ovarian tumors. They can resist antimitotic drugs, thus participating in tumor maintenance and recurrence. Despite their origin remains unclear, PGCC formation seems to be enhanced by conditions that trigger the unfolded protein response (UPR) such as hypoxia or chemotherapeutic treatments. Hypoxia has been shown to promote the formation of ovarian PGCCs by cell fusion. These PGCCs can undergo bursting and budding, contributing to generate cancer stem-like cells with more aggressive phenotypes than the parental cells.Methods: The UPR was induced in two ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV3 and COV318). UPR activation was assessed by western blot and polyploidy indexes were calculated. Then, to confirm the implication of cell fusion in PGCCs formation, two populations of SKOV3 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding for two distinct nuclear fluorescent proteins (GFP and mCherry) associated with different antibiotic resistance genes, and the two cell populations were mixed in co-culture. The co-culture was submitted to a double-antibiotic selection. The resulting cell population was characterized for its morphology, cyclicity, and proliferative and tumorigenic capacities, in addition to a transcriptomic characterization.Results: We demonstrated that cell fusion could be involved in ovarian PGCCs generation and this process was promoted by unfolded protein response activation. Double-antibiotic treatment of PGCCs led to the selection of a pure population of cells containing both GFP- and mCherry-positive nuclei. Interestingly, after three weeks of selection, we observed that these cells were no longer polynucleated but displayed single nucleus positive for both fluorescent proteins, suggesting that genetic material mixing had occurred. These cells had restarted normal cell cycles, acquired an increased invasive capacity, and can form ovarian tumors in ovo.Conclusions: UPR activation increased the in vitro formation of PGCCs by cell fusion, further leading to the acquisition of new properties for the newly generated cells. UPR modulation in ovarian cancer patients could be an interesting therapeutic strategy to avoid the formation of PGCCs and therefore limit cancer relapse and drug resistance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document