The relationship between second language college students’ perceptions of online feedback on draft-writing and academic procrastination

Author(s):  
Miriam Sarid ◽  
Yehuda Peled ◽  
Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Annisa Risqi Anggunani ◽  
Budi Purwanto

This study aims to find out the relationship between problematic internet use (PIU) and academic procrastination in college students. This study took place in the Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada with 190 students as the participants. The data were collected using Academic Procrastination Scale (APS) and Generalized Problematic Internet Use-2 (GPIUS2) that has been adapted in Bahasa. Hypothesis is analyzed using Pearson's product-moment correlation which shows that there is a positive relationship between problematic internet use and academic procrastination (r = 0,478; p = 0,000 (p<0,01). Furthermore, additional analysis shows that there is no different level in problematic internet use and academic procrastination based on gender. Other than that, there is also a no different level of academic procrastination based on the duration of internet usage in one day. Conversely, there is a different level of problematic internet use based on the duration of internet usage in one day.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 296-302
Author(s):  
Sri Supriyantini ◽  
Khirzun Nufus

Untuk meraih gelar sarjana di perguruan tinggi, mahasiswa diwajibkan untuk menyelesaikan tugas akhir skripsi. Umumnya mahasiswa diberikan waktu untuk penyusunan skripsi selama 1 semester atau kuranglebih 6 bulan. Namun banyak mahasiswa yang memerlukan waktu lebih dari enam bulan untuk mengerjakan skripsi[5]. Hal ini berakibat pada masa studi mahasiswa yang menjadi lebih lama dari yang seharusnya. Salah satu faktor yang menyebabkan keterlambatan mahasiswa dalam menyusun skripsi adalah prokrastinasi akademik. Prokrastinasi akademik ini terkait dengan self efficacy yang dimiliki mahasiswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian korelasional yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara self efficacy dengan prokrastinasi akademik pada mahasiswa Universitas Sumatera Utara yang sedang menyusun skripsi. Menurut Steel (2007) prokrastinasi adalah menunda dengan sengaja kegiatan yang diinginkan walaupun individu mengetahui bahwa perilaku penundaan tersebut dapat menghasilkan dampak buruk. Prokrastinasi akademik merupakan prokrastinasi yang terjadi pada bidang akademik. Prokrastinasi yang dilakukan berkaitan dengan menunda untuk memulai dan menyelesaikan skripsi. Prokrastinasi akademik berkaitan dengan keyakinan dari dalam diri mahasiswa akan kemampuan yang dimiliki untuk mengerjakan tugas (dalam hal ini adalah penyusunan skripsi). Keyakinan seseorang akan kemampuannya oleh Bandura (2001) disebut sebagai self efficacy. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 307 mahasiswa USU yang sedang menyusun skripsi. Data diambil dengan menggunakan skala self efficacy yang disusun berdasarkan dimensi- dimensi self efficacy [1] dan skala prokrastinasi akademik berdasarkan aspek-aspek prokrastinasi akademik [6]. Hasil analisa data menunjukkan adanya hubungan negatif antara self efficacy dengan prokrastinasi akademik pada mahasisa USU yang sedang menyusun skripsi (r = -0.335, p = 0.000).   To get a bachelor's degree in college, students are required to complete the thesis final assignments. Generally, students are given time for the preparation of a thesis for 1 semester or approximately 6 months. But many students need more than six months to work on a thesis [5]. This results in the study period of students becoming longer than they should. One of the factors that causes student delays in preparing a thesis is academic procrastination. Academic procrastination is related to student self-efficacy. This research was a correlational study that aimed to determine the relationship between self-efficacy and academic procrastination in University of Sumatera Utara students who were preparing a thesis. According to Steel (2007) procrastination is to deliberately delay the desired activity even though the individual knows that the delaying behavior can produce adverse effects. Academic procrastination is procrastination that occurs in the academic field. Procrastination is carried out in connection with delaying starting and completing a thesis. Academic procrastination is related to the confidence in the student's ability to do the task (in this case the preparation of the thesis). A person's belief in his ability by Bandura (2001) is referred as self-efficacy. The sample of this study was 307 USU students who were preparing a thesis. Data were taken using the scale of self-efficacy which was compiled based on the dimensions of self-efficacy [1] and the scale of academic procrastination based on aspects of academic procrastination [6]. The results of data analysis showed a negative relationship between self-efficacy and academic procrastination of USU's students who were preparing a thesis (r = -0.335, p = 0.000).


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Amalia Rahmandani

AbstrakProkrastinasi berdampak pada prestasi akademik, maupun kesehatan mental. Meskipun pemaafan termasuk dalam atribut psikologi positif, bukti mengenai hubungan antara pemaafan dan prokrastinasi mengesankan adanya pertentangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji hubungan antara pemaafan dan prokrastinasi akademik pada mahasiswa. Terdapat 127 mahasiswa sarjana dari Program Studi Ilmu Gizi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, yang terpilih sebagai subjek penelitian menggunakan teknik stratified random sampling. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan Skala Psikologis Pemaafan (32 aitem, α = 0,888) dan Skala Prokrastinasi Akademik (41 aitem, α = 0,916). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan hubungan yang negatif  dan signifikan (rxy = -0,358, p = 0,000). Besaran prediksi yaitu 12,8%. Hasil lebih jauh menunjukkan korelasi negatif antara pemaafan diri sendiri, orang lain, maupun situasi dengan prokrastinasi akademik. Perbedaan besaran kontribusi pemaafan di antara objek yang berbeda didiskusikan lebih jauh.Kata kunci: pemaafan; diri sendiri; orang lain; situasi; prokrastinasi akademik; mahasiswa AbstractProcrastination has an impact on academic achievement, as well as mental health. Although forgiveness is included as an attribute of positive psychology, the evidence about the relationship between forgiveness and procrastination impress contradiction. This study aims to examine the relationship between forgiveness and academic procrastination in college students. There were 127 undergraduate students from The Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Diponegoro, Indonesia, who was selected as research subjects using the stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected using The Forgiveness Psychological Scale (32 items, α = .888) and The Academic Procrastination Scale (41 items, α = .916). The results showed a negative and significant correlation (rxy = -.358, p = .000). The effective contribution is 12.8%. Further results showed negative correlations between forgiveness of self, others, and situations with academic procrastination. The differences in the amount of the contribution of forgiveness between different objects discussed further.Keywords: forgiveness; self; others; situations; academic procrastination; college students


Author(s):  
Kai Ren ◽  
Xiaolu Liu ◽  
Yujuan Feng ◽  
Changqing Li ◽  
Dingding Sun ◽  
...  

Background: Academic procrastination (AP) has been a common problematic behavior in college students. While physical activity (PA) has been reported to increase self-efficacy and reduce AP, less is known about the potential relationships among them. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between PA and AP. Methods: 687 Chinese college students (51% males, 49% females) aged 17–23 years (M = 19.59, SD = 0.89) participated in the study. PA, self-efficacy, and AP were assessed using the Physical Activity Rating Scale-3 (PARS-3), the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Procrastination Assessment Scale-Students (PASS), respectively. Pearson correlation analysis, linear regression analysis, and mediation analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: (1) PA has a significant and negative impact on college students’ AP, (2) PA has a significant and positive impact on college students’ self-efficacy; (3) self-efficacy has a significant and negative impact on AP in college students; and (4) self-efficacy significantly mediates the relationship between PA and AP. Conclusions: PA is an effective intervention for directly and indirectly decreasing college students’ AP. Therefore, more intervention efforts should focus on the promotion of PA in higher education to improve students’ self-efficacy and thus, to reduce AP among college students.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Bu ◽  
Lin Wu ◽  
Hongchun Wang

We used mindfulness as a mediating variable and self-efficacy as a moderator to examine the relationship between academic procrastination and subjective well-being. Participants comprised 512 college students from Hangzhou, Xiamen, and Huizhou in China. Results show that academic procrastination had a negative impact on subjective well-being, and that mindfulness was a mediator in this relationship. In addition, self-efficacy played a moderating role in the academic procrastination–mindfulness relationship, and, to a certain extent, regulated the relationship between academic procrastination and subjective well-being. Thus, the stronger the self-efficacy of college students, the weaker was the negative predictive effect of academic procrastination on mindfulness. The significance of mindfulness and self-efficacy regarding subjective well-being among procrastinators is discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-200
Author(s):  
Annisa Rosni Zusya ◽  
Sari Zakiah Akmal

Having graduated not at the right time is a common phenomena among college students and  procrastinantion which is delaying the final assignment become the reason. One of factors that affect  procrastination is self-efficacy. Self-efficacy that is predicting academic achievement is academic self-efficacy. This research uses quantitative methods to examine the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination among 210 students who are completing the last assignment. Instrument used are academic procrastination scale and academic self-efficacy scale. Result shows that there is no significant correlation between academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination among students who were completing the last assignment (r = -0.059, p = 0.398). Besides, academic procrastination had significant differences by age, gender, year of admission, residence, and activities. In the same time, the academic self-efficacy had differences by age, year in, obstacles and activities. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document