scholarly journals Handgrip strength and risk of cognitive outcomes: new prospective study and meta-analysis of 16 observational cohort studies

GeroScience ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Setor K. Kunutsor ◽  
Nzechukwu M. Isiozor ◽  
Ari Voutilainen ◽  
Jari A. Laukkanen
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Handgrip Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cognitive Outcomes ◽  
Risk Indicator ◽  
Observational Cohort

AbstractHandgrip strength (HGS), a measure of muscular strength, might be a risk indicator for cognitive functioning, but the evidence is not consistent. Using a new prospective study and meta-analysis of published observational cohort studies, we aimed to evaluate the prospective associations of HGS with poor cognitive outcomes including cognitive impairment, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Handgrip strength, measured using a Martin-Balloon-Vigorimeter, was assessed at baseline in a population-based sample of 852 men and women with good cognitive function in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease cohort. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for cognitive outcomes. Relevant published studies were sought in MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science from inception until October 2021 and pooled using random effects meta-analysis. During a median follow-up of 16.6 years, 229 dementia cases were recorded. Comparing extreme tertiles of HGS, the multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) for dementia, AD and vascular dementia was 0.77 (0.55–1.07), 0.75 (0.52–1.10) and 0.49 (0.16–1.48), respectively. In a meta-analysis of 16 population-based prospective cohort studies (including the current study) comprising 180,920 participants, the pooled multivariable adjusted relative risks (95% CIs) comparing the top vs bottom thirds of HGS levels were as follows: 0.58 (0.52–0.65) for cognitive impairment; 0.37 (0.07–1.85) for cognitive decline; 0.73 (0.62–0.86) for dementia; 0.68 (0.53–0.87) for AD; and 0.48 (0.32–0.73) for vascular dementia. GRADE quality of evidence ranged from low to very low. Meta-analysis of aggregate prospective data suggests that HGS may be a risk indicator for poor cognitive outcomes such as cognitive impairment, dementia and AD. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2021: CRD42021237750.

scholarly journals The Comorbid Relationship Between Migraine and Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Wang ◽  
Zi-Ru Deng ◽  
Mei-Dan Zu ◽  
Juan Zhang ◽  
Yu Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Risk Indicator ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Full Text Review ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Objective: Recent studies have indicated a pathophysiologic link between migraine and asthma. This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively estimate the risk ratio for migraine in asthma as well as that of asthma in migraine based on available evidence.Method: We systematically searched the electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS for population-based studies that measured either the odds or the risk of asthma in subjects with migraine as well as that of migraine in subjects with asthma. The titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers to identify eligible studies, and this was followed by full-text review of the included studies. Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias of included literature. A meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.3 Software to calculate the odds ratio (OR) for case-control and cross-sectional studies and either relative ratio (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) for cohort studies, and the source of heterogeneity was assessed. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted, and the I2 test were used to assess the source of heterogeneity. The funnel plot, Galbraith plot, and Egger's test were used to evaluate publication bias.Results: Fifteen published studies covering a total of 1,188,780 individuals were identified. Pooled analysis indicated that migraine was associated with increased odds (OR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.34~1.77) and risk for asthma (HR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.26~1.60), and asthma associated with increased odds (OR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.22~1.72) and risk for migraine (HR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.41~1.52).Conclusion: Migraine is a potential risk indicator for asthma, and vice versa, asthma is a potential risk indicator for migraine. However, future prospective cohort studies are warranted to provide more evidence concerning the detailed association between migraine and asthma.

scholarly journals Longitudinal association between CRP levels and risk of psychosis: a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele F. Osimo ◽  
Luke Baxter ◽  
Jan Stochl ◽  
Benjamin I. Perry ◽  
Stephen A. Metcalf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Standard Deviation Increase ◽  
Suspected Infection ◽  
Longitudinal Association ◽  
Incident Cases

AbstractMeta-analyses of cross-sectional studies suggest that patients with psychosis have higher circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) compared with healthy controls; however, cause and effect is unclear. We examined the prospective association between CRP levels and subsequent risk of developing a psychotic disorder by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Databases were searched for prospective studies of CRP and psychosis. We obtained unpublished results, including adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, alcohol use, and socioeconomic status and suspected infection (CRP > 10 mg/L). Based on random effect meta-analysis of 89,792 participants (494 incident cases of psychosis at follow-up), the pooled odds ratio (OR) for psychosis for participants with high (>3 mg/L), as compared to low (≤3 mg/L) CRP levels at baseline was 1.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–2.07). Evidence for this association remained after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03–1.66). After excluding participants with suspected infection, the OR for psychosis was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.06–1.74), but the association attenuated after controlling for confounders (aOR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.95–1.60). Using CRP as a continuous variable, the pooled OR for psychosis per standard deviation increase in log(CRP) was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.93–1.34), and this association further attenuated after controlling for confounders (aOR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.90–1.27) and excluding participants with suspected infection (aOR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92–1.24). There was no association using CRP as a categorical variable (low, medium or high). While we provide some evidence of a longitudinal association between high CRP (>3 mg/L) and psychosis, larger studies are required to enable definitive conclusions.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in (morbidly) obese or low body weight patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Grymonprez ◽  
TL De Backer ◽  
S Steurbaut ◽  
K Boussery ◽  
L Lahousse
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Observational Cohort

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) Background Oral anticoagulants are crucial for preventing systemic thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF), with guidelines preferring non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the general AF population. However, as NOACs are administered in fixed doses, concerns of unintentional underdosing in morbidly obese patients and unintentional overdosing in underweight patients have emerged. Moreover, VKAs are still recommended in morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m², body weight >120 kg) due to lack of data for NOACs in these patients. Purpose A critical appraisal of the benefit-risk profile of NOACs in AF patients across the body weight spectrum.  Methods After searching the Medline database, phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and longitudinal observational cohort studies on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs versus VKAs in obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²), and class III obese (BMI ≥40 kg/m²) non-valvular AF patients, and in low body weight (≤60 kg) AF patients during a mean/median follow-up of ≥6 months were included. The meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results A meta-analysis based on 4 phase III RCTS and 3 longitudinal observational cohort studies demonstrated that NOAC use in obese and class III obese AF patients was associated with significantly lower stroke/systemic embolism (stroke/SE) risks (RR 0.82, 95%CI [0.71-0.96]; and RR 0.75, 95%CI [0.64-0.87], respectively), similar to lower major bleeding risks (RR 0.83, 95%CI [0.69-1.00]; and RR 0.74, 95%CI [0.57-0.95], respectively), and similar mortality risks (RR 0.92, 95%CI [0.73-1.15]; and RR 1.17, 95%CI [0.83-1.64], respectively) as compared to VKAs. In AF patients ≤60 kg, significantly lower stroke/SE (RR 0.63, 95%CI [0.56-0.71]) and major bleeding risks (RR 0.71, 95%CI [0.62-0.80]), and similar mortality risks (RR 0.68, 95%CI [0.42-1.10]) were observed for NOAC- versus VKA-treated patients in a meta-analysis based on 4 phase III RCTs and 2 longitudinal observational cohort studies. Conclusions The benefit-risk profile of NOACs seems preserved in (morbidly) obese AF patients and patients with low body weight of ≤60 kg. However, more data are needed in underweight AF patients (BMI <18.5 kg/m²) and on differences between NOACs to further optimize management in these patient subgroups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document