PIAS1 negatively modulates virus triggered type I IFN signaling by blocking the DNA binding activity of IRF3

2013 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 546-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Li ◽  
Yu Pan ◽  
Dan-Dan Shi ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Jun Zhang
Virus Genes ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 797-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruoxi Zhang ◽  
Liurong Fang ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Fuwei Zhao ◽  
Tao Song ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang-Ting Lu ◽  
Chantel N. Trost ◽  
Hanna Müller-Esparza ◽  
Lennart Randau ◽  
Alan R. Davidson

ABSTRACTPhages and other mobile genetic elements express anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) to protect their genomes from destruction by CRISPR-Cas systems. Acrs usually block the ability of CRISPR-Cas systems to bind or cleave their nucleic acid substrates. Here, we investigate an unusual Acr, AcrIF9, that induces a gain-of-function to a type I-F CRISPR-Cas (Csy) complex, causing it to bind strongly to DNA that lacks both a PAM sequence and sequence complementarity. We show that specific and non-specific dsDNA compete for the same site on the Csy:AcrIF9 complex with rapid exchange, but specific ssDNA appears to still bind through complemetarity to the CRISPR RNA. We also demonstrate that induction of non-specific DNA-binding is a conserved property of diverse AcrIF9 homologues, implying that this activity contributes the biologically relevant function of this Acr family. AcrIF9 provides another example of the surprising variety of mechanisms by which Acrs inhibit CRISPR-Cas systems.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2686-2686
Author(s):  
A.E. Schade ◽  
H. Szpurka ◽  
A. Jankowska ◽  
J. Bauer ◽  
E.D. Hsi ◽  
...  

Abstract Cytokine receptors preferentially associate with particular JAK-STAT combinations to transduce specific signals. For example, erythropoietin receptor (Epo-R) preferentially interacts with JAK2 to initiate signaling pathways via STAT5. The JAK2 V617F mutation (mJAK2) found in some myeloproliferative disorders (MPD) still requires binding to type I cytokine receptors to initiate signaling. Consequently, aberrant JAK-STAT signaling in MPD may require physiologic interactions with other pathways. Src family kinases (SFK) interact with various cytokine receptors resulting in close association between SFK and JAK-STAT pathways. We hypothesized that SFK activity plays a role in the activation of STAT5 and, given the importance of STAT5 in the pathogenesis of MPD, targeted inhibition of SFK could provide a novel therapeutic approach. First, we examined the effect the SFK inhibitors PP2 and SU6656 on the proliferation of the HEL cell line harboring mJAK2 and the Epo-dependent AML line UT7/Epo; SFK inhibition significantly diminished proliferation in both cell lines. These results imply that despite of the constitutive activity of mJAK2 or in the presence of Epo stimulated JAK2-STAT5 induction, SFK activation is required for proliferation. Since mJAK2 requires a functionally intact type I cytokine receptor, we examined Epo-R signaling in greater detail via phospho-specific immunoblotting. SFK inhibition resulted in diminished levels of phospho-SFK, coinciding with a similar degree of diminished phospho-STAT5. Simultaneously decreased induction of AKT and ERK pathways after SFK inhibition suggested SFK activity is also regulating a more global signaling network through the Epo-R. Inhibition of JAK2 activity potently suppressed phospho-STAT5, as well as ERK and AKT, without affecting SFK phosphorylation. Thus, SFK lies upstream of JAK2, or SFK and JAK2 may be regulating the second messenger pathways in parallel. In electrophoretic mobility shift assays to examine the effect of SFK inhibition on STAT5 DNA binding, SFK inhibition resulted in decreased STAT5 DNA binding despite constitutive activity of mJAK2. Analogous results were obtained after Epo stimulation in UT7/Epo cells. As expected, inhibition of JAK2 resulted in almost complete loss of STAT5 DNA binding. To confirm these results in primary cells, we examined the effects of SFK inhibition on primary monocytes from a patient with mJAK2. Stimulation with GM-CSF resulted in increased STAT5A DNA binding, but not STAT5B. In the presence of the SFK inhibitor PP2, GM-CSF induction of STAT5A DNA binding activity was completely inhibited. It is interesting to note that a key difference between STAT5A and STAT5B is the potential for ERK regulation of STAT5A DNA binding activity. Thus, showing here that SFK regulates ERK activity, and knowing that ERK activity can positively regulate STAT5A DNA binding, we propose a model in which SFK activity may modulate the JAK2-STAT5 signaling axis via the ERK pathway. In summary, our results demonstrate that while JAK2 is essential for this process, SFK activity appears to be necessary for full activation by positively modulating the JAK2-STAT5 axis. SFK inhibitors recently approved and in clinical trials may demonstrate efficacy in hematologic diseases characterized by aberrant JAK-STAT signaling, such as MPD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Hao Liou ◽  
Sameer K. Singh ◽  
Robert H. Singer ◽  
Robert A. Coleman ◽  
Wei-Li Liu

AbstractThe tumor suppressor p53 protein activates expression of a vast gene network in response to stress stimuli for cellular integrity. The molecular mechanism underlying how p53 targets RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to regulate transcription remains unclear. To elucidate the p53/Pol II interaction, we have determined a 4.6 Å resolution structure of the human p53/Pol II assembly via single particle cryo-electron microscopy. Our structure reveals that p53’s DNA binding domain targets the upstream DNA binding site within Pol II. This association introduces conformational changes of the Pol II clamp into a further-closed state. A cavity was identified between p53 and Pol II that could possibly host DNA. The transactivation domain of p53 binds the surface of Pol II’s jaw that contacts downstream DNA. These findings suggest that p53’s functional domains directly regulate DNA binding activity of Pol II to mediate transcription, thereby providing insights into p53-regulated gene expression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document