Gamified flipped classroom versus traditional classroom learning: Which approach is more efficient in business education?

2022 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 100595
Author(s):  
Usman Khan Durrani ◽  
Ghazi Al Naymat ◽  
Rami M. Ayoubi ◽  
Muhammad Mustafa Kamal ◽  
Hanan Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Business Education ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Traditional Classroom ◽  
Classroom Learning

Changing Students’ Attitudes Toward Research: Comparing Traditional With Flipped Classroom Learning Methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-33
Author(s):  
Ziblim Abukari ◽  
Nora Padykula ◽  
Jennifer Propp
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Traditional Classroom ◽  
Classroom Learning ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
Students Attitudes ◽  
Work Education ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Pedagogical Approaches

Despite the importance of research to social work education, BSW students often view these courses negatively, demonstrating a lack of interest and increased levels of anxiety. This study assessed BSW students’ attitudes toward research and the impact of two different pedagogical approaches, traditional versus the flipped classroom. Using the Attitudes Toward Research Scale, two cohorts of BSW students (n=87) were surveyed at the completion of their research sequence. Findings from the study suggest that students taught in the flipped classroom reported lower levels of apprehension toward research and reported more positive attitudes and recognition of research usefulness than their traditional classroom counterparts.

scholarly journals Strategies to Improve Mathematics Learning Outcomes Through Flipped Classroom

Academia Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurin Afdillah ◽  
Ida Rindaningsih
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Fifth Grade ◽  
Classroom Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Fifth Grade Students ◽  
A Value

The purpose of this study was to analyze the presence or absence of and how much influence the flipped classroom learning model had on the mathematics learning outcomes of fractions. This research was conducted at MI Nurul Huda Candi Sidoarjo for the 2020/2021 Academic Year. This study uses quantitative research with a sample of 40 students. The data collection after the treatment was carried out using the Mathematics Learning Outcomes Test for fractions. The results showed that there were differences in learning outcomes between students who were taught using the flipped classroom learning model and students who were taught using the conventional learning model with a value (tcount = 2,041 > ttable = 2, 024) at a significance level of 5%. it can be concluded that there is an effect of the flipped classroom learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of fifth grade students at MI Nurul Huda Candi Sidoarjo. The large influence of the flipped classroom learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of fifth grade students at MI Nurul Huda Candi Sidoarjo is 6.87%.

PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN FLIPPED CLASSROOM TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN DASAR LISTRIK DAN ELEKTRONIKA (DLDE) KELAS X TITL SMK NEGERI 5 MEDAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Leo Saputra Sitanggang ◽  
Salman Bintang
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Flipped Learning ◽  
Classroom Learning

Abstract This study aims to determine: (1) student learning outcomes for DLDE subjects using the Flipped Classroom learning model (2) student learning outcomes for DLDE subjects using the Expository learning model (3) DLDE learning outcomes for students taught with the Flipped learning model. Classroom is higher than students who are taught using the expository learning model. The population in this study were 108 people. From the data obtained after the research, it was found that (1) student learning outcomes were much higher in the experimental class (classes taught using the Flipped Classroom learning model) which had an average of 85.93. (2) student learning outcomes in the control class (classes taught using the expository learning model) have an average of 73.55. (3) student learning outcomes are better (higher) using the Flipped Classroom learning model compared to the expository learning model. Keywords: Flipped Classroom, Expository, DLDE Learning Outcomes AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar siswa terhadap mata pelajaran DLDE dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Flipped Classroom (2) hasil belajar siswa terhadap mata pelajaran DLDE dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori (3) hasil belajar DLDE siswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran Flipped Classroom lebih tinggi dibandingkan siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran ekspositori. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah 108 orang. Dari data yang diperoleh setelah dilakukan penelitian, diperoleh bahwa (1) hasil belajar siswa jauh lebih tinggi dikelas ekperimen (kelas yang diajarkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Flipped Classroom)  yang memiliki rata-rata 85.93. (2) hasil belajar siswa dikelas kontrol (kelas yang diajarkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran ekspositori) memiliki rata-rata 73.55. (3) hasil belajar siswa lebih baik (lebih tinggi) menggunakan model pembelajaran Flipped Classroom dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci: Flipped Classroom, Ekspositori, Hasil Belajar DLDE

Distance Learning Essentials

2011 ◽  
pp. 248-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor X. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Distance Learning ◽  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Learning Technologies ◽  
Traditional Classroom ◽  
Classroom Learning ◽  
Senior Faculty ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Job Aids ◽  
Distance Learning Technologies ◽  
Networking Technologies

Time and space no longer separate learners from their instructors. The emergence of distance-learning technologies, especially the Internet and networking technologies connect learners with their instructors. Instructional resources such as training courses, instructional job aids, reference materials, training guides, and lesson plans, as well as teachers, trainers, and other learners that were traditionally available for traditional classroom settings are now attainable via distance-learning technologies by anyone, anywhere, and anytime. As the growth of new information in the digital age accelerates (Gagne, Wager, Golas, & Keller, 2005), the debate revolving around distance-learning essentials has become even more heated among the academic circles. One side of the debate, represented by senior faculty, indicates that distance learning is inferior to traditional classroom learning because it lacks the necessary “face-to-face” interaction. The other side of the debate, representing current researchers and junior faculty, contends that distance learning is no better or no worse than traditional learning, given the fact that distance learning offers both advantages and disadvantages. The same thing is true about traditional classroom learning, which also offers benefits and disadvantages. Regardless of the debate, distance learning is revolutionizing education and training, along with so many other aspects of our lives (Gagne, et al., 2005). Open any job ads for a faculty position and there must be a description requiring a potential faculty member to be able to use distance-learning technologies. Those faculty members who cannot use distance-learning technologies are truly at a disadvantage nowadays.

Preparing Future Teachers for the Challenges of the Digital Learner

2021 ◽  
pp. 183-198
Author(s):  
Mark S. Miller ◽  
Susan R. Poyo ◽  
George Ash ◽  
Kathleen Giannamore
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Traditional Classroom ◽  
Classroom Teachers ◽  
Classroom Learning ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Teaching Excellence ◽  
Transfer Of Skills ◽  
K 12 ◽  
And Training ◽  
Rapid Shift

With the recent pandemic, a rapid shift from traditional classroom learning to online learning has educators scrambling for resources, tips, and training tools to make the transition as smooth as possible for all involved. Traditional classroom teachers have been trained on various teaching strategies and how to apply teaching excellence standards to their physical classrooms. However, the training often falls short when transferring these same strategies and standards to online learning. This chapter aims to expand upon the work of Chickering and Gamson to provide those resources necessary to promote this transfer of skills. The application of prior research, along with some practical suggestions, will help K–12 educators, administrators, and educator preparation programs (EPPs) apply these standards of teaching excellence to virtual environments.

Flipped Classroom Teaching and Learning Pedagogy in the Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation Graduate Course: Students’ Experiences

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-228
Author(s):  
Bojana Berić-Stojšić ◽  
Naiya Patel ◽  
Janice Blake ◽  
Daryl Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Program Planning ◽  
Learning Experiences ◽  
Class Discussion ◽  
Classroom Learning ◽  
Spearman's Rho ◽  
Spearman’S Rho ◽  
Planning Implementation

This article provides support to flipped classroom pedagogy in the preparation of graduate-level public health practitioners. We describe the participatory, interactive, collaborative, and liberating process of teaching and learning in the Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation course, and we provide the results of a cross-sectional study into students’ perceptions of this process. Our investigation found a significant positive correlation between students’ participation in class discussion and classroom learning experiences (Pearson r[49] = .40, p = .004). Study results confirm the students’ appreciation for the flipped classroom pedagogy. However, the results indicate no significant correlation between the students’ learning style preferences and participation in class discussion ( t[46] = −0.94, p = .34) or classroom learning experiences ( t[46] = 1.64, p = .11); likewise, there were no significant correlations between students’ academic achievement (i.e., GPA) and participation in class discussion (Spearman’s rho correlation: ρ sp[49] = .07, p = .60) or classroom learning experiences (Spearman’s rho correlation: ρ sp[49] = .17, p = .25). No significant association was found between both participation in class discussion and learning experiences, with demographic variables such as gender, age, semester in school, and type of employment. The current flipped classroom pedagogy allows for participation, growth, and development of all students enrolled in the course. We recommend more studies to further strengthen current evidence of the effectiveness of the flipped classroom pedagogical approach on both teaching and learning in public health courses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document