Technological innovation systems in multi-level governance frameworks: The case of Taiwan's biodiesel innovation system (1997–2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 130-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-chen Chung
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2049
Author(s):  
Mohammad Esmailzadeh ◽  
Siamak Noori ◽  
Alireza Aliahmadi ◽  
Hamidreza Nouralizadeh ◽  
Marcel Bogers

For developing countries to catch up, it is vital that they develop emerging technologies and the system that supports that development. The literature suggests developing a technological innovation system (TIS) framework to investigate the development of technologies in a country. Nonetheless, most of this research focuses on developed countries without taking into account developing countries. Therefore, in this paper, we have two main goals. First, reviewing the indicators introduced to the functional analysis of TISs and modifying these indicators based on developing countries’ circumstances. Second, applying this framework to the specific case of Iran’s renewable energy program by using these indicators for analyzing Iran’s photovoltaic TIS to identify the problems. Accordingly, we review indicators used for a functional analysis by considering the needs of developing countries, and we propose a list of indicators that can be used for assessing functions in developing countries’ TISs. The results show that, to evaluate some functions of TIS, we need to use new indicators in developing countries. Finally, we propose some policy recommendations to tackle these functional problems.


Author(s):  
Işıl Çekçi ◽  
Serhat Burmaoglu ◽  
Dilek Ozdemir Gungor ◽  
Levent B. Kidak

Technological innovation has been a key driving force for economic growth, industrial development, and increasing welfare. Two dominant streams of theories as market-failure and system-failure oriented the domain to reach development economy objectives for countries. In this case, national innovation systems have been recognized by the rising understanding of systems of innovation. National Innovation Systems have been considered as complex and multi-faceted. Therefore, for overcoming this complexity and make it simplified analytically, in this chapter only the healthcare field has been examined by considering University Hospital cases. It is aimed to understand cognitive contribution of university hospitals to health innovation system by examining scientific publications. It is found that regional perspective should be applied to create more applicable policies.


Author(s):  
Бахадыр Джуманиязович Матризаев

Цель статьи - дать оценку вопросам взаимодействия между технологическими инновационными системами и некоторыми контекстными структурами. В частности, автором выделены и рассматриваются четыре особенно важных типа макроинституциональных контекстных структур: технологических, отраслевых, экстраторных и регуляторных. Для каждого из них автор приводит примеры различных способов взаимодействия контекстных структур с центральными технологическими системами и того, как наше понимание динамики технологической инновационной системы улучшается при применении данной методологии. Научная новизна статьи заключается в предложенном автором новом подходе описания контекстных структур через механизм интерактивной динамики, который демонстрирует некоторую степень институциональной согласованности. Также приводятся критерии, позволяющие различать два интерактивных вида взаимодействия, которые в свою очередь характеризуются различной степенью взаимозависимости между центральной технологической инновационной системой и конкретными контекстными структурами. This article discusses the interaction between technological innovation systems and some contextual structures. In particular, we identify and consider four particularly important types of macro-institutional contextual structures: technological, sectoral, extratorial, and regulatory. For each of them, we provide examples of different ways in which contextual structures interact with central technological systems and how our understanding of the dynamics of a technological innovation system improves when applying this methodology. In addition, the article offers a new approach to describing contextual structures through the mechanism of interactive dynamics, which demonstrate a certain degree of institutional coherence. Criteria are also provided to distinguish between two interactive types of interaction, which in turn are characterized by a different degree of interdependence between the central technological innovation system and specific contextual structures.


2007 ◽  
pp. 123-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Dezhina ◽  
V. Kiseleva

The article analyzes modern theory that explains the specificity of relationships among government, science and business in innovation systems - the "triple helix" concept. Factors that determine the appearance of new theory are systematized. The peculiarities of formation of "triple helix" in Russia are described, including the development of science, business and the system of government regulation in innovation sphere. The conclusion is made that currently in Russia only double linkages are formed.


Author(s):  
Anatoliy B. Yaroshchuk ◽  

The article considers the current and future systems for assessing the effectiveness of the use of state resources to create a national innovation system as a factor in improving the economic security of the state, the author develops a methodological approach to assessing the effectiveness of the use of state resources to create a national innovation system. The cyclical development of the world economy in the conditions of globalization is connected, first of all, with the change of technological structures, as well as with the provision of competitiveness for all levels of economic management. In the domestic and foreign economic literature, there is an idea of the national innovation system, which covers all types of economic objects in the country with innovations, increasing their competitiveness, and, thus, the national economy as a whole, and also directly affects the increase in the level of economic security of the country. Most developed countries and many developing countries have already established or are in the process of establishing their national innovation systems, built either on the basis of models already known and tested in other countries, or new, unique models for building innovation systems. The differences between these models of creation of national innovation systems of different countries are, both in the levels of economic objects, which are the basis of innovative breakthrough, and in the degree of use of public resources: "centralized model", based on public resources, or "market model", or a mixed model of "public-private partnership". These issues are the basis for consideration of the presented article. The methodological basis for writing the article was modern scientific research methods, including: dialectical method, method of system analysis, methods of analogy, comparative analysis, expert methods, structural-functional and normative approaches.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh Abrol ◽  
T. Sundararaman ◽  
Harilal Madhavan ◽  
K. J. Joseph

Abstract: This article presents an overview of the changes that are taking place within the public and private health innovation systems in India including delivery of medical care, pharmaceutical products, medical devices, and Indian traditional medicine. The nature of the flaws that exist in the health innovation system is pinpointed. The response by the government, the health, technology and medical institutions, and the evolving industry is addressed on a national level. The article also discusses how the alignment of policies and institutions was developed within the scope of national health innovation systems, and how the government and the industry are dealing with the challenges to integrate health system, industry, and social policy development processes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document