P2.01-049 Long Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival in Advanced NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutation and Complete Response with TKI Treatment

8042 Background: Pemetrexed or gefitinib is one of the standard second-line treatments for advanced non-squamousNSCLC in East Asia. The CTONG 0806 a multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II trial was designed to explore the efficacy of pemetrexed versus gefitinib as the second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC patients without EGFR mutation. Methods: The patients with locally advanced or metastatic, non-squamous NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and no EGFR mutation in exons 18-21 were enrolled. Patients were 1:1 randomized to receive either gefitinib 250 mg per oral every day (G arm) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 iv day 1 with vitamin B12 and folic acid supplement every 21 days (P arm) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation of treatment due to other reason. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were 4-month and 6-month progression-free survival rate, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life using the FACT-L questionnaire and safety, EGFR and K-ras mutation status were evaluated and correlated with outcomes. Results: From Feb. 2009 to Aug. 2012, 157 evaluable patients were randomized (81 cases in G arm and 76 in P arm). Baseline age, gender, and ECOG performance status were balanced between arms. The primary endpoint of PFS was met with 1.6 months for G arm versus 4.8 months for P arm, the HR is 0.51 (95% CI 0.36~0.73, P<0.001). Overall response rates were 14.7 % and 13.3 % (P=0.814) and DCR were 32.0% and 61.3% (P<0.001) for G arm and P arm, respectively. OS data were not yet mature. More skin rash and diarrhoea were seen in G arm, but more fatigue and ALT increased in P arm. CTCAE grade 3 or 4 of AEs was 12.3% in G arm and 32.9% in P arm (p=0.002). The further analyses of efficacy evaluated by IRR and biomarkers analysis will be presented on the ground. Conclusions: CTONG0806 is the first trial to show significant improvements in PFS and DCR with pemetrexed compared with gefitinib in second-line setting for advanced NSCLC with EGFR wild type. Patients with EGFR wild type did not benefit from EGFR TKI gefitinb in second-line setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00891579.

Download Full-text

PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as 2nd/subsequent line therapy had similar clinical outcome with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e21600 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e21600-e21600

Author(s):

Xiaoyang Zhai ◽

Yaru Tian ◽

Weiwei Yan ◽

Ning An ◽

Hui Zhu

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Second Line ◽

Monotherapy Group ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Free Survival ◽

Chemotherapy Group ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Nsclc Patients

e21600 Background: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy has been approved as second line therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study aims to compare clinical outcome of PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy as 2nd/subsequent line therapy in advanced NSCLC. Methods: The clinical data of NSCLC patients who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor as 2nd/subsequent line therapy were retrospectively collected in our study. According to the therapy modality, patients were assigned to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy group and PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy group. Disease control rates (DCRs), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated between the 2 groups. The prognostic role of derived neutrophils-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) on the outcomes was also evaluated at the same time. Results: From April 2017 to October 2019, a total of 84 patients were enrolled in the current study. Twenty-six patients were allocated to the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy group and fifty-eight patients were allocated to PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy regimens were detailed as follow: liposome paclitaxel (n = 15), nab-paclitaxel(n = 12), docetaxel(n = 9), pemetrexed(n = 6), and others(n = 16). Disease control rates (DCRs) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the two groups. Progression free survival (PFS) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy was longer(median PFS: NR vs 4.4 months, p = 0.02). Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that derived neutrophils-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) was independent prognostic factor of OS and gender was independent prognostic factor of PFS. In the second-line therapy subgroup of 38 patients, OS and PFS were not significantly different in the two groups. In the subgroup of 46 patients of over 2nd line, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy group had longer PFS (median PFS: NR vs 4.0 months, p = 0.01).The incidence of any grade adverse events (AEs) was no significant difference in the two groups. One patient in the PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy group died of immune-related pneumonitis. Conclusions: The addition of chemotherapy to PD-1 inhibitor as 2nd/subsequent line therapy had similar clinical outcomes compared with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy of advanced NSCLC patients.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab combined with or without docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC

Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy ◽

10.1007/s00262-021-02964-x ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yang Wang ◽

Jun Nie ◽

Ling Dai ◽

Weiheng Hu ◽

Jie Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Meaningful Improvement ◽

Free Survival ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Doublet Chemotherapy ◽

Platinum Doublet

Abstract Background The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253). Conclusions The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.

Download Full-text

Patterns of Care and Treatment Pathways for Non-Surgically Managed Early and Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients at Ain Shams University Clinical Oncology Department: a Retrospective and Descriptive Analysis

QJM ◽

10.1093/qjmed/hcab103.006 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Dr/Khaled Abdel Karim ◽

Dr/Khaled Nagib ◽

Dr/Ahmed Hassan Abd El Aziz ◽

Christina Gamil Garas

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Clinical Oncology ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Patterns Of Care ◽

P Value ◽

Treatment Pathways ◽

Free Survival ◽

Care And Treatment ◽

Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, but little is known about how patients with this disease are managed. Aim of the Work We aim to study patterns of care and treatment pathways of non- surgically managed early and locally advanced NSCLC patients from January 2015 to December 2018 in Ain Shams University Clinical Oncology Department. Patients and Methods In this retrospective analysis we included patients the met the following criteria; age >18, histologically confirmed NSCLC patients whom didn’t undergo surgical resection with at least 6 months of follow up data. We collected data from Clinical Oncology department archive in Ain Shams university hospital. Our primary objective is to identify the patterns of care and treatment pathway for non surgically managed NSCLC patients in ASUCOD from January 2015 to December 2018. Results 86 patients finally met our inclusion criteria. Median age at diagnosis of 61 years with a range of (38-85), 95.3% were male. Most of the patients were stage III; 40.7% were stage IIIA, 41.9% were stage IIIB, and 9.3% were stage IIIC. 41 were treated radically, 37 received palliative treatment and only 8 patients received supportive care. Overall median progression free survival in our patients was 9.23 (7.4-13.5) and overall survival duration was13.4 (9.5-18.0). In radically treated patients, 68.3% received sequential chemoradiotherapy (sCRT), 29.2% received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) or 2.4% received definitive radiotherapy alone (RT). In palliative treated patients, 73% received chemotherapy alone (CTX), 8.1% received palliative RT and 18.9% received both chemotherapy and palliative dose of radiotherapy (CRT). All treatment modalities were similar regarding median progression free survival and overall survival durations, 17.5 (3.6–19.6) and 20.6 (3.6–31.6) in cCRT, 17.5 (3.6–19.6) and 23.3 (17.7–31.2) in sCRT, 12.9 and 13.4 RT group, P value=0.57 and 0.16 receptively. Similarly, progression free survival and overall survival durations were 8.8 (3.0–15.8) and 16.2 (3.6–18.7) in CRT, 5.3 (0.4–7.6) and 8.6 (6.2–10.2) in CTX, 8.5 (0.4–8.5) and 8.5 (0.4–8.5) in palliative RT group, P value=0.64 and 0.15 receptively. In our study, first-line chemotherapy were Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin (41.9%) or Carboplatin (35.1%).The Second -line chemotherapy were Docetaxel (63.1%) or Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin (26.3%). Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin were the most regimen given with RT. Most of the patients received radiation dose of 60Gy/30Fr (73.2%). Regarding the incidence of toxicity, there were significant high rates of esophagitis in cCRT in grade 3 or more compared to sCRT. Conclusion We have found that less than half of this study population were treated radically while the other half received palliative treatment. And only few patients received best supportive care. Radically treated patients had higher progression free survival and overall survival durations compared to palliative and supportive treatment.

Download Full-text

Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.1177/1078155219891631 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 26 (6) ◽

pp. 1331-1342

Author(s):

Irena Ilic ◽

Sandra Sipetic ◽

Jovan Grujicic ◽

Milena Ilic

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Objective Response Rate ◽

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Response Rate ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Objective Response ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival

Introduction Almost half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our aim was to assess the effects of adding necitumumab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Material and methods A comprehensive literature search was performed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event data and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Results The meta-analysis included four randomized clinical trials with 2074 patients. The pooled results showed significant improvement for overall survival (HR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95), p = 0.004) when necitumumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No statistically significant improvement was noted for progression-free survival and objective response rate (HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69–1.01), p = 0.06 and OR = 1.46 (95% CI 0.90–2.38), p = 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, there was no benefit in overall survival and objective response rate. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received necitumumab were at the highest odds of developing a skin rash (OR = 14.50 (95% CI 3.16–66.43), p = 0.0006) and hypomagnesaemia (OR = 2.77 (95% CI 2.23–3.45), p < 0.00001), while the OR for any grade ≥3 adverse event was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28–1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusions The addition of necitumumab to standard chemotherapy in a first-line setting in patients with stage IV NSCLC results in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, while the results were not significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate.

Download Full-text

Stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive gynecological malignancies: a multi-institutional analysis

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1136/ijgc-2019-001115 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 30 (6) ◽

pp. 865-872 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Cem Onal ◽

Melis Gultekin ◽

Ezgi Oymak ◽

Ozan Cem Guler ◽

Melek Tugce Yilmaz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cervical Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Local Control ◽

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Term Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Oligometastatic Disease

IntroductionData supporting stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic patients are increasing; however, the outcomes for gynecological cancer patients have yet to be fully explored. Our aim is to analyze the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent or oligometastatic ovarian cancer or cervical cancer.MethodsThe clinical data of 29 patients (35 lesions) with oligometastatic cervical cancer (21 patients, 72%) and ovarian carcinoma (8 patients, 28%) who were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic sites were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had <5 metastases at diagnosis or during progression, and were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease. Patients with ≥5 metastases or with brain metastases and those who underwent re-irradiation for primary site were excluded. Age, progression time, mean biologically effective dose, and treatment response were compared for overall survival and progression-free survival.ResultsA total of 29 patients were included in the study. De novo oligometastatic disease was observed in 7 patients (24%), and 22 patients (76%) had oligoprogression. The median follow-up was 15.3 months (range 1.9–95.2). The 1 and 2 year overall survival rates were 85% and 62%, respectively, and the 1 and 2 year progression-free survival rates were 27% and 18%, respectively. The 1 and 2 year local control rates for all patients were 84% and 84%, respectively. All disease progressions were observed at a median time of 7.7 months (range 1.0–16.0) after the completion of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Patients with a complete response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis had a significantly higher 2 year overall survival and progression-free survival compared with their counterparts. In multivariate analysis, early progression (≤12 months) and complete response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis were the significant prognostic factors for improved overall survival. However, no significant factor was found for progression-free survival in the multivariable analysis. No patients experienced grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities.ConclusionsPatients with early detection of oligometastasis (≤12 months) and with complete response observed at the stereotactic body radiotherapy site had a better survival compared with their counterparts. Stereotactic body radiotherapy at the oligometastatic site resulted in excellent local control rates with minimal toxicity, and can potentially contribute to long-term survival.

Download Full-text

Prognostic value of pretreatment prognostic nutritional index in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The International Journal of Biological Markers ◽

10.1177/1724600818799876 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 33 (4) ◽

pp. 372-378 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Yuanyuan Hu ◽

Jie Shen ◽

RuiKe Liu ◽

ZhiMei Feng ◽

ChangNing Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Prognostic Biomarker ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Nutritional Index ◽

Nsclc Patients ◽

Disease Free

Background: The pretreatment prognostic nutritional index has been considered a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but this remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to systematically assess the prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with NSCLC. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI. The hazard ratios (HRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the link between the prognostic nutritional index and the oncological outcomes of patients with NSCLC, including overall survival, disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival. Results: Fifteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Twelve of these studies explored the association between the prognostic nutritional index and the overall survival of patients with NSCLC. Our pooled analysis indicated that a low prognostic nutritional index was significantly related to adverse overall survival (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.44, 1.81; P < 0.001). Our results also showed that the prognostic nutritional index was a negative predictor for disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival in patients with NSCLC. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that there was a close association between the prognostic nutritional index value and prognosis in NSCLC patients and that the prognostic nutritional index may act as a useful prognostic biomarker in NSCLC patients.

Download Full-text

PIOS (Patras Immunotherapy Score) Score Is Associated with Best Overall Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Post-Immunotherapy Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated with Anti-Program Cell Death-1 (PD-1) Inhibitors

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers12051257 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (5) ◽

pp. 1257

Author(s):

Foteinos-Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos ◽

Achilleas Nikolakopoulos ◽

Anastasia Kottorou ◽

Fotini Kalofonou ◽

Elias Liolis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Cell Death ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Small Cell ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Free Survival ◽

Nsclc Patients ◽

Program Cell Death

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the therapeutic management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) over the last decade. However, there is an unmet need for clinically useful biomarkers in this patient subgroup. The aim of this study was to combine baseline clinical characteristics of aNSCLC patients, in the form of a scoring system, and to investigate its predictive and prognostic value in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. A total of 112 patients with advanced (stages IIIA to IV) NSCLC, treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab, were enrolled in this study. Patras Immunotherapy Score (PIOS) was developed based on four of the studied parameters (performance status (PS), body mass index (BMI), age, and lines of treatment (LOT), which were incorporated into our formula (PS × BMI/ LOT × age). PIOS score was strongly associated with best overall responses (BOR), with those patients having benefit/good response (stable disease (SD) or partial (PR) or complete response (CR), achieving a higher score compared to patients who developed progressive disease (PD) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, PIOS score was associated with progression-free survival (PFS), since high-score patients had longer PFS (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.469). Moreover, PIOS was associated with post-immunotherapy overall survival (OS), with high-score patients having improved OS (log-rank p = 0.019). This study suggests that a combination of baseline parameters, which give rise to PIOS score, may predict the best response of NSCLC patients treated with anti-program cell death -1 (PD-1) monotherapy as well as it may have a potent prognostic value for PFS and post immunotherapy OS.

Download Full-text

Clinical Experience with Azacitidine In Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) in Spain

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.5040.5040 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 5040-5040

Author(s):

Pablo Gonzalez Navarro ◽

Regina García Delgado ◽

Alicia Bailén Garcia ◽

Juan Antonio Múñoz Múñoz

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Clinical Experience ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Free Survival ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Abstract 5040 Clinical Experience with Azacitidine In Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) in Spain Pablo González Navarro 1*, Regina García Delgado 2*, Alicia Bailén Garcia 3*, Juan Antonio Muñoz Muñoz 4* 1MD, PhD. Hospital San Cecilio, 18014 Granada, Spain, Teléfono: 958023600 [email protected]; 2Hospital Virgen De La Victoria, Málaga, Spain; 3Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain; 4MD, PhD. Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain Introduction: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic stem cells often occurring in elderly patients. In the new WHO classification, CMML has been reclassified as a myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disease. CMML has been subdivided in two subclasses: CMML-1:<5% blasts in peripheral blood and 5–9% blasts in bone marrow, and CMML-2: <10% blasts in peripheral blood and 10–19% blasts in bone marrow (Greco et al. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis.2011). Azacitidine (AZA) is an hypomethylating agent approved in Europe for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes, with an intermediate to high risk of progressing to AML or death; chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and AML that has developed from a myelodysplastic syndrome (prescribing information EMEA 2011). Until its approval in May 2009, AZA was used in Spain under compassionate use in clinical trials. AZA produce a direct decrease of DNA methyltransferase activity, reverting aberrant DNA methylation and increasing the expression of silenced genes, leading to celular differentiation and/or apoptosis (Greco et al. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2011). Materials and Methods: We report the results of a retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter Spanish study of 27 patients to assess the effectiveness of AZA to treat CMML. We present results of: Response, Overall Response, Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival. Results: Eighteen of the patients (69.23%) had Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) type 1 and nine (30.77%) CMML type 2. Median age at diagnosis was 69 years. Male/female ratio: 19/8. ECOG performance status score 1–2 was 78%, twenty patients (74%) received an initial dose of 75 mg/m2 of AZA, whereas three patients (11%) received 50mg/ m2. The mean number of cycles received was 8.32, 95%IC (5.91; 10.73). Overall response to treatment was 53% (CR+PR+HI+mCR): 14.81% complete response, 7.4% partial response, 3,7% Medular complete response and 29,62% Hematological Improvement. In addition, 18,51% had stable disease. Thirty-six percent of patients were alive at the end of treatment with AZA. Median Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival were 17.47 months (95%CI 9.33, upper limit not reached) and 10.97 (95%IC 3.97, 17.47) respectively (Figure 1, 2). Conclusion: Our results show that AZA is an active drug in the treatment of patients with CMML, with similar response rates in the published literature. More data from this study and further investigation with different clinical trials are needed to confirm these outcomes as well as safety and effectiveness of this treatment. Disclosures: García Delgado: Celgene and Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Final overall survival and updated biomarker analysis results from the randomized phase III ICOGEN trial.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.7559 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 7559-7559 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Yan Sun ◽

Yuankai Shi ◽

Li Zhang ◽

Xiaoqing Liu ◽

Caicun Zhou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Egfr Mutation ◽

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Biomarker Analysis ◽

Nsclc Patients

7559 Background: A total of 399 pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib or icotinib in the phase III ICOGEN trial, the first head-to-head phase III trial of EGFR-TKIs. The results of the primary endpoint, PFS, have been reported previously. This report represents the final OS and biomarker analysis results. Methods: EGFR mutation was evaluated by using Scorpion ARMS (QIAGEN, n=152). Overall survival was analyzed by Cox proportional-hazards model analysis at 82% maturity. Results: Median OS was 13.3 months for icotinib and 13.9 months for gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.02; P = .109). The EGFR mutation rate was 43% in the icotinib group and 59% in the gefitinib group. Compared to wild type patients, patients with EGFR mutation had longer PFS (median, 6.2m vs. 2.3m; P=.00001) as well as OS (median, 20.5m vs. 7.7m; P=.00001). There were no significant differences in PFS or OS between the two treatment groups in EGFR mutation-positive subgroup (median PFS, 7.8m vs. 5.3m for icotinib and gefitinib, respectively, P =.3162; median OS, 20.9m vs. 20.2m for icotinib and gefitinib, respectively, P =.7611.) or in EGFR mutation-negative subgroup (median PFS, 2.3m vs. 2.2m for icotinib and gefitinib, respectively, P =.1531; median OS, 7.8m vs. 6.9m for icotinib and gefitinib, respectively, P =.7885.). Conclusions: There is no statistically significant difference between icotinib and gefitinib in PFS or OS when given to NSCLC patients. This suggests that icotinib can provide similar OS benefits to gefitinib in advanced NSCLC patients. Moreover, EGFR mutation status is the strongest predictor in identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from icotinib.

Download Full-text