scholarly journals Three decades of messenger RNA vaccine development

Nano Today ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 100766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rein Verbeke ◽  
Ine Lentacker ◽  
Stefaan C. De Smedt ◽  
Heleen Dewitte
2019 ◽  
Vol 221 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. S493-S498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K Lo ◽  
Jessica R Spengler ◽  
Stephen R Welch ◽  
Jessica R Harmon ◽  
JoAnn D Coleman-McCray ◽  
...  

Abstract In the absence of approved vaccines and therapeutics for use in humans, Nipah virus (NiV) continues to cause fatal outbreaks of encephalitis and respiratory disease in Bangladesh and India on a near-annual basis. We determined that a single dose of a lipid nanoparticle nucleoside-modified messenger RNA vaccine encoding the soluble Hendra virus glycoprotein protected up to 70% of Syrian hamsters from lethal NiV challenge, despite animals having suboptimally primed immune responses before challenge. These data provide a foundation from which to optimize future messenger RNA vaccination studies against NiV and other highly pathogenic viruses.


Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1345
Author(s):  
Bruna Aparecida Souza Machado ◽  
Katharine Valéria Saraiva Hodel ◽  
Larissa Moraes dos Santos Fonseca ◽  
Luís Alberto Brêda Mascarenhas ◽  
Leone Peter Correia da Silva Andrade ◽  
...  

In recent years, vaccine development using ribonucleic acid (RNA) has become the most promising and studied approach to produce safe and effective new vaccines, not only for prophylaxis but also as a treatment. The use of messenger RNA (mRNA) as an immunogenic has several advantages to vaccine development compared to other platforms, such as lower coast, the absence of cell cultures, and the possibility to combine different targets. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of mRNA as a vaccine became more relevant; two out of the four most widely applied vaccines against COVID-19 in the world are based on this platform. However, even though it presents advantages for vaccine application, mRNA technology faces several pivotal challenges to improve mRNA stability, delivery, and the potential to generate the related protein needed to induce a humoral- and T-cell-mediated immune response. The application of mRNA to vaccine development emerged as a powerful tool to fight against cancer and non-infectious and infectious diseases, for example, and represents a relevant research field for future decades. Based on these advantages, this review emphasizes mRNA and self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) for vaccine development, mainly to fight against COVID-19, together with the challenges related to this approach.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3908-3908
Author(s):  
Amandine Le Bourgeois ◽  
Marianne Coste-Burel ◽  
Thierry Guillaume ◽  
Pierre Peterlin ◽  
Alice Garnier ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In a previous observational study of 117 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Allo-HSCT) recipients, we found that 83 % of them achieved a specific humoral response after two doses (V1 and V2) of BNT162b2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine (Pfizer BioNTech). However, although 61.5% of the patients achieved the highest detectable IgG titers, this proportion remained significantly lower than what was observed in healthy controls, where 100% reached these highest antibody titers. Here, we investigated whether a third dose of vaccine would improve the anti- SARS-CoV-2 response in Allo-HSCT recipients. Methods This monocentric retrospective study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a third vaccine (V3) of BNT162b2 in a cohort of Allo-HSCT adult recipients. Patients with previous clinical or asymptomatic biological COVID-19 infection at V1 were excluded from the study. A cohort of healthy volunteers (caregivers from the Clinical Hematology Department) who had also already received V1 and V2 was considered as controls. All participants were vaccinated between January 20 and June 1, 2021. Analyses were performed in July 2021. Antibody response to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain was tested after V2 for all subjects (Serology post V2, SpV2) using the Roche Elecsys® assay. All subjects benefited later from another evaluation of specific serum antibodies as monitoring (Serology post V2+, SpV2+) or after V3 (Serology post V3, SpV3). Various serological methods were used for these later assays because performed outside of our hospital for some patients. Considering thresholds of negativity and positivity as well as highest values for each test, we were able nevertheless to distinguish 4 sub-groups: i) negativity at both SpV2 & SpV2+/SpV3, ii) increase of the IgG titer between SpV2 & SpV2+/SpV3, including patients showing seroconversion, iii) decreased or stable IgG titer between SpV2 & SpV2+/SpV3 and iv) highest IgG titers at both SpV2 and SpV2+/SpV3. Results A cohort of 25 controls and 114 patients, including 91 who received V3 (V3+) and 23 who did not (V3-) was considered for the purpose of this study. The characteristics of participants and delays from SpV2 to SpV2+ or SpV2 to SpV3 are reported in Tables 1 and 2. The serological methods used for the latest assays are reported in Table 2 with criteria of negativity, positivity and highest IgG titer values. V3- patients were younger, with less myeloid disease than V3+ cases and had not received myeloablative conditioning. However, both V3+ and V3- groups shared similar median intervals between Allo-HSCT and V1, incidence of previous graft versus host disease (GVHD), proportions of patients under chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs and median lymphocyte counts at V1, suggesting similar immune status. The reasons for not receiving V3 were forgetting, refusal or surveillance after detection of the highest IgG titer at SV2. Samples from controls, all evaluated by Roche Elecsys®, showed the highest anti-spike antibody value (>250U/mL) at both SpV2 and SpV2+, suggesting a persistent response without the need of a third vaccine in this healthy population. The proportion of patients still negative at SpV2+/SpV3 was similar between V3- and V3+ patients (17% vs 12%, p=0.74). However, the proportion of patients showing a decreased/stable IgG titer between SpV2 and SpV2+/SpV3 was significantly higher for V3- cases (35% vs 4%, p=0.0001) (Table 2). Moreover, the proportion of patients with the highest IgG titer at SpV2+/SpV3 was significantly higher in the V3+ sub-group (80% vs 43%, p=0.001), even if it remained significantly lower than in controls (p=0.03). The proportion of patients showing an IgG titer increase between SpV2 and SpV2+/SpV3 was higher in V3+ vs V3- patients (24% vs 4%, p=0.06). The difference was not significant as surprisingly one V3- case showed a seroconversion without any argument for SARS-CoV-2 infection between SpV2 and SpV2+. Three patients out of 14 (21%), with a negative SpV2, showed a seroconversion after V3. Finally, with a median follow up from V1 of 106 days in V3+ patients, 138 days in V3- patients and 154 days in controls, no COVID-19 infection was documented in any participant. Conclusion This study shows the interest of a third dose of BNT162b2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine after allograft as more patients are documented with less decrease of IgG titers and the highest IgG values after V3. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Moreau: Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene BMS: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 802-807
Author(s):  
A. A. Ilyichev ◽  
L. A. Orlova ◽  
S. V. Sharabrin ◽  
L. I. Karpenko

After the genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 (Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2) was published and the number of infected people began to increase rapidly, many global companies began to develop a vaccine. Almost all known approaches to vaccine design were applied for this purpose, including inactivated viruses, mRNA and DNA-vaccines, vaccines based on various viral vectors, synthetically generated peptides and recombinant proteins produced in cells of insects and mammals. This review considers one of the promising vaccine platforms based on messenger RNA. Until recent years, mRNA-vaccination was out of practical implementation due to high sensitivity to nuclease degradation and consequent instability of drugs based on mRNA. Latest technological advances significantly mitigated the problems of low immunogenicity, instability, and difficulties in RNA-vaccine delivery. It is worth noting that mRNA-vaccines can efficiently activate both components of the immune system, i. e. T-cell and humoral responses. The essential advantage of mRNA-vaccines includes fast, inexpensive, scalable and uniform production providing a large output of desirable products in vitro. Synthesis and purification processes significantly simplify the process technology of mRNA drugs with injectable purity. Thus, mRNA production via in vitro transcription is more advantageous as compared with DNA-vaccines since it is a chemical process without the use of cells. mRNA techniques make it possible to pass all the phases of vaccine development much faster in comparison with the production of vaccines based on inactivated viruses or recombinant proteins. This property is critically important when designing vaccines against viral pathogens as the main problem of disease control includes a time gap between an epidemic and vaccine development. This paper discusses studies on the development of vaccines against coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2 with special attention to the mRNA technique.


Cornea ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren M. Wasser ◽  
Eduardo Roditi ◽  
David Zadok ◽  
Liron Berkowitz ◽  
Yishay Weill
Keyword(s):  

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 900
Author(s):  
Londiwe Simphiwe Mbatha ◽  
Fiona Maiyo ◽  
Aliscia Daniels ◽  
Moganavelli Singh

Messenger RNA (mRNA) is not an attractive candidate for gene therapy due to its instability and has therefore received little attention. Recent studies show the advantage of mRNA over DNA, especially in cancer immunotherapy and vaccine development. This study aimed to formulate folic-acid-(FA)-modified, poly-amidoamine-generation-5 (PAMAM G5D)-grafted gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and to evaluate their cytotoxicity and transgene expression using the luciferase reporter gene (FLuc-mRNA) in vitro. Nanocomplexes were spherical and of favorable size. Nanocomplexes at optimum nanoparticle:mRNA (w/w) binding ratios showed good protection of the bound mRNA against nucleases and were well tolerated in all cell lines. Transgene expression was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher with FA-targeted, dendrimer-grafted AuNPs (Au:G5D:FA) in FA receptors overexpressing MCF-7 and KB cells compared to the G5D and G5D:FA NPs, decreasing significantly (p < 0.01) in the presence of excess competing FA ligand, which confirmed nanocomplex uptake via receptor mediation. Overall, transgene expression of the Au:G5D and Au:G5D:FA nanocomplexes exceeded that of G5D and G5D:FA nanocomplexes, indicating the pivotal role played by the inclusion of the AuNP delivery system. The favorable properties imparted by the AuNPs potentiated an increased level of luciferase gene expression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document