scholarly journals Revision of CHAARTED and LATITUDE criteria among Japanese de novo metastatic prostate cancer patients

Author(s):  
Manato Kanesaka ◽  
Shinichi Sakamoto ◽  
Yasutaka Yamada ◽  
Junryo Rii ◽  
Maihulan Maimaiti ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl) ◽  
pp. 13-13
Author(s):  
Po-Jung SU ◽  
Yu-Ann Fang ◽  
Yung-Chun Chang ◽  
Yung-Chia Kuo ◽  
Yung-Chang Lin

13 Background: For de novo metastatic prostate cancer (mPC)) patients, their prognosis may be really different. Some of these patients response very well to hormone therapy with durable survival, but others may be not. For those poor prognosis patients, if we could predict them as high risk patients when diagnosed, and provide aggressive upfront chemotherapy or novel hormonal therapy, they might get better treatment outcomes. Methods: We used data of prostate cancer patients from 2000 to 2016 in Chang Gung Research Database. There are 799 de novo mPC patients with castration. We predicted the possibility for these patients progressed to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in 1 year and find the high risk group patients. Then we figured out the best features for prediction from the best classifier with Recursive Feature Elimination. Results: The de nove mPC patients who pregressed to mCRPC in 1 year, whose mOS is 21.9 months is worse than who progressed to mCRPC beyond 1 year significantly, whose mOS is 80.7 months. (adjusted hazard ratio[aHR]: 6.43, P<0.001). The overall performance of machine learning by XGBoost is the best in all predictive models for high risk patients. (AUC=0.7000, Accuracy=0.7143). We excluded the features with missing data over 50%, then put all other features in the model. (AUC=0.7042, Accuracy=0.7239). But we got the best performance with only 11 features, including age, time from diagnosis to castration, nadir PSA, hemoglobin, eosinophil/white blood cell ratio, alkaline phosphatase, alanine transaminase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, prothrombin time, and secondary primary cancer, by Recursive Feature Elimination. (AUC=0.7131, Accuracy=0.7267). Conclusions: We found the predictive model has better predictive accuracy and shorter manuscript time with less features selected by Recursive Feature Elimination.We can predict high risk group in de novo mPC patients and make better clinical decision for treatment with this XGBoost model.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt Hoeh ◽  
Christoph Würnschimmel ◽  
Rocco S. Flammia ◽  
Benedikt Horlemann ◽  
Gabriele Sorce ◽  
...  

IntroductionRandomized clinical trials demonstrated improved overall survival in chemotherapy exposed metastatic prostate cancer patients. However, real-world data validating this effect with large scale epidemiological data sets are scarce and might not agree with trials. We tested this hypothesis.Materials and MethodsWe identified de novo metastatic prostate cancer patients within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2014-2015). Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression models tested for overall survival differences between chemotherapy-exposed patients vs chemotherapy-naïve patients. All analyses were repeated in propensity-score matched cohorts. Additionally, landmark analyses were applied to account for potential immortal time bias.ResultsOverall, 4295 de novo metastatic prostate cancer patients were identified. Of those, 905 (21.1%) patients received chemotherapy vs 3390 (78.9%) did not. Median overall survival was not reached at 30 months follow-up. Chemotherapy-exposed patients exhibited significantly better overall survival (61.6 vs 54.3%, multivariable HR:0.82, CI: 0.72-0.96, p=0.01) at 30 months compared to their chemotherapy-naïve counterparts. These findings were confirmed in propensity score matched analyses (multivariable HR: 0.77, CI:0.66-0.90, p&lt;0.001). Results remained unchanged after landmark analyses were applied in propensity score matched population.ConclusionsIn this contemporary real-world population-based cohort, chemotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer patients was associated with better overall survival. However, the magnitude of overall survival benefit was not comparable to phase 3 trials.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 132-132
Author(s):  
Shinichi Sakamoto ◽  
Yasutaka Yamada ◽  
Junryo Rii ◽  
Satoshi Yamamoto ◽  
Shuhei Kamada ◽  
...  

132 Background: Based on the high response rate to the standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the Japanese cohort in LATTITUDE study failed to show the survival benefit by early Abiraterone. In order to identify the "true high-risk" patients, we studied the prognostic factors among Japanese de novo metastatic prostate cancer patients who fit CHAARTED and LATITUDE criteria. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients who fit CHAARTED (292 patients) and LATITUDE (294 patients) criteria from Japanese multi-institutions. All patients received ADT with bicalutamide as an initial treatment. Factors related to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were statistically analyzed. Results: The median OS was 56 mo and 57 mo in patients who met the CHAARTED and the LATITUDE criteria, respectively. In patients who met CHAARTED criteria, LDH (HR2.6, p < 0.00001) and CRP (HR1.7, p = 0.042) were independent risk factors for OS. In patients who met LATTITUDE criteria, GS≥9 (HR1.7, p = 0.0378) and LDH (HR2.9, p < 0.0001) were independent risk factors for OS. Modified CHAARTED criteria by adding LDH and CRP showed a significant difference in OS (HR2.8, p < 0.0001) with a comparative median OS (30 mo) to placebo of CHAARTED trial (32 mo). Modified LATTITUDE criteria by adding GS≥9 and LDH, showed a significant difference in OS (HR2.7, p < 0.0001) with a comparative median OS (33 mo) to placebo of LATTITUDE trial (34 mo). Conclusions: Modified criteria may potentially elucidate the true "high-volume" and "high-risk" patients in the Japanese cohort who require early intensive therapy.[Table: see text]


ESMO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 100261
Author(s):  
A.A. Kulkarni ◽  
N. Rubin ◽  
A. Tholkes ◽  
S. Shah ◽  
C.J. Ryan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document