scholarly journals Cell-Cycle Control of Developmentally Regulated Transcription Factors Accounts for Heterogeneity in Human Pluripotent Cells

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amar M. Singh ◽  
James Chappell ◽  
Robert Trost ◽  
Li Lin ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Pluripotent Cells ◽  
Developmentally Regulated

scholarly journals Cell-Cycle Control of Developmentally Regulated Transcription Factors Accounts for Heterogeneity in Human Pluripotent Cells

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 532-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amar M. Singh ◽  
James Chappell ◽  
Robert Trost ◽  
Li Lin ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Pluripotent Cells ◽  
Developmentally Regulated

The Role of Retinoblastoma Protein in Cell Cycle Regulation: An Updated Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabih Roufayel ◽  
Rabih Mezher ◽  
Kenneth B. Storey
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
E2f Transcription Factor ◽  
Cellular Energetics ◽  
Development And Differentiation ◽  
E2f Transcription Factors ◽  
Rb Phosphorylation

: Selected transcription factors have critical roles to play in organism survival by regulating the expression of genes that control the adaptations needed to handle stress conditions. The retinoblastoma (Rb) protein coupled with the E2F transcription factor family was demonstrated to have roles in controlling the cell cycle during freezing and associated environmental stresses (anoxia, dehydration). Rb phosphorylation or acetylation at different sites provide a mechanism for repressing cell proliferation that is under the control of E2F transcription factors in animals facing stresses that disrupt cellular energetics or cell volume controls. Other central regulators of the cell cycle including Cyclins, Cyclin dependent kinases (Cdks), and checkpoint proteins detect DNA damage or any improper replication, blocking further progression of cell cycle and interrupting cell proliferation. This review provides an insight into the molecular regulatory mechanisms of cell cycle control, focusing on Rb-E2F along with Cyclin-Cdk complexes typically involved in development and differentiation that need to be regulated in order to survive extreme cellular stress.

scholarly journals Mutational analyses of fs(1)Ya, an essential, developmentally regulated, nuclear envelope protein in Drosophila.

Genetics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 1473-1481 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Liu ◽  
K Song ◽  
M F Wolfner
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Embryonic Development ◽  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Envelope Protein ◽  
Chromatin Condensation ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Nuclear Lamina ◽  
Mitotic Division ◽  
Developmentally Regulated ◽  
Egg Maturation

Abstract The fs(1)Ya protein (YA) is an essential, maternally encoded, nuclear lamina protein that is under both developmental and cell cycle control. A strong Ya mutation results in early arrest of embryos. To define the function of YA in the nuclear envelope during early embryonic development, we characterized the phenotypes of four Ya mutants alleles and determined their molecular lesions. Ya mutant embryos arrest with abnormal nuclear envelopes prior to the first mitotic division; a proportion of embryos from two leaky Ya mutants proceed beyond this but arrest after several abnormal divisions. Ya unfertilized eggs contain nuclei of different sizes and condensation states, apparently due to abnormal fusion of the meiotic products immediately after meiosis. Lamin is localized at the periphery of the uncondensed nuclei in these eggs. These results suggest that YA function is required during and after egg maturation to facilitate proper chromatin condensation, rather than to allow a lamin-containing nuclear envelope to form. Two leaky Ya alleles that partially complement have lesions at opposite ends of the YA protein, suggesting that the N- and C-termini are important for YA function and that YA might interact with itself either directly or indirectly.

scholarly journals The transcription factors TFE3 and TFEB amplify p53 dependent transcriptional programs in response to DNA damage

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eutteum Jeong ◽  
Owen A Brady ◽  
José A Martina ◽  
Mehdi Pirooznia ◽  
Ilker Tunc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
P53 Protein ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Double Knockout ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle

The transcription factors TFE3 and TFEB cooperate to regulate autophagy induction and lysosome biogenesis in response to starvation. Here we demonstrate that DNA damage activates TFE3 and TFEB in a p53 and mTORC1 dependent manner. RNA-Seq analysis of TFEB/TFE3 double-knockout cells exposed to etoposide reveals a profound dysregulation of the DNA damage response, including upstream regulators and downstream p53 targets. TFE3 and TFEB contribute to sustain p53-dependent response by stabilizing p53 protein levels. In TFEB/TFE3 DKOs, p53 half-life is significantly decreased due to elevated Mdm2 levels. Transcriptional profiles of genes involved in lysosome membrane permeabilization and cell death pathways are dysregulated in TFEB/TFE3-depleted cells. Consequently, prolonged DNA damage results in impaired LMP and apoptosis induction. Finally, expression of multiple genes implicated in cell cycle control is altered in TFEB/TFE3 DKOs, revealing a previously unrecognized role of TFEB and TFE3 in the regulation of cell cycle checkpoints in response to stress.

scholarly journals Nuclear receptors connect progenitor transcription factors to cell cycle control

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Neto ◽  
Marina Naval-Sánchez ◽  
Delphine Potier ◽  
Paulo S. Pereira ◽  
Dirk Geerts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Cell Cycle Control

scholarly journals Involvement of Retinoblastoma Protein and HBP1 in Histone H10 Gene Expression

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (18) ◽  
pp. 6627-6637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudie Lemercier ◽  
Kym Duncliffe ◽  
Isabelle Boibessot ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
André Verdel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
High Mobility ◽  
Retinoblastoma Protein ◽  
Histone H1 ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Encoding Gene

ABSTRACT The histone H10-encoding gene is expressed in vertebrates in differentiating cells during the arrest of proliferation. In the H10 promoter, a specific regulatory element, which we named the H4 box, exhibits features which implicate a role in mediating H10 gene expression in response to both differentiation and cell cycle control signals. For instance, within the linker histone gene family, the H4 box is found only in the promoters of differentiation-associated subtypes, suggesting that it is specifically involved in differentiation-dependent expression of these genes. In addition, an element nearly identical to the H4 box is conserved in the promoters of histone H4-encoding genes and is known to be involved in their cell cycle-dependent expression. The transcription factors interacting with the H10 H4 box were therefore expected to link differentiation-dependent expression of H10 to the cell cycle control machinery. The aim of this work was to identify such transcription factors and to obtain information concerning the regulatory pathway involved. Interestingly, our cloning strategy led to the isolation of a retinoblastoma protein (RB) partner known as HBP1. HBP1, a high-mobility group box transcription factor, interacted specifically with the H10H4 box and moreover was expressed in a differentiation-dependent manner. We also showed that the HBP1-encoding gene is able to produce different forms of HBP1. Finally, we demonstrated that both HBP1 and RB were involved in the activation of H10 gene expression. We therefore propose that HBP1 mediates a link between the cell cycle control machinery and cell differentiation signals. Through modulating the expression of specific chromatin-associated proteins such as histone H10, HBP1 plays a vital role in chromatin remodeling events during the arrest of cell proliferation in differentiating cells.

scholarly journals Cyclin/Forkhead-mediated coordination of cyclin waves: an autonomous oscillator rationalizing the quantitative model of Cdk control for budding yeast

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Barberis
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Quantitative Model ◽  
Forkhead Transcription Factors ◽  
Dynamic Coordination ◽  
Cell Cycle Dynamics

AbstractNetworks of interacting molecules organize topology, amount, and timing of biological functions. Systems biology concepts required to pin down ‘network motifs’ or ‘design principles’ for time-dependent processes have been developed for the cell division cycle, through integration of predictive computer modeling with quantitative experimentation. A dynamic coordination of sequential waves of cyclin-dependent kinases (cyclin/Cdk) with the transcription factors network offers insights to investigate how incompatible processes are kept separate in time during the eukaryotic cell cycle. Here this coordination is discussed for the Forkhead transcription factors in light of missing gaps in the current knowledge of cell cycle control in budding yeast. An emergent design principle is proposed where cyclin waves are synchronized by a cyclin/Cdk-mediated feed-forward regulation through the Forkhead as a transcriptional timer. This design is rationalized by the bidirectional interaction between mitotic cyclins and the Forkhead transcriptional timer, resulting in an autonomous oscillator that may be instrumental for a well-timed progression throughout the cell cycle. The regulation centered around the cyclin/Cdk–Forkhead axis can be pivotal to timely coordinate cell cycle dynamics, thereby to actuate the quantitative model of Cdk control.

scholarly journals A role for the DP subunit of the E2F transcription factor in axis determination during Drosophila oogenesis

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (15) ◽  
pp. 3249-3261 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.L. Myster ◽  
P.C. Bonnette ◽  
R.J. Duronio
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nurse Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Egg Chambers ◽  
E2f Transcription Factors ◽  
Mutant Phenotypes ◽  
Replication Factors

The E2F family of transcription factors contributes to cell cycle control by regulating the transcription of DNA replication factors. Functional ‘E2F’ is a DNA-binding heterodimer composed of E2F and DP proteins. Drosophila contains two E2F genes (dE2F, dE2F2) and one DP gene (dDP). Mutation of either dE2F or dDP eliminates G(1)-S transcription of known replication factors during embryogenesis and compromises DNA replication. However, the analysis of these mutant phenotypes is complicated by the perdurance of maternally supplied gene function. To address this and to further analyze the role of E2F transcription factors in development we have phenotypically characterized mitotic clones of dDP mutant cells in the female germline. Our analysis indicates that dDP is required for several essential processes during oogenesis. In a fraction of the mutant egg chambers the germ cells execute one extra round of mitosis, suggesting that in this tissue dDP is uniquely utilized for cell cycle arrest rather than cell cycle progression. Mutation of dDP in the germline also prevents nurse cell cytoplasm transfer to the oocyte, resulting in a ‘dumpless’ phenotype that blocks oocyte development. This phenotype likely results from both disruption of the actin cytoskeleton and a failure of nurse cell apoptosis, each of which are required for normal cytoplasmic transfer. Lastly, we found that dDP is required for the establishment of the dorsal-ventral axis, as loss of dDP function prevents the localized expression of the EGFR ligand Gurken in the oocyte, which initiates dorsal-ventral polarity in the egg chamber. Thus we have uncovered new functions for E2F transcription factors during development, including an unexpected role in pattern formation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document