scholarly journals Does the magnitude of the beneficial effect of beta-blockers in chronic heart failure differ between diabetic and nondiabetic patients? A meta-analysis of all-cause mortality outcomes from major chronic heart failure beta-blocker trials

2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Steven Haas ◽  
Theo Vos ◽  
Richard Gilbert ◽  
Henry Krum
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Beneficial Effect ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
All Cause Mortality

scholarly journals Long-Term and Short-Term Prognostic Value of Circulating Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 Concentration in Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cardiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Guoqi Dong ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Hongru Zhang ◽  
Yihuang Gu
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Prisma Statement ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Increasing Risk

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) has been considered as a prognostic factor of cardiovascular disease. However, the prognostic value of sST2 concentration in chronic heart failure remains to be summarized. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for eligible studies up to January 1, 2020. Data extracted from articles and provided by authors were used in agreement with the PRISMA statement. The endpoints were all-cause mortality (ACM), cardiovascular mortality (CVM)/heart failure-related hospitalization (HFH), and all-cause mortality (ACM)/heart failure-related readmission (HFR). <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 11 studies with 5,121 participants were included in this analysis. Higher concentration of sST2 predicted the incidence of long-term ACM (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.04), long-term ACM/HFR (HR: 1.42, CI: 1.27–1.59), and long-term CVM/HFH (HR: 2.25, CI: 1.82–2.79), regardless of short-term ACM/HFR (HR: 2.31, CI: 0.71–7.49). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Higher sST2 concentration at baseline is associated with increasing risk of long-term ACM, ACM/HFR, and CVM/HFH and can be a tool for the prognosis of chronic heart failure.

Abstract 2887: Peri-Operative Beta-Blockers in Patients Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of 12,306 Patients from Randomized Trials

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sripal Bangalore ◽  
Shruthi Chandrashekhar ◽  
Sandeep Pulimi ◽  
Franz H Messerli
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Myocardial Ischemia ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Safety Outcomes ◽  
Β Blockers

Background: The 2007 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative evaluation recommends perioperative β-blockers for non-cardiac surgery. However, some clinical trials seem to be at odds with these recommendations. Methods: PUBMED/EMBASE/CENTRAL search for randomized trials (RCTs) evaluating β-blockers for non-cardiac surgery. Efficacy outcomes of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, heart failure, and myocardial ischemia (30 days), and safety outcomes of perioperative bradycardia, hypotension, and bronchospasm. Results: Among 33 RCTs which evaluated 12,306 patients, β-blockers were not associated with any significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality, CV mortality, or heart failure, but were associated with a 35% decrease in nonfatal MI, 64% decrease in myocardial ischemia at the expense of a 101% increase (Figure ) in nonfatal strokes. The beneficial effects were driven mainly by trials with high-bias risk, while analyses of low-biased trials showed a 28% and 101% increase in all-cause mortality and stroke with only a 29% and 59% reduction in nonfatal MI and 59%myocardial ischemia. For the safety outcomes, β-blockers were associated with a significantly increased risk of peri-op bradycardia and peri-op hypotension. Conclusions: In patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, we estimate that treatment of 1000 patients with β-blockers results in 16 fewer nonfatal MI, but at the expense of 3 disabling strokes and 45 and 59 patients with clinically significant perioperative bradycardia and hypotension respectively, and suggests an increase in all-cause mortality.

scholarly journals The Impact of Treatment with Beta-Blockers upon Mortality in Chronic Heart Failure Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borjanka Taneva ◽  
Daniela Caparoska
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Heart Failure Patients

BACKGROUND: Besides the conventional therapy for heart failure, the diuretics, cardiac glycosides and ACE-inhibitors, current pharmacotherapy includes beta-blockers, mainly because of their pathophysiological mechanisms upon heart remodeling.AIM: The study objective was to assess the cardiovascular mortality in the beta-blocker therapy group and to correlate it with the mortality in the control group as well as to correlate the combined outcome of death and/or hospitalization for cardiovascular reason between the two groups.               MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 113 chronic heart failure patients followed up for a period of 18 months. The therapy group received conventional therapy plus the target dose of beta blockers, and the control group received the conventional therapy only. The therapy group was divided in three separate subgroups in terms of the type of beta-blocker (Metoprolol subgroup, Bisoprolol and Carvedilol subgroup). To compare the mortality and the combined outcome, the RRR (relative risk reduction) and NNT (number needed to treat) were used, as well as the survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier.RESULTS: The results showed the following: in regards of the cardiovascular mortality, the relative risk for death in the therapy group was 34%, which, though statistically not significant, is of great clinical significance. In regards of the combined outcome (death and/or number of hospitalizations) the results showed a RRR of 40% in the therapy group compared to the control group, which is statistically highly significant.CONCLUSION: The study confirmed that patients with stable chronic heart failure, treated with optimal doses of beta-blockers, show a significant reduction of the risk from death as well as combined outcome (death and/or number of hospitalizations).

scholarly journals SO057BETA-BLOCKERS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCED MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION AND ADVANCED CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: COHORT STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard L Fu ◽  
Alicia Uijl ◽  
Friedo W Dekker ◽  
Lars H Lund ◽  
Gianluigi Savarese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background and Aims Beta-blockers reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) were underrepresented in landmark trials. We evaluated if beta-blockers are associated with improved survival in patients with HFrEF and advanced CKD. Method We identified 3906 persons with an ejection fraction &lt;40% and advanced CKD (eGFR &lt;30 mL/min/1.73m2) enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry during 2001-2016. The associations between beta-blocker use, 5-year all-cause mortality, and the composite of time to cardiovascular (CV) mortality/first HF hospitalization were assessed by multivariable Cox regression. Analyses were adjusted for 36 variables, including demographics, laboratory measures, comorbidities, medication use, medical procedures, and socioeconomic status. To assess consistency, the same analyses were performed in a positive control cohort of 12,673 patients with moderate CKD (eGFR &lt;60-30 mL/min/1.73m2). Results The majority (89%) of individuals with HFrEF and advanced CKD received treatment with beta-blockers. Median (IQR) age was 81 (74-86) years, 36% were women and median eGFR was 26 (20-28) mL/min/173m2. During 5 years of follow-up, 2086 (53.4%) individuals had a subsequent HF hospitalization, and 2954 (75.6%) individuals died, of which 2089 (70.1%) due to cardiovascular causes. Beta-blocker use was associated with a significant reduction in 5-year all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.96)] and CV mortality/HF hospitalization (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.98). The magnitude of the associations between beta-blocker use and outcomes was similar to that observed for HFrEF patients with mild/moderate CKD, with adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality and CV mortality/HF hospitalization of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.96), respectively. Conclusion Despite lack of trial evidence, the use of beta-blockers in patients with HFrEF and advanced CKD was high in routine Swedish care, and was independently associated with reduced mortality to the same degree as HFrEF with moderate CKD.

scholarly journals Beta-blockers Associated with a Mortality Benefit in Patients with Systolic Dysfunction and Elevated Serum Bilirubin

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-82
Author(s):  
Christopher Labos ◽  
Vivian Nguyen ◽  
Nadia Giannetti ◽  
Thao Huynh
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Secondary Endpoint ◽  
Cardiac Transplant ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact

Background:Hyperbilirubinemia is associated with increased mortality in heart failure (HF) patients. We evaluated the impact of evidence-based medical therapy, in particular beta-blocker on the survival of patients with HF and hyperbilirubinemia.Methods and Results:We reviewed the charts of all patients followed at our tertiary care heart failure clinic. Hyperbilirubinemia was defined as total bilirubin >30 µmol/L (1.5 times the upper limit of our laboratory value). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was a composite of death, cardiac transplant or ventricular assistance device implantation (VAD). Of 1035 HF patients, 121 patients (11.7%) had hyperbilirubinemia. Median follow-up was 556 days. Hyperbilirubinemia was associated with an eight-fold increase in all-cause mortality, hazard ratio (HR): 8.78[95% Confidence Intervals (CI): 5.89-13.06]. Beta-blocker use was associated with approximately 60% reduction in all-cause mortality (HR: 0.38, 95% CI:0.15-0.94) and 70% reduction in the composite secondary endpoint (HR:0.31, 95% CI:0.13-0.71) in patients with hyperbilirubinemia.Conclusion:HF patients with hyperbilirubinemia have increased early mortality, need for cardiac transplantation or VAD. Beta-blocker use was associated with early survival benefit in these patients. Bilirubin levels should be monitored in patients with HF and early initiation of beta-blockers in patients with hyperbilirubinemia should be considered.

1412Effect of beta-blocker dose on the prognosis in chronic heart failure patients depending on the presence of atrial fibrillation. Data from FAR NHL (FARmacology and NeuroHumoraL activation) registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Labr ◽  
J Spinar ◽  
J Parenica ◽  
L Spinarova ◽  
F Malek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Medium Dose

Abstract Background Beta-blockers (BB) decrease morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients and are part of the first line treatment together with inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme. New metaanalysis from year 2014 of main BB studies in chronic heart failure showed no benefit of BB in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods 1088 at least one month stable chronic heart failure patients with ejection fraction <50% were included in FAR NHL (FARmacology and NeuroHumoraL activation) registry. Three centers with speciality in heart failure in the Czech Republic were participating from November 2014 to December 2015. Results 80% patients were male with median age 66 years. Aetiology of heart failure was in 49.4% ischemic heart disease, in 42.3% dilated cardiomyopathy, in 0.5% hypertrophy cardiomyopathy. From those receiving beta-blockers 20% received low dose similar to the starting dose, 57% medium dose and 17% high dose which was set as the target BB dose. Nearly 93.8% of patients received BB. But only 17.0% received the high dose of BB. 6.2% of patients were not treated by BB at all. One third of patients (34.5%) had atrial fibrillation in medical history or newly recorded on electrocardiogram. Patients with AF were much older (median 63 vs. 70 years, respectively; p<0.001), had higher heart rate (72 vs. 74 /min; p<0.006) and were also in higher class of NYHA (New York Heart Association; p=0.005). The primary endpoint was set as all cause death, mechanical circulatory support implantation, orthotopic heart transplantation or hospitalization for acute heart failure. Patients with AF survived without primary endpoint in 70.6%, patients without AF in 78.8% (p=0.005) even after age standardization. There was significantly different survival according to dose of beta-blocker, the higher was dose of BB, the higher was survival. Patients with no beta-blocker survived without primary endpoint in 63.9%, with low dose survived in 72.6%, medium dose in 77.0% and with high dose in 80.9%. We devided FAR NHL patients into two groups according to atrial fibrillation. Patients without AF had the better survival without primary endpoint. The higher dose of beta-blockers they got, the better survival they had (69.5%, 76.7%, 78.9%, 85.1%; p=0.007). Also patients with AF had better survival without primary endpoint, the higher dose of beta-blocker they got, the higher was their survival without endpoitnt (56.0%, 63.6%, 73.0%, 75.8%; p=0.007). Conclusion In FAR NHL registry of stable chronic heart failure patietnts was one third of patients with atrial fibrillation. Nearly 94% of patients received beta-blocker. But only 17% received the target dose. Pacients even with or without atrial fibrillation had the significantly better survival without primary endpoint the higher was the dose of beta-blocker.

scholarly journals Effects of Different Telemonitoring Strategies on Chronic Heart Failure Care: Systematic Review and Subgroup Meta-Analysis

10.2196/20032 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. e20032
Author(s):  
Hang Ding ◽  
Sheau Huey Chen ◽  
Iain Edwards ◽  
Rajiv Jayasena ◽  
James Doecke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Heart Failure Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background Telemonitoring studies in chronic heart failure are characterized by mixed mortality and hospitalization outcomes, which have deterred the uptake of telemonitoring in clinical practice. These mixed outcomes may reflect the diverse range of patient management strategies incorporated in telemonitoring. To address this, we compared the effects of different telemonitoring strategies on clinical outcomes. Objective The aim of this systematic review and subgroup meta-analysis was to identify noninvasive telemonitoring strategies attributing to improvements in all-cause mortality or hospitalization outcomes for patients with chronic heart failure. Methods We reviewed and analyzed telemonitoring strategies from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemonitoring intervention with usual care. For each strategy, we examined whether RCTs that applied the strategy in the telemonitoring intervention (subgroup 1) resulted in a significantly lower risk ratio (RR) of all-cause mortality or incidence rate ratio (IRR) of all-cause hospitalization compared with RCTs that did not apply this strategy (subgroup 2). Results We included 26 RCTs (N=11,450) incorporating 18 different telemonitoring strategies. RCTs that provided medication support were found to be associated with a significantly lower IRR value than RCTs that did not provide this type of support (P=.01; subgroup 1 IRR=0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.95 vs subgroup 2 IRR=1.02, 95% CI 0.93-1.12). RCTs that applied mobile health were associated with a significantly lower IRR (P=.03; IRR=0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.96 vs IRR=1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.06) and RR (P=.01; RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.85 vs RR=0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.07). Conclusions Telemonitoring strategies involving medication support and mobile health were associated with improvements in all-cause mortality or hospitalization outcomes. These strategies should be prioritized in telemonitoring interventions for the management of patients with chronic heart failure.

Abstract 2497: Does Magnitude of Heart Reduction Influence Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Systolic Chronic Heart Failure Receiving Beta-Blockers? A Regression Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Genevieve Flannery ◽  
Rosie Gehrig-Mills ◽  
Baki Billah ◽  
Henry Krum
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Close Relationship ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background: Beta-blockers (BBs) improve cardiac function and prolong survival in patients with systolic chronic heart failure (CHF). However, the exact mechanisms underlying these benefits are uncertain. Specifically, it is unclear whether a close relationship exists between heart rate (HR) reduction and clinical outcomes with these agents. We therefore tested this hypothesis within randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of BBs in systolic CHF. Methods: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and HR values at baseline and end-study were obtained from available BB RCTs. The relationship between change in HR and all-cause mortality as well as LVEF was determined using regression analysis (SPSS). Results: Thirty-six trials, which included 23,122 patients with mean follow-up of 10.5 months, were analysed for all-cause mortality, LVEF and HR. There was a close relationship between all-cause annualised mortality rate and change in HR (adjusted R2=0.51, p=0.004). A strong correlation between change in HR and change in LVEF (adjusted R2=0.47, p=0.000, Figure ) was also observed. When only trials with >100 patients were included, an even tighter relationship was seen (adjusted R2=0.60, p=0.0004). Conclusions: These analyses indicate that a major contributor to the clinical benefits of BB therapy in systolic CHF is the HR-lowering effect of these agents. Therefore, magnitude of HR reduction may be more important than achievement of target dose in BB treatment of systolic CHF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document