Chapter 2 Primary Prevention of Stroke by Modification of Selected Risk Factors

2004 ◽  
pp. 5-54
Author(s):  
Michael A. Sloan
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Prevention

The burden of cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Middle East: A systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on primary prevention

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula ◽  
Abdullah Shehab ◽  
Anhar Ullah ◽  
Jamal Rahmani
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Family History ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Middle Eastern ◽  
History Of

Background: The increasing incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) threatens the Middle Eastern population. Several epidemiological studies have assessed CVD and its risk factors in terms of the primary prevention of CVD in the Middle East. Therefore, summarizing the information from these studies is essential. Aim: We conducted a systematic review to assess the prevalence of CVD and its major risk factors among Middle Eastern adults based on the literature published between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018 and carried out a meta-analysis. Methods: We searched electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Embase and Google Scholar to identify literature published from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. All the original articles that investigated the prevalence of CVD and reported at least one of the following factors were included: hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, smoking and family history of CVD. To summarize CVD prevalence, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: A total of 41 potentially relevant articles were included, and 32 were included in the meta-analysis (n=191,979). The overall prevalence of CVD was 10.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.1-14.3%, p<0.001) in the Middle East. A high prevalence of CVD risk factors, such as dyslipidaemia (43.3%; 95% CI: 21.5-68%), hypertension (26.2%; 95% CI: 19.6-34%) and diabetes (16%; 95% CI: 9.9-24.8%), was observed. The prevalence rates of other risk factors, such as smoking (12.4%; 95% CI: 7.7-19.4%) and family history of CVD (18.7%; 95% CI: 15.4-22.5%), were also high. Conclusion: The prevalence of CVD is high (10.1%) in the Middle East. The burden of dyslipidaemia (43.3%) in this region is twice as high as that of hypertension (26.2%) and diabetes mellitus (16%). Multifaceted interventions are urgently needed for the primary prevention of CVD in this region.

Abstract P720: Primary Stroke Prevention by Primary Care Providers: An Unmet Need

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Reichwein ◽  
Alicia Richardson ◽  
Cesar Velasco
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Stroke Risk Factors

Introduction: The majority of patients who present with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have known stroke risk factors which are not optimally managed. It has been suggested that a CHADS-VASC score can assist with primary prevention by calculating future stroke risk. This however, has not been widely adapted in the primary care setting. Methods: From 2018-2019, 686 AIS patients were included in retrospective analysis. Data elements included: historical stroke risk factors, historical CHADS-VASC score, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use at time of presentation, discharge location, and mRS. Results: Of the 686 AIS patients, 77% were age > 60, and 52% were male. Etiology subtypes were small vessel/lacunar 20%, large vessel 22%, cardioembolic 20%, undetermined 31% (cryptogenic 15%), and other determined 5%. On presentation, the majority of patients had 2 or more stroke risk factors and a calculated historical CHADS-VASC score > 2 (Table 1). Over half of the patients with large vessel or small vessel/lacunar etiology were not on any antiplatelets and 53% of patients with known history of atrial fibrillation weren’t on anticoagulants. Forty-nine percent of patients had a mRS > 3 at discharge. Conclusion: Patients with several stroke risk factors are sub optimally managed by primary care providers. Primary prevention education for PCPs in management of higher stroke risk individuals and additional analysis of the CHADS-VASC tool for this setting is needed. If widely adapted, this tool may prevent strokes by providing adequate risk reduction in the primary care setting.

scholarly journals ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION AND RISK FACTORS IN CHILDREN: LITERATURE REVIEW

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 523-531
Author(s):  
N. A. Maхimovich ◽  
◽  
A. V. Luksha ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Young People ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Environmental Risk ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Related Risk

Background. In modern society, there is an intensive increase in the incidence of arterial hypertension among young people, which is mainly due to lifestyle characteristics and related risk factors.Objective: to analyze the results of scientific researches of domestic and foreign authors regarding the study of risk factors in the development of arterial hypertension in children.Material and methods. A qualitative analysis of the current literature data on the risk factors for arterial hypertension and its prevention has been carried out.Results. It has been established that the occurrence of arterial hypertension in childhood is due to not only hereditary, but also a number of environmental risk factors.Conclusions. Further researches are needed to study new and established risk factors that must be considered when conducting primary prevention of the disease in children at high risk.

Abstract 1158: Sudden Death in Children with Cardiomyopathy: Long Term Follow-Up from a National Population-Based Study of Childhood Cardiomyopathy

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Bharucha ◽  
Andrew M Davis ◽  
Christian Turner ◽  
Robert Justo ◽  
Terry Robertson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Sudden Death ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction Better data regarding the incidence and risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in children with cardiomyopathy (CM) is critical in defining appropriate primary prevention strategies. Methods The National Australian Childhood Cardiomyopathy Study is a prospective cohort study, including all children in Australia with primary CM diagnosed at 0 – 10 years of age, between 1987–1997. SCD was defined as sudden and unexpected death in children who were not hospitalized and not in congestive heart failure at the time of death. Nine subjects with sudden death as presenting symptom were excluded. Indexed echocardiographic measurements at latest follow-up were compared between subjects with SCD and survivors. Results Study criteria were met by 291 children. Mean duration of follow-up was 9.2 years. The incidence of sudden death relative to each CM type, for all cases and as a proportion of deaths, is shown in the Table : Incidence of SCD by CM type. SCD incidence was significantly associated with CM type, for all cases ( p = 0.006) and when only those subjects who died were considered ( p = 0.005), with LVNC and RCM having up to 4 times the risk of other CM types. Children with familial DCM had a significantly higher rate of SCD than subjects with non-familial CM (12% vs 3%; p = 0.028), however, familial CM was not a risk factor in other CM types. DCM SCD subjects had larger LVEDd Z score than survivors (median 5.53 vs 1.16; p <0.0001) and lower FS Z score (median −9.23 vs −0.51; p = 0.0025). HCM SCD subjects had thicker LVPW dimension Z scores than survivors (median 4.63 vs 1.18; p = 0.007). Twelve subjects (2 DCM, 8 HCM and 2 LVNC) underwent ICD implantation (8/12 for primary prevention). Conclusions: This population based study defines new risk factors for sudden death in children with CM. RCM is well known to have a high incidence of SCD. In addition, children with LVNC and those with DCM who have severe dilatation, systolic dysfunction or familial DCM are at increased risk of sudden death.

Abstract 14575: Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator in the Setting of Tetralogy of Fallot: Long-Term Follow-Up of a French National Multicenter Retrospective Registry

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdeslam Bouzeman ◽  
Maxime De Guillebon ◽  
Guillaume Duthoit ◽  
Magalie Ladouceur ◽  
Raphael Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Tetralogy Of Fallot ◽  
Primary And Secondary Prevention ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Appropriate Therapy

Background: Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is the most frequent form of congenital heart disease managed by EP physicians for potential ICD. However, few studies have reported long-term outcomes of TOF patients with ICD. Methods: Between 2005 and 2014, all TOF patients with ICD in 17 French centers were enrolled in a specific evaluation aiming to determine characteristics at implantation as well as outcomes (overall mortality, appropriate ICD therapies, and device-related complications). Results: Overall 78 patients (45±13 years, 64% males) were enrolled. A majority of patients were implanted in the setting of secondary prevention (73%), whereas the remaining (27%) in primary prevention. Among the latest group, known risk factors for sudden cardiac death were: severe pulmonary regurgitation (30%,) prior palliative shunt (50%), syncope with unknown origin (25%), inducible ventricular tachycardia (45%), QRS duration ≥180ms (18%), non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (25%), and documented sustained supra ventricular tachycardia (45%).Overall, patients implanted in the setting of primary prevention presented with a mean of 3.1±1.4 risk factors. After a mean follow-up of 4.9±3.8 years, 35 patients (45%) experienced at least one appropriate therapy (25% in the primary prevention group compared to 53% in the secondary prevention group), giving annual-incidences of 6.9% (95%CI 0.14-13.7) and 21.3% (12.4-30.3) respectively (P=0,01). The mean time between ICD implantation and the first appropriate therapy was 2.2±3.2 years, without significant differences between primary and secondary prevention. Overall, ≥one ICD-related complication occurred in 30 patients (38%), including inappropriate shock (n=9), major pocket hematoma (n=1), lead dysfunction (n=12), infection (n=4), shoulder algodystrophia (n=2), device failure or dislodgement needing reintervention (n=2). Eventually, four patients were transplanted (5%), and six patients (8%) died during the course of follow-up. Conclusions: Considering relatively long-term follow-up, patients with TOF and ICDs experience high rates of appropriate ICD therapies, in both primary and secondary prevention. Major ICD-related complications remain, however, high.

PRIMARY PREVENTION OF DEMENTIA: AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL POINT OF VIEW

2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
C. Berr
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Life Course Approach ◽  
Important Concern ◽  
Dementia Prevention ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
The Impact

From an epidemiological perspective, in order to increase the level of evidence, it is necessary to refer to data from longitudinal studies to validate the temporal relationship between exposure (e.g. the behavior or modifying factor) and the disease. Findings from such studies are useful for defining risk factors and laying the groundwork for proposing interventions for prevention. This step is crucial in order to define the periods (life-course approach) and groups at risk, which will then become the targets of interventions designed to modify behaviors or lifestyle. Specifying the underlying mechanisms of these risk factors is one of the objectives of etiological epidemiology which focuses on the origin of diseases but is not essential for a more pragmatic interventional approach. These questions are essential for dementia prevention and are discussed in this paper. Furthermore, timing interventions is a major problem even if we identify primary prevention pathways in dementia. Another important concern for epidemiologists is the need to make projections to estimate the number of dementia cases in the next decades considering different intervention scenarios. These models require adequate descriptive indicators of dementia, demography and mortality and precise estimations of the impact of potential interventions in terms of delaying disease onset for instance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document