scholarly journals The Effect of Contact Precautions on Frequency of Hospital Adverse Events

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1268-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay D. Croft ◽  
Michael Liquori ◽  
James Ladd ◽  
Hannah Day ◽  
Lisa Pineles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Hospital Ward ◽  
Day Length ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
University Of Maryland ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Hospital Wards

OBJECTIVETo determine whether use of contact precautions on hospital ward patients is associated with patient adverse eventsDESIGNIndividually matched prospective cohort studySETTINGThe University of Maryland Medical Center, a tertiary care hospital in Baltimore, MarylandMETHODSA total of 296 medical or surgical inpatients admitted to non–intensive care unit hospital wards were enrolled at admission from January to November 2010. Patients on contact precautions were individually matched by hospital unit after an initial 3-day length of stay to patients not on contact precautions. Adverse events were detected by physician chart review and categorized as noninfectious, preventable and severe noninfectious, and infectious adverse events during the patient’s stay using the standardized Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Global Trigger Tool.RESULTSThe cohort of 148 patients on contact precautions at admission was matched with a cohort of 148 patients not on contact precautions. Of the total 296 subjects, 104 (35.1%) experienced at least 1 adverse event during their hospital stay. Contact precautions were associated with fewer noninfectious adverse events (rate ratio [RtR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–0.95; P=.02) and although not statistically significant, with fewer severe adverse events (RtR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46–1.03; P=.07). Preventable adverse events did not significantly differ between patients on contact precautions and patients not on contact precautions (RtR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.59–1.24; P=.41).CONCLUSIONSHospital ward patients on contact precautions were less likely to experience noninfectious adverse events during their hospital stay than patients not on contact precautions.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;36(11):1268–1274

scholarly journals Depression, Anxiety, and Moods of Hospitalized Patients under Contact Precautions

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah R. Day ◽  
Eli N. Perencevich ◽  
Anthony D. Harris ◽  
Ann L. Gruber-Baldini ◽  
Seth S. Himelhoch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
University Of Maryland ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Symptoms Of Depression ◽  
Mood Scale ◽  
The University

Objective.To determine the association between contact precautions and depression or anxiety as well as feelings of anger, sadness, worry, happiness, or confusion.Design.Prospective frequency-matched cohort study.Setting.The University of Maryland Medical Center, a 662-bed tertiary care hospital in Baltimore, Maryland.Participants.A total of 1,876 medical and surgical patients over the age of 18 years were approached; 528 patients were enrolled from January through November 2010, and 296 patients, frequency matched by hospital unit, completed follow-up on hospital day 3.Results.The primary outcome was Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores on hospital day 3, controlling for baseline HADS scores. Secondary moods were measured with visual analog mood scale diaries. Patients under contact precautions had baseline symptoms of depression 1.3 points higher (P < .01) and anxiety 0.8 points higher (P= .08) at hospital admission using HADS. Exposure to contact precautions was not associated with increased depression (P= .42) or anxiety (P= .25) on hospital day 3. On hospital day 3, patients under contact precautions were no more likely than unexposed patients to be angry (20% vs 20%;P= .99), sad (33% vs 38%;P= .45), worried (51% vs 46%;P= .41), happy (58% vs 67%;P= .14), or confused (23% vs 24%;P= .95).Conclusions.Patients under contact precautions have more symptoms of depression and anxiety at hospital admission but do not appear to be more likely to develop depression, anxiety, or negative moods while under contact precautions. The use of contact precautions should not be restricted by the belief that contact precautions will produce more depression or anxiety.

scholarly journals 497. Moderate Versus High Dose Corticosteroids in Adult Patients with Severe COVID-19: Less Is More

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S350-S350
Author(s):  
Seema Joshi ◽  
Sana Soman ◽  
Saniya Jain ◽  
Atheel Yako ◽  
Marwa Hojeij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Supplemental Oxygen ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Less Is More

Abstract Background The early administration of corticosteroids (CS) in patients with severe COVID-19 (hospitalized with need for supplemental oxygen) has been the only therapy to improve survival. However, the optimal dosing of CS remains unclear. Beginning March 2020 methylprednisolone (MP) in a dose of 40mg twice daily (high dose CS - HDC) was adopted at our institution. Based on emerging trials, this dose of MP was reduced to 16mg twice daily (moderate dose CS – MDC) in November 2020. The study aims to evaluate the outcome difference in patients receiving HDC versus MDC. Methods This pre-post quasi-experimental study was done at Henry Ford Hospital, an 877-bed tertiary care hospital in Detroit, Michigan. Consecutive patients in the HDC group from September 1, 2020 to November 15, 2020 were compared to the MDC group from November 30, 2020 to January 20, 2021. Only hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included progression to mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, discharge on supplemental oxygen and CS-associated adverse events. Patient demographics were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was planned to test the association between primary outcome and exposure. Results 470 patients were evaluated, 218 and 252 in the HDC and MDC groups respectively. Clinical characteristics and severity of illness on admission were comparable in both groups (Table 1). Among comorbidities - lung disease, cardiovascular disease and hypertension were higher in MDC. Antibiotic and tocilizumab use were lower in MDC. Significantly more patients in MDC group received oral CS. There was no difference in mortality between HDC and MDC through bivariate and multivariate analysis (14.7% and 13.5%, p &lt; 0.712, adjusted OR 0.913 [0.514-1.619]) (Table 2,3). Median length of hospital stay was 5 and 6 days in HDC and MDC respectively (p &lt; 0.001). There was no difference in CS-associated adverse events. Conclusion The survival in severe COVID-19 patients treated with MDC is comparable to HDC. Oral corticosteroids are an equally effective option. Disclosures Rachel Kenney, PharmD, Medtronic, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, spouse is an employee and shareholder)

scholarly journals AB1121 IMPLEMENTING HIGH VALUE CARE IN INPATIENT ANTINUCLEAR ANTIBODY TESTING

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1849.1-1850
Author(s):  
S. Mumtaz ◽  
Z. Y. Li ◽  
J. Yoon ◽  
C. Yuvienco
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Antinuclear Antibody ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Antibody Testing ◽  
Medical Provider

Background:Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) testing forms the basis on which many rheumatological diseases are subsequently diagnosed. ANA testing quantifies the dilution of plasma to produce the titer and staining pattern and this can be a part of an ANA order set that reflexively cascades to sub-serology if positive. Studies have shown that a low titer ANA may potentially translate into an erroneous diagnosis: if one estimates a 1 percent prevalence of ANA associated disease in the general population then 30% of those individuals would have a false positive result of ANA detected at 1:40 titer [1]. We theorized that there is no need for several methods to coexist within a single inpatient hospital setting especially since diagnostic value of staining patterns alone is limited.Objectives:To compare the utility and yield of “ANA screening reflex to profile” (ARP) and “ANA reflex to titer” (ART) order sets in the inpatient setting of a community tertiary care hospital. We aim to identify the appropriateness of the ANA testing ordered including cost-effectiveness of ordering ARP over ART in order to implement the identified quality measures towards improving utilization of ANA testing.Methods:We identified all inpatient ANA reflex testing orders performed at Community Regional Medical Center, Fresno, California completed between 11/2018 till 07/2019. This included ART and ARP orders with 6 sub-serologies: SSA, SSB, dsDNA, Smith, Scl-70 and U1RNP. A Health Information Management report was generated which included patient’s age, gender, length of hospital stay, dates of testing ordered, principal diagnosis and type of ANA testing ordered. Descriptive statistics were computed and analyzed.Results:We reviewed a total of 1,012 ANA lab orders performed between 11/01/2018 until 07/30/2019 performed on 700 patients. According to the laboratory standard using Immunofluorescence Assay, an ANA titer starting from 1:40 is reported as positive. Out of the 1,012 tests, 334 tests were positive i.e. 33%. The ART order by itself contributed to 29.9% of the positive testing while ARP formed 70% of the positive testing. 56 of the 910 ARP (6%) performed had one or more sub-serology antibody positive while in 178 ARP orders (20%) only the ANA titer was positive with negative serology. The most common sub-serology antibody noted positive was dsDNA forming 54% of the positive serology results. Multiple testing was noted with 218 orders of ARP and ART being ordered on the same patient within the same week, which shows 21.5% of ANA lab orders were repetitive. Length of stay was noted to be more than 3 days for 89% of the patients who had repetitive testing, majority of those tests (99%) on the same day by the same medical provider. It cost $5.0 for an ART order that resulted negative and $5.0 for an ARP panel that resulted negative. It cost $10.0 for those patients who had both ART and ARP ordered with negative results. A positive ART result added $12.0 additional to the cost of each positive ANA profile ($67.36) when both tests were ordered together.Conclusion:Our study findings reflect the need for using higher yield ANA testing that has been standardized. It demonstrated that physicians ordering the testing were not familiar with the ART vs. ARP, and the laboratory orders needed to be re-structured. We removed the ART from the inpatient Electronic Medical Record i.e. Epic system so that only the ARP order remained. This would prevent repetitive testing and reduce healthcare costs through reduction by at least $12.0 per positive ANA result and may also translate into reduced length of hospital stay. We were able to add Centromere Antibody (Ab) to the ANA profile sub serologies to standardize it further as it is an important part of Scleroderma diagnosis.References:[1]Range of antinuclear antibodies in “healthy” individuals. AU, Tan EM, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 1997; 40(9):1601Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals A Study of Factors Affecting the Length of Hospital Stay of COVID-19 Patients by Cox-Proportional Hazard Model in a South Indian Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110002
Author(s):  
Gayathri Thiruvengadam ◽  
Marappa Lakshmi ◽  
Ravanan Ramanujam
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hazard Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Model ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Proportional Hazard ◽  
Proportional Hazard Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
South Indian

Background: The objective of the study was to identify the factors that alter the length of hospital stay of COVID-19 patients so we have an estimate of the duration of hospitalization of patients. To achieve this, we used a time to event analysis to arrive at factors that could alter the length of hospital stay, aiding in planning additional beds for any future rise in cases. Methods: Information about COVID-19 patients was collected between June and August 2020. The response variable was the time from admission to discharge of patients. Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify the factors that were associated with the length of hospital stay. Results: A total of 730 COVID-19 patients were included, of which 675 (92.5%) recovered and 55 (7.5%) were considered to be right-censored, that is, the patient died or was discharged against medical advice. The median length of hospital stay of COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized was found to be 7 days by the Kaplan Meier curve. The covariates that prolonged the length of hospital stay were found to be abnormalities in oxygen saturation (HR = 0.446, P < .001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (HR = 0.742, P = .003), levels of D-dimer (HR = 0.60, P = .002), lactate dehydrogenase (HR = 0.717, P = .002), and ferritin (HR = 0.763, P = .037). Also, patients who had more than 2 chronic diseases had a significantly longer length of stay (HR = 0.586, P = .008) compared to those with no comorbidities. Conclusion: Factors that are associated with prolonged length of hospital stay of patients need to be considered in planning bed strength on a contingency basis.

scholarly journals Providing safe care for patients in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era: A case series evaluating risk for hospital-associated COVID-19

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Elizabeth B. Habermann ◽  
Aaron J. Tande ◽  
Benjamin D. Pollock ◽  
Matthew R. Neville ◽  
Henry H. Ting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Large Tertiary Care ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Serology Testing ◽  
Pcr Test

Abstract Objective: We evaluated the risk of patients contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during their hospital stay to inform the safety of hospitalization for a non–COVID-19 indication during this pandemic. Methods: A case series of adult patients hospitalized for 2 or more nights from May 15 to June 15, 2020 at large tertiary-care hospital in the midwestern United States was reviewed. All patients were screened at admission with the severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. Selected adult patients were also tested by IgG serology. After dismissal, patients with negative serology and PCR at admission were asked to undergo repeat serologic testing at 14–21 days after discharge. The primary outcome was healthcare-associated COVID-19 defined as a new positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test on or after day 4 of hospital stay or within 7 days of hospital dismissal, or seroconversion in patients previously established as seronegative. Results: Of the 2,068 eligible adult patients, 1,778 (86.0%) completed admission PCR testing, while 1,339 (64.7%) also completed admission serology testing. Of the 1,310 (97.8%) who were both PCR and seronegative, 445 (34.0%) repeated postdischarge serology testing. No healthcare-associated COVID-19 cases were detected during the study period. Of 1,310 eligible PCR and seronegative adults, no patients tested PCR positive during hospital admission (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0%–0.3%). Of the 445 (34.0%) who completed postdischarge serology testing, no patients seroconverted (0.0%; 95% CI, 0.0%–0.9%). Conclusion: We found low likelihood of hospital-associated COVID-19 with strict adherence to universal masking, physical distancing, and hand hygiene along with limited visitors and screening of admissions with PCR.

scholarly journals Clinical Team Distribution and Antibiotic Use Patterns at a Tertiary-Care Academic Medical Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s168-s169
Author(s):  
Rebecca Choudhury ◽  
Ronald Beaulieu ◽  
Thomas Talbot ◽  
George Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Hospital Units ◽  
Antibiotic Utilization ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Utilization Data

Background: As more US hospitals report antibiotic utilization to the CDC, standardized antimicrobial administration ratios (SAARs) derived from patient care unit-based antibiotic utilization data will increasingly be used to guide local antibiotic stewardship interventions. Location-based antibiotic utilization surveillance data are often utilized given the relative ease of ascertainment. However, aggregating antibiotic use data on a unit basis may have variable effects depending on the number of clinical teams providing care. In this study, we examined antibiotic utilization from units at a tertiary-care hospital to illustrate the potential challenges of using unit-based antibiotic utilization to change individual prescribing. Methods: We used inpatient pharmacy antibiotic use administration records at an adult tertiary-care academic medical center over a 6-month period from January 2019 through June 2019 to describe the geographic footprints and AU of medical, surgical, and critical care teams. All teams accounting for at least 1 patient day present on each unit during the study period were included in the analysis, as were all teams prescribing at least 1 antibiotic day of therapy (DOT). Results: The study population consisted of 24 units: 6 ICUs (25%) and 18 non-ICUs (75%). Over the study period, the average numbers of teams caring for patients in ICU and non-ICU wards were 10.2 (range, 3.2–16.9) and 13.7 (range, 10.4–18.9), respectively. Units were divided into 3 categories by the number of teams, accounting for ≥70% of total patient days present (Fig. 1): “homogenous” (≤3), “pauciteam” (4–7 teams), and “heterogeneous” (>7 teams). In total, 12 (50%) units were “pauciteam”; 7 (29%) were “homogeneous”; and 5 (21%) were “heterogeneous.” Units could also be classified as “homogenous,” “pauciteam,” or “heterogeneous” based on team-level antibiotic utilization or DOT for specific antibiotics. Different patterns emerged based on antibiotic restriction status. Classifying units based on vancomycin DOT (unrestricted) exhibited fewer “heterogeneous” units, whereas using meropenem DOT (restricted) revealed no “heterogeneous” units. Furthermore, the average number of units where individual clinical teams prescribed an antibiotic varied widely (range, 1.4–12.3 units per team). Conclusions: Unit-based antibiotic utilization data may encounter limitations in affecting prescriber behavior, particularly on units where a large number of clinical teams contribute to antibiotic utilization. Additionally, some services prescribing antibiotics across many hospital units may be minimally influenced by unit-level data. Team-based antibiotic utilization may allow for a more targeted metric to drive individual team prescribing.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Tracheostomy in Postoperative Pediatric Cardiac Surgical Patients—The Earlier, the Better

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chalattil Bipin ◽  
Manoj K. Sahu ◽  
Sarvesh P. Singh ◽  
Velayoudam Devagourou ◽  
Palleti Rajashekar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Nutrition Supplementation

Abstract Objectives This study was aimed to assess the benefits of early tracheostomy (ET) compared with late tracheostomy (LT) on postoperative outcomes in pediatric cardiac surgical patients. Design Present one is a prospective, observational study. Setting The study was conducted at a cardiac surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital. Participants All pediatric patients below 10 years of age, who underwent tracheostomy after cardiac surgery from January2019 to december2019, were subdivided into two groups according to the timing of tracheostomy: “early” if done before 7 days or “late” if done after 7 days postcardiac surgery. Interventions ET versus LT was measured in the study. Results Out of all 1,084 pediatric patients who underwent cardiac surgery over the study period, 41 (3.7%) received tracheostomy. Sixteen (39%) patients underwent ET and 25 (61%) underwent LT. ET had advantages by having reduced risk associations with the following variables: preoperative hospital stay (p = 0.0016), sepsis (p = 0.03), high risk surgery (p = 0.04), postoperative sepsis (p = 0.001), C-reactive protein (p = 0.04), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP; p = 0.006), antibiotic escalation (p = 0.006), and antifungal therapy (p = 0.01) requirement. Furthermore, ET was associated with lesser duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.0027), length of ICU stay (LOICUS; p = 0.01), length of hospital stay (LOHS; p = 0.001), lesser days of feed interruption (p = 0.0017), and tracheostomy tube change (p = 0.02). ET group of children, who had higher total ventilation-free days (p = 0.02), were decannulated earlier (p = 0.03) and discharged earlier (p = 0.0089). Conclusion ET had significant benefits in reduction of postoperative morbidities with overall shorter mechanical ventilation, LOICUS, and LOHS, better nutrition supplementation, lesser infection, etc. These benefits may promote faster patient convalescence and rehabilitation with reduced hospital costs.

Nosocomial Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-SusceptibleStaphylococcus AureusPrimary Bacteremia: At What Costs?

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 408-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray A. Abramson ◽  
Daniel J. Sexton
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Matching Criteria ◽  
Nested Case Control

Objective:To determine the attributable hospital stay and costs for nosocomial methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistantS aureus(MRSA) primary bloodstream infections (BSIs).Design:Pairwise-matched (1:1) nested case-control study.Setting:University-based tertiary-care medical center.Patients:Patients admitted between December 1993 and March 1995 were eligible. Cases were defined as patients with a primary nosocomialS aureusBSI; controls were selected according to a priori matching criteria.Measurements:Length of hospital stay and total and variable direct costs of hospitalization.Results:The median hospital stay attributable to primary nosocomial MSSA BSI was 4 days, compared with 12 days for MRSA (P=.023). Attributable median total cost for MSSA primary nosocomial BSIs was $9,661 versus $27,083 for MRSA nosocomial infections (P=.043).Conclusion:Nosocomial primary BSI due toS aureussignificantly prolongs the hospital stay. Primary nosocomial BSIs due to MRSA result in an approximate threefold increase in direct cost, compared with those due to MSSA.

Abstract 147: Hypertension-related Admission and Mortality at a Referral Hospital in Tanzania - A Call to Action

Hypertension ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Shike ◽  
Santosh Vardhana ◽  
Judith Briant ◽  
Robert Peck
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Related Disease ◽  
Reasonable Approach

Introduction The WHO has been increasingly emphasizing and calling for research on the vast unattended burden of non-communicable diseases in the developing world. Hypertension (HTN) in particular is thought to play a growing role in morbidity and mortality in these regions, but has yet to gain significant momentum in public health initiatives. Objective To determine what role HTN and comorbid diseases play in admission and mortality in Bugando Medical Center (BMC), a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania serving 13 million people. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to the internal medicine service at BMC over 34 months between 2008 and 2011. Data on admission diagnoses and mortality had been collected prospectively by Tanzanian doctors in hand-written logs. For patients with heart failure or stroke, the ward logs specified if this was primarily related to hypertension or other risk factors. Data were copied into an Excel database and analyzed to determine the proportion of admissions and deaths primarily related to hypertension. Results In 34 months 8,037 patients were admitted and 1,508 died. HTN-related disease led to 1,997 admissions (25%), while HIV-related illness led to 2,076 (26%). Similarly, HTN led to 377 deaths (25%) and HIV to 579 (38%). HTN-related disease was second only to HIV-related disease as a cause of admission and death. Among hypertensives, the most common cause of admission was congestive heart failure (446; 27%) and of death was stroke (147; 49%). In non-hypertensives, HIV-related disease was the most common cause of both admission (2029; 32%) and death (566; 46%). Conclusions HTN-related disease was second only to HIV as a cause of admission to our hospital and in-hospital death. Better strategies for early diagnosis and treatment of HTN are desperately need in sub Saharan Africa to prevent this morbidity and mortality. Building HTN screening and treatment on top of the extensive infrastructure for HIV disease may be a reasonable approach.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii as an Adjuvant Therapy in Acute Childhood Diarrhoea

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dillip Kumar Dash ◽  
Mrutunjaya Dash ◽  
M.D. Mohanty ◽  
Naresh Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Acute Diarrhoea ◽  
Oral Rehydration Therapy ◽  
Saccharomyces Boulardii ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Oral Rehydration ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: Administration of S. boulardii in addition to rehydration therapy in diarrhea found to be beneficial in many aspects owing to a variety of causes and importantly it is was not associated with any adverse effects.Material and Methods: We conducted a prospective study of children suffering from acute diarrhoea, at a private tertiary care hospital. Children were divided into 2 groups randomly as per odd(Group 1 ) and even (Group 2) bed allotted in indoor at the time of admission: Group 1 included children on oral rehydration therapy (ORT) + Zinc + Saccharomyces boulardii (Probiotic 5 billion CFU twice daily) and Group 2 comprised of children on ORT+ Zinc. Our objective was to systematically review data on the effect of S. boulardii on acute childhood diarrhoea.Results: Out of a total of 126 children less than 2 years, 2-6 years and 6-14 years were 72 (57.14%), 42(33.33%) and 12(09.52%) respectively. The duration of diarrhoea in Group 1 was 26.31 hours and Group 2 was 47.81 hours (p<0.01). The frequency of diarrhoea showed improvement within 24 and 72 hours in Group 1 and Group 2 respectively (p<0.01).Similarly, the mean duration of hospital stay was 2.68 days in Group 1 and 4.8 days in Group 2.The treatment cost was INR 850 and INR 1650 while social cost was INR 1250 and 2600 in Group 1 and 2 respectively.Conclusion:This study shows that S. boulardii reduced the duration, frequency and hospital stay of diarrhoea thereby reducing the treatment and social costs.J Nepal Paediatr Soc 2016;36(3):250-255

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document