Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Size Variability in Meta-Analysis
2017 ◽
Vol 10
(3)
◽
pp. 472-479
◽
Keyword(s):
Generalization in meta-analyses is not a dichotomous decision (typically encountered in papers using the Q test for homogeneity, the 75% rule, or null hypothesis tests). Inattention to effect size variability in meta-analyses may stem from a lack of guidelines for interpreting credibility intervals. In this commentary, we describe two methods for making practical interpretations and determining whether a particular SDρ represents a meaningful level of variability.
Keyword(s):
2013 ◽
Vol 2013
◽
pp. 1-9
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Vol 17
(10)
◽
pp. 3584
Keyword(s):
1990 ◽
Vol 24
(3)
◽
pp. 405-415
◽
2008 ◽
Vol 65
(3)
◽
pp. 437-447
◽
Keyword(s):
2005 ◽
Vol 9
(1)
◽
pp. 2-16
◽
2017 ◽
Vol 31
(2)
◽
pp. 137-159
◽
2011 ◽
Vol 16
(5)
◽
pp. 337-351
◽
Keyword(s):