A comparison of management regimes for one-year rotational set-aside within a sequence of winter wheat crops, and of growing wheat without interruption. 2. Effects on vegetation and weed control

1998 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. F. SHIELD ◽  
E. T. G. BACON

Six management regimes for 1-year set-aside were compared with continuous winter wheat for their effects on weed control in two following test crops of winter wheat. The experiment was repeated in each of three years (1989–91) on predominantly sandy loam soils in eastern England. The weed flora was dominated by Poa spp., Stellaria media, Matricaria spp., Chenopodium album and volunteer crops, predominantly wheat.Managing set-aside by allowing natural regeneration and cutting it 2–4 times during the growing season resulted in fewest weeds in the following wheat crop. It was also a low cost option. Winter wheat, despite the application of herbicides, was not as effective in minimizing weeds in the winter wheat test crops as the best set-aside options.An Italian ryegrass cover crop set seed despite being cut 2–4 times per year. The only serious weed infestation arising in following wheat crops was from volunteer ryegrass in the second wheat following set-aside. The effects of management in the set-aside year were generally greater in the second of the following wheats than in the first.

Pesticidi ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Ljiljana Radivojevic ◽  
Radmila Stankovic-Kalezic ◽  
M. Budimir

In 2001 and 2002 field trials were carried out to evaluate efficacy of eight herbicides, alone or in the combinations, in winter wheat crop, in the Juzni Banat region. The next herbicides were examined: 2,4-D, Fluroksypyr Tribenuronmethyl, 2,4-D+Florasulam, Bentazon+Dicamba, Triasulfuron+Dicamba lodosulphuron-methylodium+Amidosulphuron Herbicides were applied after tillering of wheat was over. More frequent weed species were: Anthemis arvensis, Chenopodium album, Cirsium arvense, Convolvulus arvensis Delphinium consolida, Fumaria officinalis, Galium aparine, Lamium purpureum Polygonum convolvulus, Ranunculus arvensis, Sinapis arvensis, Stellaria media, Veronica polita i Viola tricolor. The most sensitive weed species to all herbicides were S. arvensis and Ch. album. The most tolerant was G. aparine (exept to fluroxipyr). The other species were less sensitive and herbicides eficacy were good or satisfactory, exept to V. polita and D. consolida. These results sugest that all applied herbicides could be successful in broad leaves weed control in the winter wheat crop in the Juzni Banat region.


1998 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. T. G. BACON ◽  
M. V. HEWITT ◽  
C. E. SHEPHERD

A series of three experiments on loam to sandy loam soil at Woburn, all following winter or spring wheat, tested the effects of six different 1-year set-aside treatments and crops of winter wheat in 1989, 1990 and 1991 on two following winter wheat test crops. Effects of the treatments on overwinter changes in soil mineral nitrogen (SMN) and plant N in the set-aside years and in the first test crops were measured, as were the grain yields of both the first and second test crops.Differences in net overwinter changes in SMN plus plant N between set-aside treatments were variable and dependent on rainfall. During a wet winter, SMN plus plant N losses were large under fallow and natural regeneration, intermediate under winter wheat and small under Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Ryegrass restricted the growth of the following wheat but yields were unaffected where fertilizer N was applied. Ryegrass proved difficult to control in the subsequent wheat test crops. Forage rape (Brassica napus) took up large amounts of N but after topping did not compete well with weeds.Yields of the first wheat test crops after winter wheat were smaller than after the set-aside treatments, take-all was probably the cause of this yield depression. No consistent yield differences were recorded in the second wheat test crops.


2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad S. Trusler ◽  
Thomas F. Peeper ◽  
Amanda E. Stone

An experiment was conducted at three sites in central Oklahoma to compare the efficacy of Italian ryegrass management options in no-till (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) winter wheat. The Italian ryegrass management options included selected herbicide treatments, wheat-for-hay, and a rotation consisting of double-crop soybean seeded immediately after wheat harvest, followed by early season soybean, and then by wheat. In continuous wheat, before application of glyphosate or tillage, Italian ryegrass plant densities in mid-September were 12,300 to 15,000 plants/m2in NT plots vs. 0 to 500 plants/m2in CT plots. When applied POST, diclofop controlled more Italian ryegrass than tralkoxydim or sulfosulfuron. In continuous wheat, yields were greater in CT plots than in NT plots at two of three sites. None of the Italian ryegrass management options consistently reduced Italian ryegrass density in the following wheat crop. Of the Italian ryegrass control strategies applied to continuous wheat, three herbicide treatments in NT at Chickasha and all treatments in NT at Perry reduced Italian ryegrass density in the following wheat crop. Italian ryegrass plant density in November and spike density were highly related to wheat yield at two and three sites, respectively. No management options were more profitable than rotation to soybean.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy L. Grey ◽  
L. Bo Braxton ◽  
John S. Richburg

In the southeastern United States many farmers double-crop winter wheat with soybean or cotton. However, there is little information about residual injury of herbicides used in wheat to these rotational crops. Experiments were conducted from 2007 to 2008 and 2008 to 2009 in soft red winter wheat to evaluate response of rotational crops of soybean and cotton after application of various acetolactate synthase herbicides in wheat. Pyroxsulam, mesosulfuron, sulfosulfuron, propoxycarbazone, or chlorsulfuron plus metsulfuron at multiple rates were applied to wheat approximately 110 to 120 d before planting rotational crops. Soils were Tift loamy sand at Ty Ty, GA and Faceville sandy loam at Plains, GA. After wheat harvest, soybean (‘Pioneer 97M50’) and cotton (‘DP 0949 B2RF’) were strip-tillage planted and evaluated for injury, stand density, height over time, and yields. For both locations, wheat was tolerant to all herbicide treatments with little to no visible injury 7 to 90 d after application. Pyroxsulam injury was less than sulfosulfuron or mesosulfuron. At recommended use rates, wheat injury was transient with no effect on yield. Double-crop soybean for both locations had no differences in stand establishment for any herbicide treatments. There was significant carryover injury to soybean and cotton for sulfosulfuron applied to wheat for the Faceville sandy loam. There was no effect of herbicide treatment on cotton stand. There was little to no difference in residual activity on rotational crops between pyroxsulam and other wheat herbicides when labeled rates were applied. This is significant as pyroxsulam is used to control Italian ryegrass and wild radish in this region.


Weed Science ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Valenti ◽  
Gail A. Wicks

Experiments were conducted to determine the influence of nitrogen (N) fertility and winter wheat cultivars on weed infestations in a winter wheat-ecofallow sorghum-fallow rotation near North Platte, NE. Centurk 78 and Lancota winter wheat suppressed density and growth of barnyardgrass and green foxtail significantly more than Eagle winter wheat before and after wheat harvest. Increasing N rates applied to winter wheat decreased annual grass weed population and weed yields. However, 67 and 101 kg N ha−1reduced winter wheat grain yields compared to 34 kg N ha−1. Plots treated at 2.8 plus 0.3 kg ai ha−1of atrazine plus paraquat 31 d after wheat harvest had more barnyardgrass before grain sorghum planting in 1983 than plots treated 17 d after wheat harvest but the reverse was true for green foxtail after grain sorghum emergence in 1984. Increasing N rates from 34 kg ha−1to 67 and 101 kg ha−1in the previous wheat crop decreased weed density before and after grain sorghum planting. There was no advantage in weed control in the grain sorghum from applying N to winter wheat in the fall vs. spring.


1983 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 687-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. I. N. JENSEN ◽  
E. R. KIMBALL ◽  
J. A. IVANY

The efficacy and relative persistence of dinitramine (N′,N′-diethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2-4-diamine), ethalfluralin [N-ethyl-N-(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4(trifluoromethyl) benzenamine], and trifluralin (α,α,α -trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-diproply-p-toluidine) were studied in a series of field trials conducted on a Charlottetown fine sandy loam (P.E.I.) and on a Somerset loamy sand (N.S.). Phytotoxicity, as reflected by weed control and injury to the peas (Pisum sativum L.), was greater on the sandy soil and herbicide rates recommended for the region may reduce yields on light soil types. The margin of crop tolerance was also reduced in one year characterized by an extremely wet growing season. Under field conditions, there was little practical difference in weed control obtained with the three herbicides. Dinitramine and ethalfluralin were more persistent in the Somerset sand than in the Charlottetown sandy loam. The order of decreasing persistence was trifluralin>ethalfluralin>dinitramine, except in the Somerset sand where the persistence of ethalfluralin and trifluralin was similar. Significant detectable levels of all three herbicides remained 320 days after application.Key words: Processing peas, dinitramine, ethalfluralin, trifluralin, residue


2000 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Moyer ◽  
R. E. Blackshaw ◽  
E. G. Smith ◽  
S. M. McGinn

Cropping systems in western Canada that include summer fallow can leave the soil exposed to erosion and require frequent weed control treatments. Cover crops have been used for soil conservation and to suppress weed growth. Experiments were conducted under rain-fed conditions at Lethbridge, Alberta to determine the effect of short-term fall rye (Secale cereale L.), winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and annual rye cover crops in the fallow year on weed growth and subsequent wheat yield. Under favorable weather conditions fall rye was as effective as post-harvest plus early spring tillage or herbicides in spring weed control. Winter wheat and fall rye residues, after growth was terminated in June, reduced weed biomass in September by 50% compared to no cover crop in 1993 but had little effect on weeds in 1995. Fall-seeded cover crops reduced the density of dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Weber in Wiggers) and Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] but increased the density of downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.), wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus L.), and thyme-leaved spurge (Euphorbia serpyllifolia Pers.) in the following fall or spring. Wheat yields after fall rye and no cover crop were similar but yields after spring-seeded annual rye were less than after no cover crop. Spring-seeded annual rye did not adequately compete with weeds. Cover crops, unlike the no cover crop treatment, always left sufficient plant residue to protect the soil from erosion until the following wheat crop was seeded. Key words: Allelopathies, fall rye, nitrogen, soil conservation, soil moisture, weed control, spring rye, winter wheat


1970 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. L. Penman

SUMMARYExperiments on a sandy loam, using adequate fertilizer, gave:(a) Crop yield (as total dry matter) when soil water content was kept near field capacity.(b) A measure of the departure from field capacity (limiting deficit, Dι) that produced no detectable change in yield.(c) Responses to irrigation: (i) conventional, as δY/δI; (ii) a theoretical maximum, k, after allowing for Dι in the water balance.(d) Other information, botanical and technical.Grass (S 22 Italian ryegrass)Two year crop, cut fourteen times, October 1959 to October 1961.(a) Best yields: 1960, 15 t ha−1 (ɛ ≃ 100 × 10−4); 1961, 12 t ha−1 (ɛ ≃ 70 × 10−4).(b) Dι ≃ 5 cm.(c) (i) δY/δI: 1960, 0·36; 1961, 0·43 t ha−1 cm−1; (iii) k: 1960, 0·40; 1961, 0·27 t ha−1 cm−1.(d) In 1960 irrigation was needed in spring only: the benefit was maintained on plots with large N and K dressings, but almost disappeared on those with small dressings (Y = 11 t ha−1). In 1961 the unirrigated crop could not exploit all the limited summer rain: hence δY/δI > k.One year crop, cut five times, March to October 1965.(a) Yield, 12 t ha−1 (ɛ ≃ 90 × 10−4, from emergence).(b) and (c) (i) The meteorological need was slight, Dι (above) was not exceeded, and there was no response; (c) (ii) k = 0·46 t ha−1 cm−1.Lucerne (Du Puits)Three year crop, cut eleven times, April 1962 to November 1964.(a) Best yields: 1962, 7; 1963, 8; 1964, 10 t ha−1.(b) Dι = 11 cm for established crop.(c) (i) No response other than in first dry spring of establishment. At first cut δY/δI = 0·18 t ha−1 cm−1, (ii) k = 0·26 t ha−1 cm−1.(d) Extra K seemed to be helpful in sustaining the early benefit throughout the 3 years.Clover (Crimson)One year crop, drilled April and cut (once only) July 1963.(a) Best yield: 3 t ha−1.(b) Dι, not detectably different from zero (evidence inadequate).(c) (i) δY/δI = 0·16 t ha−1 cm−1; (ii) k ≃ δY/δI (?).(d) First cut completely defoliated irrigated crop, there was no recovery, and the experiment was abandoned.Clover (Dorset Marl)One year crops undersown in previous barley crops, 1963 for 1964 (three cuts), 1964 for 1965 (three cuts).(a) Best yields: 1964, 9 t ha−1 (ɛ ≃ 60 × 10−4); 1965, 8 t ha−1 (ɛ ≃ 60 × 10−4).(b) Dι ≃ 2·5 cm.(c) (i) δY/δI: 1964, 0·24 t ha−1 cm−1. 1965, no response; (ii) k: 0·22–0·34, depending on method of derivation.(d) The response to irrigation was slightly greater on plots not previously irrigated in the barley year. In (c) the uncertainties arise out of excessive rain after the first irrigation in 1965; there was estimated drainage from the irrigated plots but not from the control plots. In 1964, the control plots failed to exploit all the summer rain.GeneralThere seems to be a need to know two limiting deficits, one, the Dt of these papers, that is a measure of what can be tolerated without any check to growth, and a second that is a kind of maintenance deficit, necessary to keep the crop non-senescent so that it can use all the rain it gets.Irrigation greatly helped the establishment of all three leys, and both grass and clover responded well to later irrigation. Lucerne did not. In English units, the limiting deficits, Dt, for well-fertilized established crops were, approximately, 4 in for lucerne, 2 in for grass, and 1 in for clover.


2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorota Gawęda ◽  
Andrzej Woźniak ◽  
Elżbieta Harasim

In-crop weed infestation is affected by both habitat conditions and agronomic practices, including the forecrop and tillage treatments used. This study evaluated the effect of the forecrop and the tillage system on species composition, number and dry weight of weeds in a winter wheat ‘Astoria’. A field study was carried out over the period 2014–2017 at the Uhrusk Experimental Farm (SE Poland), on a mixed rendzina soil with a grain-size distribution of sandy loam. Wheat was grown in a four-course crop rotation: soybean – winter wheat – rapeseed – winter wheat. The experimental factors were as follows: a forecrop of winter wheat (soybean and winter rapeseed) and a tillage system (ploughing and no-tillage). <em>Avena fatua</em> was the most frequently occurring weed in the wheat crop sown after soybean, whereas after winter rapeseed it was <em>Viola arvensis</em>. <em>Viola arvensis</em> was the dominant weed under both tillage systems. In all experimental treatments, the species <em>Viola arvensis</em> and <em>Cirsium arvense</em> were characterized by the highest constancy (Constancy Class V and IV), and also <em>Veronica arvensis</em> after the previous winter rapeseed crop. In the wheat crop sown after winter rapeseed, the number of weeds was found to be higher by 62.1% and the weed dry weight higher by 27.3% compared to these parameters after the previous soybean crop. A richer floristic composition of weeds was also observed in the stand after winter rapeseed. Under conventional tillage conditions, compared to no-tillage, the number of weeds was found to be lower by 39.7% and their dry weight by 50.0%. An increase in the numbers of the dominant weed species was also noted in the untilled plots.


2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz R. Sekutowski ◽  
Janusz Smagacz

An experiment, conducted over the period 2008–2010, evaluated the effect of tillage system on the occurrence and species composition of anthropophytes in winter wheat, maize and spring wheat. Regardless of crop plant and tillage system, anthropophytes (73.9%), represented by archaeophytes and kenophytes, were the main component of the flora in the crops studied, whereas apophytes accounted for the remaining 26.1%. Most archaeophytes (13 species) were found in the spring wheat crop under no-tillage, while their lowest number (6 species) occurred in the spring wheat crop under conventional tillage. The only kenophyte, <em>Conyza canadensis</em>, was found to occur in the spring wheat and maize crops in the no-tillage system. The following taxa were dominant species among archeophytes: <em>Geranium pusillum</em>, <em>Anthemis arvensis, </em>and <em>Viola arvensis </em>(regardless of tillage system and crop plant), <em>Anthemis arvensis </em>(in spring wheat – conventional tillage), <em>Echinochloa crus-galli </em>and <em>Setaria glauca </em>(in maize – reduced tillage and no-tillage), <em>Chenopodium album </em>(in maize – no-tillage) as well as <em>Apera spica-venti</em>, <em>Anthemis arvensis </em>and <em>Papaver rhoeas </em>(in winter wheat – no-tillage).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document